<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with gladwell</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/gladwell</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'gladwell' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:46:58 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:46:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Gladwell for Dummies</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86425/Gladwell%2Dfor%2DDummies</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;Such are the contradictions that seem to riddle not just Gladwell&apos;s thinking but the thinking on Gladwell&apos;s thinking, and perhaps even the thinking on thinking on that, and it is precisely these slippery but substantive contradictions that have allowed Gladwell to tout his revolutionary &quot;big ideas&quot; without couching them in anything so mundane as a logical, well-supported or otherwise sound argument.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc/20091123/tkacik/single&quot;&gt;Gladwell for Dummies&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86425</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:46:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blink</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>malcolmgladwell</category>
		<category>maureentkacik</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<category>outliers</category>
		<category>thenation</category>
		<category>tippingpoint</category>
		<category>tkacik</category>
		<category>whatthedogsaw</category>
		<dc:creator>defenestration</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Folsomism vs. Activism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84022/Folsomism%2Dvs%2DActivism</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/08/10/090810fa_fact_gladwell?printable=true&quot;&gt;Atticus Finch and the limits of Southern liberalism.&lt;/a&gt;  An essay in the latest &lt;em&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/em&gt; by Malcolm Gladwell.  &quot;Atticus Finch is faced with jurors who have one set of standards for white people like the Ewells and another set for black folk like Tom Robinson. His response is to adopt one set of standards for respectable whites like Boo Radley and another for white trash like Bob Ewell. A book that we thought instructed us about the world tells us, instead, about the limitations of Jim Crow liberalism in Maycomb, Alabama.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84022</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:15:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>atticus</category>
		<category>atticusfinch</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>malcolmgladwell</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<category>tokillamockingbird</category>
		<dc:creator>billysumday</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Adam Gopnik and Malcolm Gladwell Debate Canada as Nation or Notion</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70927/Adam%2DGopnik%2Dand%2DMalcolm%2DGladwell%2DDebate%2DCanada%2Das%2DNation%2Dor%2DNotion</link>
		<description> Canadian-born New Yorkers Adam Gopnik and Malcolm Gladwell have &lt;a href=&quot;http://podcast.cbc.ca/mp3/ideas_20080414_5283.mp3&quot;&gt;an eloquent conversation (MP3)&lt;/a&gt; about the nature of our eternally under-confident country. Gladwell quips early on that &quot;those of you who are familiar with my writing will know that this practice of talking about X by discussing Y is my only rhetorical move.&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macleans.ca/canada/national/article.jsp?content=20080403_145320_5072&amp;page=1&quot;&gt;Text&lt;/a&gt; (though not an exact transcript) is also available, as is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eyeweekly.com/city/scrollingeye/article/22644&quot;&gt;a report&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70927</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:08:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>gopnik</category>
		<category>new</category>
		<category>yorker</category>
		<dc:creator>dbarefoot</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Tipping point-counterpoint</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68615/Tipping%2Dpointcounterpoint</link>
		<description> Yet another buzzword for the dustbin.

Tipping Point. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gladwell.com/tippingpoint/index.html&quot;&gt;Exploitable phenomenon&lt;/a&gt; or&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/122/is-the-tipping-point-toast.html&quot;&gt; total load of crap&lt;/a&gt;. Seems anecdote isn&apos;t evidence. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68615</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:14:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>debunk</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>tippingpoint</category>
		<dc:creator>Toekneesan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>You are probably in your mid-20s, early 30s.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66334/You%2Dare%2Dprobably%2Din%2Dyour%2Dmid20s%2Dearly%2D30s</link>
		<description> Malcolm Gladwell takes a look at the effectiveness of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/11/12/071112fa_fact_gladwell&quot;&gt;criminal profiling&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66334</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 11:20:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>crime</category>
		<category>criminal</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>malcolm</category>
		<category>profile</category>
		<category>profiling</category>
		<dc:creator>graventy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>You&apos;re so smart you probably think this post is about you</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58583/Youre%2Dso%2Dsmart%2Dyou%2Dprobably%2Dthink%2Dthis%2Dpost%2Dis%2Dabout%2Dyou</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/27840/"&gt;&quot;You&apos;re really smart!&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Psychologist &lt;a href=&quot;http://www-psych.stanford.edu/~dweck/&quot;&gt;Carol Dweck&lt;/a&gt; says that praising a child for being smart only teaches the kid to avoid any effort that might fail.  &quot;When we praise children for their intelligence, we tell them that this is the name of the game: Look smart, don&apos;t risk making mistakes.&quot;  Malcolm Gladwell chimes in with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/getArticle.cfm?id=2026&quot;&gt;his thoughts on the importance of being a smart kid&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;What a gifted child is, in many ways, is a gifted learner. And what a gifted adult is, is a gifted doer. And those are quite separate domains of achievement.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58583</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:15:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>childdevelopment</category>
