<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with icann and internet</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/icann+internet</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'icann' and 'internet' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:40:29 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:40:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The dry, technical language of Microsoft&apos;s October update did not indicate anything particularly untoward.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82489/The%2Ddry%2Dtechnical%2Dlanguage%2Dof%2DMicrosofts%2DOctober%2Dupdate%2Ddid%2Dnot%2Dindicate%2Danything%2Dparticularly%2Duntoward</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227121.500-the-inside-story-of-the-conficker-worm.html"&gt;Its reach is impossible to measure precisely, but more than 3 million vulnerable machines may ultimately have been infected.&lt;/a&gt; : The inside story on the Conficker Worm at  New Scientist.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82489</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:40:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>encryption</category>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Kaspersky</category>
		<category>malicious</category>
		<category>Malware</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Security</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<category>TrendMicro</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>worm</category>
		<category>Zombiebotarmy</category>
		<dc:creator>The Whelk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>ICANN has been under pressure</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72841/ICANN%2Dhas%2Dbeen%2Dunder%2Dpressure</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jienXKDbIYHNPcywgq84IqyHtbPw"&gt;The popular online trading site eBay is one of the many companies that wants to have its own domain name.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;PARIS (AFP) &#8212; Web regulators Thursday voted to allow the creation of thousands of new &lt;strike&gt;domain names&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-level_domain&quot;&gt;top-level domains&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;, from .paris to .Pepsi, in one of the biggest shake-ups in Internet history, a French web official said.&lt;/em&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72841</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:21:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dns</category>
		<category>icann</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>tld</category>
		<dc:creator>finite</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Verisign and ICANN</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49358/Verisign%2Dand%2DICANN</link>
		<description> Bob Parsons of Go Daddy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bobparsons.com/dotcomscam.html&quot;&gt;warns &lt;/a&gt;about the proposed contract between VeriSign and ICANN, allowing VeriSign a permanent monopoly on .COM and price increases without regulation.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49358</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:18:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>.com</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>GoDaddy</category>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>VeriSign</category>
		<dc:creator>Protocols of the Elders of Awesome</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Keep Internet out of UN control, says US</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46008/Keep%2DInternet%2Dout%2Dof%2DUN%2Dcontrol%2Dsays%2DUS</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/0,39020369,39231613,00.htm"&gt;The Bush administration is backing a US Senate resolution to stop the UN in its plans to try and move some control of the Internet away from the US&lt;/a&gt; -- A new resolution introduced in the U.S. Senate offers political backing to the Bush administration by slamming a United Nations effort to exert more influence over the Internet.
	
Senator Norm Coleman, a Republican from Minnesota, said his nonbinding resolution would protect the Internet from a takeover by the United Nations that&apos;s scheduled to be discussed at a summit in Tunisia next month.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46008</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 07:54:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>coleman</category>
		<category>control</category>
		<category>icann</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>nations</category>
		<category>norm</category>
		<category>resolution</category>
		<category>un</category>
		<category>united</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>zouhair</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18077/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verisign.com/&quot;&gt;Verisign&lt;/a&gt; (aka &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verisignoff.org/&quot;&gt;Satan&lt;/a&gt;) is set to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/15/technology/15NET.html&quot;&gt;relinquish the management of the .org domain&lt;/a&gt; pool this week, after agreeing to drop both the .org and .net registries to keep the .com one until 2007. &lt;a href=&quot;http://videolab.uoregon.edu/events/ICANN/icann_bucharest.html&quot;&gt;ICANN is meeting on it this week &lt;/a&gt; (webcast). The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/applications/&quot;&gt;list of all interested parties with competing applications is here&lt;/a&gt;, but personally I&apos;m pulling for Carl from &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.org/&quot;&gt;media.org&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s proposal for &lt;a href=&quot;http://not.invisible.net/MT/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=55&quot;&gt;a public trust&lt;/a&gt;. For anyone that owns a .org domain, this is one to watch.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18077</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2002 16:06:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>.org</category>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>topleveldomains</category>
		<category>verisign</category>
		<category>www</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17796/</link>
		<description> Are national &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.lycos.com/news/story.asp?section=Internet&amp;storyId=437519&quot;&gt;governments&lt;/a&gt; about to &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.lycos.com/news/story.asp?section=Internet&amp;storyId=437539&quot;&gt;take over &lt;/a&gt;the Internet?  Has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icann.org/&quot;&gt;ICANN&lt;/a&gt; done such a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,50670,00.html&quot;&gt;terrible&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,51138,00.html&quot;&gt;job&lt;/a&gt; that they should be permitted to?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17796</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:49:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>control</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>international</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>tech</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4449/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/14999.html"&gt;Maybe ICANN really can&apos;t.&lt;/a&gt; There may be a revolt among all those Europeans who think that they own their parts of the Internet. (Who do they think they are, anyway? Don&apos;t they realize that they&apos;re just electronic colonies of the US?)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually, I&apos;m with them; I think ICANN is getting just a little too full of itself.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4449</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2000 08:14:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>icann</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>tld</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4323/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/apf/001116/internet_n.html"&gt;johnsmith.name and many more silly new suffixes.&lt;/a&gt; Do we need this many? I have yet to see anything good with the previous additions, it all looks a bit like those http://take.me.to/, http://fly.to redirectional services.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4323</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2000 05:31:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>.name</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>domain</category>
		<category>doublepost</category>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>suffixes</category>
		<category>TLD</category>
		<dc:creator>tiaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4176/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.icann.org/tlds/report/"&gt;New top level domains?&lt;/a&gt; It looks like we&apos;re one step closer to the creation of some new domains. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icann.org/&quot;&gt;ICANN&lt;/a&gt; has posted their staff recommendations. How did your favorite fare?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4176</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2000 05:37:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>TLD</category>
		<dc:creator>Aaaugh!</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2548/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.icann.org/minutes/prelim-report-16jul00.htm"&gt;ICANN&apos;s Report on new Top Level Domains&lt;/a&gt; came out a few days ago, and I saw a list in a paper of some of the new proposed TLDs. These include: .shop, .travel, .news, .sex or .xxx, .web, .arts, .store. Two things worthy of discussion - what&apos;s the difference between .shop .store and .web (and where are other CONTENT based divisions such as .gay, .fan, .info, .zine, .kids) and secondly, why are these supposedly GLOBAL domain names all in full uncompressed English?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2548</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2000 06:50:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>TLD</category>
		<dc:creator>barbelith</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1611/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bizreport.com/daily/2000/04/20000428-5.htm"&gt;To continue the theme, &lt;/a&gt;  Yahoo starts going after &quot;sound-alike&quot; domains with a little help from ICANN.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1611</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2000 10:34:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>DomainNames</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/199/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/HOME/BUSINESS/CUTTING/t000089117.html"&gt;Due to the recent truce between the ICANN and NSI, new suffixes may be&lt;/a&gt; prevented from ever being allowed or at least delayed. It&apos;s a shame, because good URLs are running out fast and domain squatters are making a killing.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.199</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 1999 23:11:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>.com</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>icann</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>nsi</category>
		<category>suffixes</category>
		<category>urls</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


