2 posts tagged with government by aaron.
Displaying 1 through 2 of 2.

Related tags:
+ (213)
+ (128)
+ (84)
+ (76)
+ (51)
+ (47)
+ (44)
+ (43)
+ (42)
+ (38)
+ (30)
+ (30)
+ (28)
+ (26)
+ (26)
+ (26)
+ (25)
+ (25)
+ (22)
+ (22)
+ (21)
+ (21)
+ (20)
+ (20)
+ (20)
+ (20)
+ (19)
+ (19)
+ (18)
+ (17)
+ (17)
+ (17)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (15)
+ (15)
+ (15)
+ (15)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (11)
+ (11)
+ (11)
+ (11)


Users that often use this tag:
kliuless (57)
amberglow (43)
reenum (40)
Postroad (18)
zarq (16)
specialk420 (9)
skallas (9)
rushmc (8)
homunculus (7)
owillis (6)
Trurl (6)
mathowie (5)
y2karl (5)
scalefree (5)
divabat (4)
Gyan (4)
the fire you left me (4)
acrobat (4)
mr_crash_davis (4)
semmi (4)
East Manitoba Regi... (4)
MrMoonPie (3)
capt.crackpipe (3)
brownpau (3)
quirked (3)
nofundy (3)
PrinceValium (3)
sourbrew (3)
bendybendy (3)
four panels (3)
archimago (3)
The Jesse Helms (3)
pjern (3)
klangklangston (3)
cashman (3)
Rhaomi (3)
Joe Beese (3)
daksya (2)
nooneyouknow (2)
triolus (2)
knave (2)
fenriq (2)
thedailygrowl (2)
oissubke (2)
troutfishing (2)
Steve_at_Linnwood (2)
Ignatius J. Reilly (2)
ewkpates (2)
jonson (2)
dejah420 (2)
dglynn (2)
swift (2)
Asparagirl (2)
liam (2)
magullo (2)
Ty Webb (2)
fold_and_mutilate (2)
monju_bosatsu (2)
boost ventilator (2)
jhiggy (2)
"Big government is good for you, and we'll spare no expense making sure you know it!" New figures show the largest advertiser in the UK is now the British government, with the government blowing about 2 1/2 times as much on ads per year as it did before before Labour's rise to power. This is far more than than any other country's government spends. Dissemination of truly important information, or taxpayer-funded plugs for Labour?
posted by aaron on Apr 17, 2001 - 16 comments

The House has passed the bankruptcy reform bill that Clinton vetoed at the end of the last session. I'm mildly optimistic that it won't pass the Senate, given that the Democratic vote in the House was split. But should we be worried at all? At first glance, it doesn't seem like a bad idea. But so many consumer groups are against it, and it seems to benefit credit card companies while hurting individuals, so I'm inclined to think we should leave things as-is. Especially since personal bankruptcies are down and credit card issuers' profits are up. Anyone know more about this?
posted by aaron on Mar 1, 2001 - 7 comments

Page: 1