<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with jihad and islam</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/jihad+islam</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'jihad' and 'islam' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:40:39 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:40:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The Clarion Call of Obsession</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74981/The%2DClarion%2DCall%2Dof%2DObsession</link>
		<description> The &lt;a href=&quot;http://clarionfund.org/&quot;&gt;Clarion Fund&lt;/a&gt; has been placing DVD advertisements in newspapers. That, in itself is not &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/entertainment/music/commentary/listeningpost/2007/07/listeningpost_0709&quot;&gt;terribly&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.videobusiness.com/index.asp?layout=article&amp;articleid=CA6593573&quot;&gt;new&lt;/a&gt;. What&apos;s new is that they are advertising &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jewsonfirst.org/08a/obsession.html&quot;&gt;fear&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/erik-ose/pro-mccain-group-dumping_b_125969.html&quot;&gt;propaganda&lt;/a&gt;, and they&apos;re only &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0,,id=163395,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Things 503(c)(3)s aren&apos;t supposed to do...&quot;&gt;targeting swing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003849746&quot;&gt;states&lt;/a&gt;. The Clarion Fund, a shadowy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0,,id=96099,00.html&quot;&gt;501(c)(3)&lt;/a&gt; non-profit organization, has also been sending &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.obsessionthemovie.com/&quot;&gt;Obsession: Radical Islam&#8217;s War Against the West&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/57667/Hate-crime-law-used-to-censor-the-viewing-of-Obsession&quot;&gt;sort-of previously&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt; to people as direct mail, but there&apos;s no telling who they buy their list from, since they don&apos;t seem to answer the phones at their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.offices.org/offices/gcp.htm&quot;&gt;rent-an-office&lt;/a&gt;. Apparently, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.watchobsession.org/&quot;&gt;one of their affiliates&lt;/a&gt; even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earnedmedia.org/rnc0903.htm&quot;&gt;handed them out at the RNC&lt;/a&gt;. Supposedly the Producer/Co-Writer, Raphael Shore, is related to David Shore, creator of Fox&#8217;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fox.com/house/&quot;&gt;House, M.D.&lt;/a&gt;, though that doesn&#8217;t seem to have helped the movie&#8217;s production values. It&#8217;s not easy to figure out who makes up Clarion - some have claimed that even some of the crew positions are false names. And, nobody can seem to figure out &lt;a href=&quot;http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2008/09/what-is-clarion-fund.html&quot;&gt;where the money is coming from&lt;/a&gt;. That&#8217;s OK though, because the Executive Producer for &#8220;24&#8221; says, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.obsessionthemovie.com/about_quotes.php&quot; title=&quot;A bunch of promo quotes, including one from David Shore&quot;&gt;&#8220;...it&apos;s required viewing for everyone.&#8221;&lt;/a&gt;

