<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with intellectualproperty</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/intellectualproperty</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'intellectualproperty' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:30:39 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:30:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>19th Century Patents -- 200 Years Later</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86525/19th%2DCentury%2DPatents%2D200%2DYears%2DLater</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202435264768&amp;src=EMC-Email&amp;et=editorial&amp;bu=Law.com&amp;pt=LAWCOM%20Newswire&amp;cn=NW_20091109&amp;kw=A%20Math%20Geek%27s%20Ride%20to%20the%20High%20Court%20in%20Landmark%20Patent%20Fight&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court is hearing arguments on the appeal of two &quot;math geeks&quot;&lt;/a&gt; who were denied a patent  for a business method they developed for utility companies.  This is one of the most watched cases of the Supreme Court term, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/08/briefs-in-bilski.html&quot;&gt;drawing some 67 briefs.&lt;/a&gt;  Although the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uspto.gov/patents/resources/methods/index.jsp&quot;&gt;patent office has recognized that business methods can be patented&lt;/a&gt;, it is not clear whether patents,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ladas.com/Patents/USPatentHistory.html&quot;&gt; developed to protect innovations like machines and transformative processes&lt;/a&gt;, are available for 21st century inventions such as software.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86525</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:30:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>patents</category>
		<category>softwaredevelopment</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<dc:creator>bearwife</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Who owns The Man?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84156/Who%2Downs%2DThe%2DMan</link>
		<description> The Electronic Frontier Foundation has published a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/08/snatching-rights-playa&quot;&gt;criticism&lt;/a&gt; of Burning Man, LLC&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://tickets2.burningman.com/info.php?i=2386&quot;&gt;Terms and Conditions&lt;/a&gt;, saying that the automatic rights assignment to BMOrg for photos &amp;amp; video taken during the event is &quot;creative lawyering intended to allow the BMO to use the streamlined &#8220;notice and takedown&#8221; process enshrined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to quickly remove photos from the Internet&quot; and that this is corrosive to our freedom of speech.  Burning Man &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.burningman.com/?p=4599#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=snatching-digital-rights-or-protecting-our-culture-burning-man-and-the-eff&quot;&gt;responds&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84156</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:14:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>burningman</category>
		<category>eff</category>
		<category>firstamendment</category>
		<category>freedomofspeech</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>ip</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<dc:creator>scalefree</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>intellectual property asshole competition</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81934/intellectual%2Dproperty%2Dasshole%2Dcompetition</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://evan-roth.com/"&gt;who&apos;s the biggest asshole?&lt;/a&gt; Obama&apos;s face vs Shepard Fairey vs Associated Press vs the rest of us.

Go &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Roth&quot;&gt;Evan Roth&lt;/a&gt; Go! </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81934</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:53:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>appropriation</category>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>asshole</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>Obama</category>
		<dc:creator>philip-random</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>If you&apos;re going to panic, panic constructively.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78734/If%2Dyoure%2Dgoing%2Dto%2Dpanic%2Dpanic%2Dconstructively</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/sterling/&quot;&gt;Bruce Sterling&lt;/a&gt;, fresh from his online State of the World 2008 discussion &lt;small&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/67881/Sterlings-World-2008&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;, delivers his succinct prognosis for the new year: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2009/01/2009_will_be_a_year_of_panic.php&quot;&gt;2009 Will Be a Year of Panic&lt;/a&gt;.  At least it&apos;s an opportunity to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2009/01/the_true_21st_century_begins.php&quot;&gt;say good-bye to the 20th century&lt;/a&gt; at last.  &lt;small&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2009/01/29/bruce-sterling-on-ou.html&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78734</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:51:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2009</category>
		<category>BruceSterling</category>
