<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with hoax and moonlanding</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/hoax+moonlanding</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'hoax' and 'moonlanding' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:26:11 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:26:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Did NASA fake the moon landings?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35323/Did%2DNASA%2Dfake%2Dthe%2Dmoon%2Dlandings</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.brainsluice.com/miscellanea/misc/moonlanding.html"&gt;Did NASA fake the moon landings?&lt;/a&gt; I&apos;m convinced!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35323</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:26:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fake</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>moon</category>
		<category>moonlanding</category>
		<category>nasa</category>
		<dc:creator>glenwood</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21456/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2410431.stm"&gt;NASA Challenges Moon Hoax Conspiracy&lt;/a&gt; After decades of almost ignoring claims that the Apollo missions were hoaxed, NASA commissioned aerospace writer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jamesoberg.com/&quot;&gt;James Olberg&lt;/a&gt; to write an official rebuttle.  Perhaps a bit more reasonable than the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasastooge.fsnet.co.uk/&quot;&gt;NASA Stooge&lt;/a&gt;, the book is aimed at the general public.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21456</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:25:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Apollo</category>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>ConspiracyTheory</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>JamesOberg</category>
		<category>Luna</category>
		<category>LunarLanding</category>
		<category>Moon</category>
		<category>MoonLanding</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<dc:creator>KirkJobSluder</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6556/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html"&gt;Conspiracy or not?&lt;/a&gt; Convinced to sit and watch FOX&apos;s show on whether we landed on the moon, I found myself wondering why &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/02/19/nasa.moon/index.html&quot;&gt; there was no evidence&lt;/a&gt; against the hoax presented.   Is this is clearly &lt;a href=&quot;http://science.krishna.org/Articles/2000/12/00227.html&quot;&gt; another &lt;/a&gt; feed on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.empusa.clara.net/lunar/lunar1.htm&quot;&gt;conspiracy theories&lt;/a&gt; surrounding JFK&apos;s administration?  Or was it just another &quot;When cars attack?&quot;  (If so, I didn&apos;t find this as funny)



 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6556</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2001 06:39:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apollo</category>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>FOX</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>moonlanding</category>
		<category>nasa</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<category>spaceflight</category>
		<dc:creator>samsara</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3581/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wirednews.com/wired/archive/2.09/moon.land_pr.html"&gt;Some people still believe that the Moon landings were faked.&lt;/a&gt;  Some actually believe an even more disturbing scenario:   that in fact a &quot;World Government&quot; has secretly colonized the Moon and Mars.  This is the premise of the &lt;i&gt;&quot;Alternative Three&quot;&lt;/i&gt; conspiracy theory.  Interestingly enough, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://helix.ucsd.edu/~aboese/alt3.html&quot;&gt;&quot;documentary&quot;&lt;/a&gt; that spawned this theory was admittedly a hoax (Copyright April 1, 1977), and so was the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ufomind.com/ufo/updates/1999/mar/m23-012.shtml&quot;&gt;book that followed it&lt;/a&gt;.  However, it seems that even the author has been having a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ufomind.com/ufo/updates/2000/aug/m29-001.shtml&quot;&gt;hard time convincing believers&lt;/a&gt; that it was indeed a hoax.  Well, why don&apos;t you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thule.org/alt3.html&quot;&gt;see for yourself?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3581</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2000 16:31:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alternativethree</category>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>moonlanding</category>
		<dc:creator>costas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


