<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with intelligence and iraqwar</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/intelligence+iraqwar</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'intelligence' and 'iraqwar' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:47:00 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:47:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>wmd intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46842/wmd%2Dintelligence</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/1120-01.htm&quot;&gt;Curveball&apos;s motive, CIA officials said, was not to start a war. He simply was seeking a German visa.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You would think that there would be some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/27/AR2005052701618_pf.html&quot;&gt;serious repercussions&lt;/a&gt; for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19831-2005Apr1.html&quot;&gt;&quot;mishandling&quot;&lt;/a&gt; intelligence used to start a war. &lt;br /&gt;
Then again it&apos;s not like this is really &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1184172,00.html&quot;&gt;news &lt;small&gt;(dated 4/2004)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/46515&quot;&gt;A different angle previously discussed here on Metafilter&lt;a /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46842</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:47:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>Curveball</category>
		<category>Germany</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<category>WMDs</category>
		<dc:creator>threehundredandsixty</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>More Whitewash, Jeeves?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34278/More%2DWhitewash%2DJeeves</link>
		<description> As the verdict of &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.scotsman.com/politics.cfm?id=785582004&quot;&gt;Butler 

Report&lt;/a&gt; into the intelligence used to justify the war in Iraq, draws near in 

Britain, a senior intelligence source &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/3850979.stm&quot;&gt;reveals&lt;/a&gt; that MI6 

took the &quot;rare step&quot; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3884353.stm&quot;&gt;withdrawing the intelligence 

assessment&lt;/a&gt; that underpinned the claim that Saddam had continued to produce WMD (an 

admission that such information was fundamentally unreliable), however Blair did not 

tell the public &lt;a href=&quot;http://observer.guardian.co.uk/politics/story/0,6903,1258755,00.html&quot;&gt;&quot;that the 

evidence of WMD was crumbling beneath him&quot;&lt;/a&gt;. [&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsa/n5ctrl/progs/panorama/latest.ram&quot;&gt;Watch the Panorama 

programme in question here for 7 days from 11-7-2004&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;]

The Dossier that Lord Hutton declared &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3437471.stm&quot;&gt;was not sexed-up&lt;/a&gt; (leading to 

senior BBC resignations), Dr Brian Jones (former head of the nuclear, chemical and 

biological branch of the Ministry of Defence&apos;s Defence Intelligence Staff) says &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; 

