<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with generalization</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/generalization</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'generalization' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:19:18 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:19:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>dogs and monsters</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48825/dogs%2Dand%2Dmonsters</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060206fa_fact"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;of pit bulls, terrorists and generalization&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &quot;...the Ontario ban prohibits not only these three breeds but any &apos;dog that has an appearance and physical characteristics that are substantially similar&apos; to theirs; the term of art is &apos;pit bull-type&apos; dogs. But what does that mean? Is a cross between an American pit bull terrier and a golden retriever a pit bull-type dog or a golden retriever-type dog?&quot; (from the New Yorker)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48825</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:19:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bulls</category>
		<category>generalization</category>
		<category>generalize</category>
		<category>pit</category>
		<category>terrorists</category>
		<dc:creator>punkbitch</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


