<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with gaymarriage and civilunions</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/gaymarriage+civilunions</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'gaymarriage' and 'civilunions' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:47:41 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:47:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>christian fundamentalist on the anti gay marriage amendment in Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45908/christian%2Dfundamentalist%2Don%2Dthe%2Danti%2Dgay%2Dmarriage%2Damendment%2Din%2DTexas</link>
		<description> The politics of fear 101: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.texasobserver.org/showArticle.asp?ArticleID=2044&quot;&gt;Meet the Fundies!&lt;/a&gt;


The Texas senate is about to vote on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/3192823&quot;&gt; constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage AND civil union.&lt;/a&gt; Here are some of the proponents in their own words.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45908</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:47:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilunions</category>
		<category>gaymarriage</category>
		<dc:creator>threehundredandsixty</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Thanks, homophobes!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40714/Thanks%2Dhomophobes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.advocate.com/new_news.asp?id=15513&amp;amp;sd=03/25/05"&gt;Domestic abuser goes free - thanks, gay marriage ban!&lt;/a&gt; An Ohio man has been acquitted of domestic abuse charges on the grounds that under the state&apos;s new ban on civil unions - gay and straight- the defendant could not be guilty of domestic abuse because he was not married to his live-in girlfriend.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40714</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 04:38:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CivilUnions</category>
		<category>GayMarriage</category>
		<category>Ohio</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s like America, only with freedom!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37662/Its%2Dlike%2DAmerica%2Donly%2Dwith%2Dfreedom</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6685653/"&gt;Supreme Court of Canada approves gay marriage.&lt;/a&gt; Although agreeing that religious groups can&apos;t be forced to perform any ceremonies, the Court stated in their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/rec/html/2004scc079.wpd.html&quot;&gt;ruling &lt;/a&gt;that defining marriage for civil purposes in Canada as a lawful union of two people would be constitutional.  The ruling validates future legislation legalizing gay marriage, which is apparently &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=514&amp;e=3&amp;u=/ap/20041209/ap_on_re_ca/canada_same_sex_marriage_1&quot;&gt;almost guaranteed to pass&lt;/a&gt; early next year.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37662</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 08:45:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Canada</category>
		<category>CivilUnions</category>
		<category>GayMarriage</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Gay Marriage in Scandinavia</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33216/Gay%2DMarriage%2Din%2DScandinavia</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/toolbar.aspx?action=read&amp;amp;id=2100884"&gt;Scandinavia&lt;/a&gt; has had &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gaymarriagenews.com&quot;&gt;gay marriage&lt;/a&gt; for years, and surprise surprise, the institution has not collapsed.  It&apos;s amazing how rarely Americans take advantage of these sorts of international comparisons...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33216</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 16:02:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilunions</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>gaymarriage</category>
		<category>gayrights</category>
		<category>scandinavia</category>
		<dc:creator>MikeB</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1448/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.leg.state.vt.us/docs/2000/bills/house/H-847.HTM"&gt;The same-sex domestic partnerships bill&lt;/a&gt; in Vermont has &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20000425/ts/vermont_gay_marriage.html&quot;&gt;been approved&lt;/a&gt; by the state&apos;s lawmakers. &quot;&lt;i&gt;The continued denial of these legal protections, benefits and responsibilities to a small but vulnerable class of Vermont&apos;s citizens diminishes their humanity, dignity, freedom and independence.&lt;/i&gt;&quot; It&apos;s about damn time, hopefully other states will soon follow suit. Oh, and if you have a problem with this, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/trash/homosexuality.mp3&quot;&gt;listen to this&lt;/a&gt; and let me know why you continue to have problems with it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1448</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2000 12:50:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CivilRights</category>
		<category>CivilUnions</category>
		<category>DomesticPartnership</category>
		<category>GayMarriage</category>
		<category>GayRights</category>
		<category>HumanRights</category>
		<category>Marriage</category>
		<category>Sexuality</category>
		<category>Vermont</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1059/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://frc.org/radio/c00c02.html"&gt;An informed view of prop twenty-two.&lt;/a&gt; This may be a bit belated, but it&apos;s astonishing that someone could come up with a comparison like this and actually believe that it had any worth in judgment or persuasion.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1059</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:49:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>CivilUnions</category>
		<category>DomesticPartnership</category>
		<category>FamilyResearchCouncil</category>
		<category>FRC</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>GayMarriage</category>
		<category>homosexuality</category>
		<category>JanetParshall</category>
		<dc:creator>EngineBeak</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