		<category>climatechange</category>
		<category>doom</category>
		<category>failedstates</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>panic</category>
		<category>precarity</category>
		<dc:creator>Doktor Zed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Can&apos;t pirate, the IP Czar will eat me</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75654/Cant%2Dpirate%2Dthe%2DIP%2DCzar%2Dwill%2Deat%2Dme</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:SN03325:@@@L&amp;amp;summ2=m&amp;amp;"&gt;The Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property (PRO-IP) Act&lt;/a&gt; has added a whole other dimension to the term &quot;copyright infringement.&quot;  Sponsored by the US entertainment industry, it allows seizure of assets &lt;em&gt;before&lt;/em&gt; the accused is found guilty and the creation of a new executive branch led by an &quot;Intellectual Property Czar&quot; who would report directly to the President on IP crimes--similar to the Drug Czar of the War on Drugs.  Financial penalties for copyright crimes have increased dramatically.  More information &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95702932&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and a summary of critiques &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080205-white-paper-pro-ip-acts-damage-increases-are-dangerous.html&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;  Is this a useful addition to the War On Copyright Infringement or just more &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95697760&quot;&gt;bureaucratic red tape&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75654</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:51:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>copyrightinfringement</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>ip</category>
		<category>ipczar</category>
		<category>pirating</category>
		<category>uspolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>schroedinger</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Girl fight</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71387/Girl%2Dfight</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.barbie.com/&quot;&gt;Barbie&lt;/a&gt; vs &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bratz.com &quot;&gt;Bratz&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/may/05/usa&quot;&gt;Mattel sues MGA&lt;/a&gt;, claiming the Bratz designs were created by a Mattel employee and smuggled to its rival.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71387</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 08:55:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Barbie</category>
		<category>Bratz</category>
		<category>dolls</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>ip</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>toys</category>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Se necesita una poca de gracia</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70979/Se%2Dnecesita%2Duna%2Dpoca%2Dde%2Dgracia</link>
		<description> &quot;I mean he quite literally -- and in no way do I exaggerate when I say -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jambase.com/Articles/Story.aspx?StoryID=9391&amp;pagenum=3&quot;&gt;[Paul Simon] stole the songs from us&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; Steve Berlin of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.loslobos.org/site/&quot;&gt;Los Lobos&lt;/a&gt; talks about the making of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulsimon.com/&quot;&gt;Paul Simon&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s triumphant 1986 comeback, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graceland_%28album%29&quot;&gt;Graceland&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, in an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jambase.com/Articles/9391/LONE-WOLF-HANGIN&apos;-WITH-STEVE-BERLIN/1&quot;&gt;interview&lt;/a&gt;  on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jambase.com/&quot;&gt;JamBase&lt;/a&gt;.  (&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wfmu.org/freeform/2008/04/rhymin-simon-no.html&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://stereogum.com/archives/video/david-byrne-does-paul-simon-the-worlds-biggest-pri_009106.html&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;) </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70979</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:28:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>allegations</category>
		<category>authorship</category>
		<category>credits</category>
		<category>graceland</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>interview</category>
		<category>IP</category>
		<category>jambase</category>
		<category>loslobos</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>paulsimon</category>
		<category>plagiarism</category>
		<category>royalties</category>
		<category>songwriter</category>
		<category>songwriting</category>
		<category>steveberlin</category>
		<category>theft</category>
		<category>uncorroborated</category>
		<dc:creator>Sys Rq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Scrabble vs. Scrabulous</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68268/Scrabble%2Dvs%2DScrabulous</link>
