<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with huttoninquiry</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/huttoninquiry</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'huttoninquiry' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:25:59 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:25:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Hutton Inquiry Out</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31001/Hutton%2DInquiry%2DOut</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/"&gt;The Hutton Inquiry has concluded its investigation.&lt;/a&gt; It unanimously vindicates the British Government, castigates the BBC for lying and criticising the Government&apos;s honour, and mildly criticises some aspects of the Intelligence services and Dr. David Kelly himself.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dracos.co.uk/hutton/&quot;&gt;An accessible PDF to HTML version of the Hutton website&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/hutton/&quot;&gt;The Guardian&apos;s Hutton site&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk/2003/david_kelly_inquiry/default.stm&quot;&gt;The BBC&apos;s Hutton site&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.google.co.uk/news?hl=en&amp;edition=uk&amp;q=Hutton&amp;btnG=Search+News&quot;&gt;Google News UK&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31001</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:25:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DavidKelly</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>Hutton</category>
		<category>HuttonInquiry</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>report</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>Blue Stone</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>BBC invests in Google</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30975/BBC%2Dinvests%2Din%2DGoogle</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://media.guardian.co.uk/bbc/story/0,7521,1130050,00.html"&gt;The BBC is buying up search terms&lt;/a&gt; for &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/&quot; title=&quot;Offical Hutton Inquiry site&quot;&gt;Hutton Inquiry&lt;/a&gt;&apos; and &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk/2003/david_kelly_inquiry/default.stm&quot; title=&quot;BBC&apos;s in-depth coverage&quot;&gt;Hutton Report&lt;/a&gt;&apos; through Google&apos;s Adwords service.

I see this almost as the online journalistic equivalent of a government sexing up dossiers, and a first for any news organisation, according to the Guardian. Regardless of your (or Hutton&apos;s) opinion of the BBC&apos;s role in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/weblog/special/0,10627,1002839,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Guardian weblog&quot;&gt;Kelly affair&lt;/a&gt;, I don&apos;t see how they can possibly justify trying to control where people get their news from, especially as Hutton is almost certain to find the corporation (well, &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/kelly/story/0,13747,1025912,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Guardian&apos;s Hutton Inquiry witness profile of Gilligan&quot;&gt;Andrew&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3082323.stm&quot; title=&quot;BBC profile&quot;&gt;Gilligan&lt;/a&gt; anyway) to be a contributing factor in Kelly&apos;s suicide.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30975</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:16:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>davidkelly</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>huttoninquiry</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<dc:creator>cbrody</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