In case you haven&apos;t had your fear propagandized enough for you, they&apos;ve also got another happy little feature coming out October 10th called &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thethirdjihad.com/&quot;&gt;The Third Jihad&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;. And, in case you really want to get behind the fear and hate and vitriol against a religion usually called the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_of_peace&quot;&gt;religion of peace&lt;/a&gt;, you can get your fill of it at their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.radicalislam.info/&quot;&gt;&#8220;Learning&#8221; site&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74981</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:40:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>clarionfund</category>
		<category>fear</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>jihad</category>
		<category>obsessionthemovie</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>thethirdjihad</category>
		<dc:creator>tomierna</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Jihad Will Be Televised</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71794/The%2DJihad%2DWill%2DBe%2DTelevised</link>
		<description> NewsFilter: Sen. Joe Lieberman (ID - Conn.) &lt;a href=&quot;http://lieberman.senate.gov/newsroom/release.cfm?id=298006&quot;&gt;strikes a decisive blow&lt;/a&gt; against another Islamic terror front group: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxu1LwJk7uA&amp;feature=related&quot;&gt;YouTube&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71794</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:44:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlQaeda</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>GWOT</category>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>jihad</category>
		<category>Lieberman</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Schmidt</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>YouTube</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Spy of the Heart</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60342/The%2DSpy%2Dof%2Dthe%2DHeart</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.spyoftheheart.com/"&gt;The Spy of the Heart&lt;/a&gt; - The story of an American&apos;s exploration of Islamic spirituality within the turmoil of Afghanistan.  Full &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spyoftheheart.com/the_spy_of_the_heart.pdf&quot;&gt;book &lt;small&gt;(PDF)&lt;/small&gt; &lt;/a&gt;available free onsite.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.60342</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:50:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>afghanistan</category>
		<category>ebook</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>jihad</category>
		<category>robertabdulhayydarr</category>
		<category>spirituality</category>
		<category>sufism</category>
		<dc:creator>Burhanistan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Landscapes Of The Jihad</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47375/Landscapes%2DOf%2DThe%2DJihad</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;...With the end of the cold war and the emergence of global networks in which goods, ideas and people circulate outside the language of citizenship, the fundamentalist fight for ideological states has lost influence... Muslim radicalism, by contrast, has moved beyond the language of citizenship to assume a global countenance, joining movements as different as environmentalism and pacifism in its pursuit of justice on a worldwide scale. Such movements are ethical rather than political in nature: they can neither predict nor control the global consequences of their actions...&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/debates/article.jsp?id=2&amp;debateId=124&amp;articleId=2768#&quot; title=&quot;&apos;In the global perspective adopted by the jihad, the peoples of the world are bound together in a web of mutual relations and complicities.&apos;&quot;&gt;Spectral brothers: al-Qaida&#8217;s world wide web&lt;/a&gt; &amp;#0160;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Snapshots of Faisal Devji&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/books/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=5135539&quot; title=&quot;Al-Qaeda&apos;s importance in the long run lies not in its pioneering a new form of networked militancy, but instead in its fragmentation of traditional structures of Muslim authority within new global landscapes.&quot;&gt;Landscapes of the Jihad&lt;/a&gt; are to be seen within&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47375</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:27:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlQaeda</category>
		<category>ethical</category>
		<category>Globalism</category>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>Jihad</category>
		<category>networks</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Interview with a British Jihadist</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43812/Interview%2Dwith%2Da%2DBritish%2DJihadist</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=6992"&gt;An interview with a British Jihadist.&lt;/a&gt; What he believes, how he came to his beliefs. &lt;small&gt;An extended version of the interview from the latest issue of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/&quot;&gt;Prospect&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43812</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:40:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>islamist</category>
