3 posts tagged with intelligence by specialk420.
Displaying 1 through 3 of 3.

Related tags:
+ (43)
+ (28)
+ (27)
+ (24)
+ (23)
+ (19)
+ (19)
+ (18)
+ (18)
+ (16)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (11)
+ (11)
+ (10)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (4)
+ (4)
+ (4)
+ (4)
+ (4)
+ (4)


Users that often use this tag:
homunculus (14)
Postroad (10)
scalefree (8)
kliuless (7)
zarq (7)
digaman (5)
Ignatius J. Reilly (5)
the man of twists ... (5)
darth_tedious (4)
kirkaracha (4)
Gyan (4)
specialk420 (3)
y2karl (3)
anemone of the state (3)
The Whelk (3)
cthuljew (2)
Mean Mr. Bucket (2)
Foci for Analysis (2)
reenum (2)
flapjax at midnite (2)
Artw (2)
mystyk (2)
Smedleyman (2)
hank_14 (2)
troutfishing (2)
jack_mo (2)
amberglow (2)
bas67 (2)
donkeyschlong (2)
MiguelCardoso (2)
stbalbach (2)
rushmc (2)
netbros (2)
tranquileye (2)
owillis (2)

condi rice and pre-war intel hype

Condi Rice and pre-war intel hype
The tubes were "only really suited for nuclear weapons programs," Condoleezza Rice, the president's national security adviser, explained on CNN on Sept. 8, 2002. "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."

But almost a year before, Ms. Rice's staff had been told that the government's foremost nuclear experts seriously doubted that the tubes were for nuclear weapons, according to four officials at the Central Intelligence Agency and two senior administration officials, all of whom spoke on condition of anonymity. The experts, at the Energy Department, believed the tubes were likely intended for small artillery rockets.

Are these women right to be angry with the Bush administration?
posted by specialk420 on Oct 3, 2004 - 23 comments

 

intel official quits - and rings the alarm bell

the administration is "underestimating the enemy." It has failed to address the root causes of terror, he said. "The difficult, long-term issues both at home and abroad have been avoided, neglected or shortchanged and generally underfunded." Would we prefer to have this man providing intelligence information to our president more than a woman who has an oil tanker named after her?
posted by specialk420 on Jun 16, 2003 - 33 comments

so which "officials" do we believe?

so which "officials" do we believe? is this a final salvo from the "now disbanded" office of military misinformation? i don't know which is spookier the thought of the threat, or the folks in charge getting their "credible" info from some clown in las vegas??
posted by specialk420 on Mar 7, 2002 - 4 comments

Page: 1