<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with iraq and Folly</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/iraq+Folly</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'iraq' and 'Folly' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:20:40 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:20:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>1,220,580 - None Dare Call It Genocide</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64789/1220580%2DNone%2DDare%2DCall%2DIt%2DGenocide</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;...These findings come from a poll released today by ORB, the British polling agency that has been tracking public opinion in Iraq since 2005. In conjunction with their Iraqi fieldwork agency a representative sample of 1,499 adults aged 18+ answered the following question: &lt;em&gt;How many members of your household, if any, have died as a result of the conflict in Iraq since 2003 (ie as a result of violence rather than a natural death such as old age)? &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Answer: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opinion.co.uk/Newsroom_details.aspx?NewsId=78&quot; title=&quot;In the week in which General Patraeus reports back to US Congress on the impact the recent &#8216;surge&#8217; is having in Iraq, a new poll reveals that more than 1,000,000 Iraqi citizens have been murdered since the invasion took place in 2003. &quot;&gt;1,220,580&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opinion.co.uk/Documents/TABLES.pdf&quot;&gt;Tables pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opinion.co.uk/Documents/FinalDeadNumbersWEIGHTED.xls&quot;&gt;FinalDeadNumbersWEIGHTED.xls&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-iraq14sep14,1,3270284,print.story?coll=la-headlines-world&quot; title=&quot;The figure from ORB, a British polling agency that has conducted several surveys in Iraq, followed statements this week from the U.S. military defending itself against accusations it was trying to play down Iraqi deaths to make its strategy appear successful...  According to the ORB poll, a survey of 1,461 adults suggested that the total number slain during more than four years of war was more than 1.2 million.&quot;&gt;Poll: Civilian toll in Iraq may top 1M&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://lewrockwell.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&amp;title=None+Dare+Call+It+Genocide+by+Llewellyn+H.+Rockwell%2C+Jr.&amp;expire=&amp;urlID=23973912&amp;fb=Y&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lewrockwell.com%2Frockwell%2Fnone-dare-call-genocide.html&amp;partnerID=3009&quot; title=&quot;It was the US that turned this country into a killing field. Why won&#8217;t we face this? Why won&apos;t we take responsibility? ...What excuse do we have today? Our blindness is not technological but ideological. We are the good guys, right?&quot;&gt;None Dare Call It Genocide&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64789</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:20:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Death</category>
		<category>Dishonor</category>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Genocide</category>
		<category>Impeachment</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Trials</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<category>Warcrimes</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Planning for Defeat -- How should we withdraw from Iraq ?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64510/Planning%2Dfor%2DDefeat%2DHow%2Dshould%2Dwe%2Dwithdraw%2Dfrom%2DIraq</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/09/17/070917fa_fact_packer?printable=true&quot; title=&quot;...the petraeus-crocker testimony is the kind of short-lived event which the administration has relied to shore up support for the war: the &apos;mission accomplished&apos; declaration, the deaths of uday and qusay hussein, saddam&#8217;s capture, the transfer of sovereignty, the three rounds of voting, the plan for victory, the death of abu musab al-zarqawi. every new milestone, however illusory, allows the administration to avoid thinking ahead, to the years when the mistakes of iraq will continue to haunt the u.s.&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Planning for Defeat -- How should we withdraw from Iraq ? &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;by George Packer  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64510</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:31:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>So Iraq is over. But Iraq has not yet begun...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63146/So%2DIraq%2Dis%2Dover%2DBut%2DIraq%2Dhas%2Dnot%2Dyet%2Dbegun</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;...The U.S. has probably not yet fully woken up to the appalling fact that, after a long period in which the first motto of its military was &quot;no more Vietnams,&quot; it faces another Vietnam. There are many important differences, but the basic result is similar: The mightiest military in the world fails to achieve its strategic goals and is, in the end, politically defeated by an economically and technologically inferior adversary. Even if there are no scenes of helicopters evacuating Americans from the roof of the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, there will surely be some totemic photographic image of national humiliation as the U.S. struggles to extract its troops. Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo have done terrible damage to the U.S. reputation for being humane; this defeat will convince more people around the world that it is not even that powerful. And Bin Laden, still alive, will claim another victory over the death-fearing weaklings of the West.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-garton19jul19,0,7214015,print.story&quot; title=&quot;&apos;...In history, the most important consequences are often the unintended ones. We do not yet know the longer-term unintended consequences of Iraq. Maybe there is a silver lining hidden somewhere in this cloud. But as far as the human eye can see, the likely consequences of Iraq range from the bad to the catastrophic. Looking back over a quarter of a century of chronicling current affairs, I cannot recall a more comprehensive and avoidable man-made disaster.&apos;&quot;&gt;Iraq hasn&apos;t even begun&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;(more within)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63146</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:02:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Exit</category>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Strategy</category>
		<category>Tragedy</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Imperial Overreach: The Iraq War Is Lost</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63032/Imperial%2DOverreach%2DThe%2DIraq%2DWar%2DIs%2DLost</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;The Iraq war is lost. Of course, neither the president nor the 

