<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with johnhoward</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/johnhoward</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'johnhoward' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:04:29 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:04:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The Howard Years</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/77256/The%2DHoward%2DYears</link>
		<description> Former Australian Prime Minister John Howard was booted out in the 2007 elections. He had been Prime Minister for 11 years and in that time he had taken the country to war and divided the country on issues like Aboriginal reconciliation and workplace reforms. &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/howardyears/&quot;&gt;The Howard Years&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, a four part documentary originally screened on the ABC, is now online and available to view for free and takes a detailed look at the legacy of his Prime Ministership. The four part series explores in greater detail than ever before Howard&apos;s fractured relationship with his deputy and heir apparent, Peter Costello, and also contains some startling revelations from Howard Government ministers that many candidly admit they would never have told you while they were still in Government.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.77256</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:04:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>documentary</category>
		<category>johnhoward</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>Effigy2000</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Tenth Anniversary of the Patrick Stevedores Dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70574/Tenth%2DAnniversary%2Dof%2Dthe%2DPatrick%2DStevedores%2DDispute</link>
		<description> Australian dock workers will &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/04/07/2209454.htm&quot;&gt;stop work for a minute today&lt;/a&gt; to remember the Patrick stevedores dispute, an industrial dispute that involved the stevedoring corporation Patricks, the Howard government and the Maritime Union of Australia. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mauriceblackburn.com.au/about/landmark_cases.asp&quot;&gt;A landmark event in Australian political and legal history&lt;/a&gt;, the dispute saw dock workers stand &lt;em&gt;&quot;in the first line against the Howard government and the Patrick corporation that was seeking to remove their legal rights, their right to go to work [and] the right to collective bargaining&lt;/em&gt;.&quot; In its wake, the event generated debate about &lt;a href=&quot;http://jir.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/42/4/497&quot;&gt;the role of unions in Australia&lt;/a&gt;, an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/cib/1998-99/99cib01.htm#A&quot;&gt;alleged conspiracy between Patricks and the former Howard Government&lt;/a&gt; and even spawned a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2007/s1923992.htm&quot;&gt;controversial&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200705/s1926110.htm&quot;&gt;TV&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21730555-12272,00.html&quot;&gt;mini&lt;/a&gt;-&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/news/in-depth/reloading-history/2007/05/15/1178995153200.html&quot;&gt;series&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=PplJiSz2wHI&quot;&gt;Bastard Boys&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;. For more history and analysis of the dispute, you can read about it from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mua.org.au/war/&quot;&gt;the view of the MUA&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.takver.com/wharfie/wotw.htm&quot;&gt;this account&lt;/a&gt; but for the definitive analysis &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/cib/1997-98/98cib15.htm&quot;&gt;see&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/cib/1998-99/99cib01.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70574</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:56:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>bastardboys</category>
		<category>industrialrelations</category>
		<category>ir</category>
		<category>johnhoward</category>
		<category>MUA</category>
		<category>patricks</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>unions</category>
		<category>waterfrontdispute</category>
		<dc:creator>Effigy2000</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Australian Federal Election 2007 on November 24</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65537/Australian%2DFederal%2DElection%2D2007%2Don%2DNovember%2D24</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/14/2059084.htm&quot;&gt;And we&apos;re off&lt;/a&gt;! Prime Minister John Howard has set the date for the Australian Federal election as November 24th, meaning we&apos;re up for a long six-week campaign. With Kevin Rudd leading the PM by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ozpolitics.info/blog/2007/09/11/reuters-poll-trend-4/&quot;&gt;between 16 to 18 points&lt;/a&gt; (depending on who you read) in recent opinion polls, this election seems the most likely to provide a change of Government since Howard was first elected 11 years ago. Antony Green&apos;s usual excellent election guide is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/elections/federal/2007/guide/&quot;&gt;up and running here&lt;/a&gt;, along with an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/elections/federal/2007/calculator/&quot;&gt;excellent calculator&lt;/a&gt; which shows which seats are up for grabs dependent on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://australianpolitics.com/elections/two-party/two-party-preferred.shtml&quot;&gt;2 party preferred&lt;/a&gt; swing. You might also want to check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news.com.au/feature/0,,5012863,00.html&quot;&gt;Vote-O-Matic&lt;/a&gt;, a fun but entirely disposable quiz which aims to help you decide who you&apos;ll vote for. Metafilter&apos;s international readers unfamiliar with the Australian political scene will likely be scratching their heads when trying to figure out just what the hell is going on over here, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ozpolitics.info/&quot;&gt;this page offers a useful guide as a starting point&lt;/a&gt;. It can be handy to read over whether you&apos;re from outside Australia or a true blue Aussie yourself.

