<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with jurisdiction</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/jurisdiction</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'jurisdiction' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:32:21 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:32:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Supplemental Jurisdiction</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49239/Supplemental%2DJurisdiction</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00001367----000-.html&quot;&gt;28 U.S.C 1367&lt;/a&gt;

was a &lt;a title=&quot;The Simmering Debate Over Supplemental Jurisdiction by Prof. James Pfander&quot; href=&quot;http://home.law.uiuc.edu/lrev/publications/2000s/2002/2002_5/Pfander.pdf&quot;&gt;controversial&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a title=&quot;Making Sense of Nonsense: Reforming Supplemental Jurisdiction by Prof. Graham C. Lilly&quot; href=&quot;http://www.law.indiana.edu/ilj/volumes/v74/no1/lilly.pdf&quot;&gt;confusing attempt&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a title=&quot;Supplemental Serendipity: Accidental Improvement of Supplemental Jurisdiction by Prof. James M. Underwood&quot; href=&quot;http://www.uakron.edu/law/docs/underwood37.4.pdf&quot;&gt;Congress&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a title=&quot;1367 and All That: Recodifying Federal Supplemental Jurisdiction by Prof. Thomas Rowe&quot; href=&quot;http://eprints.law.duke.edu/archive/00000475/01/74_Ind._L.J._53_(1998-1999).pdf&quot;&gt;codify&lt;/a&gt; and address &lt;a title=&quot;A Coda on Supplemental Jurisdiction by Prof. Thomas Rowe, et. al.&quot; href=&quot;http://eprints.law.duke.edu/archive/00000486/01/40_Emory_L._J._993_(1991).pdf&quot;&gt;the issue&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a title=&quot;Introduction to Federal Jurisdiction Concepts&quot; href=&quot;http://www.catea.org/grade/legal/juris.html&quot;&gt;Supplemental Jurisdiction &lt;/a&gt;established in cases such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?navby=case&amp;court=us&amp;vol=383&amp;page=727&quot;&gt; &lt;em&gt;United Mine Workers v. Gibbs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, 383 U.S. 715 (1966), &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&amp;vol=414&amp;invol=291&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Zahn v. International Paper, Co.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, 414 U.S. 291 (1973), and &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=search&amp;court=US&amp;case=/us/490/545.html&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Finley v. United States&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, 490 U.S. 545 (1989).  The Supreme Court tried to clarify some of the confusing issues regarding 1367 in a 2005 opinion. &lt;a href=&quot;http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-70.ZS.html&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Exxon Mobil Corp v. Allapattah Servs., Inc.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, (2005) (Kennedy, J., &lt;a href=&quot;http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-70.ZO.html&quot;&gt;writing for the Court&lt;/a&gt;) (Stevens, J., &lt;a href=&quot;http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-70.ZD.html&quot;&gt;dissenting&lt;/a&gt;) (Ginsburg, J., &lt;a href=&quot;http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-70.ZD1.html&quot;&gt;dissenting&lt;/a&gt;).  The &lt;a title=&quot;Sausage-Making, Pigs&apos; Ears, and Congressional Expansions of Federal Jurisdiction by Adam Steinman on SSRN&quot; href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=802764&quot;&gt;question&lt;/a&gt; of whether the Court &lt;a title=&quot;Straightening Out the Supplemental Jurisdiction Mess: Short and Long Term Fixes by Alan B. Morrison&quot; href=&quot;http://subscript.bna.com/SAMPLES/cal.nsf/85256269004a991e8525611300214487/574cde26f0a11c7e85257076007ca370?OpenDocument&quot;&gt;clarified the issue&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a title=&quot;Federal Jurisdiction Expanded by Gregory P. Joesph&quot; href=&quot;http://www.josephnyc.com/FEDERALJURISDICTIONEXPANDED.shtml&quot;&gt;made it&lt;/a&gt; more &lt;a title=&quot;Supplemental Jurisdiction in Diversity-Only Class Actions after Exxon Mobil&quot; href=&quot;http://www.jonesday.com/files/Publication/7550ef97-588e-4305-9379-22e90fb7f15f/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/63a2263f-9c71-44da-a771-24f412f91d73/Vergonis_Fountain_012006.pdf&quot;&gt;complicated&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2005/06/todays_opinion_2.html&quot;&gt;remains&lt;/a&gt; arguably &lt;a title=&quot;Harvard Law Review Analysis of Supreme Court&apos;s Term with focus on Exxon Mobil&quot; href=&quot;http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/119/Nov05/Leading%20Cases/Exxon_vFTX.pdf&quot;&gt;unanswered.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49239</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:32:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>28USC1367</category>
		<category>AmountInControversity</category>
		<category>Diversity</category>