war&apos;s intellectual architects are prepared to admit this. Nonetheless, the 

specter of defeat shapes their thinking in telling ways. The case for the 

war is no longer defined by the benefits of winning -- a stable Iraq, 

democracy on the march in the Middle East, the collapse of the evil 

Iranian and Syrian regimes -- but by the consequences of defeat. As 

President Bush put it, &quot;The consequences of failure in Iraq would be death 

and destruction in the Middle East and here in America.&quot; Tellingly, the 

Iraq war&apos;s intellectual boosters, while insisting the surge is working, 

are moving to assign the blame for defeat. And they have already picked 

their target: the American people...&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2007/07/18/iraq/print.html&quot; title=&quot;&apos;...Indeed, Vietnam is the image many Americans have of defeat in Iraq. Al-Qaida would overrun the Green Zone and the last Americans would evacuate from the rooftop of the still-unfinished largest embassy in the world. Bush feeds on this imagery... But there will be no Saigon moment in Iraq... Iraq after an American defeat will look very much like Iraq today -- a land divided along ethnic lines into Arab and Kurdish states with a civil war being fought within its Arab part. Defeat is defined by America&apos;s failure to accomplish its objective of a self-sustaining, democratic and unified Iraq. And that failure has already taken place, along with the increase of Iranian power in the region.&apos;&quot;&gt;The Iraq War Is Lost&lt;/a&gt; by Peter Galbraith July 18, 2007&lt;br&gt;
See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-360es.html&quot; title=&quot;&apos;...The successful overthrow of Saddam could make things worse. Iraq could be thrown into civil war and break up, or a more radical Iraqi regime could arise. Either outcome could cause instability in the entire region. Given the hardships the Iraqi population has suffered since the 1991 war, a post-Saddam regime could be even more virulently anti&#8211;United States than he is.&apos;&quot;&gt;Imperial Overreach: Washington&#8217;s Dubious Strategy to Overthrow Saddam Hussein &lt;/a&gt; by David Isenberg November 17, 1999 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa360.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63032</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:12:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Defeat</category>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Amnesty International - Cruel and Inhuman: Conditions of isolation for detainees at Guant&amp;#0225;namo Bay</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60107/Amnesty%2DInternational%2DCruel%2Dand%2DInhuman%2DConditions%2Dof%2Disolation%2Dfor%2Ddetainees%2Dat%2DGuant%E1namo%2DBay</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;Detainees are confined for 22 hours a day to individual, enclosed, steel cells where they are almost completely cut off from human contact. The cells have no windows to the outside or access to natural light or fresh air. No activities are provided, and detainees are subjected to 24 hour lighting and constant observation by guards through the narrow windows in the cell doors. They exercise alone in a high-walled yard where little sunlight filters through; detainees are often only offered exercise at night and may not see daylight for days at a time... It appears that around 80 per cent of the approximately 385 men currently held at Guant&amp;#0225;namo are in isolation &#8211; a reversal of earlier moves to ease conditions and allow more socialising among detainees. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://web.amnesty.org/library/print/ENGAMR510512007&quot; title=&quot;&apos;...Some [inmates] are dangerously close to full-blown mental and physical breakdown.&apos; UK director Kate Allen. Amnesty International&quot;&gt;Cruel and Inhuman: Conditions of isolation for detainees at Guant&amp;#0225;namo Bay &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.miamiherald.com/416/v-print/story/64854.html&quot; title=&quot;ICRC President Jakob Kellenberger&apos;s meetings this week &apos;stressed that the detention of persons captured or arrested in connection with the fight against terrorism must take place within an appropriate legal framework,&apos; according to a communiqu&amp;#0233; issued on Thursday from ICRC headquarters in Geneva. &apos;In particular, he insisted on the need for more robust procedural safeguards,&apos; it added, &apos;especially in Guant&amp;#0225;namo Bay and in Bagram, Afghanistan.&apos;&quot;&gt;Red Cross chief raises Guant&amp;#0225;namo issue in D.C.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/bin/print.php?id=5172225&quot; title=&quot;PRESIDENT (of the tribunal): Please describe the methods that were used. DETAINEE: (CENSORED) There were doing so many things. What else did they did? (CENSORED) After that another method of torture began. (CENSORED) They used to ask me questions and the investigator after that used to laugh. And, I used to answer the answer that I knew. And if I didn&apos;t replay what I heard, he used to (CENSORED)...&quot;&gt;Guant&amp;#0225;namo follies &lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.60107</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 08:32:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dishonor</category>
		<category>folly</category>
		<category>GenevaConvention</category>
		<category>guantanamo</category>
		<category>Guant&#xe1;namo</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>Torture</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Top Secret Polo Step - Iraq War Plan Assumed Only 5,000 U.S. Troops Still There by December 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58648/Top%2DSecret%2DPolo%2DStep%2DIraq%2DWar%2DPlan%2DAssumed%2DOnly%2D5000%2DUS%2DTroops%2DStill%2DThere%2Dby%2DDecember%2D2006</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;It&apos;s quite frustrating the way this works, but the way we do things nowadays is combatant commanders brief their products in PowerPoint up in Washington to OSD and Secretary of Defense... In lieu of an order, or a frag [fragmentary] order, or plan, you get a set of PowerPoint slides... [T]hat is frustrating, because nobody wants to plan against PowerPoint slides.&quot; 

Lt. Gen. McKiernan&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB214/index.htm&quot; title=&quot;U.S. Central Command estimated that 5,000 u.s. troops would remain in Iraq by December 2006.&quot;&gt;Top Secret Polo Step&lt;/a&gt;: CentCom PowerPoint Slides Briefed to White House and Rumsfeld in 2002, Obtained by National Security Archive through Freedom of Information Act.  &lt;br&gt;&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB207/index.htm&quot; title=&quot;&apos;There was consensus that the United States would not intervene without coalition support except under the most dire circumstances such as WMD use or catastrophic humanitarian disaster.&apos; - Desert Crossing After Action Report, 1999.&quot;&gt;Desert Crossing&quot; 1999 Assumed
