<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with imports</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/imports</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'imports' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:49:20 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:49:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>FDA detains Chinese food imports.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60785/FDA%2Ddetains%2DChinese%2Dfood%2Dimports</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fda.gov/ora/fiars/ora_import_ia9929.html"&gt;Melamine found in almost half of all Chinese food imports now on the banned list.&lt;/a&gt; The Food and Drug Administration is enforcing a new import alert that greatly expands its curtailment of some food ingredients imported from China, authorizing border inspectors to detain ingredients used in everything from noodles to breakfast bars. The FDA has also announced that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=14&amp;click_id=125&amp;art_id=vn20070430234643595C200510&quot;&gt;melamine laced products &lt;/a&gt;have found their way into the human consumption cycle via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2007/NEW01621.html&quot;&gt;poultry &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.northcountrygazette.org/news/2007/05/01/cosumer-safety/&quot;&gt;pork&lt;/a&gt;.    Interesting to note that the budget for FDA inspections is at it&apos;s lowest level ever, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2007-03-18-food-safety-usat_N.htm&quot;&gt;that only 1% of all imports actually get inspected&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.60785</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:49:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>budgets</category>
		<category>FDA</category>
		<category>food</category>
		<category>foodadditives</category>
		<category>foodrecalls</category>
		<category>foodsafety</category>
		<category>imports</category>
		<category>melamine</category>
		<category>petdeaths</category>
		<category>regulations</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>mmm... chocolate covered scorpions...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28089/mmm%2Dchocolate%2Dcovered%2Dscorpions</link>
		<description> tibetan yak butter, reindeer hash, crocodile pat&amp;#0233;, and smoked cobra. All this and more at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edible.com&quot;&gt;edible.com&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28089</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2003 16:26:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>british</category>
		<category>cobra</category>
		<category>crocodile</category>
		<category>edible</category>
		<category>exotic</category>
		<category>food</category>
		<category>imports</category>
		<category>reindeer</category>
		<category>yak</category>
		<dc:creator>crunchland</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20955/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dickies-europe.com/"&gt;Damn La Difference!&lt;/a&gt; Europe (&lt;small&gt;and apparently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.la-tune.com/dickies/dickies-Frameset.htm&quot;&gt;Japan&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;) seem to be going through a &lt;b&gt;Dickies craze&lt;/b&gt;. You say &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dickies.com/web/default.asp&quot;&gt;work wear&lt;/a&gt;; we say American &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-duke.co.uk/&quot;&gt;blue-collar chic&lt;/a&gt;.  You pay &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dickies4less.com/Dickies/index.htm&quot;&gt;$20&lt;/a&gt; for an industrial shirt; we pay &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dickies-uk.co.uk/indexc.jphtml&quot;&gt;$100&lt;/a&gt;. Should we call the whole thing off? [&lt;small&gt;&lt;i&gt;More inside&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20955</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2002 06:55:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bluecollarchic</category>
		<category>clothing</category>
		<category>dickies</category>
		<category>europe</category>
		<category>exports</category>
		<category>fads</category>
		<category>fashion</category>
		<category>imports</category>
		<category>japan</category>
		<category>style</category>
		<category>trends</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15301/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&amp;amp;c=Article&amp;amp;cid=FT36HQQ6GYC&amp;amp;live=true&amp;amp;tagid=IXLYK5HZ8CC"&gt;Trade Wars&lt;/a&gt; Bush imposes import tariffs on steel, something I didn&apos;t really expect coming from the administration.  Dangerous precedent or useful bulwark against laissez-faire globalization?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15301</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2002 16:12:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>imports</category>
		<category>steel</category>
		<category>tariffs</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14112/</link>
		<description> Last week, the WTO &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/44698.html&quot;&gt;ruled&lt;/a&gt; against a corporate welfare program for US exporters (&lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/news/nation-world/html98/fisc_20000224.html&quot;&gt;again&lt;/a&gt;). This week, a Canadian hemp company &lt;a href=&quot;http://ens.lycos.com/ens/jan2002/2002L-01-14-05.html&quot;&gt;claims&lt;/a&gt; the US owes them US$20m under NAFTA for harrassment and impinging on future returns.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14112</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:38:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Canada</category>
		<category>exports</category>
		<category>hemp</category>
		<category>imports</category>
		<category>NAFTA</category>
		<category>tariffs</category>
		<category>trade</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WTO</category>
		<dc:creator>raaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12506/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/business/newsid_1665000/1665890.stm"&gt;&quot;We have always maintained that we have the right to decide the way in which we distribute our products to best serve our customers.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; (Especially at a 100% markup.) Levi Strauss celebrates an EU judgement on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.derwent.com/ipmatters/interviews/hugh_brett.html&quot;&gt;parallel imports&lt;/a&gt; that protects their ability to sell $40 jeans for &#xa3;50 in the UK. In an era of online storefronts, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aol.co.uk/webcentres/travel/location/lr_newyork.html&quot;&gt;transatlantic shopping trips&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oneswoop.com/&quot;&gt;continental car sales&lt;/a&gt;, can these new brand-based tariff barriers really hold up?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12506</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2001 09:30:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>EU</category>
		<category>imports</category>
		<category>Levis</category>
		<category>LeviStrauss</category>
		<category>tariffs</category>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


