<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with greens</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/greens</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'greens' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:48:36 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:48:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Australian Federal Election 2007 on November 24</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65537/Australian%2DFederal%2DElection%2D2007%2Don%2DNovember%2D24</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/14/2059084.htm&quot;&gt;And we&apos;re off&lt;/a&gt;! Prime Minister John Howard has set the date for the Australian Federal election as November 24th, meaning we&apos;re up for a long six-week campaign. With Kevin Rudd leading the PM by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ozpolitics.info/blog/2007/09/11/reuters-poll-trend-4/&quot;&gt;between 16 to 18 points&lt;/a&gt; (depending on who you read) in recent opinion polls, this election seems the most likely to provide a change of Government since Howard was first elected 11 years ago. Antony Green&apos;s usual excellent election guide is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/elections/federal/2007/guide/&quot;&gt;up and running here&lt;/a&gt;, along with an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/elections/federal/2007/calculator/&quot;&gt;excellent calculator&lt;/a&gt; which shows which seats are up for grabs dependent on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://australianpolitics.com/elections/two-party/two-party-preferred.shtml&quot;&gt;2 party preferred&lt;/a&gt; swing. You might also want to check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news.com.au/feature/0,,5012863,00.html&quot;&gt;Vote-O-Matic&lt;/a&gt;, a fun but entirely disposable quiz which aims to help you decide who you&apos;ll vote for. Metafilter&apos;s international readers unfamiliar with the Australian political scene will likely be scratching their heads when trying to figure out just what the hell is going on over here, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ozpolitics.info/&quot;&gt;this page offers a useful guide as a starting point&lt;/a&gt;. It can be handy to read over whether you&apos;re from outside Australia or a true blue Aussie yourself.

Some other excellent Australian election resources include;

Links to some of the contenders web pages;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alp.org.au/&quot;&gt;Australian Labor Party&lt;/a&gt; (plus the &lt;a href=&quot;http://kevin07.com.au/&quot;&gt;Kevin07&lt;/a&gt; website).
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.liberal.org.au/&quot;&gt;Liberal Party&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationals.org.au/&quot;&gt;The Nationals&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bobbrown.org.au/&quot;&gt;Greens&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democrats.org.au/&quot;&gt;Australian Democrats&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulinehanson.com.au/&quot;&gt;Pauline Hanson&apos;s United Australia Party&lt;/a&gt;

And here&apos;s some links to some excellent blogs which will no doubt continue to annoy the mainstream media throughout the campaign.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ozpolitics.info/blog/&quot;&gt;Oz Politics&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollbludger.com/&quot;&gt;Poll Bludger&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://possumcomitatus.wordpress.com/&quot;&gt;Possum Comitatus&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.roadtosurfdom.com/&quot;&gt;The Road to Surfdom&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://larvatusprodeo.net/&quot;&gt;Larvatus Prodeo&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.news.com.au/news/blogocracy/&quot;&gt;Tim Dunlop&apos;s Blogocracy&lt;/a&gt;

Mind you, the following two blogs are by mainstream media pundits, and right wing columnists Piers Ackerman and Andrew Bolt.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/piersakerman/index.php/dailytele/comments/warzone_whingers_suddenly_australian/&quot;&gt;Piers Ackerman&apos;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/&quot;&gt;Andrew Bolt&apos;s blog.&lt;/a&gt;

And finally, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com.au/election2007/&quot;&gt;Google&apos;s election guide&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/64752/Googling-the-Australian-Federal-Election&quot;&gt;seen previously on Metafilter&lt;/a&gt;.