400,000 Troops and Still a Mess&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/15/washington/15military.html?ei=5090&amp;en=ab52e1ac39c1c717&amp;ex=1329195600&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=print&quot; title=&quot;&apos;D.O.S. will promote creation of a broad-based, credible provisional government &#8212; prior to D-Day,&apos; noted a slide on &apos;key planning assumptions.&apos; That was military jargon for the notion that the Department of State would assemble a viable Iraqi governing coalition before the invasion even began.&quot;&gt;A Prewar Slide Show Cast Iraq in Rosy Hues &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58648</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:50:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>PowerPoint</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>From the Wonderful Folks Who Brought You Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58448/From%2Dthe%2DWonderful%2DFolks%2DWho%2DBrought%2DYou%2DIraq</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;...&quot;Shifting to StratCom indicates that they are talking about a really punishing air-force and naval air attack [on Iran],&quot; says Lang. ...&quot;If they write a plan like that and the president issues an execute order, the forces will execute it. He&apos;s got the power to do that as commander-in-chief. We set that up during the Cold War. It may, after the fact, be considered illegal, or an impeachable offense, but if he orders them to do it, they will do it.&quot; ...by the end of February the United States will have enough forces in place to mount an assault on Iran. That, in the words of former national-security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, would be &quot;an act of political folly&quot; so severe that &quot;the era of American preponderance could come to a premature end.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/03/whitehouse200703?printable=true&amp;#0164;tPage=all&quot; title=&quot;&apos;The same neocon ideologues behind the Iraq war have been using the same tactics--alliances with shady exiles, dubious intelligence on W.M.D.--to push for the bombing of Iran. As President Bush ups the pressure on Tehran, is he planning to double his Middle East bet?...&apos;&quot;&gt;From the Wonderful Folks Who Brought You Iraq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=4690&quot; title=&quot;...A comment in the French newspaper Le Figaro on January 27 noted that with the two carrier groups, &apos;the United States now has the ability to conduct an air offensive 24 hours a day for 30 to 40 days. It can rely on Bahrain, the huge al-Udaid airbase in Qatar and its operational command centre, and the Diego Garcia base in the Indian Ocean for supply. The American satellites have reportedly identified 1,500 targets linked to the Iranian nuclear weapon program, distributed over 18 main sites. No one doubts that considerable damage could be inflicted on them. Industrial and oil targets could be added to them.&apos;&quot;&gt;Stepped up US preparations for war against Iran&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/articles/ViewPopUpArticle.jsp?id=2&amp;articleId=4306&quot; title=&quot;The Bush administrations&apos;s hardline rhetoric, backed by more military hardware in the Persian Gulf, brings a devastating confrontation nearer. &quot;&gt;The United States and Iran: the logic of war &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=background.view&amp;backgroundid=00156&amp;stoplayout=true&amp;print=true&quot; title=&quot;Journalists, and through us the public, have a grave responsibility to not be complicit in another march to war on false pretenses. So what lessons should we have learned from Iraq?&quot;&gt;How the press can prevent another Iraq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/02/AR2007020201551_pf.html&quot; title=&quot;...Avoiding the next military folly in the Middle East requires that the agenda for analysis and debate not be so severely and tendentiously truncated as before Iraq. Not only must proponents of military action not be allowed to manipulate the answers, they also should not be allowed to define the questions.&quot;&gt;What to Ask Before the Next War&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58448</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:28:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Iran</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Babbling Bobster Beatnik Poetry</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55862/Babbling%2DBobster%2DBeatnik%2DPoetry</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnniqpqySrs&quot; title=&quot;Street poetry performance 1966 - Bob Dylan Street poetry performance 1966 - Bob Dylan in London makes a Chaplinesque exit... from Seattle EMP exhibit. ...&quot;&gt;His fog, his amphetamines and his pearls&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Lofi shot off the monitor at the recent EMP exhibit, the entire footage of an &lt;em&gt;Eat The Document&lt;/em&gt; outtake recently edited by Martin Scorcese for &lt;em&gt;No Direction Home&lt;/em&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;I don&apos;t entirely get the &lt;em&gt;Chaplinesque&lt;/em&gt;--To paraphrase crunchland, Hey, Skeezix--it&apos;s &lt;em&gt;a talkie&lt;/em&gt;...&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55862</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:36:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Beatnik</category>
		<category>BlahBlah</category>
		<category>Dylan</category>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>FreakyTweaky</category>
		<category>In&apos;shallah</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Poetry</category>
		<category>Torture</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<category>WoofWoof</category>
		<category>YadaYada</category>