		<category>dweck</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>praise</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>revgeorge</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>There are plenty of times when knowledge gets in the way of judgement...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49711/There%2Dare%2Dplenty%2Dof%2Dtimes%2Dwhen%2Dknowledge%2Dgets%2Din%2Dthe%2Dway%2Dof%2Djudgement</link>
		<description> There&apos;s an excellent &lt;a href=&quot;http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/060302&quot;&gt;two&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/060303&quot;&gt;part&lt;/a&gt; dialog between &lt;a href=&quot;http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/simmons/index&quot;&gt;Bill Simmons&lt;/a&gt; and  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gladwell.com/&quot;&gt;Malcolm Gladwell&lt;/a&gt; on ESPN&apos;s Page 2 this week. The two cover a wide variety of topics such as writing, how a kid with no TV from the middle of nowhere in Canada can be a sports fan, the NFL, the economics of sports, and everyone&apos;s favorite NBA GM Isiah Thomas.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49711</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 11:45:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>golf</category>
		<category>mlb</category>
		<category>nba</category>
		<category>nfl</category>
		<category>simmons</category>
		<category>sports</category>
		<dc:creator>togdon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Gladwell gets a blog</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49462/Gladwell%2Dgets%2Da%2Dblog</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://gladwell.typepad.com/"&gt;Will Malcolm Gladwell&apos;s blog&lt;/a&gt; be as good as his &lt;em&gt;New Yorker&lt;/em&gt; articles and books?  Will it be better?  I&apos;m always fascinated when &quot;big name&quot; people start blogging.  Will he be interesting and personal, dry and professional, or will the blog crash and burn?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49462</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:47:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<dc:creator>cmaxmagee</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>How to think about prescription drugs.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36652/How%2Dto%2Dthink%2Dabout%2Dprescription%2Ddrugs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://newyorker.com/critics/atlarge/?041025crat_atlarge"&gt;How to think about prescription drugs.&lt;/a&gt; Malcolm Gladwell&apos;s latest piece in&lt;i&gt; The New Yorker&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;The emphasis of the prescription-drug debate is all wrong. We&apos;ve been focussed on the drug manufacturers. But decisions about prevalence, therapeutic mix, and intensity aren&apos;t made by the producers of drugs. They&#8217;re made by the consumers of drugs.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36652</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:03:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bigpharma</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>healthcare</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<category>pharmaceuticals</category>
		<category>prescription</category>
		<dc:creator>trharlan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Approved by the Council</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36302/Approved%2Dby%2Dthe%2DCouncil</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.gladwell.com/2004/2004_09_06_a_ketchup.html"&gt;An unusually long article about ketchup.&lt;/a&gt; Fascinating, I swear.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36302</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:32:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>essay</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>ketchup</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>umami</category>
		<dc:creator>Hildago</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16408/</link>
		<description> Malcom Gladwell&apos;s got a new one in the New Yorker about a guy whose investment strategy positions him to profit from unlikely and scary random catastrophes like 9/11. Its&apos; not on newyorker.com, but the story&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://pw1.netcom.com/~ntaleb/&quot;&gt;subject &lt;/a&gt;was kind enough to scan it and &lt;a href=&quot;http://pw1.netcom.com/~ntaleb/newyorker.pdf&quot;&gt;post it&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16408</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2002 13:48:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blackswan</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>investing</category>
		<category>investments</category>
		<category>malcolmgladwell</category>
		<category>nassimtaleb</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<category>stockmarket</category>
		<category>taleb</category>
		<dc:creator>luser</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3412/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.gladwell.com/2000_08_21_a_choking.htm"&gt;Malcolm Gladwell on JFK Jr&apos;s Crash&lt;/a&gt; New from the New Yorker. Actually the article talks mostly about the difference between choking and panicking, mostly in Sports. Still, the discussion about the plane crash is the most fascinating. Perhaps thats because of my morbid fascination with plane crashes:&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cooper.com/books/t_chapter1.html&quot;&gt;Chapter 1 of &quot;Inmates Are Running the Asylum&quot;&lt;/a&gt; by Alan Cooper (American Crash in Cali, Colombia).... Bruce Tognazzini on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.asktog.com/columns/027InterfacesThatKill.html&quot;&gt;Interfaces that Kill&lt;/a&gt; (John Denver).... The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/98mar/valujet1.htm&quot;&gt;Lessons of ValuJet 592&lt;/a&gt; by the masterful William Langweische.... The same Mr. Langweische has a book called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/067975007X/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;&quot;Inside the Sky: Meditations on Flight&quot;&lt;/a&gt; which looks interesting.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3412</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 13:18:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aviation</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>JFKjr</category>
		<category>johndenver</category>
		<category>kennedy</category>
		<category>langewwische</category>
		<category>malcolmgladwell</category>
		<category>planecrashes</category>
		<category>planes</category>
		<dc:creator>lockecito</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