The next six weeks are going to be long, grueling and if the  experts are to be believed, incredibly negative. Strap yourselves in, folks. It&apos;s going to be one hell of a ride. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65537</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:48:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alp</category>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>australiandemocrats</category>
		<category>australiangreens</category>
		<category>australianpolitics</category>
		<category>BedsAreBurning</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>BobBrown</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>election07</category>
		<category>greens</category>
		<category>internationalgreens</category>
		<category>johnhoward</category>
		<category>kevinrudd</category>
		<category>labor</category>
		<category>latham</category>
		<category>liberals</category>
		<category>nationals</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>paulinehanson</category>
		<category>PM</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>pollbludger</category>
		<category>possumcomitatus</category>
		<category>primeminister</category>
		<category>rodent</category>
		<category>rudd</category>
		<category>seinfeld</category>
		<category>theendofallthings</category>
		<category>worm</category>
		<dc:creator>Effigy2000</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Campaigning in Oz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35582/Campaigning%2Din%2DOz</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/09/12/1094927437986.html"&gt;Sunday Night&apos;s Election Debate&lt;/a&gt; &amp;nbsp;&amp;mdash;&amp;nbsp; National security issues loom large, voters are admonished not to decide to &amp;ldquo;cut and run&amp;rdquo;.  Medicare and the economy were also points of contention.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,10691275%255E2702,00.html&quot;&gt;greens are being attacked&lt;/a&gt; as &amp;ldquo;commies&amp;rdquo;.  John Quiggin has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crookedtimber.org/archives/002489.html&quot;&gt;some observations&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35582</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:31:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>greens</category>
		<category>quiggin</category>
		<dc:creator>Ethereal Bligh</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>LNSGP</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27417/LNSGP</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://nazi.org"&gt;The Nazis are back&lt;/a&gt; and this time they&apos;re green! 
I can&apos;t seem to tell if it&apos;s real or not... which is kind of worrying.[Via memepool]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27417</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:02:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>green</category>
		<category>greens</category>
		<category>libertarianism</category>
		<category>movements</category>
		<category>nazis</category>
		<category>nazism</category>
		<category>politicalparties</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>socialism</category>
		<category>socialists</category>
		<dc:creator>knapah</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Nader takes on the SEC, will a campaign be next?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24055/Nader%2Dtakes%2Don%2Dthe%2DSEC%2Dwill%2Da%2Dcampaign%2Dbe%2Dnext</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsday.com/business/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-nader-accounting0303mar03,0,5024599.story?coll=sns-ap-business-headlines"&gt;Nader takes on the SEC, will a campaign be next?&lt;/a&gt; Bit by bit, &lt;a href=&quot;http://ralphnader.com/&quot;&gt;Ralph Nader&lt;/a&gt; does what he does best, annoying those who abuse power. This last year, he has kept with advocacy that is in parallel with smart campaign strategy and the creation of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://citizenworks.org/actions/aia.php&quot;&gt;SEC watchdog group&lt;/a&gt; is an example of that. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://greens.org&quot;&gt;Greens&lt;/a&gt; are still debating him in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://greenpartyforums.org&quot;&gt;forums&lt;/a&gt;, wondering if he is still their guy. Maybe they should be asking if he&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://whitehouse.gov&quot;&gt;OUR&lt;/a&gt; guy?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24055</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2003 20:17:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advocacy</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>candidates</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>greens</category>
		<category>nader</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<category>sec</category>
		<dc:creator>StormBear</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21274/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sltrib.com/2002/oct/10272002/nation_w/11119.htm"&gt;Ralph repents? Or something?&lt;/a&gt; The man many Democrats see as just a few steps short of an evil spawn of Satan for being a 2000 election spoiler has issued statements of support for 13 non-Green candidates in tight races. These are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/27/national/27SEAS.html?ex=1036386000&amp;en=9bfef4580871e677&amp;ei=5062&amp;partner=GOOGLE&quot;&gt;all Democrats&lt;/a&gt;, including Jean Carnahan (Mo.), Tim Johnson (S.D.) and Tom Strickland (Co.). &quot;I certainly don&apos;t want Republicans controlling Congress,&quot; Nader said. What happened to the &quot;things have to get worse before they get better&quot; theory? Or has the situation in D.C. indeed grown so bad that at least &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; Dems. are turning far enough left for Nader? (Note: He&apos;d thrown support behind Wellstone, even though there&apos;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/nm/20021021/pl_nm/politics_green_dc_1&quot;&gt;Green candidate&lt;/a&gt; for Senate in Minn.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21274</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:40:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2002</category>
		<category>endorsement</category>
		<category>Green</category>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>Greens</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>SaltLakeCityTribune</category>
		<dc:creator>raysmj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15004/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.spectator.co.uk/article.php3?table=old&#xa7;ion=current&amp;amp;issue=2002-02-23&amp;amp;id=1602"&gt;Challenging the Goliath of Environmentalism&lt;/a&gt; This piece is a brief chronicle of the (mis)adventures of a &quot;green&quot; whose only sin is optimism.  Are the environmentalists too doomsday-ish for their own good? Is technology the problem, or part of the solution?  Link via The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailygrail.com&quot;&gt;Daily Grail&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15004</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:57:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>deadlinks</category>
		<category>doomsday</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>environmentalism</category>
		<category>greens</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>yesster</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4526/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.greenparty.org/"&gt;I looked at the Green Party platform&lt;/a&gt; for the first time today, as a followup to the Nader discussion below. I like the ideas, in general, but how would we fund them? I don&apos;t like current economic policies, etc, but the money sure seems to flow. A lot of us seem to be Greens. How&apos;s it work?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4526</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2000 11:49:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>Greens</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>ThirdParty</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>Sean Meade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4515/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.workingforchange.com/news/article.cfm?ItemId=9898"&gt;What went wrong for Ralph?&lt;/a&gt; Now that the whining and accusations has died down a little, it&apos;s time to finally ask the hard question: &lt;b&gt;So why &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; Ralph Nader do so badly?&lt;/b&gt;. Did his campaign drift too far left? Was Winnona LaDuke the right running mate? Did the Green party help or hurt him?  What did Nader himself do to screw his own campaign. 
  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4515</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:36:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>3rd</category>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>Greens</category>
		<category>hindsight</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>Party</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>review</category>
		<dc:creator>lagado</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4304/</link>
		<description> I know it is cheap and easy to link to Salon, but I imagine this might make interesting conversation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2000/11/15/nader/index.html &quot;&gt;&lt;B&gt;We can thank Nader and his supporters for the election mess -- and they&apos;re not even sorry.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don&apos;t you idiots know the Democratic party owns your votes? Quit being so selfish.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4304</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2000 08:57:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>democraticparty</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>greenparty</category>
		<category>greens</category>
		<category>nader</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>thirteen</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


