<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with iraqwar and journalism</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/iraqwar+journalism</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'iraqwar' and 'journalism' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:39:20 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:39:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>&quot;Jesus Day&quot; in Baghdad</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87293/Jesus%2DDay%2Din%2DBaghdad</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/07/jesus-day-baghdad/"&gt;&quot;Jesus Day&quot; in Baghdad.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.87293</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:39:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>baghdad</category>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>lifeduringwartime</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>nyt</category>
		<dc:creator>ibmcginty</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fourth Estate Failure</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34949/Fourth%2DEstate%2DFailure</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-4412951,00.html"&gt;&quot;There was an attitude among editors: Look, we&apos;re going to war, why do we even worry about all this contrary stuff?&apos;&apos;&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Editors at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A58127-2004Aug11?language=printer&quot;&gt; The Washington Post acknowledge&lt;/a&gt; they underplayed stories questioning President Bush&apos;s claims of the threat posed by Saddam Hussein in the months leading up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq.&quot;  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lunaville.com/blogging/&quot;&gt;weblog Lunaville notes&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cissm.umd.edu/documents/WMDstudy_full.pdf&quot;&gt; The Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland found&lt;/a&gt; that &quot;since September 11, 2001, the Bush administration has been especially successful at getting the American media to confirm its political and diplomatic agenda. Media reporting on the President amplified the administration s voice: when Bush said to the country that Americans are vulnerable to WMD in the hands of terrorists, the media effectively magnified those fears.&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freepress.net/news/4271&quot;&gt;Lawrence Lessig says:&lt;/a&gt; &quot;As media becomes more concentrated, competition to curry favor with politicians only increases... Concentrated media and expansive copyright are the perfect storm not just for stifling debate but, increasingly, for weakening democracy as well.&quot; Can we make the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bostonreview.net/BR23.3/mcchesney.html&quot;&gt;media democratic?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34949</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:08:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>press</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>fold_and_mutilate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Times and Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33317/The%2DTimes%2Dand%2DIraq</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/26/international/middleeast/26FTE_NOTE.html?8dpc=&amp;amp;pagewanted=all&amp;amp;position="&gt;Finally&lt;/a&gt; the NYT offers up an analysis of its pre-war coverage. &quot;But we have found a number of instances of coverage that was not as rigorous as it should have been. In some cases, information that was controversial then, and seems questionable now, was insufficiently qualified or allowed to stand unchallenged. Looking back, we wish we had been more aggressive in re-examining the claims as new evidence emerged &#8212; or failed to emerge.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33317</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 02:29:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>analysis</category>
		<category>coverage</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>meta</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<dc:creator>raaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>US Army Used Reporters for Own Ends in Iraq War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28150/US%2DArmy%2DUsed%2DReporters%2Dfor%2DOwn%2DEnds%2Din%2DIraq%2DWar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=industryNews&amp;amp;storyID=3396575"&gt;U.S. Army Used Media Cover in Iraq for Own Ends&lt;/a&gt; which sounds like a big old bowl of yellow journalism but isn&apos;t really, at least I don&apos;t think so. It was more to refute the Iraqi Minister of Lies talking about the whooping the Iraqi war machine was delivering to the coalition forces.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The main issue that the reporters had was that they were only getting the one side of the story and not the Iraqi perspective. 
