<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with joshuagreen</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/joshuagreen</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'joshuagreen' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 21:51:35 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 21:51:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Why do political ads stink?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34184/Why%2Ddo%2Dpolitical%2Dads%2Dstink</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2004/07/green.htm"&gt;Joshua Green wrote&lt;/a&gt; an interesting and insightful piece regarding the current state of political advertisements. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brabendercoxmihalke.com/screeningroom/screeningroom2.cfm&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; is an example of an ad by a media consultant he refers to, based in Pittsburgh. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tnr.com/etc.mhtml?pid=1752&quot;&gt;Another spin&lt;/a&gt; here. I&apos;ve often wondered why they&apos;re so predictable. The Atlantic gives us a glimpse into poly. ad history and, quite possibly, its future.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34184</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 21:51:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertisements</category>
		<category>atlantic</category>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>joshuagreen</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politicalads</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>BlueTrain</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


