<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with intelligence and GOP</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/intelligence+GOP</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'intelligence' and 'GOP' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:10:18 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:10:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The Hiding of the President</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54130/The%2DHiding%2Dof%2Dthe%2DPresident</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13345463/&quot;&gt;Keep Bush away from the press&lt;/a&gt;. Joe Scarborough (in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/19/AR2006081900568.html?sub=AR&quot;&gt;news &lt;/a&gt; lately for asking rude questions about the President&apos;s intelligence) opines that &quot;If George Bush has lost his ability to give a commanding presser, then stage manage him differently. Play to his strengths... Show him only in settings where he is in control.&quot; Curiously, while Bush&apos;s press conferences have become unsetllingly less coherent in recent days -- even for him -- the so-called liberal media and even the blogosphere have barely mentioned it (perhaps in the spirit of preserving the dignity of the office, like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.umich.edu/~urecord/0304/Oct27_03/19.shtml&quot;&gt;FDR&apos;s wheelchair&lt;/a&gt;?) Example: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/VIDEO_Bush_Condemns_Judges_Ruling_Against_0818.html&quot;&gt;watch this video&lt;/a&gt; -- &lt;i&gt;what&lt;/i&gt; happens at 1:34 or so, right before the President abruptly terminates the questioning? Will Bush in his twilight years, as Foxborough advises, become like Ronald Reagan, protected from public humiliation by his faithful staff?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54130</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:10:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alcoholism</category>
		<category>Alzheimer&apos;s</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Deaver</category>
		<category>FDR</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>polio</category>
		<category>press</category>
		<category>Reagan</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>Scarborough</category>
		<category>TonySnow</category>
		<category>wheelchair</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Tell &apos;em Uncle Alberto Says It&apos;s Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49848/Tell%2Dem%2DUncle%2DAlberto%2DSays%2DIts%2DCool</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/03/08/gop_senators_refuse_eavesdropping_inquiry/"&gt;&apos;The committee is, to put it bluntly, basically under the control of the White House,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; said Jay Rockefeller, vice-president of the Senate Intelligence Committee, after the committee quashed a broad inquiry into the legality of the NSA spying on Americans -- despite an increasing number of legal scholars &lt;a href=&quot;http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/03/nsa-eavesdropping-and-fourth-amendment.php&quot;&gt;coming forward&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.constitutionproject.org/article.cfm?messageID=145&quot;&gt;declaring&lt;/a&gt; that the program is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2006_hr/022806koh.html&quot;&gt;&quot;blatantly illegal,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; in the words of Yale Law School dean Harold Koh. Meanwhile, the GOP proposes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/07/eavesdropping/&quot;&gt;giving spying on Americans the &quot;force of law&quot;&lt;/a&gt; while subjecting it to &quot;rigorous oversight.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49848</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:51:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>checksandbalances</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>FourthAmendment</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>SenateSelectCommitteeonIntelligence</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Cherry-Picking on the Road to War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49051/CherryPicking%2Don%2Dthe%2DRoad%2Dto%2DWar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/09/AR2006020902418_pf.html"&gt;&quot;It has become clear that official intelligence was not relied on&lt;/a&gt; in making even the most significant national security decisions, that intelligence was misused publicly to justify decisions already made, that damaging ill will developed between [Bush] policymakers and intelligence officers, and that the intelligence community&apos;s own work was politicized,&quot; writes former CIA official Paul Pillar, coordinator of U.S. intelligence on the Middle East until 2005, in an article soon to appear in &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foreignaffairs.org/&quot;&gt;Foreign Affairs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, hardly a radical rag. More confirmation that Seymour Hersh was right about the administration &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/031027fa_fact&quot;&gt;&quot;cherry-picking&quot; intelligence&lt;/a&gt; to justify a foregone conclusion to go to war in Iraq.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49051</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:49:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Cheney</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>Hersh</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>Pillar</category>
		<category>Plame</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s not censorship if it doesn&apos;t work</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27182/Its%2Dnot%2Dcensorship%2Dif%2Dit%2Ddoesnt%2Dwork</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/07/23/168232"&gt;GOP Warns TV Stations Not to Air Ad Alleging Bush Mislead the Nation Over Iraq&lt;/a&gt; They claim that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democrats.org/truth/index.html?s=front&quot;&gt;ad itself &lt;/a&gt;is dishonest, and cite the obligation of broadcast outlets to be free of misleading information.  &#8220;&lt;em&gt;Such obligations must be taken seriously. This letter puts you on notice that the information contained in the above-cited advertisement is false and misleading; therefore, you are obligated to refrain from airing this advertisement.&#8221; &lt;/em&gt;  Despite the implicit threats, &lt;em&gt;only one station has refused to run the ad, a Fox station. &lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27182</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:57:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Liberal Media, huh?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25687/Liberal%2DMedia%2Dhuh</link>
		<description> As you may have heard, long term FBI Agent and Chinese double-agent Katrina Leung was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/05/08/double.agent.charges/index.html&quot;&gt;charged yesterday.&lt;/a&gt;  What you might not have heard, if, say, you only read the CNN story, was that Leung was &lt;a href=&quot;http://talkingpointsmemo.com/may0302.html#050803206pm&quot;&gt;a prominent Republican,&lt;/a&gt; who probably did a good bit to subvert the campaign finance reform effort.  However, this isn&apos;t being covered by &lt;a href=&quot;http://talkingpointsmemo.com/may0302.html#050803206pm&quot;&gt;ABC, CNN,&lt;/a&gt; Newsweek, &lt;a href=&quot;http://talkingpointsmemo.com/may0302.html#050903635pm&quot;&gt;the New York Times,&lt;/a&gt; or pretty much anyone with any name recognition, as TalkingPointsMemo reports.  Funny how potential sabotage isn&apos;t worth mentioning in these fast times full of SARS and terror, no?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25687</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2003 07:25:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CampaignFinance</category>
		<category>Chinese</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>DoubleAgent</category>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>KatrinaLeung</category>
		<category>republican</category>
		<category>TalkingPointsMemo</category>
		<category>TPM</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>kaibutsu</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