		<description> Toymakers Hasbro and Mattel claim that the popular online game &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/apps/application.php?id=3052170175&quot;&gt;Scrabulous&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrabulous&quot;&gt;available on Facebook&lt;/a&gt;) infringes on the trademark for the board game &lt;a href=&quot;http://scrabble.com/&quot;&gt;Scrabble&lt;/a&gt;. They have not yet filed suit, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7191264.stm&quot;&gt;have asked Facebook to desist in its alleged infringement&lt;/a&gt;. Scrabulous is one of the top ten plug-ins on the site, developed by brothers Rajat and Jayant Agarwalla in Calcutta, India. &quot;There has been speculation that the challenge to Scrabulous had been launched as Hasbro and Mattel prepare their own online version of Scrabble.&quot; Electronic Arts holds the license to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/GameOn/story?id=4145468&amp;page=1&quot;&gt;electronic rights&lt;/a&gt; to Scrabble.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/underwire/2008/01/so-long-scrabul.html&quot;&gt;Facebook users are rallying to save the game&lt;/a&gt;. Related AskMe &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/81271/Dont-Tase-Me-Hasbro&quot;&gt;thread&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68268</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:27:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ElectronicArts</category>
		<category>Facebook</category>
		<category>Hasbro</category>
		<category>IntellectualProperty</category>
		<category>IP</category>
		<category>Mattel</category>
		<category>Scrabble</category>
		<category>Scrabulous</category>
		<category>Trademark</category>
		<category>TrademarkInfringement</category>
		<dc:creator>ericb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>War on Drugs, War on Terror, War on Leaks</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67861/War%2Don%2DDrugs%2DWar%2Don%2DTerror%2DWar%2Don%2DLeaks</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/42391/"&gt;Steal this album.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;In the dying days of the music business as we once knew it, record labels are waging war on leaks&#8212;only to discover that many of the saboteurs come from within the industry itself.&quot; It&apos;s easy to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/oink_admin_arrested.php&quot;&gt;arrest a geek&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jammie_Thomas&quot;&gt;lay draconian fines on a single mom;&lt;/a&gt; what happens when their witchhunt leads to their own offices? Animal Collective won&apos;t always be around to &lt;a href=&quot;http://shamelesscomplacency.wordpress.com/category/panda-bear/&quot;&gt;get the culprits off the hook&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.67861</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:55:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<dc:creator>Coherence Panda</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Boy Howdy, what a mess</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67084/Boy%2DHowdy%2Dwhat%2Da%2Dmess</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/new-creem-retrospective-outrages-magazines-alums"&gt;You&apos;d think news of a Creem Magazine retrospective book would be greeted with cries of glee.&lt;/a&gt; You&apos;d be wrong. Occasional staff shutterbug Bob Matheu licensed rights to use the name of the beloved, iconoclastic Detroit rock zine years after it ceased to be relevant, but despite occasional &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freewilliamsburg.com/may_2003/creem.html&quot;&gt;&quot;Creem is back&quot;&lt;/a&gt; announcements, only produced a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.creemmagazine.com/index1.php&quot;&gt;website.&lt;/a&gt; But now a Creem &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0061374563/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;book&lt;/a&gt; is on the stands, and surviving &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.observer.com/2007/no-rock-love-gents-try-creem-each-other#comments&quot;&gt;contributors&lt;/a&gt; like Dave Marsh, Sue Whitall, Jaan Uhelszki and publisher&apos;s widow Connie Kramer are none too pleased with the contents. Even less happy, the guys who &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scribd.com/doc/500259/complaint1&quot;&gt;invested&lt;/a&gt; most of the money needed to re-secure the rights. But a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.observer.com/2007/no-rock-love-gents-try-creem-each-other&quot;&gt;dust up&lt;/a&gt; at a book signing? Lester would approve. More discussion &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.velvetrope.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&amp;Number=459303&amp;page=1#Post459303&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67084</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 08:12:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>creem</category>
		<category>criticism</category>
		<category>detroit</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>magazine</category>
		<category>publishing</category>
		<category>robertmatheu</category>
		<category>rock</category>
		<category>zine</category>
		<dc:creator>Scram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Putting their bandwidth where their mouth is</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63508/Putting%2Dtheir%2Dbandwidth%2Dwhere%2Dtheir%2Dmouth%2Dis</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.goodcopybadcopy.net/"&gt;Good Copy Bad Copy&lt;/a&gt; is &quot;a documentary about the current state of copyright and culture,&quot; featuring Danger Mouse, Lawrence Lessig, Dan Glickman of the MPAA and others. The film&apos;s creators are releasing it free of charge, via Bittorrent.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63508</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:09:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bittorrent</category>
