<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with hoax and NASA</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/hoax+NASA</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'hoax' and 'NASA' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:30:22 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:30:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Mythbusters takes on the Moon Hoax!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/77556/Mythbusters%2Dtakes%2Don%2Dthe%2DMoon%2DHoax</link>
		<description> Has man really set foot on the moon?  There have certainly been a lot of claims that the whole Apollo missions were one giant hoax.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/user/MoonMythBusted&quot;&gt;Adam and Jamie at Mythbusters&lt;/a&gt; examine the claims of the Hoax Believers one by one.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-DQPgHkD8A&amp;feature=channel_page&quot;&gt;Did they use a wire rig or slow down the film&lt;/a&gt; to simulate the 1/6 moon gravity?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyyjolYQnnQ&amp;feature=channel&quot;&gt;What would it look like in real 1/6 G?&lt;/a&gt;  Would a footprint in the lunar regolith have maintained it&apos;s shape &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-W9CO1k7UY&amp;feature=channel_page&quot;&gt;even if there was no moisture&lt;/a&gt; to keep the material together?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EMr8H1vmOo&amp;feature=channel_page&quot;&gt;Why was the flag waving so much&lt;/a&gt; if there was no wind on the moon?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YHBr7yvhwY&amp;feature=channel_page&quot;&gt;Why are the shadows on the moon not parallel&lt;/a&gt; if they are coming from a single light source?  Why can we see the astronauts when they are in shadows if there isn&apos;t a second light source? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orvMZn8L1f0&amp;feature=email&quot;&gt;To finish it all off they shoot a laser at the moon&lt;/a&gt; to see if the reflector they supposedly left there is actually there.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.77556</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:30:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adamsavage</category>
		<category>apollo</category>
		<category>asavage</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>lunar</category>
		<category>moon</category>
		<category>mythbusters</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<dc:creator>Sir Mildred Pierce</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>They&apos;re out there, by which I mean the crazy people who believe in aliens.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55527/Theyre%2Dout%2Dthere%2Dby%2Dwhich%2DI%2Dmean%2Dthe%2Dcrazy%2Dpeople%2Dwho%2Dbelieve%2Din%2Daliens</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://topufo.com/"&gt;Directory of UFO/aliens/crop circle videos.&lt;/a&gt; From the &lt;a href=&quot;http://topufo.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=154&amp;Itemid=28&quot;&gt;really lame fakes&lt;/a&gt; to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://topufo.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=91&amp;Itemid=28&quot;&gt;completely misinterpreted&lt;/a&gt; (watch the time counter) to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://topufo.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=110&amp;Itemid=28&quot;&gt;kind of neat to watch, but not exactly any sort of proof&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55527</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:33:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aliens</category>
		<category>bems</category>
		<category>fakes</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>littlegreenmen</category>
		<category>nasa</category>
		<category>ufo</category>
		<dc:creator>Kickstart70</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Did NASA fake the moon landings?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35323/Did%2DNASA%2Dfake%2Dthe%2Dmoon%2Dlandings</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.brainsluice.com/miscellanea/misc/moonlanding.html"&gt;Did NASA fake the moon landings?&lt;/a&gt; I&apos;m convinced!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35323</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:26:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fake</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>moon</category>
		<category>moonlanding</category>
		<category>nasa</category>
		<dc:creator>glenwood</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21456/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2410431.stm"&gt;NASA Challenges Moon Hoax Conspiracy&lt;/a&gt; After decades of almost ignoring claims that the Apollo missions were hoaxed, NASA commissioned aerospace writer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jamesoberg.com/&quot;&gt;James Olberg&lt;/a&gt; to write an official rebuttle.  Perhaps a bit more reasonable than the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasastooge.fsnet.co.uk/&quot;&gt;NASA Stooge&lt;/a&gt;, the book is aimed at the general public.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21456</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:25:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Apollo</category>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>ConspiracyTheory</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>JamesOberg</category>
		<category>Luna</category>
		<category>LunarLanding</category>
		<category>Moon</category>
		<category>MoonLanding</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<dc:creator>KirkJobSluder</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6556/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html"&gt;Conspiracy or not?&lt;/a&gt; Convinced to sit and watch FOX&apos;s show on whether we landed on the moon, I found myself wondering why &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/02/19/nasa.moon/index.html&quot;&gt; there was no evidence&lt;/a&gt; against the hoax presented.   Is this is clearly &lt;a href=&quot;http://science.krishna.org/Articles/2000/12/00227.html&quot;&gt; another &lt;/a&gt; feed on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.empusa.clara.net/lunar/lunar1.htm&quot;&gt;conspiracy theories&lt;/a&gt; surrounding JFK&apos;s administration?  Or was it just another &quot;When cars attack?&quot;  (If so, I didn&apos;t find this as funny)



 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6556</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2001 06:39:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apollo</category>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>FOX</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>moonlanding</category>
		<category>nasa</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<category>spaceflight</category>
		<dc:creator>samsara</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


