<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with gwbush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/gwbush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'gwbush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:39:12 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:39:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Women are &quot;evildoers&quot; too.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36268/Women%2Dare%2Devildoers%2Dtoo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;cid=519&amp;amp;ncid=519&amp;amp;e=23&amp;amp;u=/ap/20041014/ap_on_re_us/un_population_agenda"&gt;U.S. refuses to join U.N. plan for women&lt;/a&gt; From AP via Yahoo:  &lt;em&gt;UNITED NATIONS - The United States has refused to join 85 other heads of state and government in signing a statement that endorsed a 10-year-old U.N. plan to ensure every woman&apos;s right to education, health care, and choice about having children. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;

 and
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;President Bush&apos;s administration withheld its signature because the statement included a reference to &quot;&lt;strong&gt;sexual rights&lt;/strong&gt;.&quot; &lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36268</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:39:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>conservativism</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWBush</category>
		<category>SexualRights</category>
		<category>UN</category>
		<category>UnitedNations</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>WomensRights</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>Skygazer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bush lies again</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36245/Bush%2Dlies%2Dagain</link>
		<description> During the Wednesday night debate, Senator Kerry questioned why the President said that he &quot;was not concerned&quot; with Osama Bin Laden. In response, Bush said, &lt;i&gt;&#8220;Gosh, I don&#8217;t think I ever said I&#8217;m not worried about Osama Bin Laden. That&#8217;s kinda one of those exaggerations.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; The video proof &lt;a href=&quot;http://a9.g.akamai.net/7/9/8082/v003/democratic1.download.akamai.com/8082/video/notconcerned.wmv&quot;&gt;is here&lt;/a&gt; showing that he indeed say exactly that.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36245</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 04:58:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GWBush</category>
		<category>lies</category>
		<dc:creator>Dome-O-Rama</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Subservient President</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34724/Subservient%2DPresident</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.subservientpresident.net/"&gt;Subservient President.&lt;/a&gt; MoveOn&apos;s homage to BK&apos;s Chicken. (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.waxy.org/links&quot;&gt;waxy&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34724</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 11:05:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>burgerking</category>
		<category>chicken</category>
		<category>gwbush</category>
		<category>MoveOn</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>satire</category>
		<category>subservientpresident</category>
		<dc:creator>Ufez Jones</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Save.Overtime.Pay.Org</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31658/SaveOvertimePayOrg</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.saveovertimepay.org/"&gt;Save Overtime Pay&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Warning: AFL-CIOfilter
&lt;br&gt;From the site: &quot;Under a proposal by President Bush, more than 8 million workers might not be paid extra for the overtime hours they work.&quot;
&lt;br&gt;
Yeah, I saw the &quot;might&quot; in there too.
&lt;br&gt;They do have a summary page of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saveovertimepay.org/bushproposal.htm&quot;&gt;Bush&apos;s proposal&lt;/a&gt; and hey, here&apos;s a little &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saveovertimepay.org/ot.htm?file=realimpact/afl-cio/7tvads/rulesstr.rm&quot;&gt;cartoon&lt;/a&gt; to help explain things.
&lt;br&gt;And &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/business/national/8136553.htm&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; in today&apos;s Miami Herald helps explain the issue a little better than &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationalcenter.org/WCT030104.html&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt; from the National Center for Public Policy Research which quotes The Heritage Foundation and Secretary of Labor Elaine Choe.