		<category>downloading</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<dc:creator>jbickers</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Lessig moves on.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62296/Lessig%2Dmoves%2Don</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/003800.shtml"&gt;Lawrence Lessig moves on&lt;/a&gt; Lessig has spent the last 10 years fighting for IP reform and open culture, He&apos;s decided to focus on fighting what he calls &quot;corruption&quot; (with quotes)... the pernicious effect that moneyed interests have in crafting and controlling public policy.&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;sub&gt;Finally, I am not (as one friend wrote) &quot;leaving the movement.&quot; &quot;The movement&quot; has my loyalty as much today as ever. But I have come to believe that until a more fundamental problem is fixed, &quot;the movement&quot; can&apos;t succeed either. Compare: Imagine someone devoted to free culture coming to believe that until free software supports free culture, free culture can&apos;t succeed. So he devotes himself to building software. I am someone who believes that a free society -- free of the &quot;corruption&quot; that defines our current society -- is necessary for free culture, and much more. For that reason, I turn my energy elsewhere for now.&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62296</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:23:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>creativecommons</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>IP</category>
		<category>Lessig</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<dc:creator>delmoi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The problem with music, redux.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58347/The%2Dproblem%2Dwith%2Dmusic%2Dredux</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/14/love/print.html&quot;&gt;While Courtney&lt;/a&gt; pulled an &lt;a href=&quot;http://negativland.com/albini.html&quot;&gt;Albini&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/culture/1,65688-0.html&quot;&gt;Jeff handed out the bread&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prosoundweb.com/recording/commentary/ck/exc.php&quot;&gt;Are the peasants acting like emperors&lt;/a&gt;, or do they still want something &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.negativland.com/minidis.html&quot;&gt;shiny, aluminum, plastic, and digital&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.janisian.com/article-internet_debacle.html&quot;&gt;Debacle&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/July-August-2003/feature_zittrain_julaug03.msp&quot;&gt;cage&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.woodpecker.com/writing/essays/royalty-politics.html&quot;&gt;something&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/media/columns/medialife/6099/&quot;&gt;got&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dallasfed.org/news/research/2004/04it_anderson.pdf&quot;&gt;give&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(pdf)&lt;/small&gt;. Alternatively, you can just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/Sep02/articles/diylabel.asp&quot;&gt;roll your own&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58347</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:16:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>albini</category>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>artisnotaloafofbread</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>copyrightlaw</category>
		<category>courtneylove</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>drm</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>hole</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>ip</category>
		<category>jefftweedy</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>longtail</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>napster</category>
		<category>negativland</category>
		<category>p2p</category>
		<category>soundonsound</category>
		<category>stevealbini</category>
		<category>thelongtail</category>
		<category>wilco</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>At home he still plays with his organ from time to time</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57149/At%2Dhome%2Dhe%2Dstill%2Dplays%2Dwith%2Dhis%2Dorgan%2Dfrom%2Dtime%2Dto%2Dtime</link>
		<description> Procol Harum organist &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/6196413.stm&quot;&gt;wins&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nme.com/news/procol-harum/25554&quot;&gt;battle&lt;/a&gt; over joint authorship of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.procolharum.com/awsop.htm&quot;&gt;A Whiter Shade of Pale&lt;/a&gt;. Gary Brooker is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.procolharum.com/awsop_lawsuit-061220_gb.htm&quot;&gt;not&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.procolharum.com/awsop_lawsuit-061220_kr.htm&quot;&gt;amused&lt;/a&gt;, but then again &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.archive.org/web/20010616224827/www.bachfaq.org/awsopafg.html&quot;&gt;it was a Bach ripoff anyway&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.57149</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:59:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>authorship</category>