Some other excellent Australian election resources include;

Links to some of the contenders web pages;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alp.org.au/&quot;&gt;Australian Labor Party&lt;/a&gt; (plus the &lt;a href=&quot;http://kevin07.com.au/&quot;&gt;Kevin07&lt;/a&gt; website).
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.liberal.org.au/&quot;&gt;Liberal Party&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationals.org.au/&quot;&gt;The Nationals&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bobbrown.org.au/&quot;&gt;Greens&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democrats.org.au/&quot;&gt;Australian Democrats&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulinehanson.com.au/&quot;&gt;Pauline Hanson&apos;s United Australia Party&lt;/a&gt;

And here&apos;s some links to some excellent blogs which will no doubt continue to annoy the mainstream media throughout the campaign.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ozpolitics.info/blog/&quot;&gt;Oz Politics&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollbludger.com/&quot;&gt;Poll Bludger&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://possumcomitatus.wordpress.com/&quot;&gt;Possum Comitatus&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.roadtosurfdom.com/&quot;&gt;The Road to Surfdom&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://larvatusprodeo.net/&quot;&gt;Larvatus Prodeo&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.news.com.au/news/blogocracy/&quot;&gt;Tim Dunlop&apos;s Blogocracy&lt;/a&gt;

Mind you, the following two blogs are by mainstream media pundits, and right wing columnists Piers Ackerman and Andrew Bolt.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/piersakerman/index.php/dailytele/comments/warzone_whingers_suddenly_australian/&quot;&gt;Piers Ackerman&apos;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/&quot;&gt;Andrew Bolt&apos;s blog.&lt;/a&gt;

And finally, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com.au/election2007/&quot;&gt;Google&apos;s election guide&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/64752/Googling-the-Australian-Federal-Election&quot;&gt;seen previously on Metafilter&lt;/a&gt;.

The next six weeks are going to be long, grueling and if the  experts are to be believed, incredibly negative. Strap yourselves in, folks. It&apos;s going to be one hell of a ride. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65537</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:48:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alp</category>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>australiandemocrats</category>
		<category>australiangreens</category>
		<category>australianpolitics</category>
		<category>BedsAreBurning</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>BobBrown</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>election07</category>
		<category>greens</category>
		<category>internationalgreens</category>
		<category>johnhoward</category>
		<category>kevinrudd</category>
		<category>labor</category>
		<category>latham</category>
		<category>liberals</category>
		<category>nationals</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>paulinehanson</category>
		<category>PM</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>pollbludger</category>
		<category>possumcomitatus</category>
		<category>primeminister</category>
		<category>rodent</category>
		<category>rudd</category>
		<category>seinfeld</category>
		<category>theendofallthings</category>
		<category>worm</category>
		<dc:creator>Effigy2000</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Poo Bum Dicky Wee Wee!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64083/Poo%2DBum%2DDicky%2DWee%2DWee</link>
		<description> People vandalising Wikipedia is hardly a new thing but now even the office of the Australian Prime Minister, John Howard, is getting into the act. Website &lt;a href=&quot;http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/&quot;&gt;Wiki-Scanner&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/63806&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;) has traced several edits to Wikipedia articles by the Prime Ministers staff, according to Australian newspaper &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,22299459-952,00.html&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Courier Mail&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. And they aren&apos;t confined solely to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_howard&quot;&gt;Wikipedia entry on the PM &lt;/a&gt;himself; there was even an act of vandalism on &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bubishi&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=77315197&quot;&gt;a martial-arts related entry&lt;/a&gt;, in which one of Howard&apos;s ministerial staffers wrote, &#8220;Poo bum dicky wee wee&#8221; on the page. Not good news on the eve of a federal election that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/no-gain-for-pm-from-strip-club-furore/2007/08/23/1187462438809.html&quot;&gt;PM is largely expected to lose&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, &apos;new media&apos; is being put to good use at Opposition leader Kevin Rudd&apos;s website, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kevin07.com.au&quot;&gt;Kevin07&lt;/a&gt;, where a recent blog entry compiles &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kevin07.com.au/myblog/thebestofyoutube-2.html&quot;&gt;Youtube&apos;s &apos;best&apos; political videos.