		<category>Yoda</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Game Over</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55699/Game%2DOver</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;...Iraq may have started as a war of choice for the Bush administration, but it has become a war of great and unintended consequences. Immense risks lurk down every strategic road. Given the fractured state of the American body politic, it is almost certainly too late to rally the country behind an all-out war effort -- think tax increases; a war Cabinet; a full mobilization of the National Guard and the Reserves; a civilian reconstruction corps; a larger Army and Marine Corps; longer combat tours for troops; mandatory combat-zone deployments for U.S. diplomats and aid officials; a return to national service; and possibly even a limited draft. Yet absent a plan that puts the nation on either an all-out wartime footing or the firm path to retreat, the United States is largely condemned to some tweaked-around-the-edges variation of the administration&apos;s current approach on Iraq of &quot;muddle through and hand over.&quot; And America, the experts agree, is already losing that war.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nationaljournal.com/scripts/printpage.cgi?/about/njweekly/stories/2006/1020nj1.htm&quot; title=&quot;&apos;If you look at the relevant historical experiences with insurgencies, the United States might be in a better position in Iraq at the end of a decade or so,&apos; said Brian Jenkins, a senior counter- terrorism and counterinsurgency expert at the Rand think tank. &apos;But not necessarily. Israel was in southern Lebanon for 18 years, and the situation just got worse until it became intolerable.&apos; In the meantime, the U.S. presence in Iraq will continue to galvanize Islamic radicals worldwide and drain America of blood, treasure, and moral standing. That has to be weighed, Jenkins said, against a precipitous withdrawal that could lead to all-out civil war, massive ethnic and sectarian cleansing, and a major psychological victory for Qaeda and Islamic extremists. &apos;The basic problem with the equation is that the costs and downsides of Iraq are all front-loaded and being felt today, while the potential upsides are dependent on a reasonably successful and still murky outcome some years down the road.&apos;&quot;&gt;Endgame&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55699</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 07:55:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Tragedy</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Torture &apos;R US[A]</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54977/Torture%2DR%2DUSA</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article1696153.ece&quot; title=&quot;The republic of fear is born again. The state of terror now gripping Iraq is as bad as it was under Saddam Hussein. Torture in the country may even be worse than it was during his rule, the United Nation&apos;s special investigator on torture said yesterday... The Iraqi state and much of society have been criminalised. Gangs of gunmen are often described on state television as &apos;wearing police uniforms&apos; . One senior Iraqi minister laughed as he told The Independent: &apos; Of course they wear police uniforms. They are real policemen.&apos;&quot;&gt;New terror that stalks Iraq&apos;s republic of fear &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/middleeast/21iraq.html?pagewanted=print&quot; title=&quot;A United Nations report released Wednesday says that 5,106 people in Baghdad died violent deaths during July and August, a number far higher than reports that have relied on figures from the city&#8217;s morgue. Across the country, the report found, 3,590 civilians were killed in July--the highest monthly total on record--and 3,009 more were killed in August. There were 4,309 Iraqi civilians reported wounded in August, a 14 percent increase from July... &quot;&gt;U.N. Finds Baghdad Toll Far Higher Than Cited &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5368360.stm&quot; title=&quot;&apos;What most people tell you is that the situation as far as torture is concerned now in Iraq is totally out of hand,&apos; the Austrian law professor said. &apos;The situation is so bad many people say it is worse than it has been in the times of Saddam Hussein,&apos; he added. The UN report says detainees&apos; bodies often show signs of beating using electrical cables, wounds in heads and genitals, broken legs and hands, electric and cigarette burns. Bodies found at the Baghdad mortuary &apos;often bear signs of severe torture including acid-induced injuries and burns caused by chemical substances&apos;. Many bodies have missing skin, broken bones, back, hands and legs, missing eyes, missing teeth and wounds caused by power drills or nails, the UN report says. &quot;&gt;Iraq torture &apos;worse after Saddam&apos; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomdispatch.com/indexprint.mhtml?pid=123690&quot; title=&quot;Whatever arguments may be going on in Washington over which &apos;tools&apos; or &apos;interrogation techniques&apos; the CIA is to be allowed to use or over exactly how the 14 al-Qaeda detainees just transferred to Guantanamo will be tried, this set of facts-on-the-ground adds up to our own global Bermuda Triangle of Injustice into which untold numbers of human beings can simply disappear.&quot;&gt;The Facts on the Ground: Mini-Gulags, Hired Guns, Lobbyists, and a Reality Built on Fear&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HI22Ak01.html&quot; title=&quot;Three and a half years after the occupation began, the US military is no longer the real power in Iraq. As the chief of intelligence for the US Marine Corps revealed in a recent report, US troops have been unable to shake the hold that Sunni insurgents have on the vast western province of al-Anbar. But the main threat to the occupation comes not from the Sunni insurgents but from the militant Iraqi Shi&apos;ite forces aligned with Iran, led by Muqtada al-Sadr&apos;s Mehdi Army. The armed Shi&apos;ite militias are now powerful enough to make it impossible for the US occupation to continue.&quot;&gt;U.S. troops in Iraq are Tehran&apos;s &apos;hostages&apos;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-anti22sep22,1,583305,print.story&quot; title=&quot;&apos;The outpouring of anti-American rhetoric at the United Nations this week is demonstrating how anger at the United States is uniting the developing world in a way not seen since the 1980s, U.S. officials and analysts say.&apos; Well, duh.&quot;&gt;Anti-Americanism Is A Glue&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54977</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:02:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>disaster</category>
		<category>dishonor</category>
		<category>folly</category>
		<category>GenevaConvention</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Gabriel Kolko - Lessons From Iraq and Lebanon &amp;amp; Another Century of War ?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54529/Gabriel%2DKolko%2DLessons%2DFrom%2DIraq%2Dand%2DLebanon%2Dand%2DAnother%2DCentury%2Dof%2DWar</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;...The United States, whose costliest political and military adventures since 1950 have ended in failure, now must face the fact that the technology for confronting its power is rapidly becoming widespread and cheap. It is within the reach of not merely states but of relatively small groups of people. Destructive power is now virtually &apos;democratized.&apos; If the challenges of producing a realistic concept of the world that confronts the mounting dangers and limits of military technology seriously are not resolved soon, recognizing that a decisive equality of military power is today in the process of being re-imposed, there is nothing more than wars and mankind&#8217;s eventual destruction to look forward to.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lewrockwell.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&amp;title=The+Great+Equalizer+by+Gabriel+Kolko&amp;expire=&amp;urlID=19346810&amp;fb=Y&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lewrockwell.com%2Forig6%2Fkolko4.html&amp;partnerID=10&quot; title=&gt;The Great Equalizer - Lessons From Iraq and Lebanon&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;