&lt;br&gt;As I understand it, they want to move the level of mandatory overtime pay from about $8000 a year to $22K but there&apos;s so much double speak and rhetoric that my head&apos;s only just stopped spinning.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31658</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 15:46:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>GWBush</category>
		<category>overtimepay</category>
		<dc:creator>fenriq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>hired guns?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31436/hired%2Dguns</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0225-10.htm&quot;&gt;
&quot;I don&apos;t think that there&apos;s any question about the fact that the weapons that they have did not come from Haiti,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; says Kurzban. &quot;They&apos;re organized as a military commando strike force that&apos;s going from city to city.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Parts of the rebellion&apos;s leadership, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0223/p07s01-woam.html?s=entee&quot;&gt;such as head of military operations Louis Chamberlain,&lt;/a&gt; were leaders in the attempted 1994 Hatian coup that resulted in the use of 20,000 U.S. troops.  A coup which, according to the U.N. Human Right Commission, was &lt;a href=&quot;http://haitireborn.org/campaigns/toto-constant/background.php&quot;&gt;supported and aided by the CIA.&lt;/a&gt;  In other words, this wouldn&apos;t be the first time that the U.S. has played on both sides of a Haitian military uprising.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Meanwhile, Bush refuses to protect President Aristide&apos;s life - and perhaps the lives of thousands of Hatians - citing &lt;em&gt;the opposition&apos;s&lt;/em&gt; refusal of a U.S. peace plan.  Silmultaneously, he issued a harsh pronouncement warning refugee Hatians off from American shores.&lt;br /&gt;

&quot;It is clear that the right wing in this country does not support that democracy,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apwashington_story.asp?category=1153&amp;slug=US%20Haiti%20Politics &quot;&gt;said Jesse Jackson, today.&lt;/a&gt;  &quot;(Bush) is, in fact, supporting overthrow of this government in this hemisphere.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31436</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:03:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Aristide</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>coup</category>
		<category>GWBush</category>
		<category>Haiti</category>
		<category>Jessejackson</category>
		<category>Louischamberlain</category>
		<category>uprising</category>
		<dc:creator>kaibutsu</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>London Calling</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29521/London%2DCalling</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.resistbush.org/"&gt;A nice sit down and a cup of tea&lt;/a&gt; are among many &lt;a href=&quot;http://stopwar.org.uk/Resources/bushevents.pdf&quot;&gt;events &lt;/a&gt; (pdf) planned for GWB&apos;s impending visit to the UK.  Police are estimating 100,000 plus demonstrators for his visit, and London&apos;s Mayor says of American requests for an exclusion zone to protect him, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3260415.stm&quot;&gt;&apos;I don&apos;t think that&apos;s got a chance at all&apos;&lt;/a&gt;.  How does this level of grass-roots dissent compare to his reception when out and about in the US?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29521</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:10:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>GWBush</category>
		<category>london</category>
		<category>protest</category>
		<dc:creator>punilux</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The view is nice from the yacht</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26046/The%2Dview%2Dis%2Dnice%2Dfrom%2Dthe%2Dyacht</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/29/politics/29CHIL.html"&gt;The bait and switch.&lt;/a&gt; A last-minute revision by House and Senate leaders in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&amp;c=StoryFT&amp;cid=1051390020618&amp;p=1012571727085&quot;&gt;tax bill&lt;/a&gt; that President Bush signed today will prevent millions of minimum-wage families from receiving the increased child credit that is in the measure.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26046</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 06:14:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>childcredit</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>gwbush</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poverty</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>trickledown</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>four panels</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Battle for American Science</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25301/The%2DBattle%2Dfor%2DAmerican%2DScience</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/feature/story/0,13026,933055,00.html"&gt;Oh, God!&lt;/a&gt; Under the Bush administration there were a lot of things we had to forget, things like how democratic presidents get elected, how to sell democracy to undemocratic peoples, how to be free, patriotic, etc. Now, it seems, is the time to forget all about this menace to mankind: SCIENCE.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25301</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2003 07:18:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bushadministration</category>
		<category>controversy</category>
		<category>creationism</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>gwbush</category>
		<category>intelligentdesign</category>
		<category>patriotism</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>acrobat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The President might ask himself,</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24795/The%2DPresident%2Dmight%2Dask%2Dhimself</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/story/0,9171,1101030127-409553,00.html"&gt;How Affirmative Action Helped George W. Bush...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;
President might  ask himself, &lt;i&gt;&quot;Wait a minute. How did I get into Yale?&quot;&lt;/i&gt; It wasn&apos;t because of any academic achievement, It wasn&apos;t because of his life experience&#8212; prosperous family, fancy prep school &#8212;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;George W. Bush, in fact, may be the most spectacular affirmative-action success story of all time...&lt;/b&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24795</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 23:51:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>affirmativeaction</category>
		<category>GWBush</category>
		<dc:creator>bureaustyle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Terry Jones Monty Python Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23353/Terry%2DJones%2DMonty%2DPython%2DObserver</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.observer.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903,882459,00.html"&gt;Terry Jones of Monty Python fame attempts to apply the Bush administration policy to his own neighborhood.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23353</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2003 21:31:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>gwbush</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>python</category>
