<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with gasoline and environment</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/gasoline+environment</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'gasoline' and 'environment' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:18:51 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:18:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Convert Your Car to Run On Water</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71616/Convert%2DYour%2DCar%2Dto%2DRun%2DOn%2DWater</link>
		<description> Do You Want To Know RIGHT NOW How You Can Drive Around Using &lt;a href=&quot;http://water4gas.com/2books.htm&quot;&gt;WATER as FUEL&lt;/a&gt; and Laugh At Rising Gas Costs, While Reducing Emissions and Preventing Global Warming?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71616</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:18:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cars</category>
		<category>DIY</category>
		<category>engines</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>gasoline</category>
		<category>miracle</category>
		<category>panacea</category>
		<category>peakoil</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>thefuture</category>
		<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Biofuels worsen global warming</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68957/Biofuels%2Dworsen%2Dglobal%2Dwarming</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/08/science/earth/08wbiofuels.html?pagewanted=1&amp;ei=5070&amp;en=66d0030c0b190f67&amp;ex=1203138000&amp;emc=eta1&quot;&gt;Biofuels worsen global warming&lt;/a&gt;, according to two studies published in &lt;em&gt;Science&lt;/em&gt; last week. Current US biofuel policies would double carbon emissions over the gasoline alternative. More details: ScienceExpress &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gmfus.org/doc/economics/Searchinger-02-08-08.pdf&quot;&gt;fulltext pdf&lt;/a&gt; of study #1, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gmfus.org/doc/Searchinger%20gmf%20press%20briefing%20Feb%207,%202008.ppt&quot;&gt;powerpoint&lt;/a&gt; summary of study #1, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1152747&quot;&gt;abstract&lt;/a&gt; of study #2, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.mongabay.com/2008/0207-biofuels.html&quot;&gt;summary&lt;/a&gt; of both, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gmfus.org/doc/SearchingerBiofuelBrief_Final.pdf&quot;&gt; policy recommendations&lt;/a&gt; pdf (via: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/02/more-bad-news-f.html&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gmfus.org/press/article.cfm?id=132&amp;parent_type=R&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ksgrains.com/ethanol/useth.html&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Here&apos;s some context I needed to understand the US study: annually, the US produces ~5 billion gallons of ethanol and uses ~140 billion gallons of gasoline = 145 billion gallons total (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ethanolrfa.org/industry/statistics/&quot;&gt;sour&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eia.doe.gov/basics/quickoil.html&quot;&gt;ces&lt;/a&gt;). US &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.enn.com/pollution/article/30643&quot;&gt;law&lt;/a&gt; now calls for 36 billion gallons of biofuel production by 2022. The projections are based on increasing biofuel production to 31 billion gallons by 2015 (or the equivalent of the entire US grain crop from 2004).&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68957</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:50:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biodiesel</category>
		<category>biofuel</category>
		<category>climatechange</category>
		<category>deforestation</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>gasoline</category>
		<category>globalwarming</category>
		<dc:creator>salvia</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Got oil?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62741/Got%2Doil</link>
		<description> Need oil?  Try &lt;a href=&quot;http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn12141-giant-microwave-turns-plastic-back-to-oil.html&quot;&gt;microwaving&lt;/a&gt; your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalresourcecorp.com/Plastic%20Recycling.html&quot;&gt;plastics&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62741</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 09:10:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>diesel</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>gasoline</category>
		<category>microwave</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>plastic</category>
		<category>recycling</category>
		<dc:creator>sunshinesky</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Wal-Mart isn&apos;t completely evil after all?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53733/WalMart%2Disnt%2Dcompletely%2Devil%2Dafter%2Dall</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/08/08/news/companies/pluggedin_gunther.fortune/index.htm?cnn=yes"&gt;Perhaps Wal-Mart isn&apos;t completely evil?&lt;/a&gt; In a move that I&apos;m sure will stun environmentalists, Wal-Mart wants to introduce E85 (85% ethanol, 15% gasoline) to its gas stations (which could potentially more than double the national locations that offer E85 from 800 to almost 2150).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53733</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 05:05:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>E85</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>ethanol</category>
		<category>gasoline</category>
		<category>Wal-Mart</category>
		<dc:creator>SeizeTheDay</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7362/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://channel.nytimes.com/2001/05/01/politics/01CHEN.html"&gt;He gives a whole new meaning to the word &lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;&quot;Conservation may be a sign of personal virtue, but it is not a sufficient basis for a sound, comprehensive energy policy.&quot;&lt;small&gt; NY Times&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7362</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2001 08:54:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cars</category>
		<category>Cheney</category>
		<category>conservation</category>
		<category>DickCheney</category>
		<category>efficiency</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>fuel</category>
		<category>gas</category>
		<category>gasoline</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<dc:creator>crunchland</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


