<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with krugman</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/krugman</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'krugman' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:42:26 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:42:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Economist attacks Krugman as superficial and partisan.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85437/Economist%2Dattacks%2DKrugman%2Das%2Dsuperficial%2Dand%2Dpartisan</link>
		<description> Paul Krugman attacked professional macroeconomists (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/84751/If-Paul-Krugman-Was-So-Right&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;). &lt;a href=&quot;http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john.cochrane/research/Papers/&quot;&gt;John Cochrane&lt;/a&gt;, an economist at the University of Chicago, &lt;a href=&quot;http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john.cochrane/research/Papers/krugman_response.htm&quot;&gt;returns the favor&lt;/a&gt;, arguing that Krugman deeply misrepresents current economic ideas because he&apos;s abandoned economics as a &quot;quest for understanding&quot; in favor of trying to be the &quot;Rush Limbaugh of the Left.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85437</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:42:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>financialcrisis</category>
		<category>krugman</category>
		<category>macroeconomics</category>
		<dc:creator>shivohum</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Video: Krugman&apos;s Friday address to Nat&apos;l Press Club</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/77630/Video%2DKrugmans%2DFriday%2Daddress%2Dto%2DNatl%2DPress%2DClub</link>
		<description> The president of a Savings &amp;amp; Loan sent the following email to his family:
&lt;i&gt;If you have one hour of your time to invest in learning more about the current economic crisis, I highly recommend you click on one of the two below links and view [Paul Krugman&apos;s Friday address to the National Press Club].  His remarks take about 1/2 hour followed by 25 minutes of Q&amp;amp;As.  I believe you will find watching it worth your time.

P.S.  If you decide to view Krugman&apos;s speech, I recommend you view it
&quot;full screen&quot; for the best effect of viewing his body language.&lt;/i&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://npc.press.org/video/player.cfm?type=lunch&amp;id=16709&quot;&gt;Link 1&lt;/a&gt;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://cspan.org/Watch/watch.aspx?MediaId=HP-A-13522&quot;&gt;Link 2&lt;/a&gt; I pass it along to you with the same recommendations. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.77630</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:15:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Economy</category>
		<category>Krugman</category>
		<category>speech</category>
		<dc:creator>spock</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75844/Underlying%2Dmost%2Darguments%2Dagainst%2Dthe%2Dfree%2Dmarket%2Dis%2Da%2Dlack%2Dof%2Dbelief%2Din%2Dfreedom%2Ditself</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reportonbusiness.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081021.wrbanksfriedman22/BNStory/Business/home"&gt;Friedman under attack&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;More than 100 faculty at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uchicago.edu/&quot;&gt;University of Chicago,&lt;/a&gt; where &lt;a href=&quot;http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1976/friedman-autobio.html&quot;&gt;Milton Friedman&lt;/a&gt; won the &lt;a href=&quot;http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1976/press.html&quot;&gt;1976 Nobel Prize in economics&lt;/a&gt;, are trying to stop the university from putting Mr. Friedman&apos;s name on &lt;a href=&quot;http://mfi.uchicago.edu/&quot;&gt;a $200-million (U.S.) research centre&lt;/a&gt;. The opponents argue that the Milton Friedman Institute would compromise the academic integrity of the university and serve as a monument to &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_School_of_Economics&quot;&gt;Mr. Friedman&apos;s world outlook&lt;/a&gt;, which they say &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19857&quot;&gt;has largely been discredited&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;Supporters say it&apos;s unfair to use today&apos;s economic troubles to tarnish Mr. Friedman or scrap the project. They have organized a counterpetition and set up websites, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.friedmanfacts.com/institute-controversy/&quot;&gt;Friedmanfacts.com&lt;/a&gt;, to challenge opponents.&lt;/em&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75844</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:23:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2008financialcrisis</category>
		<category>ChicagoSchool</category>
		<category>criticism</category>
		<category>Economics</category>
		<category>Friedman</category>
		<category>Krugman</category>
		<category>MiltonFriedman</category>
		<category>UniversityofChicago</category>
		<dc:creator>KokuRyu</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Nobel Prize is Shrill</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75616/The%2DNobel%2DPrize%2Dis%2DShrill</link>
		<description> &quot;...&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=axpy67IVqPj8&amp;refer=home&quot;&gt;For his analysis of trade patterns and location of economic activity&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; the 2008 Nobel Prize in economics has been awarded to &lt;a href=&quot;http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/13/paul-krugman-wins-economics-nobel/?hp&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; columnist Paul Krugman&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75616</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:56:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Economics</category>
		<category>Krugman</category>
		<category>Nobel</category>
		<category>NYT</category>