&lt;/a&gt; Hours of fun for the whole family!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64083</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:51:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>australianpolitics</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>johnhoward</category>
		<category>kevin07</category>
		<category>kevinrudd</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>wikipedia</category>
		<category>youtube</category>
		<dc:creator>Effigy2000</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Double edged sword</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63054/Double%2Dedged%2Dsword</link>
		<description> Australian Prime Minister John Howard &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/howard-in-his-unnatural-habitat/2007/07/17/1184559787113.html&quot;&gt;dipped his toe in the waters of new media&lt;/a&gt; this week by releasing his climate change policy via &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube&quot;&gt;youtube&lt;/a&gt;, however &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/results?search_query=john+howard+climate+change&amp;search=&quot;&gt;which &lt;/a&gt;is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=vjnqCbaAGWM&quot;&gt;real &lt;/a&gt;clip?

Unfortunately Labor was ready with their own &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=lMnygl-VvYY&quot;&gt;message&lt;/a&gt;.
Rumours abound (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crikey.com.au/index.html&quot;&gt;crikey&lt;/a&gt;- login req&#8217;d) that the PM&#8217;s staffers are censoring comments, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/news/web/howard-clip-becomes-spam-magnet/2007/07/18/1184559838528.html&quot;&gt;or are they&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63054</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:35:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>climatechange</category>
		<category>johnhoward</category>
		<category>youtube</category>
		<dc:creator>mattoxic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>John Howard in &apos;Cabinet: The Movie.&apos;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63021/John%2DHoward%2Din%2DCabinet%2DThe%2DMovie</link>
		<description> &lt;a _top href=&quot;http://www.roadtosurfdom.com/2007/07/18/cabinet-the-movie/&quot;&gt;Cabinet: The Movie&lt;/a&gt;. Starring Australian PM John Howard and a bunch of chickens. &lt;small&gt;[more inside]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63021</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 04:06:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>australianpolitics</category>
		<category>bloggers</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>johnhoward</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>parody</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>Effigy2000</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Evil Little Bastard Filter</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61279/Evil%2DLittle%2DBastard%2DFilter</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,21736062-5001028,00.html?from=public_rss"&gt;How Could He?&lt;/a&gt; After the (who else but) Murdoch owned Sydney telegraph splashed the headline &#8220;How Could She&#8221; in response to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.google.com.au/news?q=baby+dandenong&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;channel=s&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;hs=Kpg&amp;um=1&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=news&amp;ct=title&quot;&gt;mother&#8217;s abandonment of her new born baby&lt;/a&gt; outside a hospital in depressed outer Melbourne suburb of Dandenong, Australia&#8217;s Prime Minister Howard leaped to the paper&apos;s defence saying that&#8217;s how most Australian&#8217;s would feel- Is it really how most of us would feel? Or is it just &#8220;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.101usesforajohnhoward.com/2006/07/21/27-dog-whistle-john-howard/&quot;&gt;dog whistle politics&lt;/a&gt;&#8221; from this past master, or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crikey.com.au/Politics/20070516-News-Ltd-on-Howards-side-for-now-.html&quot;&gt;a bad idea to criticise the &#8216;Tele&#8217; in an election year&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61279</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 05:44:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dogwhistlepolitics</category>