		<category>awhitershadeofpale</category>
		<category>bach</category>
		<category>garybrooker</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>lawsuits</category>
		<category>mattfisher</category>
		<category>matthewfisher</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>plagiarism</category>
		<category>procolharum</category>
		<category>proculharum</category>
		<category>progrock</category>
		<category>songsyourmumlikes</category>
		<category>whitershadeofpale</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>All Your Kernals Are Belong to Us</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56366/All%2DYour%2DKernals%2DAre%2DBelong%2Dto%2DUs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=9005171&amp;amp;intsrc=hm_list"&gt;Ballmer: Linux Users Owe Microsoft.&lt;/a&gt; Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer stated at the Professional Association for SQL Server (PASS) conference in Seattle yesterday, that Linux infringes upon his company&apos;s intellectual property.  Does this signal preparations for all out war against the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux&quot;&gt;open source community&lt;/a&gt;?   Microsoft&apos;s recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9005011&quot;&gt;acquisition of Novell&lt;/a&gt; was seen as an ominous sign.  Or perhaps it&apos;s a sign that user friendly versions of linux such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ubuntu.com/&quot;&gt;Ubuntu&lt;/a&gt; threaten sales of Microsoft&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/03/24/76795_HNvistaprobsworse_1.html&quot;&gt;problematic&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html?forumID=102&amp;threadID=203131&amp;messageID=2115517&quot;&gt;new&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Study+No+Vista+for+majority+of+European+businesses/2100-1016_3-6135429.html&quot;&gt;VISTA&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.desktoplinux.com/articles/AT8288296398.html&quot;&gt;OS&lt;/a&gt;, scheduled for release Nov. 30th for businesses and Jan. 30, 2007 for consumers?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56366</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:00:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Ballmer</category>
		<category>FUD</category>
		<category>IBM</category>
		<category>IntellectualProperty</category>
		<category>JawdroppingArrogance</category>
		<category>Linux</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Novell</category>
		<category>OpenSource</category>
		<category>patent</category>
		<category>SCO</category>
		<category>SUSE</category>
		<category>Ubuntu</category>
		<category>Vista</category>
		<dc:creator>Skygazer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>When art is outlawed, only criminals will have brushes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55805/When%2Dart%2Dis%2Doutlawed%2Donly%2Dcriminals%2Dwill%2Dhave%2Dbrushes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.illegal-art.org/index.html"&gt;Illegal Art:&lt;/a&gt; Should artists &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.illegal-art.org/articles/index.html&quot;&gt;be allowed&lt;/a&gt; to use copyrighted materials? Where do the First Amendment and &quot;intellectual property&quot; law collide? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.silenttheft.com/intro.htm&quot;&gt;What is art&apos;s future&lt;/a&gt; if the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uslaw.com/library/article/TNPCommercialCol071900.html&quot;&gt;current laws&lt;/a&gt; are allowed to stand?  Questions asked by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stayfreemagazine.org/&quot;&gt;Stay Free!&lt;/a&gt; in their ongoing multimedia exhibit.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55805</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:51:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>illegal</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Pink-collar crime</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53562/Pinkcollar%2Dcrime</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P!nk"&gt;P!nk,&lt;/a&gt; aka Alecia Moore, aka the hip new face of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.illicit.co.nz/news.htm&quot;&gt;copyright infringement&lt;/a&gt;. P!nk&#8217;s latest video, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsYdtP4-5EU&amp;search=pink%20u%20%2B%20ur%20hand&quot;&gt;U + Ur Hand&lt;/a&gt;, [youtube] blatantly appropriates characters created by late New Zealand artist &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.illicit.co.nz/martinemond/&quot;&gt;Martin Emond&lt;/a&gt; [possibly NSFW]. No permission was sought or granted, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.illicit.co.nz/&quot;&gt;Illicit Clothing&lt;/a&gt;, which manage&#8217;s Emond&#8217;s estate, do not feel they have sufficient resources to sue Sony BMG. Nevertheless, they and Emond&#8217;s fans are justifiably &lt;a href=&quot;http://badtaste.deviantart.com/journal/9573157/&quot;&gt;livid&lt;/a&gt;. It is highly unlikely that Emond, who took his own life in 2004, and whose musical tastes went in a very &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danzig_%28band%29&quot;&gt;different direction&lt;/a&gt;, would have felt any different.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53562</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 19:20:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>pink</category>
