<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with lamont</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/lamont</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'lamont' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:28:11 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:28:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Sen. Lieberman (I - Aetna).</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86202/Sen%2DLieberman%2DI%2DAetna</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJ-VZ1VXkmc"&gt;Joe Lieberman... Deal or No Deal?!&lt;/a&gt; (SLYT) A campaign ad for Ned Lamont has suddenly become very relevant, considering &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=2010&amp;cid=n00000616&amp;type=I&amp;mem=&quot;&gt;Sen. Joe Lieberman&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/10/27/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5425530.shtml?tag=cbsContent;cbsCarousel&quot;&gt;statement&lt;/a&gt; threatening to block any health care legislation with a public option.

&quot;I accused him of, after 20 years, dithering on that topic,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28800.html&quot;&gt;said Ned Lamont yesterday&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;As far as I can tell, a filibuster is one more dither.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86202</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:28:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>healthcare</category>
		<category>insurance</category>
		<category>Lamont</category>
		<category>Lieberman</category>
		<category>Ned</category>
		<dc:creator>markkraft</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Democratic Party, What They Said, Who Was Naughty, Who Was Nice</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56296/The%2DDemocratic%2DParty%2DWhat%2DThey%2DSaid%2DWho%2DWas%2DNaughty%2DWho%2DWas%2DNice</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/11/14/122820/27&quot;&gt;Tim Tagaris,&lt;/a&gt; a &quot;netroots blogger&quot;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2917/&quot;&gt;David Sirota,&lt;/a&gt; a DC policy wonk turned blogger, both went to work for the Ned Lamont for Senate campign. Now they give their explanations for why Lamont lost. Regardless of your feelings about Lamont and Joementum, these fascinating inside stories provide insight into &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/11/14/11534/580&quot;&gt;the internecine struggle&lt;/a&gt; for the future of the Democratic Party.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56296</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:16:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>Lamont</category>
		<category>Lieberman</category>
		<category>Sirota</category>
		<category>Tagaris</category>
		<dc:creator>orthogonality</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Can&apos;t/Won&apos;t Pay Your Bill?  It&apos;s Ned&apos;s fault.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53721/CantWont%2DPay%2DYour%2DBill%2DIts%2DNeds%2Dfault</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://nedlamont.com/blog/985/statement-on-joes-website"&gt;Ned Lamont responds to accusations of hacking the Lieberman website.&lt;/a&gt; In response to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/hc-liebermansite0808,0,2471743.story?coll=stam-top-headlines&quot;&gt;reported issue&lt;/a&gt; with the Lieberman &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joe2006.com&quot;&gt;campaign &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lieberman2006.com&quot;&gt;websites&lt;/a&gt;, Ned Lamont claims to have nothing to do with it.  In Lamont&apos;s blog you&apos;ll notice, however, that someone has divulged the real reason behind the websites not being available:  &quot;Perhaps Joe should contact Diana Fassbender, fassbenderw (at) yahoo (dot) com, the billing contact for joe2006.com at &#8220;Friends of Joe Lieberman.&#8221; She can ask their host, www.theplanet.com, how to reconcile the account and restore service. It&#8217;s 1-800-377-6103&#8212;we&#8217;re here to help. It looks like a simple case of non-payment. Pretty sloppy by the Lieberman folks.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53721</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:18:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>connecticut</category>
		<category>democrat</category>
		<category>lamont</category>
		<category>lieberman</category>
		<category>primary</category>
		<dc:creator>thanotopsis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Primary insanity</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53583/Primary%2Dinsanity</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://home.comcast.net/%7Ectblogger/CT_RJ.pdf"&gt;Things in the CT-Senate race take a bizarre turn.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/8/3/205416/1615&quot;&gt;yesterday several Lieberman supporters&lt;/a&gt; waited for Challenger Ned Lamont at a campaign stop&lt;/a&gt;.  When he got there they all put on Joe Lieberman t-shirts and started &lt;a href=&quot;http://lamontblog.blogspot.com/2006/08/lieberman-staffers-disrupt-lamont.html&quot;&gt;harassing him and his supporters&lt;/a&gt;.  It turns out one of the loudest hecklers was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/8/4/11191/05211&quot;&gt;professional lobbyist&lt;/a&gt; for a chemical and health supplies industry group. 

Today Lieberman announced that he was going to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/8/4/102851/3818&quot;&gt;give up&lt;/a&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/03/AR2006080300597.html&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;]  on his ground game in order to save money for the general.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53583</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:10:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>lamont</category>
		<category>lieberman</category>
		<category>wtf</category>
		<dc:creator>delmoi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Primary in Connecticut</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51735/Primary%2Din%2DConnecticut</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://lamontblog.blogspot.com/2006/05/neds-on-ballot.html"&gt;Have the netroots finally hit solid ground?&lt;/a&gt; There&apos;s been a lot of debate about how effective left-wing blogs have been in the political process, but tonight a huge factor has just been added to that debate. Fueled by net support from big-name blogs, &lt;a href=&quot;http://nedlamont.com/&quot;&gt;Ned Lamont&lt;/a&gt; has secured the vote of &lt;a href=&quot;http://mydd.com/story/2006/5/19/202342/141&quot;&gt;nearly twice the necessary 15% of delegates&lt;/a&gt; in Connecticut&apos;s state Democratic convention to force a Senate primary against &lt;a href=&quot;http://lieberman.senate.gov/&quot;&gt;Joe Lieberman&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51735</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 17:41:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2006</category>
		<category>Connecticut</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>Elections</category>
		<category>Lamont</category>
		<category>Lieberman</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