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
But it raises some questions about the supposed objectivity of the media. Is this a proper use of them? To help achieve military goals? Or to try to avoid more unnecessary deaths?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28150</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 13:51:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>reporters</category>
		<category>USArmy</category>
		<category>USMilitary</category>
		<dc:creator>fenriq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s not censorship if it doesn&apos;t work</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27182/Its%2Dnot%2Dcensorship%2Dif%2Dit%2Ddoesnt%2Dwork</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/07/23/168232"&gt;GOP Warns TV Stations Not to Air Ad Alleging Bush Mislead the Nation Over Iraq&lt;/a&gt; They claim that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democrats.org/truth/index.html?s=front&quot;&gt;ad itself &lt;/a&gt;is dishonest, and cite the obligation of broadcast outlets to be free of misleading information.  &#8220;&lt;em&gt;Such obligations must be taken seriously. This letter puts you on notice that the information contained in the above-cited advertisement is false and misleading; therefore, you are obligated to refrain from airing this advertisement.&#8221; &lt;/em&gt;  Despite the implicit threats, &lt;em&gt;only one station has refused to run the ad, a Fox station. &lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27182</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:57:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Salam&apos;s Story</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26076/Salams%2DStory</link>
		<description> Salam Pax, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://dear_raed.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Baghdad Blogger&lt;/a&gt; is finally &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.guardian.co.uk/newmedia/story/0,7496,966935,00.html&quot;&gt;tracked down&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26076</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 02:31:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Baghdad</category>
		<category>BaghdadBlogger</category>
		<category>blogger</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>SalamPax</category>
		<category>TheGuardian</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>MintSauce</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Ashleigh Banfield, hot or not?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25595/Ashleigh%2DBanfield%2Dhot%2Dor%2Dnot</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ky3/banfield/"&gt;Ashleigh Banfield&lt;/a&gt; was recently &quot;&lt;a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/05/business/media/05ASH.html?ex=1052798400&amp;amp;en=aaec32568c7f1a3c&amp;amp;ei=5062&amp;amp;partner=GOOGLE&gt;demoted&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;  &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/2003/04/000772.html&quot;&gt;Coincidentally&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; this came after her public &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cjonline.com/stories/042403/bre_landonlec.shtml&quot;&gt;comments&lt;/a&gt; about coverage of the war in Iraq.  I have thought about her in the past, but never as an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.glennbeck.com/teddwebb/index.shtml&quot;&gt;ideologue&lt;/a&gt;, and certainly not as a journalist on the level of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.daytradernews.net/in/daytrades/marialinks.html&quot;&gt;Maria Bartiromo&lt;/a&gt;.  It is shocking that her career might be a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hollywoodhalfwits.com/index.php&quot;&gt;casualty&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://amysrobot.com/archive/2003_04_01_index.php#93433739&quot;&gt;war&lt;/a&gt;.  Thoughts about this &lt;a href=&quot;http://magazines.ivillage.com/cosmopolitan/connect/fearless/spc/0,12859,284424_294206,00.html &quot;&gt;fallen soldier&lt;/a&gt;, as a &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=638&amp;ncid=579&amp;e=4&amp;u=/nm/20030429/en_nm/television_banfield_dc &quot;&gt;journalist&lt;/a&gt;, or as a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blackmarketgold.com/ash.html&quot;&gt;hot&lt;/a&gt; little &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.angelfire.com/wi3/abgallery/ashdefensive.jpg&quot;&gt;firecracker&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25595</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 23:07:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AshleighBanfield</category>
		<category>backlash</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>comments</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>son_of_minya</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Journalistic Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25049/Journalistic%2DFreedom</link>
		<description> We all know that a number of journalists have &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.guardian.co.uk/broadcast/story/0,7493,934832,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Guardian Story&quot;&gt;quit the embedded roles&lt;/a&gt; they were playing. And while Saddam&apos;s regime may have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/11/opinion/11JORD.html?ex=1050638400&amp;en=ea21e8c88feae21c&amp;ei=5062&amp;partner=METAFILTER&quot; title=&quot;New York Times&quot;&gt;quite brutal&lt;/a&gt; to the press and others, some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/jour-a11.shtml&quot; title=&quot;World Socialist Web Site? Hadn&apos;t ever heard of them before...&quot;&gt;claim the recent loss&lt;/a&gt; of a few journalists was no accident.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25049</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:26:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>embedded</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>journalists</category>
		<dc:creator>woil</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Media Map of Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24888/Media%2DMap%2Dof%2DIraq</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://poynterextra.org/map/deploy.html"&gt;Media Map of Iraq&lt;/a&gt; (Requires Flash 6.)  Click on a location or unit to see a list of embedded reporters.  Then each reporter&apos;s name is a link to a list of their war reporting either at their website or via a Google News search.  Also, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.poynter.org/content/content_view.asp?id=27077&quot;&gt;Poynter.org is constantly looking to improve this map&lt;/a&gt; via reader input, as the Pentagon is not giving up much information on the embedment program.  Also, The Atlantic Monthly/Washington Post&apos;s Michael Kelly is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27396-2003Apr4.html&quot;&gt;first embedded reporter to be killed &lt;/a&gt;in this war.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24888</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 10:43:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>embedded</category>