		<dc:creator>Soulfather</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>55 years for breaking a EULA?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53202/55%2Dyears%2Dfor%2Dbreaking%2Da%2DEULA</link>
		<description> A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.justice.gov/criminal/cybercrime/baileyCharge.htm&quot;&gt;unethical businessman could get&lt;/a&gt; 55 years &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/pae/News/Pr/2006/jun/baileyindict.pdf&quot;&gt;for clicking ok  on a eula.(pdf)&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53202</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:20:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>asshole</category>
		<category>cybercrime</category>
		<category>eula</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<dc:creator>bigmusic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Gracenote.com announces legal lyrics downloads</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53018/Gracenotecom%2Dannounces%2Dlegal%2Dlyrics%2Ddownloads</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/07/14/BUG1MJUJOT29.DTL"&gt;An end to&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kissthisguy.com/&quot;&gt;mondegreens?&lt;/a&gt; It looks like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gracenote.com/&quot;&gt;Gracenote&lt;/a&gt;, the company behind the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mp3-converter.com/faq/cddb.htm&quot;&gt;CDDB&lt;/a&gt; (CD database), is looking to enhance your music-listening experience by providing an expansive and &quot;legitimate&quot; lyrics database &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.betanews.com/article/Gracenote_Inks_Deal_to_Offer_Lyrics/1152903017&quot;&gt;in association with major on-line digital music providers&lt;/a&gt;. Will this be the end of the road for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mredkj.com/other/lyrics-illegal2.html&quot;&gt;existing lyrics sites&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;small&gt;[more inside]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53018</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:39:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>gracenote</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>lyrics</category>
		<category>lyricswebsites</category>
		<dc:creator>persona non grata</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Files are not for sharing</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52500/Files%2Dare%2Dnot%2Dfor%2Dsharing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.themorningnews.org/archives/spoofs_satire/files_are_not_for_sharing.php"&gt;Files are not for sharing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;An illustrated primer for everyone still unclear on the rights and wrongs of intellectual property by Matthew Baldwin and Goopymart at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themorningnews.org&quot;&gt;The Morning News&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52500</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:26:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>files</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>goopymart</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>matthewbaldwin</category>
		<category>primer</category>
		<category>sharing</category>
		<category>tmn</category>
		<dc:creator>soplerfo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Time to Panic</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51409/Time%2Dto%2DPanic</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.panic.com/extras/ripoff/"&gt;Panic&lt;/a&gt; -- makers of &quot;Shockingly Good Mac Software&quot; and visually appealing marketing collateral (including their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.panic.com&quot;&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;) -- have documented the various places their branding has been &lt;strike&gt;honored&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;strike&gt;flatteringly borrowed&lt;/strike&gt; ripped-off on the internets. My favorite is the site selling one of their original icons for $199, promising &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.panic.com/extras/ripoff/images/ripoffs/rip17-full.jpg&quot;&gt;exclusive ownership&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; Is imitation really the sincerest form of flattery?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51409</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 08:37:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>panic</category>
		<category>ripoff</category>
		<dc:creator>pmbuko</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Free to stitch, free to bitch</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48523/Free%2Dto%2Dstitch%2Dfree%2Dto%2Dbitch</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/41869"&gt;As a followup&lt;/a&gt; to this post about Sew Fast, Sew Easy&apos;s cease and desist orders for using the phrase &quot;Stitch and Bitch&quot; et.al. to a variety of merchants, Yahoo groups, and knitting groups, it seems that a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freetostitchfreetobitch.org/&quot;&gt;boycott&lt;/a&gt; movement is gaining momentum.  They also have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cafepress.com/saynotosfse/&quot;&gt;CafePress store&lt;/a&gt; to support the cause.  Additionally, I think SFSE may have underestimated the enormous growth in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ringsurf.com/netring?ring=knittingblogs;action=list&quot;&gt;knitting blogs&lt;/a&gt; and how &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.knit1crochet2.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;quickly&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://youknitwhat.blogspot.com/2006/01/stirring-shit-up.html&quot;&gt;they&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.43things.com/people/progress/Elabeth/374585&quot;&gt;band&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://neoknits.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;together&lt;/a&gt; when given a cause.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48523</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:17:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>knitting</category>
