<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with intel and p4</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/intel+p4</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'intel' and 'p4' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2001 06:30:13 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2001 06:30:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9685/</link>
		<description> The &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1524&quot;&gt;reviews&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.tech-report.com/reviews/2001q3/pentium4-2ghz/index.x?pg=1&quot;&gt;for&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;A HREF=&quot;http://hardocp.com/reviews/cpus/intel/p42ghz/&quot;&gt;the&lt;/A&gt; 2GHZ
Pentium 4 are out.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9685</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2001 06:30:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2Gigahertz</category>
		<category>Anandtech</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Intel</category>
		<category>P4</category>
		<category>Pentium4</category>
		<category>processor</category>
		<dc:creator>machaus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4367/</link>
		<description> It&apos;s officially the 20th of November (some places) and the P4 NDA&apos;s have lifted. Here come the reviews!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=1360&amp;p=14&quot;&gt;Anandtech&lt;/a&gt; gives it poor marks. On a lot of tests it gets creamed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hardocp.com/reviews/cpus/intel/pentiumfour15z/&quot;&gt;HardOCP&lt;/a&gt; is more kind, but does a much less comprehensive test against a must less formidable competitor.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gamepc.com/reviews/hardware_review.asp?review=pentium4&amp;page=1&amp;mscssid=&amp;tp=&quot;&gt;GamePC&lt;/a&gt; gives it a &quot;thumbs down&quot;.&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m still waiting for Tom Pabst&apos;s review; I expect it to be brutal.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4367</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2000 23:37:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>benchmark</category>
		<category>hardware</category>
		<category>intel</category>
		<category>p4</category>
		<category>pentium4</category>
		<category>review</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4338/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/14822.html"&gt;On Monday the Intel P4 becomes commercially available&lt;/a&gt; in systems from three vendors. The prices were supposed to be secret but they&apos;ve been leaked. &lt;u&gt;Wait until you see them.&lt;/u&gt; They &lt;i&gt;&lt;u&gt;can&apos;t&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/i&gt; be serious; do they actually think they&apos;re going to sell even one of these things, let alone large numbers of them, at those kinds of prices?
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4338</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2000 13:54:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>intel</category>
		<category>p4</category>
		<category>price</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3983/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.inqst.com/articles/athlonddr/athlonddr.htm"&gt;Athlon + DDR:&lt;/a&gt; Bert McComas is a &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; highly respected analyst of the CPU and memory industry, and I always read his articles with great interest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Intel has announced that they don&apos;t expect the P4 to be a significant part of their business until late 2001. According to McComas, if they don&apos;t change that plan, AMD is going to eat them for lunch, because the P3 is no longer competitive. The performance/price ratio for the new AMD stuff has to be seen to be believed. I think Intel is in major trouble, because informal reports are that a 1.5GHz P4 is about the same power as a 900 MHz P3.[more&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3983</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2000 18:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amd</category>
		<category>Athlon</category>
		<category>BertMcComas</category>
		<category>CPU</category>
		<category>DDR</category>
		<category>ghz</category>
		<category>gigahertz</category>
		<category>Intel</category>
		<category>McComas</category>
		<category>p3</category>
		<category>p4</category>
		<category>pentium</category>
		<category>processor</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