		<category>johnhoward</category>
		<dc:creator>mattoxic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>McLeod&apos;s Pollsters</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61271/McLeods%2DPollsters</link>
		<description> As the countdown to the Australian federal election continues ever onward, the key issue looks set to be industrial relations. The incumbent Howard Government&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.workchoices.gov.au/&quot;&gt;WorkChoices laws&lt;/a&gt; (now &lt;a _top href=&quot;http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7007378294&quot;&gt;re-branded&lt;/a&gt; due to their increasing unpopularity) have seen the poll figures for challenger &lt;a _top href=&quot;http://www.alp.org.au/people/qld/rudd_kevin.php&quot;&gt;Kevin Rudd&lt;/a&gt; go &lt;a _top href=&quot;http://www.ozpolitics.info/guide/elections/fed2007/polls2007/&quot;&gt;up and up and up&lt;/a&gt;. But even as the Government prepares to unleash &lt;a _top href=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21753384-601,00.html&quot;&gt;a major advertisement spree in an attempt to sell the alleged benefits of Work Choices&lt;/a&gt;, the new laws have &lt;a _top href=&quot;http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,21753263-953,00.html&quot;&gt;come under attack from the most unlikely of places&lt;/a&gt;; popular prime time TV soap &lt;em&gt;&lt;a _top href=&quot;http://mcleodsdaughters.ninemsn.com.au/&quot;&gt;McLeod&apos;s Daughters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, which last night aired &lt;a _top href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAO2jmdj4Qk&quot;&gt;this thinly veiled assault&lt;/a&gt; (youtube) on the central element of WorkChoices, &lt;a _top href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Workplace_Agreement&quot;&gt;AWAs&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61271</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 23:52:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>industrialrelations</category>
		<category>ir</category>
		<category>johnhoward</category>
		<category>kevinrudd</category>
		<category>mcleodsdaughters</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>workchoices</category>
		<dc:creator>Effigy2000</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Imperator Howard&apos;s Tenth Year.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49634/Imperator%2DHowards%2DTenth%2DYear</link>
		<description> Today marks Australian Prime Minister &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_howard&quot;&gt;John Howard&apos;s &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200603/s1581785.htm&quot;&gt;tenth year in the top job&lt;/a&gt;. The event has sparked the usual calls of when, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,18315618%255E25377,00.html&quot;&gt;if ever&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000081&amp;sid=akULQHp1S69w&amp;refer=australia&quot;&gt;he will step down &lt;/a&gt;to make way for his annointed successor, Peter Costello, and has also opened the flood gates on a range of editorial &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,18287026%255E12272,00.html&quot;&gt;criticisms &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/story/0,20281,18314849-5001032,00.html&quot;&gt;praise &lt;/a&gt;from the usual suspects. But even with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=worldNews&amp;storyID=2006-02-28T012611Z_01_SYD37487_RTRUKOC_0_UK-AUSTRALIA-POLITICS-POLL.xml&amp;archived=False&quot;&gt;new poll released today &lt;/a&gt;claiming that he is the most popular PM in Australia&apos;s modern political history, will the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2006/s1581111.htm&quot;&gt;continuing AWB scandal&lt;/a&gt; (previously discussed in one of my own FPP posts &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/48790&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) and an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200601/s1554615.htm&quot;&gt;unhappy Coalition partner &lt;/a&gt;finally end his seemingly endless run of political good fortune?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49634</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:18:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>howard</category>
		<category>johnhoward</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>Effigy2000</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Bomber Gets Bombed.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45242/The%2DBomber%2DGets%2DBombed</link>
