<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with international and law</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/international+law</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'international' and 'law' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:47:48 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:47:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Life and death of a black and white</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73888/Life%2Dand%2Ddeath%2Dof%2Da%2Dblack%2Dand%2Dwhite</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/06/us/06execute.html?partner=rssyahoo&amp;emc=rss&quot;&gt;Texas executes Mexican national who was denied consul visit.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ccadp.org/josemedellin.htm&quot;&gt;Jose Medellin&lt;/a&gt;, a Mexican national, was born in the border town of &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=27.490609,-99.440002&amp;spn=0.543936,1.031342&amp;z=11 &quot;&gt;Nuevo Laredo, just across the Rio Grande river from Laredo,TX.&lt;/a&gt;

Medell&amp;#0237;n moved to the US when he was 3 years of age, and was 18 years of age in June of 1993 when he participated in the gang rape and murder of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.murdervictims.com/voices/jeneliz.html&quot;&gt;Jennifer Ertman, 14 and Elizabeth Pena, 16 in Houston,Texas.&lt;/a&gt; He was subsequently found guilty and sentenced to death. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://lonestartimes.com/2008/04/04/jose-medellin-and-president-bush/&quot;&gt;In 2004&lt;/a&gt;, the International Court of Justice ruled that the Bush Administration must reconsider the case because Medellin was not informed of his right to contact Mexican consulate officials under the Vienna Convention.

After the ruling, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_06_984/&quot;&gt;President Bush&lt;/a&gt; asserted authority under the Constitution and the various laws of the United States to order states to review the convictions and sentences of foreign nationals who had not been advised of their Vienna Convention rights.

On March 25, 2008, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medell%C3%ADn_v._Texas&quot;&gt;U.S. Supreme Court&lt;/a&gt; rejected the arguments of the Bush Administration, and ruled that President Bush can&apos;t force Texas to reconsider, even if in violation of the International Court of Justice.[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/70399/SCOTUS-tells-the-ICJ-to-go-hang&quot;&gt;Previously&lt;/a&gt;] </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73888</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:47:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>border</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>court</category>
		<category>death</category>
		<category>execution</category>
		<category>gang</category>
		<category>illegal</category>
		<category>immigration</category>
		<category>innocent</category>
		<category>international</category>
		<category>irony</category>
		<category>justice</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>mexico</category>
		<category>murder</category>
		<category>rape</category>
		<category>row</category>
		<category>scotus</category>
		<category>states</category>
		<category>supreme</category>
		<category>texas</category>
		<category>theHague</category>
		<category>united</category>
		<category>victims</category>
		<category>violence</category>
		<dc:creator>mrducts</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Yarr! There be a precedent!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/44412/Yarr%2DThere%2Dbe%2Da%2Dprecedent</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/July-August-2005/feature_burgess_julaug05.msp"&gt;What if there &lt;em&gt;were&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; an established international legal precedent for addressing the terrorism problem? Maybe there is. And maybe it involves a plank. Or an eyepatch. Or, like, a hook instead of a hand. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aldaily.com/&quot;&gt;[via aldaily]&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.44412</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:08:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>international</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>pirates</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<dc:creator>willpie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Despite American efforts, world criminal court is born</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24219/Despite%2DAmerican%2Defforts%2Dworld%2Dcriminal%2Dcourt%2Dis%2Dborn</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.iht.com/cgi-bin/generic.cgi?template=articleprint.tmplh&amp;amp;ArticleId=89441"&gt;Despite American efforts, world criminal court is born&lt;/a&gt; With China, Russia, and the United States refusing to go along with this international court, just how effective can it become? And will the refusal of these major nations to join in add the what now appears the disintegration of global attempts at moderating international affairs?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24219</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:46:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>courts</category>
		<category>international</category>
		<category>internationalcourt</category>
		<category>internationallaw</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>worldcriminalcourt</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18421/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;cid=514&amp;amp;u=/ap/20020712/ap_on_re_us/un_international_court_43"&gt;&quot;A sad day for the United Nations.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; When it comes to international law, there&apos;s one law for the USA and one law for the rest of the world. Disgusting.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18421</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:49:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>international</category>
		<category>internationallaw</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>un</category>
		<category>unitednations</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16925/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/126/nation/US_to_withdraw_from_world_court_treaty+.shtml&quot;&gt;U.S. Declares Itself Above the Law.&lt;/a&gt;  Powell says that &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1922000/1922542.stm&quot;&gt;a groundbreaking United Nations International Criminal Court&lt;/a&gt; would be harmful towards maintaining U.S. military action.  But what does skipping out on such niceties as genocide and human rights abuses say to the rest of the world about accountability in Washington?  Discuss.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16925</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2002 06:42:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>HumanRights</category>
		<category>ICC</category>
		<category>international</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>UN</category>
		<category>UnitedNations</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12177/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-7815683.html?tag=mn_hd"&gt;As usual, when it&apos;s the U.S. turn, they play by different rules&lt;/a&gt; How come Russian and Scandinavian hackers can be charged under U.S.  law for activities done in their home countries, yet when an American company gets a very reasonable request (IP tracking that it is done for web banners anyway) from a judge overseas, the U.S. grabs the free speech / local law argument.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12177</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2001 09:10:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>international</category>
		<category>internationallaw</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>magullo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9710/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.excite.com/news/zd/010829/07/nations-uniting-for"&gt;Software Libre!&lt;/a&gt; Local and national governments around the world are legislating in favor of open source, in a challenge to US corporate (read Microsoft) dominance. A liberating movement, or too much government intrusion?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9710</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2001 06:06:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>international</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


