Join 3,551 readers in helping fund MetaFilter (Hide)

2 posts tagged with georgebush by ed.
Displaying 1 through 2 of 2.

Related tags:
+ (300)
+ (237)
+ (168)
+ (147)
+ (106)
+ (60)
+ (58)
+ (41)
+ (38)
+ (32)
+ (31)
+ (27)
+ (23)
+ (21)
+ (19)
+ (19)
+ (19)
+ (18)
+ (18)
+ (16)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (13)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (11)
+ (10)
+ (10)
+ (10)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)


Users that often use this tag:
Postroad (26)
amberglow (8)
skallas (7)
owillis (7)
troutfishing (6)
holgate (5)
Ty Webb (5)
nofundy (5)
XQUZYPHYR (5)
y2karl (5)
dejah420 (5)
homunculus (5)
specialk420 (4)
onegoodmove (4)
insomnia_lj (4)
Brilliantcrank (4)
aaron (4)
rcade (4)
Outlawyr (3)
bkdelong (3)
Mr. skullhead (3)
DragonBoy (3)
tamim (3)
crasspastor (3)
TiggleTaggleTiger (3)
kirkaracha (3)
Ignatius J. Reilly (3)
quirked (3)
four panels (3)
thedailygrowl (3)
fenriq (3)
jengod (2)
CrazyJub (2)
EmoChild (2)
sparky (2)
elwoodwiles (2)
jonp72 (2)
PrinceValium (2)
Slagman (2)
mrgrimm (2)
Dome-O-Rama (2)
risenc (2)
wfrgms (2)
acrobat (2)
tsarfan (2)
GernBlandston (2)
metaxa (2)
brucec (2)
mapalm (2)
semmi (2)
dagny (2)
raysmj (2)
ed (2)
stbalbach (2)
subpixel (2)
tiaka (2)
rschram (2)
solistrato (2)
baylink (2)
tranquileye (2)

End of a Poetic Legacy on Penn. Ave.?

Other U.S. Presidents have dabbled in poetry (that is, if they weren't busy winning Pulitzers before hitting the Oval Office). But Our Fearless Leader's poem has been rejected by the Missouri Review. "While we realize that the phrase 'lump in the bed' has a personal meaning that is meant to be endearing (please give the First Lady our regards), we fear that it portrays a, shall we say say, less than progressive attitude toward women." Is there any hope for Bush's literary inclinations? And what does this mean for the future of Presidential dignity?
posted by ed on Oct 14, 2003 - 21 comments

Bush wants to turn back the schoolclock to an eduational epoch sometime before 1972. Thirty years after educational gender bias became a legislative reality, Bush has announced that he's pushing for single sex schools, offering no specific reason for this backwards waltz. But what kind of message does this send to tomorrow's graduates about equal gender opportunity? Is there really any discernable advantage in a single sex educational institution? Or is Bush possibly intimidated by the overwhelming number of female graduates that are dominating males these days?
posted by ed on May 9, 2002 - 36 comments

Page: 1