<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with iraqwar and AbuGhraib</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/iraqwar+AbuGhraib</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'iraqwar' and 'AbuGhraib' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:26:57 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:26:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>A Guardian interview with  Lynndie England</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78005/A%2DGuardian%2Dinterview%2Dwith%2DLynndie%2DEngland</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jan/03/abu-ghraib-lynndie-england-interview"&gt;A Guardian interview with  Lynndie England&lt;/a&gt; (of Abu Ghraib notoriety).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78005</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:26:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abughraib</category>
		<category>guardian</category>
		<category>humanrights</category>
		<category>interview</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>lynddieengland</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>nthdegx</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Botero</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42950/Botero</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.revistadiners.com.co/noticia.php3?nt=24663"&gt;Fernando Botero on Abu Ghraib&lt;/a&gt; Fernando Botero, the Colombian artist best-known for his &lt;a href=&quot;http://pierre.lilamand.free.fr/Botero%2004.jpg&quot;&gt;odd and cute depictions of fleshy men and women&lt;/a&gt;, has just opened an exhibition in Rome featuring his own interpretations of the Abu Ghraib abuses. Expect to be shocked all over again - which is apparently exactly what he wants. (Link in Spanish).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42950</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:39:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>Botero</category>
		<category>FernandoBotero</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>From The Never Ending Story - The Torture Papers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40410/From%2DThe%2DNever%2DEnding%2DStory%2DThe%2DTorture%2DPapers</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;small&gt;While the proverbial road to hell is paved with good intentions, the internal government memos collected in this publication demonstrate that the path to the purgatory that is Guantanamo Bay, or Abu Ghraib, has been paved with decidedly bad intentions. The policies that resulted in rampant abuse of detainees first in Afghanistan, then at Guantanamo Bay, and later in Iraq, were product of three pernicious purposes designed to facilitate the unilateral and unfettered detention, interrogation, abuse, judgment, and punishment of prisoners: (1) the desire to place the detainees beyond the reach of any court or law; (2) the desire to abrogate the Geneva Convention with respect to the treatment of persons seized in the context of armed hostilities; and (3) the desire to absolve those implementing the policies of any liability for war crimes under U.S. and international law.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Regarding the &lt;a href=&quot;http://scoop.agonist.org/story/2005/2/25/93911/1890&quot; title=&quot;The memoranda that comprise this volume follow a logical sequence: (1) find a location secure not only from attack and infiltration, but also, and perhaps more importantly in light of the December 28, 2001, memo that commences this trail, from intervention by the courts; (2) rescind the U.S.&apos;s agreement to abide by the proscriptions of the Geneva Convention with respect to the treatment of persons captured during armed conflict; and (3) provide an interpretation of the law that protects policy makers and their instruments in the field from potential war crimes prosecution for their acts. The result, as clear from the arrogant rectitude emanating from the memos, was unchecked power, and the abuse that inevitably followed.&quot;&gt;Torture&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2005/02/15/features/bookwed.html&quot; title=&quot;&apos;The Torture Papers,&apos; the new compendium of government memos and reports chronicling the road to Abu Ghraib and its aftermath, definitively blows such arguments to pieces. In fact, the book provides a damning paper trail that reveals, in uninflected bureaucratic prose, the roots that those terrible images had in decisions made at the highest levels of the Bush administration - decisions that started the torture snowball rolling down the slippery slope of precedent by asserting that the United States need not abide by the Geneva conventions in its war on terror.&quot;&gt;Papers&lt;/a&gt;, which detail &lt;a href=&quot;http://chronicle.com/free/v51/i20/20a01201.htm#torture&quot; title=&quot;Notable Moments In The Torture Debates&quot;&gt;Torture&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://chronicle.com/free/v51/i20/20a01201.htm&quot; title=&quot;A new collection of government memoranda, some written by professors, shows how officials justified prisoner abuse in the campaign against terrorism &quot;&gt;Paper Trail&lt;/a&gt;, and, then there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://bostonreview.net/BR30.1/deborahstone.html&quot; title=&quot;By some unholy coincidence, the terms &apos;water boarding&apos; and &apos;air hunger&apos; entered my vocabulary in the same week. They came by such different routes, though, that I didn&#8217;t know how they were related until some time later. &quot;&gt;Hungry for Air&lt;/a&gt;: Learning The Language Of Torture, and, of course, there&apos;s &lt;small&gt;( more inside)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40410</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:55:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>GenevaConvention</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>Guantanamo</category>