		<category>jihad</category>
		<category>jihadist</category>
		<category>muslim</category>
		<dc:creator>biffa</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The next terrorist attack on America may be perpetrated by Europeans.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43338/The%2Dnext%2Dterrorist%2Dattack%2Don%2DAmerica%2Dmay%2Dbe%2Dperpetrated%2Dby%2DEuropeans</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cfr.org/publication.php?id=8218"&gt;The next terrorist attack on America may be perpetrated by Europeans.&lt;/a&gt; Radical Islam is spreading across Europe among descendants of Muslim immigrants. Disenfranchised and disillusioned by the failure of integration, some European Muslims have taken up jihad against the West. They are dangerous and committed -- and can enter the United States without a visa.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43338</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 08:49:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>Europe</category>
		<category>immigration</category>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>jihad</category>
		<category>Muslim</category>
		<category>Muslims</category>
		<category>Radical</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>dsquid</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Good Muslim, Bad Muslim</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41148/Good%2DMuslim%2DBad%2DMuslim</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt; ...The presumption that there are &apos;good&apos; Muslims readily available to be split off from &apos;bad&apos; Muslims masks a failure to make a political analysis of our times. This book argues that political Islam emerged as the result of a modern encounter with Western power, and that the terrorist movement at the center of Islamist politics is an even more recent phenomenon, one that followed America&#8217;s embrace of proxy war after its defeat in Vietnam. Mamdani writes with great insight about the Reagan years, showing America&#8217;s embrace of the highly ideological politics of &apos;good&apos; against &apos;evil.&apos; Identifying militant nationalist governments as Soviet proxies in countries such as Nicaragua and Afghanistan, the Reagan administration readily backed terrorist movements, hailing them as the &apos;moral equivalents&apos; of America&#8217;s Founding Fathers. The era of proxy wars has come to an end with the invasion of Iraq. And there, as in Vietnam, America will need to recognize that it is not fighting terrorism but nationalism...&lt;/small&gt; Here is an excerpt of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readersread.com/excerpts/goodmuslimbadmuslim.htm&quot; title=&quot;Culture Talk; or, How Not to Talk About Islam and Politics - &apos;In post&#8211;9/11 America, Culture Talk has come to focus on Islam and Muslims who made culture only at the beginning of creation, as some extraordinary, prophetic act. After that, it seems Muslims just conformed to culture. According to some, our culture seems to have no history, no politics, and no debates, so that all Muslims are just plain bad. According to others, there is a history, a politics, even debates, and there are good Muslims and bad Muslims. In both versions, history seems to have petrified into a lifeless custom of an antique people who inhabit antique lands. Or could it be that culture here stands for habit, for some kind of instinctive activity with rules that are inscribed in early founding texts, usually religious, and mummified in early artifacts?&apos;&quot;&gt;Chapter 1&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chapters.indigo.ca/item.asp?Item=978038551537&amp;Catalog=Books&amp;N=35&amp;Lang=en&amp;Section=books&amp;zxac=1&quot; title=&quot;...The presumption that there are &apos;good&apos; Muslims readily available to be split off from &apos;bad&apos; Muslims masks a failure to make a political analysis of our times. This book argues that political Islam emerged as the result of a modern encounter with Western power, and that the terrorist movement at the center of Islamist politics is an even more recent phenomenon, one that followed America&#8217;s embrace of proxy war after its defeat in Vietnam. Mamdani writes with great insight about the Reagan years, showing America&#8217;s embrace of the highly ideological politics of &apos;good&apos; against &apos;evil.&apos; Identifying militant nationalist governments as Soviet proxies in countries such as Nicaragua and Afghanistan, the Reagan administration readily backed terrorist movements, hailing them as the &apos;moral equivalents&apos; of America&#8217;s Founding Fathers. The era of proxy wars has come to an end with the invasion of Iraq. And there, as in Vietnam, America will need to recognize that it is not fighting terrorism but nationalism, a battle that cannot be won by occupation.&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the Roots of Terror&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, and with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lipmagazine.org/articles/reviwiegand_mamdani.htm&quot; title=&quot;While a slew of books have come out over the past few years to support this argument, Mahmood Mamdani&apos;s Good Muslim, Bad Muslim is one of the few to examine thoroughly the phenomenon of modern Islamic terrorism and to demonstrate how its rise is a political reaction to imperialism... The book examines the Western premise that &apos;bad&apos; Muslims practice terrorism, are &apos;fundamentalists&apos; and hate freedom, while &apos;good&apos; Muslims are modern, secular and support US foreign policy. The underlying assumptions, of course, are that any Muslim could be a terrorist and that good Muslims should be ready and willing to prove their patriotism and loyalty.