By Gabriel Kolko, author of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/product-description/1565841921/ref=dp_proddesc_0/103-1497812-7667853?ie=UTF8&amp;n=283155&amp;s=books&quot; title=&quot;&apos;Over the last three decades the historian Gabriel Kolko has redefined the way we look at modern warfare and its social and political effects. Century of War gives us a masterly synthesis of the effects of war on civilian populations and the political results of these traumatizing experiences in the twentieth century...&apos;&quot;&gt;Century of War: Politics, Conflicts, and Society Since 1914&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/HE03Aa02.html&quot; title=&quot;Since World War II the United States has been increasingly willing to use its military might to impose its will on the world. But it is not sure exactly what its will is, and it has never evolved a workable doctrine that specifies its global role and how and when force should be used to achieve its ends. The result is haphazard foreign-policy decisions and ill-conceived military adventures embarked on without an understanding of local conditions and in utter disregard of possible consequences. Besides, Kolko argues, military means seldom if ever achieve the desired political ends. Still, the US goes in, with massive firepower, its smart bombs thinking overtime and its superweapons primed, only to find more often than not that its awesome arsenal is utterly unsuited for the job at hand. Thus it gets sucked in to prolonged, escalating conflicts such as Vietnam and Iraq, and its original intentions are forgotten as it fights on simply to avoid defeat and humiliation - in other words, to protect its credibility as a superpower. The massive human, social and economic damage that it inflicts in the process serves to destabilize regions and create enemies that the US did not have before. &quot;&gt;The Age of War: The United States Confronts the World&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0PBZ/is_5_83/ai_111573659/print&quot; title=&quot;&apos;The century of war was a time of mutually assured destruction and a balance of terror. But despite its extreme violence, the 20th century was a time of balanced powers. Now the United States stands alone. In the absence of countervailing forces, wrongheaded U.S. policies are destabilizing a world already rife with unsettled regions and easily obtained fire-power. Kolko&apos;s basic premise is that for 50 years the United States has fumbled around, being consistent only in its policies of being anticommunist and pro-oil. He feels that the United States holds a consistent over-optimism about the efficacy of its technology and firepower, and that it consistently fails to recognize that the world is a subtle, complex place that requires finesse, flexibility, and receptivity to the needs and wants of others.Inadvertently or perhaps knowingly, the United States has disrupted regions of the world by its support of anticommunist tyrannies. Because of its blunders, the U.S. weakened democratic movements throughout the world, generally making a world where the events of 11 September 2001 were the consequence.&apos;&quot;&gt;Another Century of War?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54529</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:17:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Vietnam</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iran&#8217;s regional position is key to its strength</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54170/Iran%3Fs%2Dregional%2Dposition%2Dis%2Dkey%2Dto%2Dits%2Dstrength</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;Iran&apos;s influence in Iraq has superseded that of the US, and it is increasingly rivalling the US as the main actor at the crossroads between the Middle East and Asia... As a result, the US-driven agenda for confronting Iran is severely compromised by the confident ease with which Iran sits in its region... The report also looks into the ideology of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and unpicks Iran&#8217;s complicated power structure.  It claims that despite his popularity, Ahmadinejad neither holds an insurmountable position within Iran nor commands universal support for his outspoken foreign policy positions... On hostility with the US, the report argues that while the US may have the upper hand in &#8216;hard&#8217; power projection, Iran has proved far more effective through its use of &#8216;soft&apos; power. The report also holds a cautious view of the Iran-Israel relationship. It outlines four future scenarios for the relationship between the two states, one of which is the creation of a &#8216;cold-war&#8217; style nuclear stand-off should Iran achieve nuclear capability.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/index.php?id=189&amp;pid=315&quot; title=&quot;Key messages: The &apos;war on terror&apos; removed the Taliban and Saddam Hussein, Iran&apos;s two greatest regional rivals, and strengthened Iran&#8217;s regional leverage in doing so; Israel&apos;s failure to defeat Hizbullah has reinforced Iran&apos;s position as the region&apos;s focal point against US-led policy; If seriously threatened, Iran has the potential to inflame the region yet further; A US-sponsored military strike would be devastating for Iran, the Persian Gulf region and beyond&quot;&gt;Iran, its Neighbours and the Regional Crises&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/pdf/research/mep/Iran0806.pdf&quot; title=&quot;In the widest-ranging report of its kind, Iran&#8217;s position in relation to all of the players in the Middle East and Asian regions is analyzed, with sections on Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, Egypt, the GCC states, Turkey, Russia and the former Soviet states, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, China and Japan.&quot;&gt;(full report in pdf)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-3-2325352-23,00.html&quot; title=&quot;The report adds: &apos;The great problem facing the US is that Iran has superseded it as the most influential power in Iraq. This influence has a variety of forms but all can be turned against the US presence in Iraq with relative ease, and almost certainly would heighten US casualties to the point where a continued presence might not be tenable.