		<category>GuantanamoBay</category>
		<category>humanrights</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>POWs</category>
		<category>prisoners</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>An Executive Order Along Torture&apos;s Path</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38012/An%2DExecutive%2DOrder%2DAlong%2DTortures%2DPath</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf&quot; title=&quot;&apos;&apos;I have been told that all interrogation techniques previously authorized by the Executive Order are still on the table but that certain techniques can only be used if very high-level authority is granted.&apos;&apos;&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Request for guidance regarding the OGC&apos;s EC regarding detainee abuse, referring to &#8220;interrogation techniques made lawful&#8221; by the &#8220;President&apos;s Executive Order.&#8221;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt; comes  from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/&quot;&gt;Records Released in Response to Torture FOIA Request&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/news/NewsPrint.cfm?ID=17216&amp;c=206&quot; title=&quot;The two-page e-mail that references an Executive Order states that the President directly authorized interrogation techniques including sleep deprivation, stress positions, the use of military dogs, and &apos;&apos;sensory deprivation through the use of hoods, etc.&apos;&apos; The ACLU is urging the White House to confirm or deny the existence of such an order and immediately to release the order if it exists. The FBI e-mail, which was sent in May 2004 from &apos;&apos;On Scene Commander--Baghdad&apos;&apos; to a handful of senior FBI officials, notes that the FBI has prohibited its agents from employing the techniques that the President is said to have authorized. &quot;&gt;Smoking Gun ?&lt;/a&gt; asks the ACLU--or just another stepping stone from &lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6733558/site/newsweek/print/1/displaymode/1098/&quot; title=&quot;In a Jan. 25, 2002, memo to Bush, Gonzales said the new war on terror &apos;&apos;renders obsolete Geneva&apos;s strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners.&apos;&apos; Some State Department lawyers charge that Gonzales misrepresented so many legal considerations and facts (including hard conclusions by State&apos;s Southeast Asia bureau about the nature of the Taliban) that one lawyer considers the memo to be &apos;&apos;an ethical breach.&apos;&apos; In response, a senior White House official says Gonzales&apos;s memo was only a &apos;&apos;draft&apos;&apos; and just one part of an extensive decision-making process in which all views were aired.&quot;&gt;Torture&apos;s Path&lt;/a&gt; ? As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/16/politics/16jag.html?ei=5090&amp;en=5016ee06544b6bc4&amp;ex=1260939600&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot; title=&quot;Several former high-ranking military lawyers say they are discussing ways to oppose President Bush&apos;s nomination of Alberto Gonzales to be attorney general, asserting that Gonzales&apos;s supervision of legal memorandums that appeared to sanction harsh treatment of detainees, even torture, showed unsound legal judgment.&quot;&gt;Ex-Military Lawyers Object to Bush Cabinet Nominee&lt;/a&gt;, and in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2004/12/17/memo/print.html&quot; title=&quot;Renewed exposure of prisoner abuse, torture and even murder by American military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan is widening already deep divisions between the Pentagon and the intelligence community -- and creating an untenable situation for Donald Rumsfeld, the beleaguered secretary of defense. A recently disclosed FBI memo indicates that &apos;&apos;marching orders&apos;&apos; to abandon traditional interrogation methods came from the defense secretary himself. In recent days, a coalition of human rights groups led by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights has brought new cases of abuse to public attention. Using the Freedom of Information Act, they have pried thousands of pages of previously secret documents from the Defense Department and other agencies.&quot;&gt;Torture begins at the top&lt;/a&gt;, Joe Conason suggests that a recently disclosed FBI memo indicates that &quot;marching orders&quot; to abandon traditional interrogation methods came from Defense Secretary Rumsfeld himself and all the while &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5083701-110481,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Fresh allegations about a regime of torture and humiliation inflicted on detainees by their American captors at Guant&amp;#0225;namo Bay have been made by a Briton still held there, according to Foreign Office documents seen by the Guardian. The claims by Martin Mubanga, from London, are the latest to surface from the prison where the US holds 550 Muslim men it claims are terrorists in conditions that have sparked worldwide condemnation. &quot;&gt;Guant&amp;#0225;namo torture and humiliation still going on, says shackled Briton&lt;/a&gt;. (more inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.38012</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:53:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>AlbertoGonzales</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>ExecutiveOrder</category>
		<category>FOIA</category>
		<category>FreedomOfInformationAct</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWOT</category>