&quot;&gt;one review&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.spirithit.com/index/book_reviews/print/good_muslim_bad_muslim/&quot; title=&quot;The book begins with an analysis of the ways in which the &apos;war on terror&apos; has politicised religion, and in particular the pervasive association between &apos;Muslim&apos; and &apos;terrorist&apos; now made in the minds of many in America... Behind this assumption is the idea that fundamentalist Islam is premodern and backward, whereas moderate Islam embraces Western values, which are modern and progressive. From this, it is only a short step to begin to imagine that invading countries to bring them democracy is a form of &apos;liberation.&apos; In reality, the development of religious fundamentalism, its politicization, and the demonization of particular groups on the grounds of belief need to be seen largely in the context of modern Western politics. As Mamdani points out, while the concepts of the Islamic state and popular Islamic-based political movements have been aspirations for intellectuals and activists in Egypt, India and elsewhere, the promotion of religious fundamentalism as a political entity has largely been the work of the US government. This is evident from the ways in which religious fundamentalism has become increasingly influential within the US itself; a fundamentalism that has successfully hijacked what Mamdani calls &apos;culture talk,&apos; and which has promoted the idea of a &apos;clash of civilizations&apos; between Islam and Christianity for its own political purposes.&quot;&gt;two review&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://mobile.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/13021/&quot; title=&quot;Perhaps the heart of this book can be found in the first chapter titled &apos;Culture Talk; Or How Not To Talk About Islam And Politics&apos;. The author is able to penetrate the limits of conventional discourse on democracy and dictatorship, poverty and wealth and also succeeds in locating &apos;culture&apos; within the chasm of globalisation. As he explains, unlike the culture studied by anthropologists - face-to-face, intimate, local and lived - the talk of culture is highly politicised and comes in large geo-packages. Hence linking &apos;terrorism&apos; to Islam and the grossly abused term of &apos;Islamic terrorism&apos; is a consequence of Culture Talk. The lucid arguments advanced by Mamdani in support of his thesis provides readers with an array of tools to probe deeper or simply to acknowledge his profound contribution. Not only does the author succeed in tracing the footprints of malevolent historians who during the era of the Cold War were responsible for stigmatising Africans as the prime examples of people not capable of modernity; he also does so with equal success in detailing how Islam has displaced Africa as &apos;the hard premodern core&apos; in a rapidly globalising world.&quot;&gt;three reviews&lt;/a&gt; hereafter. And here is author &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.columbia.edu/cu/sipa/RESEARCH/bios/mm1124.html&quot; title=&quot;Mahmood Mamdani is the Herbert Lehman Professor of Government at the Department of Anthropology at Columbia University. He is also the Director of the Institute of African Studies at SIPA.&quot;&gt;Mahmood Mandmani &lt;/a&gt;interviewed by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.asiasource.org/news/special_reports/mamdani.cfm&quot; title=&quot;Even when Bush speaks of &apos;good&apos; Muslims and &apos;bad&apos; Muslims, what he means by &apos;good&apos; Muslims is really pro-American Muslims and by &apos;bad&apos; Muslims he means anti-American Muslims. Once you recognize that, then it is no longer puzzling why good Muslims are becoming bad Muslims at such a rapid rate. You can actually begin to think through that development. If, however, you think of &apos;good&apos; and &apos;bad&apos; Muslims in cultural terms, it is mind-boggling that in one week, you can have a whole crop of &apos;bad&apos; Muslims - cultural changes do not usually happen with such rapidity! ...Political Islam, especially radical political Islam, and even more so, the terrorist wing in radical political Islam, did not emerge from conservative, religious currents, but on the contrary, from a secular intelligentsia. In other words, its preoccupation is this-worldly, it is about power in this world.&quot;&gt;AsiaSource&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41148</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:19:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>Jihad</category>
		<category>Mandmani</category>
		<category>Muslim</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Why so quiet?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36069/Why%2Dso%2Dquiet</link>
		<description> I&apos;m not much for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinfoil_hat&quot;&gt;tin foil hat&lt;/a&gt; types out there, but does anyone else find it odd that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=worldNews&amp;storyID=596998&amp;#0167;ion=news&quot;&gt;the leader of the Islamic Jihad was killed&lt;/a&gt; [Reuters UK via Fark] and it&apos;s not being reported by &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.google.com&quot;&gt;anyone else&lt;/a&gt;?