		<category>Times</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>New Trade Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69803/New%2DTrade%2DTheory</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/11/economics-the-final-frontier/"&gt;Where no economist had gone before&lt;/a&gt; . Paul Krugman posts a type-written paper on interstellar trade which he wrote as &quot;an oppressed assistant professor&quot; in the &apos;70s. &lt;em&gt;I do not propose to develop a theory which is universally valid, but it may at least have some galactic relevance.&lt;/em&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/interstellar.pdf&quot;&gt;pdf link&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69803</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:38:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>einstein</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>interstellar</category>
		<category>krugman</category>
		<category>paulkrugman</category>
		<category>relativity</category>
		<category>trade</category>
		<dc:creator>grobstein</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Money for nothing, and bombs for free.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57723/Money%2Dfor%2Dnothing%2Dand%2Dbombs%2Dfor%2Dfree</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.radaronline.com/features/2007/01/betting_on_iraq_1.php"&gt;Getting rich by getting it wrong&lt;/a&gt; How the elite pundits who pushed the war profited in money and prominence, despite being completely wrong. Mean while many pundits who opposed the war from the start were &lt;a href=&quot;http://nitpicker.blogspot.com/2006/12/writers-who-got-iraq-right-episode-1.html&quot;&gt;sidelined&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.57723</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:08:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>krugman</category>
		<category>pundits</category>
		<category>radar</category>
		<dc:creator>delmoi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Goodbye Krugman, Friedman, et c.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45093/Goodbye%2DKrugman%2DFriedman%2Det%2Dc</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/editorsletter.html?hp"&gt;NY Times will be going pay-only for access to columns&lt;/a&gt; by Paul Krugman, Thomas Friedman, and Maureen Dowd. On the 19th of Sept! And I assume the others like Herbert and Frank will drop behind the iron curtain as well. These are obviously some of the most blogged about and emailed content on the NYT site. Do you think it will be worth $49.95 year (it does come with 100 archive articles, which is admittedly pretty sweet)? Do you think that bloggers will stop linking to those columnists? Is this the end of free?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45093</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:14:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Friedman</category>
		<category>Krugman</category>
		<category>News</category>
		<category>NYtimes</category>
		<category>Subscriptions</category>
		<category>TheEndofFree</category>
		<dc:creator>zpousman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>All the High School That&apos;s Fit to Print</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42420/All%2Dthe%2DHigh%2DSchool%2DThats%2DFit%2Dto%2DPrint</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://forums.nytimes.com/top/opinion/readersopinions/forums/thepubliceditor/publiceditorswebjournal/index.html?offset=1&amp;amp;fid=.f779788/1"&gt;Paul Krugman and Daniel Okrent get into a pissing match.&lt;/a&gt; In his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/22/weekinreview/22okrent.html&quot;&gt;final column&lt;/a&gt; as New York Times ombudsman, Okrent stated that Krugman, the New York Times columnist, &quot;has the disturbing habit of shaping, slicing and selectively citing numbers in a fashion that pleases his acolytes but leaves him open to substantive assaults.&quot;  The paper gave the two of them some webspace to discuss the matter.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.nytimes.com/top/opinion/readersopinions/forums/thepubliceditor/publiceditorswebjournal/index.html?offset=1&amp;fid=.f779788/1&quot;&gt;result&lt;/a&gt; is catty and entertaining, but the tone is certainly more vicious than I&apos;d expected.  They really don&apos;t seem to like each other very much.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42420</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 09:43:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>krugman</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>okrent</category>
		<dc:creator>Tin Man</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Krugman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32123/Krugman</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/30/opinion/30KRUG.html"&gt;Haaretz Daily: &quot;This isn&apos;t America; the government did not invent intelligence material nor exaggerate the description of the threat to justify their attack.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Krugman: So even in Israel, George Bush&apos;s America has become a byword for deception and abuse of power. And the administration&apos;s reaction to Richard Clarke&apos;s &quot;Against All Enemies&quot; provides more evidence of something rotten in the state of our government.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32123</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2004 06:37:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>haaretz</category>
		<category>krugman</category>
		<category>richardclarke</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Paul Krugman gives some free advice</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30406/Paul%2DKrugman%2Dgives%2Dsome%2Dfree%2Dadvice</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/26/opinion/26KRUG.html?pagewanted=print&amp;amp;position="&gt;Paul Krugman gives some free advice to reporters covering the election.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30406</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2003 22:54:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>krugman</category>
