<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with hackers and copyright</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/hackers+copyright</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'hackers' and 'copyright' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2001 07:46:27 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2001 07:46:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12031/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/20011102/tc/movie_industry_dealt_dvd-cracking_blow_1.html"&gt;Hackers win round one!&lt;/a&gt; Feel free to post DeCSS to this thread; it is no longer illegal.&lt;br&gt;What, if anything, does this mean to the movie industry?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12031</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2001 07:46:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>code</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>decryption</category>
		<category>decss</category>
		<category>dmca</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>mpaa</category>
		<dc:creator>TiggleTaggleTiger</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11054/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fuckedcompany.com/extras/riaa_email.cfm"&gt;The War Against MP3?&lt;/a&gt; Hilary Rosen, everyone&apos;s favourite defender of record company hegemony, outlines her new strategy (&quot;Help me help you.&quot;) in an email leaked to &lt;i&gt;FuckedCompany&lt;/i&gt;. Interestingly, it&apos;s aimed at beating the dastardly hackers at their own game, with tactics such as &quot;Spoofing and/or interdiction methods for existing peer to peers&quot;. Signs of desparation on the part of the RIAA, or should people be making the most of the second-generation Napster clones while they have a chance?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11054</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2001 09:30:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>hilaryrosen</category>
		<category>mp3</category>
		<category>napster</category>
		<category>p2p</category>
		<category>pirates</category>
		<category>riaa</category>
		<category>rosen</category>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3695/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20001014/tc/free_kevin_mitnick_oh_he_is__1.html"&gt;FREE KEVIN MITNICK! (oh, he is?) &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Yahoo Internet Life interview with Mitnick (shh about posting stories from big sites). Interesting: how clueless he appears to be about the commercial web (and other post-1995 internet developments). Be very strange to go to jail when we did for what he did and, really, miss out ...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3695</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2000 18:17:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>kevinmitnick</category>
		<dc:creator>sylloge</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3277/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www2.linuxjournal.com/articles/misc/0022.html"&gt;&quot;Boycott hacksdmi.org&quot;&lt;/a&gt; [I can&apos;t believe the idiots at SDMI thought this was actually going to accomplish anything anyway.]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3277</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2000 21:03:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>boycott</category>
		<category>copyprotection</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>hacking</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>SDMI</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/292/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,32263,00.html"&gt;So the DVD copy protection was cracked,&lt;/a&gt; and it&apos;s interesting to hear the comments from the industry. The DVD Forum&apos;s release makes the hackers sound awful. The DVD folks feel like they&apos;ve been ripped off. Can&apos;t these motion picture and DVD industry folks see this as a good thing? A couple hackers decrypted what was supposed to be a secure format and they&apos;re horrified? They should be horrified at the idiots that created the weak &apos;protection&apos; in the first place. These hackers just did the industry a great service. They found a gaping security hole before good recordable DVDs ever came out! I&apos;m surprised hackers are vilified instead of being offered lucrative positions as security experts.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.292</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1999 10:15:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyprotection</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>DVD</category>
		<category>DVDs</category>
		<category>hacked</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


