<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with guardian and newspaper</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/guardian+newspaper</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'guardian' and 'newspaper' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:18:04 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:18:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>&quot;I notice the &apos;wank&apos; has remained fairly constant.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80553/I%2Dnotice%2Dthe%2Dwank%2Dhas%2Dremained%2Dfairly%2Dconstant</link>
		<description> &quot;The editor&apos;s guidelines are as follows: First, remember the reader, and respect demands that we should not casually use words that are likely to offend. Second, use such words only when absolutely necessary to the facts of a piece, or to portray a character in an article; there is almost never a case in which we need to use a swearword outside direct quotes. Third, the stronger the swearword, the harder we ought to think about using it.Finally, never use asterisks, which are just a cop-out.&quot; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2009/apr/03/research-digital-media&quot;&gt;Swearing in The Guardian&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/twhume/3407112348/&quot;&gt;A chart&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80553</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:18:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chart</category>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>newspaper</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>swearing</category>
		<category>TheGuardian</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Death of another Newspaper</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80481/Death%2Dof%2Danother%2DNewspaper</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/apr/01/guardian-twitter-media-technology"&gt;The Guardian is moving entirely to Twitter.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Sceptics have expressed concerns that 140 characters may be insufficient to capture the full breadth of meaningful human activity, but social media experts say the spread of Twitter encourages brevity, and that it ought to be possible to convey the gist of any message in a tweet.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80481</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:15:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>april</category>
		<category>fools</category>
		<category>guardian</category>
		<category>newspaper</category>
		<category>twitter</category>
		<dc:creator>djgh</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>1,000 Songs Your Must Hear</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80085/1000%2DSongs%2DYour%2DMust%2DHear</link>
		<description> Those of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/table/2009/mar/14/love-1000-songs-everyone-must-hear&quot;&gt;Love&lt;/a&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2009/mar/14/love-songs-missed?commentpage=1&quot;&gt;+&lt;/a&gt;), those of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/table/2009/mar/17/sex-1000-songs-everyone-must-hear&quot;&gt;Sex&lt;/a&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2009/mar/17/1000-songs-sex?commentpage=1&quot;&gt;+&lt;/a&gt;), those of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/table/2009/mar/15/heartbreak-1000-songs-everyone-must-hear&quot;&gt;Hearbreak&lt;/a&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2009/mar/15/heartbreak-songs-missed?commentpage=1&quot;&gt;+&lt;/a&gt;), those of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/table/2009/mar/16/people-and-places-1000-songs-everyone-must-hear&quot;&gt;People and Places&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2009/mar/16/1000-people-places-songs-missed?commentpage=1&quot;&gt;+&lt;/a&gt;), those of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/table/2009/mar/18/protest-1000-songs-everyone-must-hear&quot;&gt;Politics and Protest&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2009/mar/18/1000-protest-political-songs?commentpage=1&quot;&gt;+&lt;/a&gt;). The Guardian&apos;s journalists purloin you with &quot;1,000 Songs You Must Hear&quot;. The plus links lead to people&apos;s outraged suggestions of those that are missing from each category. Perfect for when &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-top-tens.com/lists/top-ten-songs-of-all-time.asp&quot;&gt;10&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturecritics/neilmccormick/4978868/100-Greatest-Songs-of-All-Time.html&quot;&gt;100&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/500songs&quot;&gt;500 &lt;/a&gt;or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/79813/Top-Three-Thousand-Songs-and-Albums&quot;&gt;3,000&lt;/a&gt; are just the wrong numbers.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80085</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:07:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>composition</category>
		<category>guardian</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>newspaper</category>
		<category>songs</category>
		<category>your_favorite_x_sucks</category>
		<dc:creator>rongorongo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>NewsNewsFilter? Uh, OK!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26840/NewsNewsFilter%2DUh%2DOK</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://nymetro.com/nymetro/news/media/columns/medialife/n_8938/"&gt;It&#8217;s not a mass-produced American product.&lt;/a&gt; It&apos;s either &quot;a turnaround in American publishing, or... radically wrongheaded&quot; - but it looks like The Guardian may be launching a version in the USA soon.

Could such a venture lead to the demise of the venerable old Fleet Street institution, owned by an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gmgplc.co.uk/gmg/scotttrust/formation/&quot;&gt;independent trust&lt;/a&gt;? Is it overreaching ambition or a daring entry into niche market?
More interesting to me, are there any similar non-profit media organisations in your part of the world (wherever that may be)?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26840</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2003 17:40:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>newspaper</category>
		<category>transatlantic</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>dash_slot-</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16103/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/story/0,1284,676269,00.html"&gt;New US paper aims at Afghan war truth &lt;/a&gt; What do you do when you are fed up with the biased and slanted coverage that the major news organizations are giving the &quot;war on terroirsm&quot;? Start your own newspaper of course.&lt;br&gt;

&quot;A newspaper aimed at providing news of the war in Afghanistan is to be launched this month. Its editors argue that the mainstream media in the US are not providing a full picture of the war and its effects. &quot;
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16103</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2002 01:17:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspaper</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WarTimes</category>
		<dc:creator>futureproof</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