sexed-up, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=540084&quot;&gt;details exactly how&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34278</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2004 01:57:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>Blair</category>
		<category>ButlerReport</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>report</category>
		<category>SaddamHussein</category>
		<category>TonyBlair</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<dc:creator>Blue Stone</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iraq Lacked Atom Whack</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29205/Iraq%2DLacked%2DAtom%2DWhack</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;At least four times in the fall of 2002, the president and his advisers invoked the specter of a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/07/bush.transcript/&quot; title=&quot;Bush: Don&apos;t wait for mushroom cloud&quot;&gt;mushroom cloud&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; and some of them, including Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, described &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A17707-2003Oct25?language=printer&quot; title=&quot;According to records made available to The Washington Post and interviews with arms investigators from the United States, Britain and Australia, it did not require a comprehensive survey to find the central assertions of the Bush administration&apos;s prewar nuclear case to be insubstantial or untrue. Although Hussein did not relinquish his nuclear ambitions or technical records, investigators said, it is now clear he had no active program to build a weapon, produce its key materials or obtain the technology he needed for either.&quot;&gt;Iraq&apos;s nuclear ambitions as a threat to the American homeland&lt;/a&gt;... Among the closely held internal judgments of the Iraq Survey Group, overseen by David Kay as special representative of CIA Director George J. Tenet, are that Iraq&apos;s nuclear weapons scientists did no significant arms-related work after 1991, that facilities with suspicious new construction proved benign, and that equipment of potential use to a nuclear program remained under seal or in civilian industrial use. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/em&gt;So in regards to Iraq&apos;s possession of &lt;em&gt;the one weapon we can be certain causes mass destruction: the atomic bomb&lt;/em&gt;, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.why-war.com/news/2002/10/07/weaponso.html&quot; title=&quot;Aum Shinrikyo employed skilled scientists and spent freely to make&apos;&apos;high grade&apos;&apos; anthrax, which it spread around Tokyo on several occasions. The cult gave up on anthrax after it failed to infect even a single person.&quot;&gt;Gregg&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newagepointofinfinity.com/homeland_security.htm&quot; title=&quot;The British and Germans used one ton of chemical weapons per fatality caused during World War I. The 1995 release of the nerve gas sarin in the Tokyo subways by the Aum Shinrikyo sect killed 12 people, fewer than a small, standard bomb might have killed in that crowded, enclosed area. An estimated 5,000 Kurds died in Saddam Hussein&apos;s chemical attack on Halabja, Iraq, in 1988, but this involved dozens of fighter-bombers making repeated low passes over the town. It&apos;s hard to imagine that terrorists could pull off such a coordinated heavy military maneuver. The image of millions cowering behind plastic sheets as clouds of biological weapons envelop a city owes more to science fiction than reality. The Japanese use of fleas infected with bubonic plague against Chinese cities in World War II was the only successful instance of bioattacks in contemporary warfare. In 1971, &apos;&apos;weaponized&apos;&apos; smallpox was accidentally released from a Soviet plant; three people died. In 1979, an explosion at another Soviet site released a large quantity of weapons-grade anthrax; 68 people died.In 1989, workers at an American government laboratory near Washington were accidentally exposed to Ebola, and it was several days before the mistake was discovered; no one died. A coordinated anthrax attack in the fall of 2001 killed five people, a tiny fraction of the number who died of influenza during the time the nation was terrified by the anthrax letters.&quot;&gt;Easterbrook&lt;/a&gt; put it, the verdict is the unsurprising (and unsurprisingly &lt;em&gt;closely held&lt;/em&gt;) nope, not, zero, zip, nada...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29205</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:43:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>DavidKay</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Easterbrook</category>
		<category>GeorgeTenet</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>IraqSurveyGroup</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>mushrooms</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>Tenet</category>
		<category>USMilitary</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dude, where&apos;s my WMD?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28156/Dude%2Dwheres%2Dmy%2DWMD</link>
		<description> So, how to explain the incorrect allegations about Iraqi WMD?  Lies?  Self-interest?  Ideology?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globeandmail.ca/servlet/story/RTGAM.20030906.wweap0906/BNStory/International/&quot;&gt;Clerical error&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28156</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 22:02:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bookkeeping</category>
		<category>CaususBelli</category>
		<category>clerical</category>
		<category>ClericalError</category>
		<category>GlobeAndMail</category>
		<category>Intelligence</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<category>WeaponsOfMassDestruction</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Cherry picking shopping</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27634/Cherry%2Dpicking%2Dshopping</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34042"&gt;$20,000 bonus to official who agreed on nuke claim&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;A former Energy Department intelligence chief who agreed with the White House claim that Iraq had reconstituted its defunct nuclear-arms program was awarded a total of $20,500 in bonuses during the build-up to the war, WorldNetDaily has learned...His officers argued at a pre-briefing at Energy headquarters that there was no hard evidence to support the alarming Iraq nuclear charge, and asked to join State Department&apos;s dissenting opinion, Energy officials say.  Rider ordered them to &quot;shut up and sit down,&quot; according to sources familiar with the meeting.&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27634</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2003 08:28:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanPolitics</category>
		<category>bribery</category>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>deception</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>kickbacks</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s not censorship if it doesn&apos;t work</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27182/Its%2Dnot%2Dcensorship%2Dif%2Dit%2Ddoesnt%2Dwork</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/07/23/168232"&gt;GOP Warns TV Stations Not to Air Ad Alleging Bush Mislead the Nation Over Iraq&lt;/a&gt; They claim that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democrats.org/truth/index.html?s=front&quot;&gt;ad itself &lt;/a&gt;is dishonest, and cite the obligation of broadcast outlets to be free of misleading information.  &#8220;&lt;em&gt;Such obligations must be taken seriously. This letter puts you on notice that the information contained in the above-cited advertisement is false and misleading; therefore, you are obligated to refrain from airing this advertisement.&#8221; &lt;/em&gt;  Despite the implicit threats, &lt;em&gt;only one station has refused to run the ad, a Fox station. &lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27182</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:57:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>An unbearable stench?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26991/An%2Dunbearable%2Dstench</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/15/opinion/15KRIS.html?pagewanted=print&amp;amp;position="&gt;Cooked intel revolts spooks - Spooks revolt&lt;/a&gt; : elements of the US intelligence community are between &lt;a href=&quot;http://cnn.usnews.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&amp;expire=-1&amp;urlID=6483447&amp;fb=Y&amp;partnerID=2004&quot;&gt;outrage and open revolt&lt;/a&gt;, and Veterans for Intelligence Sanity, a group of ex - CIA professionals led by Ray McGovern, a 27 year veteran of the CIA who used to brief George Bush Sr., has called for Dick Cheney&apos;s resignation in an open letter to GW Bush, reports Nick Kristoff. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stopdubya.com/CIA%20Vets%20say%20intelligence%20was%20cooked.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;You may not realize the extent of the current ferment within the intelligence community and particularly the CIA&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; they have warned Mr. Bush. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redpepper.org.uk/July2003/x-July2003-dreyfuss.html&quot;&gt;At the heart of the matter&lt;/a&gt; is the  Pentagon&#8217;s Office of Special Plans (OSP) under the leadership of Abram Shulsky.