&apos;&quot;&gt;Iran now the key power in Iraq, says UK think-tank&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/5277362.stm&quot; title=&quot;One of the authors of the Chatham House report, Dr Ali Ansari of the University of St Andrews, told BBC Radio Five Live: &apos;We&apos;ve seen really since 9/11 that the chief beneficiary of America&apos;s global war on terror in the Middle East has been the very country that it considers to be a major part or a founding member of the axis of evil. And that basically tells us that there&apos;s an enormous incoherence in American approach to the Middle East. They simply haven&apos;t managed to work out a strategy and a policy that will work and will achieve results.&apos; &quot;&gt;Iran &apos;boosted by war on terror&apos;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54170</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:31:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Iran</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Strategy</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Mindless In Iraq - What Next ?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54094/Mindless%2DIn%2DIraq%2DWhat%2DNext</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;The debate is over: By any definition, Iraq is in a state of civil war. Indeed, the only thing standing between Iraq and a descent into total Bosnia-like devastation is 135,000 U.S. troops -- and even they are merely slowing the fall... The consequences of an all-out civil war in Iraq could be dire. Considering the experiences of recent such conflicts, hundreds of thousands of people may die. Refugees and displaced people could number in the millions. And with Iraqi insurgents, militias and organized crime rings wreaking havoc on Iraq&apos;s oil infrastructure, a full-scale civil war could send global oil prices soaring even higher... Welcome to the new &quot;new Middle East&quot; -- a region where civil wars could follow one after another, like so many Cold War dominoes. And unlike communism, these dominoes may actually fall. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/18/AR2006081800983_pf.html&quot; title=&quot;It took 30,000 British troops to bring the Irish Civil War to an end, 45,000 Syrian troops to conclude the Lebanese Civil War, 50,000 NATO troops to stop the Bosnian Civil War, and 60,000 to do the job in Kosovo. Considering Iraq&apos;s much larger population, it probably would require 450,000 troops to quash an all-out civil war there. such an effort would require a commitment of enormous military and economic resources, far in excess of what the United States has already put forth. How Iraq got to this point is now an issue for historians (and perhaps for voters in 2008); what matters today is how to move forward and prepare for the tremendous risks an Iraqi civil war poses for this critical region. the outbreak of a large-scale civil conflict would not relieve us of our responsibilities in iraq; in fact, it could multiply them. Unfortunately, in the Middle East, should never assume that the situation can&apos;t get worse. it always can -- and usually does.&quot;&gt;What Next?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19197&quot; title=&quot;In the three weeks that followed Baghdad&apos;s fall, I was able to go unchallenged into sites of enormous intelligence value, including the Foreign Ministry, Uday&apos;s house, and a wiretap center right across Firdos Square from the Sheraton. All three had many sensitive documents but even weeks after the takeover, the only people to take an interest in these document caches were looters, squatters (who burned wiretap transcripts for lighting), journalists, Baathists, Iraqi factions looking for dirt on political rivals, and (possibly) agents of countries hostile to the United States. Neither the Pentagon nor the CIA had a workable plan to safeguard and exploit the vast quantities of intelligence that were available for the taking in Iraq&apos;s capital. That information might have provided insight into terrorism&#8212;the Foreign Ministry documents included names of jihadists who had come into Iraq before the war--and the incipient insurgency. &quot;&gt;Mindless in Iraq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;And note that, as of tomorrow, Tuesday, August 22nd, 2006,   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion?pid=113486&quot; title=&quot;We&apos;ve been in Iraq one thousand, two hundred and forty-seven [1249 as of Tuesday...] days---and still the Administration has no exit strategy, no plan for victory and no clue what it is doing.&quot;&gt;the war in Iraq will have lasted one full week longer than US involvement in World War II&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54094</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:49:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iraq Civil War News: Iraqi Civilian Death Toll Rises Above 100 Per Day</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53114/Iraq%2DCivil%2DWar%2DNews%2DIraqi%2DCivilian%2DDeath%2DToll%2DRises%2DAbove%2D100%2DPer%2DDay</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/19/world/middleeast/19iraq.html?pagewanted=print&quot; title=&quot;An average of more than 100 civilians per day were killed in Iraq last month, the highest monthly tally of violent deaths since the fall of Baghdad, the United Nations reported today.&quot;&gt;Iraqi Death Toll Rises Above 100 Per Day, U.N. Says  &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-3-2268585-3,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Ali has a surname that could easily pass for Shia. His brother-in-law has an unmistakably Sunni name. They agreed that if they could determine that the gunmen were Shia, Ali would answer the door. If they were Sunnis, his brother-in-law would go. Whoever didn&#8217;t answer the door would hide in the dog kennel on the roof.&quot;&gt;Baghdad starts to collapse as its people flee a life of death&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themoderatevoice.com/posts/1153162221.shtml&quot; title=&quot;&apos;Peacekeeping requirements in Iraq might be much lower than historical experience in the Balkans suggests. There&apos;s been none of the record in Iraq of ethnic militias fighting one another that produced so much bloodshed and permanent scars in Bosnia.&apos; - Paul Wolfowitz, deputy secretary of defense and now president of the World Bank, Feb. 27, 2003&quot;&gt;Iraq : Costs, quotes and other things&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53114</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:19:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dishonor, Blood and Treasure - By The Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51243/Dishonor%2DBlood%2Dand%2DTreasure%2DBy%2DThe%2DNumbers</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;Two years after the Abu Ghraib scandal, &lt;a href=&quot;http://hrw.org/reports/2006/ct0406/&quot; title=&quot;Under the doctrine of command responsibility, a long-recognized principle of U.S. domestic and international law, commanders can be held criminally liable as principals for the criminal acts of their subordinates, if they knew or should have known about criminal activity, but did not take steps to prevent it or to punish the perpetrators... Not a single U.S. military officer serving in Iraq, Afghanistan, or Guant&amp;#0225;namo Bay has been criminally charged under the doctrine of command responsibility for detainee abuses committed by his or her subordinates.