<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with gwb and NYTimes</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/gwb+NYTimes</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'gwb' and 'NYTimes' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:03:17 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:03:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The Road To Abu Ghraib</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36544/The%2DRoad%2DTo%2DAbu%2DGhraib</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0411.carter.html&quot; title=&quot;The world will forgive&#8212;and indeed, secretly applaud&#8212;those occasions, such as Kosovo, where we ignore the letter of the law or sidestep international institutions in the service of an obviously greater good. What it will neither understand nor condone is the wholesale abandonment of the law. The Bush administration has cast the debate over the laws of war in all-or-nothing terms&#8212;either you can throw out the old laws of war, or do nothing to secure the nation against a terrorist attack. In many ways, this position resembles much of the administration&apos;s rhetoric in the war on terror and its bid for reelection: You&apos;re either with us or against us, for good or for evil, a supporter of American policy or a supporter of terrorism. But the world is far more complex than that. There was a third path between living with the anachronistic laws of war and rejecting them in favor of expediency. The Bush administration rejected that path, and now, every day, U.S. soldiers and Iraqi citizens are paying the ultimate price for its mistake.&quot;&gt;The Road To Abu Ghraib&lt;/a&gt;&lt;small&gt; A generation from now, historians may look back to April 28, 2004, as the day the United States lost the war in Iraq... It was a direct&#8212;and predictable&#8212;consequence of a policy, hatched at the highest levels of the administration, by senior White House officials and lawyers, in the weeks and months after 9/11. Yet the administration has largely managed to escape responsibility for those decisions; a month from election day, almost no one in the press or the political class is talking about what is, without question, the worst scandal to emerge from President Bush&apos;s nearly four years in office...  Given the particular conditions faced by the president and his deputies after 9/11&#8212;a war against terrorists, in which the need to extract intelligence via interrogations was intensely pressing, but the limits placed by international law on interrogation techniques were very constricting&#8212;did those leaders have better alternatives than the one they chose? The answer is that they did. And we will be living with the consequences of the choices they made for years to come.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36544</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:03:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>detention</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>humanrights</category>
		<category>interrogation</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>PhilipCarter</category>
		<category>prison</category>
		<category>Slate</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>WashingtonMonthly</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>George Bushes&apos;s military record: critical analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35465/George%2DBushess%2Dmilitary%2Drecord%2Dcritical%2Danalysis</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/opinion/lechliter.pdf"&gt;George Bushes&apos;s Military record: a critical analysis&lt;/a&gt; This pdf file is about as definitive a look as we are likely to get on the Bush military record. Clearly most post4ers/readers of Metafilter do not support Bush, but having some clear-cut evidence at hand to use in arguments against  those who attack the Kerry militaryrecord, this will give the Bushites reason to move on to other topics  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35465</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 10:19:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AWOL</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>NationalGuard</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>pdf</category>
		<category>Vietnam</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Well.  of course.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34236/Well%2Dof%2Dcourse</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/09/politics/campaign/09records.html"&gt;The dog ate my service records.&lt;/a&gt; The Pentagon has announced that the payroll records for National Guard service for three months between 1972 and 1973 have been accidentally destroyed.  These three months coincidentally cover the disputed period of George W. Bush&apos;s service in the Texas Air National Guard.  (Similar Google link &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&amp;storyID=5627899&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/7/8/23589/81575&quot;&gt;dKos&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34236</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 05:00:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>1972</category>
		<category>1973</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>coverup</category>
		<category>destroyed</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>NationalGuard</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>Pentagon</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>records</category>
		<category>service</category>
		<category>TexasAirNationalGuard</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Khaki and Camo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26163/Khaki%2Dand%2DCamo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/03/opinion/03KRUG.html"&gt;Paul Krugman&lt;/a&gt; writes that the Bush administration will fight a &quot;khaki election&quot; next year, taking advantage of the general good feeling after the Iraq war. The original khaki election was the British election of 1900, contested during the Boer War. Our armed forces don&apos;t really wear khaki so much anymore and I think we need a new term. I suggest calling 2004 the &quot;Camo Election.&quot; Any better suggestions?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26163</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2003 10:15:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Election2004</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>khaki</category>
		<category>KhakiElection</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>PaulKrugman</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>Mekon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19910/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/11/opinion/11BUSH.html"&gt;George Bush&apos;s Article in NYTIMES.&lt;/a&gt; I was surprised to see an article by the prez on nytimes.com.  We are used to presidents communicating through TV- but there the speech is picked up by all major channels in that case.  It seems odd to see a sitting president use &lt;i&gt;one&lt;/i&gt; newspaper to put forward a viewpoint.  Perhaps, Al Gore&apos;s articles in the same space spurred dubya.  Oh, by the way, what did you think of the story?  Is this the work of a speechwriter or do you think it is genuine? Did everyone notice the absence of the word Iraq in this article?

