<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with gaul</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/gaul</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'gaul' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:56:37 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:56:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Double Crossing the Rubicon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32413/Double%2DCrossing%2Dthe%2DRubicon</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubicon&quot;&gt;&quot;Crossing the Rubicon&quot;&lt;/a&gt; is a phrase widely believed to refer to the moment when Julius Caesar and his army crossed the stream separating Gaul from Italy, a move which meant civil war and commonly used to mean &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossing_the_Rubicon&quot;&gt;&quot;point of no return&quot;&lt;/a&gt;. Now Swiss archaeologists are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.swissinfo.org/sen/Swissinfo.html?siteSect=105&amp;sid=4836120&quot;&gt;challenging that theory&lt;/a&gt; with a phrase that should be &quot;Double Crossing the Rubicon&quot;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32413</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:56:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>caesar</category>
		<category>crossingtherubicon</category>
		<category>gaul</category>
		<category>italy</category>
		<category>juliuscaesar</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Paris not in Paris</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31801/Paris%2Dnot%2Din%2DParis</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tuftsdaily.com/articleDisplay.jsp?a_id=3524&quot;&gt;Paris is not actually in Paris&lt;/a&gt; according to French archaeologists last month. It appears that the ancient capital of Gaul, named after the Celtic tribe Parissi, is not buried under modern-day Paris but under its unremarkable neighbor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mapquest.fr/cgi-bin/ia_find?link=btwn/twn-map_results&amp;zoom_level=7&amp;uid=u4d0j1w6s1n2saha:25q6zsl68l&amp;SNVData=3mad3-g.fy%28wyg5z1_1u1sg.hqu%3b%28_W%17LVJNCM%3d%12S.ID_%19%14%17LYJ%3a%28%19%14%3arg5rtw%3d02wdy%28l%241w-u.wf7%3bxcx5sf7.grfe%7cs&amp;pcat=&quot;&gt;Nanterre&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;It&apos;s an unprecedented attack on the French national identity and the greater glory of Paris by a group of dirty-fingernailed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yourdictionary.net/parvenu.html&quot;&gt;parvenus&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; Spare the dirty archaeologists and blame it on Julius Caesar who gave inaccurate descriptions of the location, returning from the grave causing fresh Parisian identity consternations.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31801</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2004 20:27:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>archaeology</category>
		<category>france</category>
		<category>gaul</category>
		<category>geography</category>
		<category>paris</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