		<category>Interrogation</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>Torture</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Road To Abu Ghraib</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36544/The%2DRoad%2DTo%2DAbu%2DGhraib</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0411.carter.html&quot; title=&quot;The world will forgive&#8212;and indeed, secretly applaud&#8212;those occasions, such as Kosovo, where we ignore the letter of the law or sidestep international institutions in the service of an obviously greater good. What it will neither understand nor condone is the wholesale abandonment of the law. The Bush administration has cast the debate over the laws of war in all-or-nothing terms&#8212;either you can throw out the old laws of war, or do nothing to secure the nation against a terrorist attack. In many ways, this position resembles much of the administration&apos;s rhetoric in the war on terror and its bid for reelection: You&apos;re either with us or against us, for good or for evil, a supporter of American policy or a supporter of terrorism. But the world is far more complex than that. There was a third path between living with the anachronistic laws of war and rejecting them in favor of expediency. The Bush administration rejected that path, and now, every day, U.S. soldiers and Iraqi citizens are paying the ultimate price for its mistake.&quot;&gt;The Road To Abu Ghraib&lt;/a&gt;&lt;small&gt; A generation from now, historians may look back to April 28, 2004, as the day the United States lost the war in Iraq... It was a direct&#8212;and predictable&#8212;consequence of a policy, hatched at the highest levels of the administration, by senior White House officials and lawyers, in the weeks and months after 9/11. Yet the administration has largely managed to escape responsibility for those decisions; a month from election day, almost no one in the press or the political class is talking about what is, without question, the worst scandal to emerge from President Bush&apos;s nearly four years in office...  Given the particular conditions faced by the president and his deputies after 9/11&#8212;a war against terrorists, in which the need to extract intelligence via interrogations was intensely pressing, but the limits placed by international law on interrogation techniques were very constricting&#8212;did those leaders have better alternatives than the one they chose? The answer is that they did. And we will be living with the consequences of the choices they made for years to come.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36544</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:03:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>detention</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>humanrights</category>
		<category>interrogation</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>PhilipCarter</category>
		<category>prison</category>
		<category>Slate</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>WashingtonMonthly</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>sound familiar?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33494/sound%2Dfamiliar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1231978,00.html"&gt;I have been in torture photos, too.&lt;/a&gt; Gerry Adams speaks out. &quot;News of the ill-treatment of prisoners in Iraq created no great surprise in republican Ireland. We have seen and heard it all before. Some of us have even survived that type of treatment. Suggestions that the brutality in Iraq was meted out by a few miscreants aren&apos;t even seriously entertained here. We have seen and heard all that before as well. But our experience is that, while individuals may bring a particular impact to their work, they do so within interrogative practices authorised by their superiors.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33494</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2004 09:32:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>GerryAdams</category>
		<category>IRA</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>Ireland</category>
		<category>IrishRepublicanArmy</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>sunexplodes</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>the wrong morons</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33022/the%2Dwrong%2Dmorons</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2903288.php"&gt;The Wrong Morons.&lt;/a&gt; (from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.armytimes.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Army Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;) &quot;Around the halls of the Pentagon, a term of caustic derision has emerged for the enlisted soldiers at the heart of the furor over the Abu Ghraib prison scandal: the six morons who lost the war...But the folks in the Pentagon are talking about the wrong morons.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33022</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 09:46:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>army</category>
		<category>ArmyTimes</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>prison</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Ty Webb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Scandal&apos;s Growing Stain</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32993/The%2DScandals%2DGrowing%2DStain</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/subscriber/cover/0,9171,1101040517-634634,00.html"&gt;The Scandal&apos;s Growing Stain&lt;/a&gt; Time Magazine: &quot;Abuses by U.S. soldiers in Iraq shock the world and roil the Bush Administration. the inside story of what went wrong&#8212;and who&apos;s to blame&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32993</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 11:12:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>abuse</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>detainees</category>
		<category>detention</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>prisoners</category>
		<category>prisons</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>soldiers</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>USArmy</category>
		<category>USmilitary</category>
		<category>waterboarding</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


