<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with lawclerks</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/lawclerks</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'lawclerks' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:55:52 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:55:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Just how important are law clerks?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49210/Just%2Dhow%2Dimportant%2Dare%2Dlaw%2Dclerks</link>
		<description> David Garrow reviewed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.loc.gov/rr/mss/blackmun/&quot;&gt;Justice Blackmun&apos;s papers&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/news/specials/blackmun/&quot;&gt;released to the public in 2005&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/May-June-2005/feature_garrow_mayjun05.msp&quot;&gt;concludes&lt;/a&gt; that towards the end of his career, Blackmun&apos;s clerks all but signed his opinions.  In an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reason.com/0507/fe.jw.supreme.shtml&quot;&gt;interview&lt;/a&gt;, discussing senility and Supreme Court Justices, Garrow argues that  there has been &quot;a dramatic increase over the last 35 or 45 years in the amount of the justices&#8217; work that is performed by their law clerks,&quot; and recommends a &quot;reduction to two or, even better yet, one clerk&quot; from the four clerks available per Justice now.  Garrow also comments on the now-deceased Chief Justice Rehnquist, who suffered from an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2125906/&quot;&gt;addiction to painkillers in the 1980s&lt;/a&gt;.  Garrow&apos;s view is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.com/jsp/printerfriendly.jsp?c=LawArticle&amp;t=PrinterFriendlyArticle&amp;cid=1113555914558&quot;&gt;controversial&lt;/a&gt;, though, and Legal Affairs published &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/May-June-2005/feature_response_mayjun05.msp&quot;&gt;several responses&lt;/a&gt; in the same issue.  Other law professors have weighed in, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2005/04/markel_on_garro.html&quot;&gt;Dan Markel&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://balkin.blogspot.com/2005/04/garrow-on-blackmun-and-law-clerks_19.html&quot;&gt;Mark Tushnet&lt;/a&gt;, and some of the folks at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://volokh.com/posts/chain_1113928611.shtml&quot;&gt;Volokh Conspiracy&lt;/a&gt;.  So how &lt;a href=&quot;http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2005/08/quantifying_ver.html&quot;&gt;large&lt;/a&gt; is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://sports-law.blogspot.com/2004/07/importance-of-judicial-clerks-lest.html&quot;&gt;impact&lt;/a&gt; of law clerks?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49210</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:55:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blackmun</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lawclerks</category>
		<category>rehnquist</category>
		<category>scotus</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>monju_bosatsu</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