Could it have anything to do with the fact that it&apos;s nearing election time and the fact that it wasn&apos;t us who did it?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36069</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:52:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>jihad</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>twiggy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Intruders in the House of Saud, Part I: The Jihadi Who Kept Asking Why</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31629/Intruders%2Din%2Dthe%2DHouse%2Dof%2DSaud%2DPart%2DI%2DThe%2DJihadi%2DWho%2DKept%2DAsking%2DWhy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/07/magazine/07SAUDIS.html?ei=5062&amp;amp;en=2f0b531c68daa285&amp;amp;ex=1079240400&amp;amp;partner=GOOGLE&amp;amp;pagewanted=print&amp;amp;position="&gt;The Jihadi Who Kept Asking Why&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;em&gt;An unlikely group of onetime religious jihadists have recently stepped into the midst of the debate on Saudi Arabia&apos;s future. They belong to a larger circle of liberals, intellectuals, professors, former Wahhabi scholars, judges and even women who are discussing subjects in the media that were taboo before 9/11 -- questions about terrorism, about Wahhabi discrimination toward Muslims of the Shiite and Sufi sects (whom they consider apostates), about alcohol, about AIDS, about the rights of women to drive and work.  The ex-jihadists are fluent in Islam and, more important, in the lingo of the underground terrorists, and they&apos;ve surfaced from the extremist subculture with a message for the Wahhabi official clerics, the royal family and even their complicit American allies: Wake up. It&apos;s you who created us. We are not an aberration.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;br&gt; From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.agonist.org/&quot;&gt;The Agonist&lt;/a&gt;--where the editorial comment &lt;em&gt;this is an absolutely excellent article and a must read&lt;/em&gt; is quite indisputable. From entering &lt;em&gt;Salafiyya&lt;/em&gt; in Google comes the fascinating polemic &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geocities.com/~abdulwahid/muslimarticles/dogs.html&quot;&gt;The Salafi Cult. better known as the Khawarij&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31629</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:15:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>jihad</category>
		<category>jihadis</category>
		<category>Khawarrij</category>
		<category>NYT</category>
		<category>Salafis</category>
		<category>Salafiyya</category>
		<category>Saud</category>
		<category>Saudi</category>
		<category>Wahhabis</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rappin&apos; Taliban</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28045/Rappin%2DTaliban</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.eastbayexpress.com/issues/2003-09-03/feature.html/1/index.html"&gt;John Walker Lindh, Hip Hop MC?&lt;/a&gt; Before John Walker Lindh became the American Taliban, he hid his whiteness, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/groups?q=author:doodoo%40hooked.net&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;scoring=d&amp;selm=40jdqd%246en%40its.hooked.net&amp;rnum=45&amp;filter=0&quot;&gt;excoriating wack MCs&lt;/a&gt; on Usenet hip-hop bulletin boards.  Attracted to Islam after listening to &lt;a href=&quot;http://comp.uark.edu/~tsweden/5per.html&quot;&gt;hip hop influenced by the Five Percenter movement&lt;/a&gt;, he later abandoned rap to &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/groups?q=author:doodoo%40hooked.net&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;scoring=d&amp;selm=33827991.18EB%40hooked.net&amp;rnum=7&quot;&gt;denounce Nas&lt;/a&gt; as a fake Muslim.  An interesting, but previously unexamined side to the American jihadist.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28045</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2003 13:55:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>americantaliban</category>
		<category>fivepercenter</category>
		<category>hiphop</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>jihad</category>
		<category>johnwalkerlindh</category>
		<category>lindh</category>
		<category>taliban</category>
		<dc:creator>jonp72</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21123/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.americanvalues.org/html/can_we_coexist-press_release.html"&gt; &quot;God&apos;s boys on both sides of the Atlantic&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  It began back in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/15383&quot;&gt;February&lt;/a&gt;. Now, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanvalues.org/html/follow-up.html&quot;&gt;6 letters, 350+ intellectuals &lt;/a&gt;later, the great debate rages on,  though apparently and regrettably now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A8527-2002Oct24?language=printer&quot;&gt;censored in Saudi Arabia&lt;/a&gt;. Pity.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21123</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2002 07:56:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>jihad</category>
		<category>obl</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>saudi</category>
		<category>saudiarabia</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Voyageman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20092/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/online/content/?020916on_onlineonly02&quot;&gt;The &quot;merger&quot; &lt;/a&gt;of the Egyptian Zawahiri&apos;s Islamic Jihad and the Saudi Osama bin Laden&apos;s Al Qaeda in 2001, based on the foundation of Qutb&apos;s book &quot;Milestones&quot;,  provide outlet for those who have no other way of expressing their objections to the authoritarian regimes of the countries they live in, and the reach of American power in the Middle East.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20092</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2002 21:44:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>binLaden</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>Islamism</category>
		<category>Jihad</category>
		<category>merger</category>
		<category>NewYorker</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Zawahiri</category>
		<dc:creator>semmi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10944/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.secularislam.org/wtc2.htm"&gt;From  the essay by Ziauddin Sardar: &lt;/a&gt; Scroll 2/3 of the way down--it&apos;s from &lt;a href=&quot;http://&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;I.S.I.S. The Institute For Islamic Secularization&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;b&gt;A Call for Caution and Prudence&lt;/b&gt;

* We need free inquiry of the religious premises of the growing conflagration.

* We need rational debate of the questionable premises of a &quot;holy war&quot; or jihad.

* We need a rational debate of the biblical call for retribution.

* We call upon the United States not to act unilaterally and to petition the United Nations to establish a peace-keeping force.

* All terrorists when apprehended should be brought to the World Court at the Hague and put on trial.

* The basic constitutional civil liberties of America should not be abrogated. 



--Perhaps we&apos;re all best off with the godless making the rules?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10944</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2001 00:03:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>jihad</category>
		<category>Secular</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