		<description> While the Democrats seem a spent force in the United States, fighting to hold its political relevance in a political system dominated by the Right, here in Australia, our own Centre Left party is facing a similar battle. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alp.org.au/&quot; _blank&gt;Australian Labor Party&lt;/a&gt; (ALP) is being attacked not by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pm.gov.au/&quot; _blank&gt;Prime Minister John Howard&lt;/a&gt; but by one of their own, former leader &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Latham&quot; _blank&gt;Mark Latham&lt;/a&gt;. In his new book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mup.unimelb.edu.au/catalogue/0-522-85215-7.html&quot; _blank&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Latham Diaries&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, released today, Latham ferociously attacks the party that paid his way through University and gave him his first job. His major claim is that current leader of the ALP, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Beazley&quot; _blank&gt;Kim Beazley&lt;/a&gt;, waged a six year smear campaign against him and that this disloyalty, as well as an antagnostic press, resulted in the devestating defeat of the ALP at the 1996 general election.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
To say that this book, which seems to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/news/editorial/lathams-vitriol-detracts-from-a-valid-critique/2005/09/16/1126750124947.html&quot; _blank&gt;based on one man&apos;s vitriol rather than solid, well researched facts&lt;/a&gt;, has created a storm in a teacup would be to understate the media circus that has erupted since News Limited, Rupert Murdoch&apos;s publishing empire, began to publish exerpts from the book a week before it&apos;s launch. In this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,16608560%5E2702,00.html&quot; _blank&gt;media circus&lt;/a&gt;, we have seen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200509/s1461374.htm&quot; _blank&gt;court battles&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/tv/enoughrope/transcripts/s1463685.htm&quot; _blank&gt;internal&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2005/s1463827.htm&quot; _blank&gt;media-institution&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s1463149.htm&quot; _blank&gt;bickering&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/grudging-praise-for-labors-opponents-could-be-diaries-killer-blow/2005/09/19/1126981996850.html&quot; _blank&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; after &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/news/National/Diaries-hurting-ALPs-momentum-pollster/2005/09/19/1126982002757.html&quot; _blank&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; after &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,16626540%5E7583,00.html&quot; _blank&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, the ALP has closed ranks and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecourier.com.au/detail.asp?class=news&amp;subclass=local&amp;category=general%20news&amp;story_id=425070&amp;y=2005&amp;m=9&quot; _blank&gt;rallied around it&apos;s embattled leader&lt;/a&gt;, though some Labor MPs &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200509/s1462102.htm&quot; _blank&gt;have suggested that Latham&apos;s claims may hold more water than many would give him credit for&lt;/a&gt;. Others, such as Beazley&apos;s own daughters, have simply dismissed the claims as &quot;bitter and hateful rantings&quot; at their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twosittingducks.com/weblog/&quot; _blank&gt;webblog&lt;/a&gt;. 
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
But what is the real effect of the Diaries? What was Latham&apos;s intent in releasing them? Was it merely &lt;a href=&quot;http://seven.com.au/news/entertainment/108291&quot; _blank&gt;to make money&lt;/a&gt;? Are they simply the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/bitter-loser-or-brave-tellall/2005/09/15/1126750070502.html&quot; _blank&gt;ramblings of a bitter loser?&lt;/a&gt; Or in his own, twisted (and probably ill-concieved) way, was he aiming to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200509/s1462799.htm&quot; _blank&gt;achieve the change of culture in the ALP&lt;/a&gt; he believes needs to occur? And, perhaps sweetest of all things to ponder over, has Latham used the media he hated so much to acheive all of this?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45242</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 04:34:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ALP</category>
		<category>johnhoward</category>
		<category>latham</category>
		<category>lathamdiaries</category>
		<dc:creator>Effigy2000</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


