<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with larryking</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/larryking</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'larryking' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:43:29 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:43:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The real Neverland thriller.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/83049/The%2Dreal%2DNeverland%2Dthriller</link>
		<description> Perhaps it was bound to happen eventually, but it seems &lt;a href=&quot;http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/07/michael-jacksons-ghost.html&quot;&gt;Michael Jackson&apos;s ghost&lt;/a&gt; is already haunting the halls of Neverland Ranch.  Whether or not the spirt was moonwalking is currently inconclusive. During a Larry King interview with Jermaine Jackson at the ranch, a CNN camera crew inside MJ&apos;s bedroom suite catch an inadverdent shot of...Micheal Jackson&apos;s incorporeal spirit.  Or someone&apos;s shadow.  Or a lens abberation.  You be the judge! </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.83049</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:43:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cnn</category>
		<category>ghost</category>
		<category>larryking</category>
		<category>michaeljackson</category>
		<dc:creator>zardoz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Is Jon Stewart ready for his closeup?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49612/Is%2DJon%2DStewart%2Dready%2Dfor%2Dhis%2Dcloseup</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0602/27/lkl.01.html"&gt;At this Larry King interview&lt;/a&gt; and in other places, Jon Stewart is getting ready for his very big &quot;before and after&quot; moment. In one week he will go from hosting a sort of anti-establishment &quot;basic cable&quot; talk show to hosting the very establishment (of some sort at least) Oscars viewed by usually at least 40 million people. Despite what most of us me-fiers might think, Stewart is sort of unknown outside his core devotees and especially for a Oscar host -- unlike Bob Hope, Billy Crystal, Whoopi Goldberg, and even Chris Rock -- he has never been responsible for a hit movie.       Moreover, his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/politics/cablenewsratings.htm&quot;&gt;ratings&lt;/a&gt; (at 1.1 -- or about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/388148p-329167c.html&quot;&gt;two and half million&lt;/a&gt; people a night) would place him at about the sixth most seen cable news &quot;show&quot; -- behind Greta, Shepard Smith, Hannity, Larry, and, of course, the factor.  Now, that&apos;s a very wealthy, influential 2-3 million viewers that policy makers and advertisers love, so it&apos;s not chicken change but you can still understand what the Oscars might mean for fans of Jon.      For people who believe Stewart is the only effective keeper of a liberal flame, you can only hope he will continue to impress on the bigger stage.  However, some people are getting worried -- a la the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/28/movies/redcarpet/28wadler.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;NYT&lt;/a&gt;
and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=w060227&amp;s=siegel022706&quot;&gt;New Republic &lt;/a&gt; which is already claiming Stewart is losing his bite in order to please Hollywood and that he might not be so funny in the first place.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49612</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:39:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dailyshow</category>
		<category>jonsteward</category>
		<category>larryking</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<dc:creator>skepticallypleased</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Blow, Larry King, Blow!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42458/Blow%2DLarry%2DKing%2DBlow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/video/lking--bushes.mov"&gt;Watch Larry King blow his nose and solicit the Bushes during a commercial break.&lt;/a&gt; (an .mov file via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/harry-shearer/kingsized-week-part-2_1964.html&quot; /&gt;Harry Shearer&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/&quot; /&gt;The Huffington Post&lt;/a&gt;.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42458</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:30:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BarbaraBush</category>
		<category>GeorgeHWBush</category>
		<category>LarryKing</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<dc:creator>adrober</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17438/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/larry.king.live&quot;&gt;All pistachio nuts should come shelled. Every time I have a few, I break another thumb&lt;/a&gt;... Remember Larry&apos;s 

King&apos;s hilariously banal blatherings in his USAToday column? How &lt;a href=&quot;http://shtick.org/LarryKing/3-19-02.htm&quot;&gt;effortlessly&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rabbitbrush.com/lin/king.html&quot;&gt;mockable&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flatoday.com/!NEWSROOM/columnstoryA5610A.htm&quot;&gt;it&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theonion.com/onion3120/iminsane.html&quot;&gt;was&lt;/a&gt;? How he finally got &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/life/columns/lking.htm&quot;&gt;shitcanned&lt;/a&gt; last fall? Well, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/TV/05/01/larry.king.column/index.html&quot;&gt;he&apos;s back&lt;/a&gt;. Giveaway that King himself supervised the web presentation: how you have to hit &quot;next&quot; to see each individual, um...thought?...insight?...nugget? Like they&apos;re so substantial.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17438</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2002 06:58:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cnn</category>
		<category>larryking</category>
		<category>nuts</category>
		<category>pistachios</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>usatoday</category>
		<dc:creator>luser</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4148/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://x74.deja.com/threadmsg_ct.xp?AN=691204791.1&amp;amp;mhitnum=25&amp;amp;CONTEXT=973795793.1607008286"&gt;Bennett&apos;s tirade on Larry King: Does anyone have a transcript?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; I&apos;m curious. This is the only web mention I&apos;ve managed to dig up.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4148</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 10:56:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bennett</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>larryking</category>
		<category>transcript</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3513/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.patbuchanan.com/library/default.asp?id=148"&gt;Did Anybody catch Nader and Buchanan on Larry King last night?&lt;/a&gt; I did, and I actually found myself *agreeing* with Buchanan -- on so many issues that I surprised and shocked myself!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3513</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2000 10:46:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Buchanan</category>
		<category>LarryKing</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>PatBuchanan</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>snakey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3417/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/09/26/gwb.king/index.html"&gt;i happened to catch bush on larry king live last night.&lt;/a&gt; what i found to be especially interesting was his body language. talking about women, being popular with women, winning the women&apos;s vote - shaking head &quot;no&quot; the whole time...having women in top level govt. positions - shaking head &quot;no&quot;...he shook his head &quot;no&quot; a lot. talking about reagan and what a great president he was - shaking head &quot;yes&quot;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3417</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:57:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bodylanguage</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>larryking</category>
		<dc:creator>centrs</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/644/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/larry.king.live/"&gt;First Quote of the Century&lt;/a&gt; Here&apos;s the first quotable quote of the century.  Monica Lewinsky on CNN&apos;s Larry King Live discussing her miraculous Jenny Craig weight-loss: &quot;I&apos;ve learned not to put things in my mouth that are bad for me.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.644</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2000 12:46:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>century</category>
		<category>larryking</category>
		<category>lewinsky</category>
		<category>monicalewinsky</category>
		<category>quote</category>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


