<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with geophysics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/geophysics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'geophysics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:42:32 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:42:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>They&apos;re not available from Edmund Scientific</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72270/Theyre%2Dnot%2Davailable%2Dfrom%2DEdmund%2DScientific</link>
		<description> Later this year, geophysicist Dan Lathrop&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90947943&amp;ft=1&amp;f=1026&quot;&gt;DIY Planet Earth&lt;/a&gt; will be filled with liquid sodium, weigh in at 26 tons, and will be spun-up to 80mph at its equator  in an effort to discover how the earth&apos;s magnetic field is generated. Currently undergoing tests, even those can be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm_iqzmR2cE&quot;&gt;pretty impressive&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72270</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:42:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>engineering</category>
		<category>geology</category>
		<category>geophysics</category>
		<category>magnetism</category>
		<dc:creator>Kronos_to_Earth</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;What a beautiful world this will be. What a glorious time to be free.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62293/What%2Da%2Dbeautiful%2Dworld%2Dthis%2Dwill%2Dbe%2DWhat%2Da%2Dglorious%2Dtime%2Dto%2Dbe%2Dfree</link>
		<description> It&apos;s been nearly 50 years since the beginning of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://celebrating200years.noaa.gov/magazine/igy/welcome.html#intro&quot;&gt;International Geophysical Year&lt;/a&gt; (IGY), an 18-month period of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www7.nationalacademies.org/archives/igyhistory.html&quot;&gt;scientific activities and discoveries &lt;/a&gt;that ran from July 1, 1957, to December 31, 1958. Both the US and the USSR launched the world&apos;s first artificial satellites during the IGY (&lt;a href=&quot;http://history.nasa.gov/sputnik/&quot;&gt;Sputnik 1&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://history.nasa.gov/sputnik/expinfo.html&quot;&gt;Explorer 1&lt;/a&gt;). Other achievements of the IGY included the discovery of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www-spof.gsfc.nasa.gov/Education/Iradbelt.html&quot;&gt;Van Allen radiation belts &lt;/a&gt;and the mapping of &lt;a href=&quot;http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dynamic/baseball.html&quot;&gt;mid-ocean ridges&lt;/a&gt;. The IGY also inspired at least one artistic endeavor: Steely Dan&apos;s Donald Fagen wrote his 1982 solo song &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WX5V53Trngo&quot;&gt;&quot;I.G.Y. (International Geophysical Year)&quot;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[YouTube]&lt;/small&gt; as an homage to 50s optimism.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62293</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:20:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>1957</category>
		<category>1958</category>
		<category>geophysics</category>
		<category>IGY</category>
		<category>internationalgeophysicalyear</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<dc:creator>amyms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>More than junk science?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32509/More%2Dthan%2Djunk%2Dscience</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/04/15/1081998278993.html"&gt;Quake to hit LA &quot;by September 5,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; predicts a geophysicist at UCLA&apos;s Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics.  Some skeptical, while others say it&apos;s not junk science.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32509</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2004 13:11:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>algorithm</category>
		<category>earthquake</category>
		<category>earthquakes</category>
		<category>geology</category>
		<category>geophysics</category>
		<category>predictions</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>seismology</category>
		<category>UCLA</category>
		<dc:creator>valerie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Richter calls it a 3.2, but I just call it shaky.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30766/Richter%2Dcalls%2Dit%2Da%2D32%2Dbut%2DI%2Djust%2Dcall%2Dit%2Dshaky</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.geophys.washington.edu/recenteqs/Quakes/uw01160818.htm"&gt;Minor Washington state quake.&lt;/a&gt; It&apos;s been a while since I&apos;ve experienced and earthquake, so when tonight&apos;s little one hit my hometown (a mere 3.2) I was a little shocked (and a little excited).  I was also really impressed with the seemingly instantaneous response by the USGS and the University of Washington&apos;s GeoPhysics Dept. on their websites classifying it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the &lt;em&gt;olden-days&lt;/em&gt; (eg- pre-Internet) I&apos;d have to wait for the early morning news to find out any information about it, but through the miracle of HTTP I have all the info I want mere seconds after the event.  In fact, less than 15 minutes after the quake the USGS site had over 260 responses on their website about the quake from people who felt it and left comments on their site.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if there are other sites that help classify and/or disseminate information about other naturally occurring phenomenon (hurricanes, tornadoes, etc.)... anyone, anyone?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30766</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:07:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>earthquake</category>
		<category>geophysics</category>
		<category>hurricanes</category>
		<category>quake</category>
		<category>richter</category>
		<category>tornadoes</category>
		<category>usgs</category>
		<dc:creator>crankydoodle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20915/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sigmaxi.org/amsci/bookshelf/Leads02/hubbert.html"&gt;Hubbert&apos;s Peak: the impending oil shortage&lt;/a&gt; Is this the REAL reason behind the push to invade Iraq? In 1956. M. King Hubbert, a respected petroleum geologist, predicted - to within a year! - the peak in US oil production: 1970. US oil production has declined every year since. Using the same statistical methods, others now predict a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hubbertpeak.com/&quot;&gt;world peak in oil production within a decade or even as early as 2006.&lt;/a&gt;    </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20915</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2002 13:38:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>geophysics</category>
		<category>Hubbert</category>
		<category>HubbertsPeak</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>MKingHubbert</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>statistics</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