(The customary apology for the nytimes post applies.  I believe you can still register as metafilter, metafilter.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19910</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2002 05:41:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>anniversary</category>
		<category>article</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<dc:creator>SandeepKrishnamurthy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19227/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/16/opinion/16KRIS.html"&gt;The Axis of Medieval.&lt;/a&gt; Claims of support for women and women&apos;s rights in the current regime are nothing more than hot air according to Mr. Kristof.  He says their record and the facts tell a different story.  The details are shocking.  Kowtowing to religious fundamentalists in the US  causes devastating results abroad.
Would programs like these qualify for using some of the wealthiest persons dollars instead of a tax cut?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19227</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2002 12:21:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Africa</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>MiddleEast</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<category>womensrights</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17740/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/09/opinion/09DOWD.html"&gt;Special Agent Crowley Speaks Up &lt;/a&gt; (NYTimes link , normal rules apply)
Ladies like this are the real heroes in our country and she has something to say before Congress about the new Bush agency.  Ms. Dowd agrees and said, &quot;The shape of the government is not as important as the policy of the government.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17740</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:30:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>CassandraRowley</category>
		<category>criticism</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>MaureenDowd</category>
		<category>NationalSecurity</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15609/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/flash.htm"&gt;Is President Bush Gay?&lt;/a&gt; (Answer: No, but he says &quot;fabulous&quot; a lot.)  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/18/arts/music/18JOEL.html&quot;&gt;Is Billy Joel washed up? (NYT required)&lt;/a&gt;  (Answer: Sounds like it.)  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aint-it-cool-news.com/display.cgi?id=11796&quot;&gt;Is Star Wars Episode Two any good?&lt;/a&gt; (Answer: Yes, beyond your wildest dreams.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15609</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:58:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BillyJoel</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>drudgereport</category>
		<category>druge</category>
		<category>Ep2</category>
		<category>Episode2</category>
		<category>EpisodeII</category>
		<category>fabulous</category>
		<category>films</category>
		<category>flash</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>StarWars</category>
		<dc:creator>adrober</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13509/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/03/opinion/03SAFI.html"&gt;Even Safire is getting sick of Bush&lt;/a&gt; in today&apos;s NY Times op-ed piece writing about the bogus executive privilege order he signed re: FBI missteps in Boston: &quot;Why is Bush, so early in his term and with little to hide, going down this road to upset our system of checks and balances?...It&apos;s another mistake that will come home to haunt the Bush presidency.&quot; (nytimes.com Member ID: metafi, password: metafi) And with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Enron-Congress.html&quot;&gt;Lieberman and Levin opening up the Enron investigation &lt;/a&gt;(&quot;Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., the full committee&apos;s chairman, promised Wednesday `a search for the truth, not a witch hunt.&apos; But he did not rule out an examination of Enron&apos;s relationships with the Bush administration.&quot;) does anyone not think the Dems are getting fired up for the fall elections, war or no war?
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13509</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2002 05:24:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>executiveprivilege</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>WilliamSafire</category>
		<dc:creator>willrich</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