&quot;&gt;new research&lt;/a&gt; shows that abuse of detainees in U.S. custody in Iraq, Afghanistan, and at Guant&amp;#0225;namo Bay has been widespread, and that the United States has taken only limited steps to investigate and punish implicated personnel. A briefing paper issued today, &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hrw.org/reports/2006/ct0406/1.htm#_Toc133381851&quot; title=&quot;Detainee abuse has been widespread. The DAA Project has documented over 330 cases in which U.S. military and civilian personnel are credibly alleged to have abused or killed detainees. These cases involve more than 600 U.S. personnel and over 460 detainees. Allegations have come from U.S. facilities throughout Afghanistan, Iraq and at Guant&amp;#0225;namo Bay... Only fifty-four military personnel--a fraction of the more than 600 U.S. personnel implicated in detainee abuse cases--are known to have been convicted by court-martial; forty of these individuals have been sentenced to prison time.&quot;&gt;By the Numbers&lt;/a&gt;,&apos; presents findings of the Detainee Abuse and Accountability Project... the first comprehensive accounting of credible allegations of torture and abuse in U.S. custody in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guant&amp;#0225;namo.  The project has collected hundreds of allegations of detainee abuse and torture occurring since late 2001 &#8211; allegations implicating more than 600 U.S. military and civilian personnel and involving more than 460 detainees.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/04/26/usint13268_txt.htm&quot; title=&quot;The project found that many abuses were never investigated, and investigations that did occur often closed prematurely, or stalled without resolution. In cases where abuses were substantiated and perpetrators identified by military investigators, military commanders often chose to use weak non-judicial disciplinary measures as punishment, instead of pursuing criminal courts-martial. Of the courts-martial that did take place, the majority resulted in either prison sentences of less than a year, or punishments that did not involve jail time (such as discharge or rank-reduction). &quot;&gt;U.S.: More Than 600 Implicated in Detainee Abuse&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/26/AR2006042601601_pf.html&quot; title=&quot;The cost of the war in Iraq will reach $320 billion after the expected passage next month of an emergency spending bill currently before the Senate, and that total is likely to more than double before the war ends, the Congressional Research Service estimated this week.&quot;&gt;Projected Iraq War Costs Soar&lt;/a&gt;, See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2005/08/19/opinion/20bilmes.html&quot;&gt;The Trillion Dolllar War&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51243</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:11:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Blood</category>
		<category>Costs</category>
		<category>Dishonor</category>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Torture</category>
		<category>Treasure</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Fourth Year of An Endless War Begins</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50213/The%2DFourth%2DYear%2Dof%2DAn%2DEndless%2DWar%2DBegins</link>
		<description> From &lt;a href=&quot;http://bostonreview.net/BR31.2/rosen.html&quot; title=&quot;A few weeks later, after the elections, the same friend e-mailed me: ...&apos;To be clear, now Shia are Iranians for the Sunni, and Sunni are Salafi terrorists for the Shia. We have a civil war here; it is only a matter of time, and some peppers to provoke it.&apos;&quot;&gt;on the ground in Iraq&lt;/a&gt;, with &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article352362.ece&quot; title=&quot;Iraq is a country paralysed by fear. It is at its worst in Baghdad...All Iraq is suffering, but Baghdad and the central provinces are turning into a slaughter house. Normal life has long been impossible.&quot;&gt;death squads&lt;/a&gt; on the prowl in a nation paralysed by fear, with each mile, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-walk20mar20,0,1468604,print.story?coll=la-home-headlines&quot; title=&quot;Three years after the military invasion to oust Hussein, the country&apos;s landscape betrays its fault lines, like land heaved up by shifting tectonic plates.&quot;&gt;the divisions deepen&lt;/a&gt;. Some suggest Iraq is about to look a lot like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/printpage/?url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/03/iraqs_resource_sectarianism.html&quot; title=&quot;There is a key difference between Lebanon and Iraq, one that raises the stakes substantially in Iraqi politics: oil... Resource-rich Iraq offers more wealth to fight over and a powerful incentive for sectarian leaders to resist cooperation with one another. That&apos;s particularly bad news for those who hope Iraq will soon offer a model of stable democratic governance in an increasingly troubled region.&quot;&gt;Lebanon&lt;/a&gt;. Others think we should be so lucky, that what looms is much worse than mere civil war: an archipegalo of &lt;a href=&quot;http://financialtimes.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&amp;title=FT.com+%2F+Middle+East+%26+Africa+%2F+Iraq+-+Prospect+of+anarchy+on+the+rise+in+strife-torn+Iraq&amp;expire=&amp;urlID=17611149&amp;fb=Y&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F846ab5be-b76d-11da-b4c2-0000779e2340%2Cs01%3D1.html&amp;partnerID=1744&quot; title=&quot;&apos;What this leads to is something that could be worse than a civil war, it could be violent anarchy, with islands of comparative stability scattered across the country in a sea of violence&apos;&quot;&gt;complete and total anarchy&lt;/a&gt;, the war of all against all. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As the saying goes,  &lt;em&gt;even a blind squirrel may find an acorn now and then&lt;/em&gt;, especially one planetary in size--like here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/14115859.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp&quot; title=&quot;&apos;Three years after the United States invaded Iraq in pursuit of a freer, more stable Middle East, the country&apos;s deepening ethnic conflict is spreading tension across Iraq&apos;s borders, fueling terrorism and nurturing gloom about the future.&apos;&quot;&gt;predictions of a better Middle East have evaporated&lt;/a&gt;. 


