		<category>flash</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>map</category>
		<category>Poynter</category>
		<category>reporters</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>pitchblende</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Reporters vs. Bush administration vs. Saddam&apos;s regime</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24680/Reporters%2Dvs%2DBush%2Dadministration%2Dvs%2DSaddams%2Dregime</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/892201.asp?0cv=CA01"&gt;&quot;Journalists&quot; vs. The White House&lt;/a&gt; - MSNBC&apos;s Tom Curry reports on the Bush administration&apos;s frustration with the war coverage. Rumsfeld: &#8220;Fortunately... the American people have a very good center of gravity and can absorb and balance what they see and hear.&#8221;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24680</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2003 20:23:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<dc:creator>cinematique</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Graphic Design for Blog Journalism?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24558/Graphic%2DDesign%2Dfor%2DBlog%2DJournalism</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://agonist.org/annex/sitmap"&gt;Sean-Paul Kelley&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nickdenton.org/archives/images/iraq_wall_det_2003.jpg&quot;&gt;Nick Denton&lt;/a&gt; have some amateur infographics of the Iraq conflict online. [more inside]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24558</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2003 12:10:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>infographics</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>NickDenton</category>
		<category>SeanPaulKelly</category>
		<dc:creator>oissubke</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Are Embedded Journalists In Iraq Being Short-sheeted?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24535/Are%2DEmbedded%2DJournalists%2DIn%2DIraq%2DBeing%2DShortsheeted</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://mediapoint.press.net/services/media_features/livefeatures/war.html"&gt;Embedded?  Or In Bed With The Military Spin Doctors?&lt;/a&gt; Quite apart from the significant sexual and conspiratorial overtones of the word and concept themselves (when applied to people), there&apos;s something more than a little disquieting about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/kb/qualmeth.htm&quot;&gt;participant observation&lt;/a&gt; aspect of the large-scale practice of &lt;b&gt;embedded reporting&lt;/b&gt; in the current invasion of Iraq -  as opposed to the journalistic tradition of direct observation. Altogether too gung-ho - and inevitably so - I&apos;d say.  Me no like.  And don&apos;t really trust myself to be able to epistemologically introduce, in my understanding of what I see,  the (already minimal) distance that I&apos;d previously taken for granted in standard reportage. What can be done to offset this bias? [&lt;i&gt;Here is a very recent, detailed Department of Defense guide to what a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Feb2003/d20030228pag.pdf&quot;&gt;media embed&lt;/a&gt; consists of [&lt;small&gt;&lt;b&gt;pdf format&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/small&gt;] and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.journalism.org/resources/tools/ethics/wartime/embedding.asp&quot;&gt;release&lt;/a&gt; journalists must sign in order to be embedded&lt;/i&gt;.]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24535</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2003 12:46:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>embedded</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>war reporting</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24440/war%2Dreporting</link>
		<description> The War is about to Start and for those of us without a TV we are part of a grand experiment to see if we can be as well informed. According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;ncid=&amp;e=5&amp;u=/usatoday/20030319/tc_usatoday/4961688&quot;&gt;this Reuters article&lt;/a&gt;, Radio had World War II, Television had Vietnam, Cable TV had the Gulf War and now, the Internet may have the U.S. war with Iraq...reporters and producers with wireless laptops and handheld digital cameras will &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/sections/nightline/World/iraq_media_030319.html&quot;&gt;file reports from battlefields&lt;/a&gt; and military installations. Cameras are at key locations for live feeds 24 hours a day. Interactive, 3-D maps will update troop movements, casualties and weapons used. &apos;&apos;You&apos;re combining the speed of television with the depth of print,&apos;&apos; says Mitch Gelman, executive producer of CNN.com. &apos;&apos;This could define how future wars are covered.&apos;&apos; (more inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24440</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 11:22:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>embeddedjournalists</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Pentagon threatens to target journalists in Iraq.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24238/Pentagon%2Dthreatens%2Dto%2Dtarget%2Djournalists%2Din%2DIraq</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://wwa.rte.ie/rams/radio/sundayshow.ram"&gt;Pentagon threatens to target journalists in Iraq.&lt;/a&gt; (RealAudio, 49 minutes into the broadcast.)&lt;br&gt; 

In an interview with Radio One Ireland, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/correspondents/newsid_2625000/2625875.stm&quot;&gt;Kate Adie&lt;/a&gt;, former chief news correspondent for the BBC, drops a bombshell.&lt;br&gt;

If satellite uplinks from the press are detected in Baghdad, they would be &quot;targeted down&quot;, said a senior US military official. &quot;They know this. They&apos;ve been warned.&quot;&lt;br&gt;

 Ms. Adie also revealed that the US military are openly asking journalists what their feelings are on the war, and are using this information to block reporters from access to reporting on the conflict.&lt;br&gt;

These actions are &quot;shameless&quot; and &quot;entirely hostile to the free spread of information,&quot; says Ms. Adie. &quot;What actually appalls me is the difference between twelve years ago and now. I&apos;ve seen a complete erosion of any kind of acknowledgment that reporters should be able to report as they witness.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24238</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:52:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>journalists</category>
		<category>KateAdie</category>
		<category>Pentagon</category>
		<category>RadioOneIreland</category>
		<dc:creator>insomnia_lj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