		<category>ExxonMobilCorpvAllpattahServsInc.</category>
		<category>FinleyvUnitedStates</category>
		<category>Jurisdiction</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>Pendent</category>
		<category>Supplemental</category>
		<category>SupplementalJurisdiction</category>
		<category>UnitedMineWorkersvGibbs</category>
		<category>ZahnvInternationalPaperCo</category>
		<dc:creator>dios</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Information wants to be free.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48430/Information%2Dwants%2Dto%2Dbe%2Dfree</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/68603&quot;&gt;Wikipedia wrangling&lt;/a&gt; once more: the entire German edition &lt;a href=&quot;http://eurotelcoblog.blogspot.com/2006/01/wikipedia.html&quot;&gt;was&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7660&quot;&gt;shut&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/19/2056252&quot;&gt;down&lt;/a&gt; this week over the contents of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tron_%28hacker%29&quot;&gt;single&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tron_%28Hacker%29&quot;&gt;entry&lt;/a&gt;. The parents of the article&apos;s subject, a German hacker who died in 1998 under &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/0,39020369,2082173,00.htm&quot;&gt;mysterious&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,17050,00.html&quot;&gt;circumstances&lt;/a&gt;, are displeased with his real name being disclosed in the encyclopedia. It is now back online; however, the future of the family&apos;s efforts is currently unclear, not only due to the German order&apos;s debatable validity in the US - but also because the order was, initially at least,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/01/20/wikipedia_shutdown/&quot;&gt; mistakenly addressed&lt;/a&gt; to St. Petersburg, Russia, instead of St. Petersburg, Florida.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48430</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:35:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>controversy</category>
		<category>german</category>
		<category>germany</category>
		<category>hacker</category>
		<category>internationallaw</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>jurisdiction</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>lawsuits</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>suicide</category>
		<category>supranational</category>
		<category>tron</category>
		<category>wikipedia</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12558/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://robots.cnn.com/2001/TECH/internet/11/22/policing.the.internet.ap/index.html"&gt;An email sent between two cities in China probably would travel through the United States -- putting its contents under American jurisdiction.&lt;/a&gt; The recently approved anti-terrorism law is a &quot;massive expansion of U.S. sovereignty&quot; that could be used to prosecute foreign hackers. And once that precedent is established, much of global Internet communications could come under American authority.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12558</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2001 11:13:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anti-terrorism</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>jurisdiction</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9206/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/7/23/164320.shtml"&gt;Congress Will Hold Hearing: Is Income Tax Legitimate?&lt;/a&gt; Robert Schulz&#8217;s &lt;a href=http://www.givemeliberty.org/&gt;We The People Foundation&lt;/a&gt; announced that the Justice Department and the U.S. Congress had committed in writing to appear in a recorded public meeting with IRS representatives. There they will officially answer charges challenging the legal jurisdiction of the IRS and the illegal enforcement of U.S. income tax laws against U.S. citizens.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9206</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:56:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>incometax</category>
		<category>IRS</category>
		<category>jurisdiction</category>
		<category>justicedepartment</category>
		<category>U.S.A.</category>
		<category>U.S.law</category>
		<category>wethepeoplefoundation</category>
		<dc:creator>dagny</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4961/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/12/25/french.anti.racist.idg/index.html"&gt;Yahoo appeals to U.S. District Court&lt;/a&gt; to avoid being regulated by the French government. This is one of the first important cases testing jurisdiction on ecommerce sites, and neither side appears to be backing down.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4961</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2000 20:53:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>auction</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>france</category>
		<category>jurisdiction</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>nazi</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>jed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