		<category>satire</category>
		<category>terryjones</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>thedailygrowl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Powell&apos;s address to the UN</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23335/Powells%2Daddress%2Dto%2Dthe%2DUN</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2003/02/1570360_comment.php"&gt;Powell&apos;s address to the UN.&lt;/a&gt; In a direct, long and rich presentation, Colin Powell has laid the cards on the table, and presented what&apos;s likely to be our most explicit case for war. While it&apos;s difficult to separate the larger issue of War on Iraq from just this presentation, I&apos;m interested in other takes on Powell&apos;s speech. Anything substantially new? Truly irrefutable? Strong enough to justify immediate action? Does this have more heft coming from Powell (considering &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/ap/20030204/ap_wo_en_po/na_gen_us_iraq_poll_1&quot;&gt;he&apos;s more trusted&lt;/a&gt; than Bush on this issue), or is he acting as a mouthpiece? Or, to be succinct, did Colin change anyone&apos;s mind? At the very least, he satisfied my need to know more about why our administration is acting so urgently.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23335</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2003 10:44:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>colinpowell</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwbush</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>powell</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>kokogiak</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The tide is turning.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22957/The%2Dtide%2Dis%2Dturning</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=170"&gt;The tide is turning. &lt;/a&gt; A &lt;a href=&quot;http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=170&quot;&gt;new poll&lt;/a&gt; from the Pew Research Center indicates that the Bush Administration is losing support for a war against Iraq, with only 29% favoring war if U.N. inspectors fail to find weapons of mass destruction. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,879104,00.html&quot;&gt;Polls are looking considerably worse in Great Britain&lt;/a&gt;, where 47% of the public disapprove of an attack on Iraq, compared to just 30% in favor of such an attack. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/commons/story/0,9061,879196,00.html&quot;&gt;Blair is certain that he can get the British public to support war&lt;/a&gt;, however, even if Britain goes to war &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19221-2003Jan20.html&quot;&gt;without U.N. support&lt;/a&gt;.

 &lt;i&gt;&quot;When and if that time came, people would find the reasons acceptable and satisfactory &lt;b&gt;because there is no other route available to us.&lt;/b&gt;&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22957</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:14:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwbush</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>opinion</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>uspolitics</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>insomnia_lj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20932/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/10/18/iraq.usa.actor.reut/"&gt;Sean Penn totally disses President Bush in the Washington Post&lt;/a&gt; but because he did it in a full page ad and not an op/ed column it is totally unlinkable to those of use on the web, and therefore dies on the vine.

Two questions: How can one find the full transcript to Penn&apos;s advertisment, and why is it that only Republican movie stars are allowed have their voices heard in political discussions?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20932</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2002 15:30:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ad</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWBush</category>
		<category>oped</category>
		<category>SeanPenn</category>
		<dc:creator>tsarfan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20812/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14635-2002Oct11.html"&gt;Bush Doubted on 9/11 Panel&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Angry lawmakers accused the White House yesterday of secretly trying to derail creation of an independent commission to investigate the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks while professing to support the idea. The White House responded by renewing its pledge of support for the proposal and suggesting an agreement was near.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20812</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2002 03:15:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>911commission</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>gwbush</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>september11</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>terrorists</category>
		<category>wapo</category>
		<dc:creator>tranceformer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13765/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.org/initiatives/patriot/index.asp"&gt;Register as a Patriot!&lt;/a&gt; Quote: As part of the Bush Administration&apos;s ongoing efforts to obliterate all traces of terrorism in the United States, the Department of Justice has commenced registration* of each and every American Patriot. By registering all non-terrorists within our borders, it is our intention to make use of the process of elimination to identify the evil ones who walk among us. If you are a non-terrorist (American Patriot), your participation is required. &quot;  (It&apos;s a joke kids, John Ashcroft doesn&apos;t really expect you to register...yet.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13765</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2002 10:44:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bushadministration</category>
		<category>DOJ</category>
		<category>gwbush</category>
		<category>johnashcroft</category>
		<category>patriot</category>
		<category>patriotism</category>
		<category>patriotregistration</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7950/</link>
		<description> How to brew up a new cold war: &lt;a href=&quot;http://robots.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/05/28/bush.russia/index.html&quot;&gt;arm up some rivals and burn a treaty in exchange for setting up a global missle defense system&lt;/a&gt;. Can anyone find an upside to this story? Why could this be a good thing for the US and the rest of the world?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7950</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2001 23:43:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ABM</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>GWBush</category>
		<category>missile</category>
		<category>Putin</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<category>Russia</category>
		<category>treaty</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