Meanwhile, &quot;It&apos;s like, duh, the net doesn&apos;t forget. Get it?&quot; : &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/id/7943/view/print&quot;&gt;a blogger compiles a chronological list of Bush Administration statements on Iraq&apos;s WMD&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; - from &lt;i&gt;&quot;Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; (George W. Bush
Address to the Nation, March 17, 2003) to &lt;i&gt;&quot;They may have had time to destroy them, and I don&apos;t know the answer.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; (Donald Rumsfeld, Remarks to Council on Foreign Relations, May 27, 2003) and &lt;i&gt;&quot;U.S. officials never expected that &quot;we were going to open garages and find&quot; weapons of mass destruction.&lt;/i&gt; (Condoleeza Rice, Reuters Interview, May 12, 2003) Also in above link: scroll to bottom for memorandum to GW Bush.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26991</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2003 05:20:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>Intelligence</category>
		<category>intelligenceagencies</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>USIntelligence</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I&apos;m not reading this. This is bullshit.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26098/Im%2Dnot%2Dreading%2Dthis%2DThis%2Dis%2Dbullshit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/afp/20030531/wl_mideast_afp/us_iraq_powell_030531004225"&gt;Dissent in the ranks.&lt;/a&gt; US Secretary of State Colin Powell was under persistent pressure from the Pentagon and White House to include questionable intelligence in his report on Iraq&apos;s weapons of mass destruction he delivered at the United Nations  last February, source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usnews.com/usnews/home.htm&quot;&gt;US News and World Report Magazine&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,967548,00.html&quot;&gt;According to the report&lt;/a&gt;, the draft contained such questionable material that Powell lost his temper, throwing several pages in the air and declaring, &lt;strong&gt;&quot;I&apos;m not reading this. This is bullshit.&quot; &lt;/strong&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26098</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2003 08:16:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bullshit</category>
		<category>colinpowell</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>CrazyJub</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19808/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/802167.asp"&gt;White House: Bush misstated report on Iraq&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;A senior White House official acknowledged Saturday night that the 1998 report did not say what Bush claimed. &apos;What happened was, we formed our own conclusions based on the report ,&apos; &lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;The photograph in question was not U.N. intelligence imaging but simply a picture from a commercial satellite imaging company&lt;/i&gt;
  Did he think no one would notice?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19808</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2002 22:21:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>unitednations</category>
		<dc:creator>bas67</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