&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50213</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:23:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Disaster</category>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Costly Withdrawal Is the Price To Be Paid for a Foolish War - Martin van Creveld</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47099/Costly%2DWithdrawal%2DIs%2Dthe%2DPrice%2DTo%2DBe%2DPaid%2Dfor%2Da%2DFoolish%2DWar%2DMartin%2Dvan%2DCreveld</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;For misleading the American people, and launching the most foolish war since Emperor Augustus in 9 B.C sent his legions into Germany and lost them, Bush deserves to be impeached and, once he has been removed from office, put on trial along with the rest of the president&apos;s men. If convicted, they&apos;ll have plenty of time to mull over their sins.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forward.com/main/printer-friendly.php?id=6936&quot; title=&quot;&apos;Clearly, then, the thing to do is to forget about face-saving and conduct a classic withdrawal.&apos; - Martin van Creveld&quot;&gt;Costly Withdrawal Is the Price To Be Paid for a Foolish War&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; Martin van Creveld, a professor of military history at the Hebrew University, is author of &quot;Transformation of War&quot; (Free Press, 1991). He is the only non-American author on the U.S. Army&apos;s required reading list for officers. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sonshi.com/vancreveld.html&quot; title=&quot;&apos;According to Carl Woodward&apos;s &apos;Bush at War&apos;... Bush, repeatedly referred to Vietnam, adding that &apos;I am not stupid&apos;. Why, assuming the reports are correct, he nevertheless decided to go to war escapes me and will no doubt preoccupy historians to come.&apos; - Martin van Creveld&quot;&gt;An interview&lt;/a&gt; with Martin Van Creveld.  See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5344245-103550,00.html&quot; title=&quot;The inescapable fact is that the processes Mr Bush unleashed on March 20 2003 (and imagined he had ended with his &apos;mission accomplished&apos; speech six weeks later) will take a decade or more to run their course and there is little that anyone, even the US, can do now to halt them.&quot;&gt;Nowhere To Run&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47099</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:44:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Failure</category>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Somalia</category>
		<category>Vietnam</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<category>Withdrawal</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Sow the wind, reap the hurricane -- Blowback Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46390/Sow%2Dthe%2Dwind%2Dreap%2Dthe%2Dhurricane%2DBlowback%2DRevisited</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;President Jimmy Carter&#8217;s national security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, once asked of the Soviet defeat in Afghanistan: &#8220;What is most important to the history of 
the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Muslims or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War?&#8221; Today, the Bush administration is implicitly arguing a similar point: that the establishment of a democratic Iraqi state is a project of overriding importance for the United States and the world, which in due course will eclipse memories of the 
insurgency. But such a viewpoint minimizes the fact that the war in Iraq is already breeding a new generation of terrorists. The lesson of the decade of terror that 
followed the Afghan war was that underestimating 
the importance of blowback has severe consequences. Repeating the mistake in regard to Iraq could lead to 
even deadlier outcomes...&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peterbergen.com/bergen/services/print.aspx?id=231&quot; title=&quot;Today&#8217;s Insurgents in Iraq Are Tomorrow&#8217;s Terrorists &quot;&gt;Blowback Revisited&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rest assured,  torture is a gift which will keep on giving back to us--for years.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46390</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:10:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blowback</category>
		<category>folly</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Night Draws Near: Iraq&apos;s People in the Shadow of America&apos;s War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45173/Night%2DDraws%2DNear%2DIraqs%2DPeople%2Din%2Dthe%2DShadow%2Dof%2DAmericas%2DWar</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;...After the raid, an Iraqi informer walked among detainees, pointing them out to U.S. troops. Despite being disguised with a bag over his head, the informer was recognized by his fellow villagers by his yellow sandals and his amputated thumb. His name was Sabah. ...The next day, his father and brother, carrying AK-47s, entered his room before dawn and took him behind the house. With trembling hands, the father fired twice... Sabah&apos;s brother then fired three times, once at his brother&apos;s head, killing him. Sitting with the father later, Shadid found himself unable to ask the question he knew that as a journalist he had to ask: Had he killed his son? &quot;In a moment so tragic, so wretched, there still had to be decency. I didn&apos;t want to hear him say yes. I didn&apos;t want to humiliate him any further. In the end, I didn&apos;t have to.&quot; &quot;&apos;I have the heart of a father, and he&apos;s my son,&apos; he told me, his eyes cast to the ground. &apos;Even the prophet Abraham didn&apos;t have to kill his son.&apos; He stopped, steadying his voice. &apos;There was no other choice.&apos;&quot;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m15717&amp;l=i&amp;size=1&amp;hd=0&quot; title=&quot;In Anthony Shadid&apos;s extraordinary new book about the Iraq war, the Iraqis themselves finally speak. Their stories provide the most eloquent indictment yet of America&apos;s disastrous Middle East adventure.&quot;&gt;What went wrong&lt;/a&gt; That&apos;s from the Salon review of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.henryholt.com/holt/nightdrawsnearexcerpt.htm&quot; title=&quot;&apos;It all depends on God.&apos;&quot;&gt;Night Draws Near: Iraq&apos;s People in the Shadow of America&apos;s War&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2005/08/29/DI2005082900740_pf.html&quot; title=&quot;The Washington Post&apos;s Anthony Shadid was online Tuesday, Sept. 6, at 1 p.m. ET to discuss his book, &apos;Night Draws Near: Iraq&apos;s People in the Shadow of America&apos;s War,&apos; and the impact of the war on ordinary Iraqis.&quot;&gt;Anthony Shadid&lt;/a&gt; [+]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45173</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:15:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Amal</category>
		<category>Folly</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Tragedy</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


