<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with greenparty</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/greenparty</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'greenparty' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:21:05 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:21:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Michael Berg</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52425/Michael%2DBerg</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&amp;amp;name=ViewWeb&amp;amp;articleId=11672"&gt;&quot;Shortly before Father&#8217;s Day, TAP spoke with Michael Berg,&lt;/a&gt; father of &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Berg&gt;Nicholas Berg&lt;/a&gt;, about his &lt;a href=http://www.bergforcongress.us/&gt;congressional campaign&lt;/a&gt; and the recent &lt;a href=http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/2006_06_01_riverbendblog_archive.html#114988627694074375&gt;death&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Musab_al-Zarqawi&gt;Abu Musab al-Zarqawi&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;  &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=http://www.disinfo.com/site/&gt;Disinformation&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52425</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:21:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>MichaelBerg</category>
		<category>NicholasBerg</category>
		<category>Pacifism</category>
		<category>Violence</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<category>Zarqawi</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Nader&apos;s nadir</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33971/Naders%2Dnadir</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthsuperior/9020861.htm"&gt;The Green Party rejects Ralph Nader.&lt;/a&gt; On the second ballot at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gp.org/convention/&quot;&gt;Green Party nominating convention&lt;/a&gt; held today in Milwaukee, WI, David Cobb defeated Peter Camajo (Nader&apos;s running mate) for the Green Party nomination, thereby denying Nader automatic placement onto the ballot in 23 states.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33971</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2004 15:03:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>Milwaukee</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>Wisconsin</category>
		<dc:creator>thewittyname</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>If the meek don&apos;t inherit the earth, they&apos;ll at least get a say in a fringe party&apos;s platform!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32675/If%2Dthe%2Dmeek%2Ddont%2Dinherit%2Dthe%2Dearth%2Dtheyll%2Dat%2Dleast%2Dget%2Da%2Dsay%2Din%2Da%2Dfringe%2Dpartys%2Dplatform</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20040423/MACGREGOR23/"&gt;The Green Party of Canada&apos;s &lt;i&gt;living platform&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is their party platform... in Wiki form!  It seems that only party members are able to participate in the Wiki, but the rest of us are still able to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenparty.ca/platform2004/en/policies.php&quot;&gt;rank a plank&lt;/a&gt; and vote for their platform&apos;s priorities in the next election.  Once the election date is set, party administrators will form the input into some sort of rough fixed platform, but until then, it&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenparty.ca/platform2004/en/&quot;&gt;&quot;what real democracy looks like&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32675</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:34:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>greenparty</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>wiki</category>
		<dc:creator>DrJohnEvans</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21274/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sltrib.com/2002/oct/10272002/nation_w/11119.htm"&gt;Ralph repents? Or something?&lt;/a&gt; The man many Democrats see as just a few steps short of an evil spawn of Satan for being a 2000 election spoiler has issued statements of support for 13 non-Green candidates in tight races. These are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/27/national/27SEAS.html?ex=1036386000&amp;en=9bfef4580871e677&amp;ei=5062&amp;partner=GOOGLE&quot;&gt;all Democrats&lt;/a&gt;, including Jean Carnahan (Mo.), Tim Johnson (S.D.) and Tom Strickland (Co.). &quot;I certainly don&apos;t want Republicans controlling Congress,&quot; Nader said. What happened to the &quot;things have to get worse before they get better&quot; theory? Or has the situation in D.C. indeed grown so bad that at least &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; Dems. are turning far enough left for Nader? (Note: He&apos;d thrown support behind Wellstone, even though there&apos;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/nm/20021021/pl_nm/politics_green_dc_1&quot;&gt;Green candidate&lt;/a&gt; for Senate in Minn.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21274</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:40:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2002</category>
		<category>endorsement</category>
		<category>Green</category>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>Greens</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>SaltLakeCityTribune</category>
		<dc:creator>raysmj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20855/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/site/docset/platforms.htm"&gt;Platforms&lt;/a&gt; A summary of Democratic, Republican, and other party platforms over the last 150 years. Prettied up, current versions can be found for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rnc.org/gopinfo/platform&quot;&gt;Republican&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democrats.org/about/2000platform.html&quot;&gt;Democrat&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenpartyus.org/platform/2000/index.html&quot;&gt;Green&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lp.org/issues/&quot;&gt;Libertarian&lt;/a&gt; parties (and probably others!). Do you read such things? Do you find that when you read them, your perception of the party matches with the text of the platform? Do you find yourself persuaded by the text of any platform? Provoked to thoughts on policy? 
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20855</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:51:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>democraticparty</category>
		<category>greenparty</category>
		<category>libertarianparty</category>
		<category>partyplatforms</category>
		<category>republicanparty</category>
		<category>uspoliticalhistory</category>
		<dc:creator>namespan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18930/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=special&amp;amp;s=sifry20020801"&gt;Whither the Green Party USA?&lt;/a&gt; Reporting from the Green Party 2002 midterm convention, &lt;i&gt;The Nation&lt;/i&gt;&apos;s writer reports an (uneasy) consensus for &quot;spoiling&quot; selected races against the Democrats, but less clarity on how to get from there to a policy-making role in government.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18930</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2002 13:41:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>greenparty</category>
		<dc:creator>MattD</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18139/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ae-pro.com/view/greenparty/frog.html"&gt;are&apos;nt we?  &lt;/a&gt; i&apos;m no fan of many of the green parties tactical decisions (not tossing the green party votes to the greenest presidential candidate in history for example...) - a very effective ad, never the less - particularly cogent as temperatures reach a sweltering 90 + degrees in northern minnesota today... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quicktime.com&quot;&gt;quicktime required&lt;/a&gt; via newstoday  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18139</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2002 23:16:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Environment</category>
		<category>GlobalWarming</category>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>Video</category>
		<dc:creator>specialk420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17891/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.prospect.org/print/V13/12/meyerson-h.html"&gt;Greens target Senator Wellstone.&lt;/a&gt;   &quot;What could possibly explain this idiocy? Natural selection? Ever since Wellstone built the most vibrant left-leaning organization in the nation, any Minnesota progressive with the intellect to tie his shoes has been a Democrat -- leaving the Greens with the sandaled, the shoeless, and the slow. This could just be some Minnesota exceptionalism. 

