<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with jonsteward</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/jonsteward</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'jonsteward' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:39:05 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:39:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Is Jon Stewart ready for his closeup?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49612/Is%2DJon%2DStewart%2Dready%2Dfor%2Dhis%2Dcloseup</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0602/27/lkl.01.html"&gt;At this Larry King interview&lt;/a&gt; and in other places, Jon Stewart is getting ready for his very big &quot;before and after&quot; moment. In one week he will go from hosting a sort of anti-establishment &quot;basic cable&quot; talk show to hosting the very establishment (of some sort at least) Oscars viewed by usually at least 40 million people. Despite what most of us me-fiers might think, Stewart is sort of unknown outside his core devotees and especially for a Oscar host -- unlike Bob Hope, Billy Crystal, Whoopi Goldberg, and even Chris Rock -- he has never been responsible for a hit movie.       Moreover, his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/politics/cablenewsratings.htm&quot;&gt;ratings&lt;/a&gt; (at 1.1 -- or about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/388148p-329167c.html&quot;&gt;two and half million&lt;/a&gt; people a night) would place him at about the sixth most seen cable news &quot;show&quot; -- behind Greta, Shepard Smith, Hannity, Larry, and, of course, the factor.  Now, that&apos;s a very wealthy, influential 2-3 million viewers that policy makers and advertisers love, so it&apos;s not chicken change but you can still understand what the Oscars might mean for fans of Jon.      For people who believe Stewart is the only effective keeper of a liberal flame, you can only hope he will continue to impress on the bigger stage.  However, some people are getting worried -- a la the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/28/movies/redcarpet/28wadler.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;NYT&lt;/a&gt;
and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=w060227&amp;s=siegel022706&quot;&gt;New Republic &lt;/a&gt; which is already claiming Stewart is losing his bite in order to please Hollywood and that he might not be so funny in the first place.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49612</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:39:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dailyshow</category>
		<category>jonsteward</category>
		<category>larryking</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<dc:creator>skepticallypleased</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


