<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with homelandsecurity and Bush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/homelandsecurity+Bush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'homelandsecurity' and 'Bush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:36:19 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:36:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Threat Level Elevated</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84319/Threat%2DLevel%2DElevated</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.usnews.com/blogs/washington-whispers/2009/08/19/tom-ridge-on-national-security-after-911.html"&gt;US News reports that in a new tell-all book, Tom Ridge admits manipulating terror threat levels for political motives.&lt;/a&gt; In the forthcoming book, Ridge reportedly acknowledges for the first time that he was pushed to raise the security alert on the eve of President Bush&apos;s re-election, something he &quot;saw as politically motivated and worth resigning over.&quot; But as &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/08/dont_cry_for_tom_ridge.php&quot;&gt;The Atlantic&lt;/a&gt; points out, Ridge apparently gave in to the White House demands anyway, resigning only after the election. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/20/tom-ridge-i-was-pressured_n_264127.html&quot;&gt;Huffington Post&lt;/a&gt; also provides additional discussion on this developing story.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84319</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:36:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>booktours</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>ducttape</category>
		<category>homelandsecurity</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>politicsfilter</category>
		<category>prstunt</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>tomridge</category>
		<dc:creator>saulgoodman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>GWOT in the Stacks</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47680/GWOT%2Din%2Dthe%2DStacks</link>
		<description> [TotalitarianismFilter] &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/12-05/12-17-05/a09lo650.htm&quot;&gt;Don&apos;t  be asking your college librarian&lt;/a&gt; for a copy of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/083512388X/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;that Little Red Book&lt;/a&gt; to do a class assignment, or your parents might get a visit from the good folks at the Department of Homeland Security.  More evidence that the Bush administration cannot restrain itself when granted &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/17/bush.radio/&quot;&gt;enhanced surveillance powers&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47680</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 09:41:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>academia</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Communism</category>
		<category>freedom</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>libraries</category>
		<category>Mao</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>PatriotAct</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>totalitarianism</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Terror Alert: Yellow!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41933/Terror%2DAlert%2DYellow</link>
		<description> Be afraid:  The national threat-alert level today is yellow or &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/&quot;&gt;elevated&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; with &quot;significant risk of terrorist attacks,&quot; says the Department of Homeland Security.  In fact, the alert level has been elevated since December of 2003, when it was raised from orange.  During the election season, the Fox News network flashed the terror alert level in their &quot;crawl&quot; as if there was breaking news -- the sort of thing that prompted some liberal &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opednews.com/wade_071904_warning.htm&quot;&gt;wags&lt;/a&gt; to ridicule the entire system. Now former DHS secretary Tom Ridge says that &lt;a href=&quot;http://usatoday.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&amp;title=USATODAY.com+-+Ridge+reveals+clashes+on+alerts&amp;expire=&amp;urlID=14193111&amp;fb=Y&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usatoday.com%2Fnews%2Fwashington%2F2005-05-10-ridge-alerts_x.htm&amp;partnerID=1660&quot;&gt;the Bush administration was &quot;really aggressive&quot; about raising the threat-alert level&lt;/a&gt; during his tenure, even when the agency felt that the intelligence didn&apos;t warrant it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41933</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 20:49:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>homelandsecurity</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Orwell</category>
		<category>Republican</category>
		<category>Ridge</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>To establish the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21608/To%2Destablish%2Dthe%2DDepartment%2Dof%2DHomeland%2DSecurity%2Dand%2Dfor%2Dother%2Dpurposes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:HR05710:@@@L&amp;amp;summ2=m&amp;amp;"&gt;The Homeland Security Bill.&lt;/a&gt; It has passed the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/14/politics/14CONG.html&quot;&gt;House&lt;/a&gt;, on to the Senate where it is believed that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2002/11/13/homeland/index.html&quot;&gt;it will pass&lt;/a&gt;.  The President &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/deptofhomeland/&quot;&gt;will sign it&lt;/a&gt;.  Yet the text of H.R.5710 is &lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.5710:&quot;&gt;unavailable to the American public&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21608</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:48:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>departmentofhomelandsecurity</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>homelandsecurity</category>
		<category>secrecy</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>four panels</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17625/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/06/06/bush.security/index.html"&gt;Bush to announce new domestic intelligence agency.&lt;/a&gt; Just what we need, more spooks.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17625</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2002 08:02:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>domestic</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>hob</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11872/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Attacks-Holy-Warriors.html"&gt;My Opinion- &lt;/a&gt; The Director of Homeland Security that Bush appointed should have been a Muslim.  This is getting out of hand.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11872</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2001 08:04:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>homelandsecurity</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<dc:creator>Counselco</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11817/</link>
		<description> From a piece in the NYTimes today, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/25/national/25BUSH.html&quot;&gt;Home Front Is Minefield for President&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;i&gt;&quot;&lt;b&gt;The lesson we&apos;re learning&lt;/b&gt;,&quot; one administration official said today, &quot;&lt;b&gt;is that you can bomb the wrong place in Afghanistan and not take much heat for it&lt;/b&gt;. But don&apos;t mess up at the post office.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Leave it to the White House to come away with exactly the wrong interpretation. But the facts are there, too -- most Americans are more concerned about the (relatively slight) risk of getting Anthrax than the rather significant risk that, if we screw up in Afghanistan, we might lose the current coalition against terrorism, Bin Laden, and any hope for &quot;homeland security&quot; for a long time to come....  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11817</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:47:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>afghanistan</category>
		<category>anthrax</category>
		<category>binladen</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>homeland</category>
		<category>homelandsecurity</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>NYT</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>osama</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<category>WMDs</category>
		<dc:creator>mattpfeff</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