But it&apos;s not.&quot;

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17891</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2002 07:44:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>americanprospect</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>greenparty</category>
		<category>paulwellstone</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>boltman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12062/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/oden1.html"&gt;Green Party coordinator can&apos;t fly?&lt;/a&gt; According to this Counterpunch report, Nancy Oden, who is on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenparty.org/contacts.html&quot;&gt;Green Party USA Coordinating Committee&lt;/a&gt; (which is to say the equivalent of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democrats.org/hq/leadership/index.html&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rnc.org/rncleadership&quot;&gt;folks&lt;/a&gt;), a former &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geocities.com/capitolhill/2834/&quot;&gt;gubernatorial candidate&lt;/a&gt; was detained at the Bangor ME airport Thursday evening and prevented from boarding a plane to Chicago for a Friday evening panel on pesticides as weapons (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.powerlink.net/fen/oden.htm&quot;&gt;anti-pesticide &amp; genmod page&lt;/a&gt;); and was told the &quot;airport was closed to her&quot; until further notice. Oden claims this is because of the Green Party&apos;s opposition to the war; I couldn&apos;t find a different source for this that might indicate anything different. Wouldn&apos;t someone who &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mainegreens.org/electoral/referenda/StopAerialSpraying97/&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;opposes&lt;/i&gt; aerial spraying&lt;/a&gt; be on the right side of recent rhetoric? Has someone lost their mind? Did Oden get to Chicago?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12062</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2001 15:31:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>GenMod</category>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>NancyOden</category>
		<category>Oden</category>
		<category>Pesticide</category>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10772/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.diezeit.de/2001/39/Politik/200139_robertleicht_0924.html"&gt;The Greens and Social Democrats in Germany just lost big&lt;/a&gt; in local elections in Hamburg this weekend. Is this the first political fallout from the &quot;War on Terror&quot;? (Here&apos;s an &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/news/0109/25/world/world17.html&quot;&gt;English link&lt;/A&gt; too, from the Sydney Morning Herald. Couldn&apos;t find anything in the U.S. press--thank heaven for Australians.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10772</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2001 09:47:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>germany</category>
		<category>greenparty</category>
		<category>hamburg</category>
		<category>socialdemocrats</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>gimonca</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9924/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.consortiumnews.com/Print/090501.html"&gt;Is Nader Right?&lt;/a&gt; Or is he just fooling himself? I mean, even I can tell the difference between Democrats and Republicans.  Apparently, the best Ralph can ever hope for is to ruin the Democratic party.  If I were a Republican, I&apos;d be donating to the Green party right about now.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9924</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2001 07:03:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>greenparty</category>
		<category>nader</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<dc:creator>Jart</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4526/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.greenparty.org/"&gt;I looked at the Green Party platform&lt;/a&gt; for the first time today, as a followup to the Nader discussion below. I like the ideas, in general, but how would we fund them? I don&apos;t like current economic policies, etc, but the money sure seems to flow. A lot of us seem to be Greens. How&apos;s it work?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4526</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2000 11:49:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>Greens</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>ThirdParty</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>Sean Meade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4515/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.workingforchange.com/news/article.cfm?ItemId=9898"&gt;What went wrong for Ralph?&lt;/a&gt; Now that the whining and accusations has died down a little, it&apos;s time to finally ask the hard question: &lt;b&gt;So why &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; Ralph Nader do so badly?&lt;/b&gt;. Did his campaign drift too far left? Was Winnona LaDuke the right running mate? Did the Green party help or hurt him?  What did Nader himself do to screw his own campaign. 
  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4515</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:36:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>3rd</category>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>Greens</category>
		<category>hindsight</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>Party</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>review</category>
		<dc:creator>lagado</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4304/</link>
		<description> I know it is cheap and easy to link to Salon, but I imagine this might make interesting conversation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2000/11/15/nader/index.html &quot;&gt;&lt;B&gt;We can thank Nader and his supporters for the election mess -- and they&apos;re not even sorry.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don&apos;t you idiots know the Democratic party owns your votes? Quit being so selfish.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4304</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2000 08:57:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>democraticparty</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>greenparty</category>
		<category>greens</category>
		<category>nader</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>thirteen</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3920/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://salon.com/politics/feature/2000/10/28/stocks/index.html"&gt;nader&apos;s stock portfolio&lt;/a&gt; &quot;In the financial disclosure form Nader filed on June 14, the Green Party presidential candidate revealed that he owns between $100,000 and $250,000 worth of shares in the Fidelity Magellan Fund. The fund controls 4,321,400 shares of Occidental Petroleum stock.&quot;
Read on for more...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3920</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2000 06:38:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>green</category>
		<category>greenparty</category>
		<category>nader</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<category>uspresident</category>
		<dc:creator>saralovering</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3805/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://greensforgore.org/"&gt;Greens for Gore&lt;/a&gt; have a voting strategy. If you like Nader, you might want to see what they have in mind.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3805</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2000 19:24:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>GreensForGore</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>aprilgem</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