		<category>nyt</category>
		<category>paul</category>
		<category>paulkrugman</category>
		<category>reporting</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Russell Baker on Paul Krugman, Joan Didion on George W. Bush: the NYRB is 40</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29229/Russell%2DBaker%2Don%2DPaul%2DKrugman%2DJoan%2DDidion%2Don%2DGeorge%2DW%2DBush%2Dthe%2DNYRB%2Dis%2D40</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;It seems slightly scandalous that Krugman has persisted in noting that the present administration has been moving the lion&apos;s share of the money to an array of corporate interests distinguished by the greed of their CEOs, an indifference toward their workers, and boardroom conviction that it is the welfare state that is ruining the country. Krugman has been strident. He has been shrill. He has lowered the dignity of the commentariat. How refreshing. &lt;/small&gt; Russell Baker reviews Paul Krugman&apos;s &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nybooks.com/articles/16730&quot;&gt;The Great Unraveling: Losing Our Way in the New Century&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;. &lt;small&gt;We have now reached a point when even the White House may be forced to sort out how a president who got elected to execute a straightforward business agenda managed to sandbag himself with the coinciding fantasies of the ideologues in the Christian fundamentalist ministries and those in his own administration.&lt;/small&gt;... Joan Didion reviews &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nybooks.com/articles/16749&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Armageddon: The Cosmic Battle of the Ages&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
by Tim F. LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nybooks.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The New York Review of Books&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; 40th anniversary edition is an especially good read..  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29229</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:02:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>krugman</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Krugman on Media and Economics</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28479/Krugman%2Don%2DMedia%2Dand%2DEconomics</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.archive.org/movies/details-db.php?collection=opensource_movies&amp;amp;collectionid=krugman-cambridge"&gt;Video of Krugman on Media and Economics&lt;/a&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;If Bush said the earth is flat, of course Fox News would say &quot;Yes, the earth is flat, and anyone who says different is unpatriotic.&quot;&amp;#0160;And mainstream media would have stories with the headline: &quot;Shape of Earth: Views Differ; and would at most report that some Democrats&amp;#0160;say that&amp;#0160;it&apos;s round.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So said Paul Krugman during a recent interview in Boston with Chris Lydon, former host of NPR&apos;s &apos;The Connection.&apos;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28479</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:41:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Fox</category>
		<category>foxnews</category>
		<category>krugman</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>npr</category>
		<category>paulkrugman</category>
		<category>reporting</category>
		<category>theconnection</category>
		<dc:creator>ericrolph</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180/</link>
		<description> The President &quot;has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/02/opinion/02KRUG.html&quot;&gt;more familiarity&lt;/a&gt; with troubled energy companies and accounting irregularities than probably any previous chief executive.&quot;  (NYTimes link, reg req&apos;d)
Krugman chimes in on Whitehouse outrage to corporate fraud. 
(See also, Cheney&apos;s investigation regarding Halliburton&apos;s accounting while he was it&apos;s big cheese)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18180</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 07:33:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>cheney</category>
		<category>enron</category>
		<category>halliburton</category>
		<category>krugman</category>
		<dc:creator>BentPenguin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13579/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/04/opinion/04KRUG.html"&gt;America the Polarized&lt;/a&gt; NYT&apos;s Paul Krugman says that Congress is polarized because Republicans have moved to the right, while Democrats have remained fairly constant. He (and a political scientist) attribute the change to economic polarization, the sharply widening inequality of income and wealth.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13579</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2002 11:27:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>democrat</category>
		<category>incomegap</category>
		<category>krugman</category>
		<category>polarisation</category>
		<category>polarization</category>
		<category>poverty</category>
		<category>republican</category>
		<category>wealth</category>
		<dc:creator>pmurray63</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11195/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/07/opinion/07KRUG.html"&gt;That didn&apos;t take long.&lt;/a&gt; Thanks to Paul Krugman; it&apos;s high time someone disagreed with Bush&apos;s wrongheaded fiscal ideas.  Bush is going back to fuzzy math to justify another tax cut.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11195</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2001 16:18:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>finance</category>
		<category>fiscal</category>
		<category>fiscalpolicy</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>krugman</category>
		<category>paulkrugman</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<category>taxcut</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<dc:creator>Yelling At Nothing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


