<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with guardian and science</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/guardian+science</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'guardian' and 'science' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:45:44 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:45:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Medicalisation</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74582/Medicalisation</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/the-medicalisation-of-everyday-life/"&gt;The Medicalisation of Everyday Life.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;As the pace of medical innovation slows to a crawl, how do drug companies stay in profit? By &apos;discovering&apos; new illnesses to fit existing products.&quot; An extract from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/series/badscience&quot;&gt;Ben Goldacre&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; new book, &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.co.uk/Bad-Science-Ben-Goldacre/dp/0007240198/?tag=bs0b-21&quot;&gt;Bad Science&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74582</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:45:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BenGoldacre</category>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>Health</category>
		<category>Medicalisation</category>
		<category>Medicine</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Homeopathy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66687/Homeopathy</link>
		<description> The Guardian discusses homeopathy: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,2209998,00.html&quot;&gt;Jeannette Winterson&lt;/a&gt; supports it, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/a-kind-of-magic/&quot;&gt;Ben Goldacre&lt;/a&gt; opposes it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66687</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:20:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alternativeMedicine</category>
		<category>BenGoldacre</category>
		<category>guardian</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>homeopathy</category>
		<category>JeannetteWinterson</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>SCIENCE!</category>
		<category>TheGuardian</category>
		<dc:creator>East Manitoba Regional Junior Kabaddi Champion &apos;94</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>But who wants to do math?  Math is hard. Scaring ignorant people is easy.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61502/But%2Dwho%2Dwants%2Dto%2Ddo%2Dmath%2DMath%2Dis%2Dhard%2DScaring%2Dignorant%2Dpeople%2Dis%2Deasy</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wellingtongrey.net/miscellanea/archive/2007-05-27--the-truth-about-wireless-devices.html&quot;&gt;Wi-fi Routers: Silent blinking death&lt;/a&gt;. Via badscience.net, where it was posted in response to what sounds like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.badscience.net/?p=414&quot;&gt;a truly awful show&lt;/a&gt;. Electrosensitivity previously discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/60695/The-latest-in-tinfoil-hat-fashion&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61502</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 12:04:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>badscience</category>
		<category>BenGoldacre</category>
		<category>comics</category>
		<category>electrosensitivity</category>
		<category>emf</category>
		<category>guardian</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>SCIENCE!</category>
		<category>theGuardian</category>
		<category>tinfoilhat</category>
		<category>wifi</category>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Music history rendered on a London Tube Map</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49115/Music%2Dhistory%2Drendered%2Don%2Da%2DLondon%2DTube%2DMap</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/culturevulture/archives/2006/02/03/going_underground.html"&gt;Music history rendered on a London Tube Map&lt;/a&gt; They say:  &quot;Could we chart the branches and connections of 100 years of music using the London Underground map? Dorian Lynskey explains how a box of coloured crayons and lot of swearing helped.&quot;  I say: Look also at the comments in the accompanying thread, which features trolling, snarkiness and repetition, beginning with &quot;Why did you do this? What is the point? Wouldn&apos;t you have been better off doing something else? Sometimes you media people really worry me.&quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1707338,00.html&quot;&gt;The Guardian are introducing commenter registration on their new blog&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49115</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:44:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>guardian</category>
		<category>london</category>
		<category>maps</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>railway</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>tube</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9885/</link>
		<description> How easily can &lt;a href=http://depts.washington.edu/uweek/archives/2001.07.JUL_05/_article5.html&gt;false memories&lt;/a&gt; be created through advertisements?  Could you be convinced that Bugs Bunny was at Disneyland? &lt;a href=http://media.guardian.co.uk/advertising/story/0,7492,546686,00.html&gt;Full results from a larger study&lt;/a&gt; will be revealed soon.  &quot;Is it OK for marketers to knowingly manipulate consumers&apos; past?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9885</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2001 21:02:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>memory</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>gluechunk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8225/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,504486,00.html"&gt;When NASA scientists watch Michael Bay films, comedy ensues.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&apos;The technology is not at all far-fetched,&apos; said Dr Greg Laughlin, of the Nasa Ames Research Center in California. &apos;It involves the same techniques that people now suggest could be used to deflect asteroids or comets heading towards Earth. We don&apos;t need raw power to move Earth, we just require delicacy of planning and manoeuvring.&apos; &lt;/i&gt;

Oh yeah, nothing could possibly go wrong with &lt;i&gt;this&lt;/i&gt; plan. I&apos;m not being a Luddite here...I realize the scientists involved aren&apos;t going to be doing this any time soon, if ever. It still spooks me, though.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8225</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:15:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>astrophysics</category>
		<category>ClimateChange</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>GlobalWarming</category>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>physics</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>Ezrael</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