		<category>sfse</category>
		<category>stitchnbitch</category>
		<category>trademark</category>
		<dc:creator>like_neon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2005</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46932/Intellectual%2DProperty%2DProtection%2DAct%2Dof%2D2005</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.technologynewsdaily.com/node/1763"&gt;Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2005.&lt;/a&gt; In a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/speeches/2005/ag_speech_051110.html&quot;&gt;speech&lt;/a&gt; given on November 10th, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales introduced &lt;a href=&quot;http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/law_librarian_blog/files/ipprotectionact05.pdf&quot;&gt;proposed legislation&lt;/a&gt; [pdf] that would go one step further in criminalizing copyright infringement. The RIAA thinks its a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.riaa.com/news/newsletter/111005.asp&quot;&gt;good idea&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46932</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:47:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>copyrightinfringement</category>
		<category>criminallaw</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<dc:creator>ND&#xa2;</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Peer to Patent</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43535/Peer%2Dto%2DPatent</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cairns.typepad.com/blog/2005/07/peer_to_patent_.html"&gt;Peer to Patent (PtoP): A Modest Proposal&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;This modest proposal harnesses social reputation and collaborative filtering technology to create a peer review system of scientific experts ruling on innovation.&lt;/em&gt; 

&lt;small&gt;[via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bespacific.com/mt/archives/008686.html#8686&quot;&gt;beSpacific&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43535</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:19:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>invention</category>
		<category>P2P</category>
		<category>patent</category>
		<category>peertopeer</category>
		<category>socialsoftware</category>
		<category>trademark</category>
		<dc:creator>MLIS</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Cease n&apos; deBitched</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41869/Cease%2Dn%2DdeBitched</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cafepress.com/snb_chicago/"&gt;Stitch n&apos; Bitch Chicago gets a nastygram.&lt;/a&gt; The phrase, the original of which is unknown (to me) refers to the art of getting together with friends for some knitting and chatting. It was popularized by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bust.com/knithappens/&quot;&gt;a couple of books&lt;/a&gt; and is used by knitting groups &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=%22stitch+n+bitch%22&amp;sourceid=mozilla-search&amp;start=0&amp;start=0&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&quot;&gt;the world over&lt;/a&gt;. 

One of those groups, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stitchnbitch.org/&quot;&gt;Chicago SnB&lt;/a&gt;, had a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cafepress.com/snb_chicago/&quot;&gt;Cafepress store&lt;/a&gt; selling items with the phrase &quot;stitch &apos;n bitch.&quot; Then the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sewfastseweasy.com&quot;&gt;Sew Fast/Sew Easy&lt;/a&gt; folks came along and told Cafepress they hold the trademark (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uspto.gov/main/trademarks.htm&quot;&gt;reg. #2596818&lt;/a&gt;). Cafepress requested that the Chicago SnB remove the phrase from their items.

Predictably, this got people &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gapersblock.com/news/archives/2005/05/#008341&quot;&gt;all riled up&lt;/a&gt; and posting not-so-nice things on SFSE&apos;s &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sewfastseweasy.com/stitch.html&quot;&gt;Stitch and Bitch Cafe&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; Those posts were promptly deleted.

Now the call is out for free lawyerly help. If any of you IP types want to offer advice, you might join the &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stitchnbitch-chicago/&quot;&gt;Chicago SnB Yahoo group&lt;/a&gt;. I&apos;m sure they&apos;d appreciate it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41869</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 16:28:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>knitting</category>
		<category>sewing</category>
		<category>stichnbitch</category>
		<category>trademark</category>
		<dc:creator>schoolgirl report</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


