<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with left and politics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/left+politics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'left' and 'politics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:54:57 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:54:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>A concept-map exploring the Left vs Right political spectrum.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86024/A%2Dconceptmap%2Dexploring%2Dthe%2DLeft%2Dvs%2DRight%2Dpolitical%2Dspectrum</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/left-vs-right/"&gt;Left vs. Right&lt;/a&gt; , the Infographic  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86024</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:54:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>infographic</category>
		<category>left</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>right</category>
		<dc:creator>blue_beetle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>so far left they&apos;re...neocon?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54227/so%2Dfar%2Dleft%2Dtheyreneocon</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,2144,2145701,00.html"&gt;Strange Bedfellows: Radical Leftists for Bush&lt;/a&gt; Among the German far-left, one subgroup called the anti-Germans holds some contradictory views. Most call themselves communists, yet loudly proclaim their support for Israel and George W. Bush.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54227</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:20:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AntiGermans</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>contrarians</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>Germany</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>left</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>telstar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Win is irreversible, says ruling party&apos;s candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52738/Win%2Dis%2Dirreversible%2Dsays%2Druling%2Dpartys%2Dcandidate</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1811951,00.html"&gt;Mexico&apos;s election: now being recounted,&lt;/a&gt; but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gregpalast.com/stealing-it-in-front-of-your-eyes#more-1440&quot;&gt;some are saying it was stolen with our help&lt;/a&gt;. Many countries in Latin and South America have been moving to the left lately, &lt;i&gt;following in the footsteps of Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Bolivia and Chile.&lt;/i&gt; Argentina actually caught us messing with things during their election, too. Exit polls in Mexico (as in Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004) showed a lead for the more leftist (relatively) candidate, and for those who scoff at using exit polls as evidence--in 2004, &lt;i&gt;US Republican Senator Richard Lugar, in Kiev, cited the divergence of exit polls and official polls as solid evidence of &#8220;blatant fraud&#8221; in the vote count in Ukraine. As a result, the Bush Administration refused to recognize the Ukraine government&#8217;s official vote tally.&lt;/i&gt; So, honest election, or what?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52738</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:43:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>left</category>
		<category>meddling</category>
		<category>Mexico</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>right</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Prescription for the American left</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49087/Prescription%2Dfor%2Dthe%2DAmerican%2Dleft</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060227/levy"&gt;A Letter to the American Left&lt;/a&gt; By Bernard-Henri L&amp;#0233;vy. 
&lt;em&gt;
&quot;Nothing made a more lasting impression during my journey through America than the semi-comatose state in which I found the American left.

I know, of course, that the term &quot;left&quot; does not have the same meaning and ramifications here that it does in France.

And I cannot count how many times I was told there has never been an authentic &quot;left&quot; in the United States, in the European sense.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
But at the end of the day, my progressive friends, you may coin ideas in whichever way you like. The fact is: You do have a right. This right, in large part thanks to its neoconservative battalion, has brought about an ideological transformation that is both substantial and striking. &quot;&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49087</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 05:16:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BernardHenriLevy</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>left</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>TheNation</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>mountainmambo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fred Flintstone: Rockefeller Republican, Nixon Supporter</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36400/Fred%2DFlintstone%2DRockefeller%2DRepublican%2DNixon%2DSupporter</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.unknown.nu/cartoon/"&gt;Political Leanings of Selected Cartoon Characters&lt;/a&gt; Did you know that Mickey Mouse is an &lt;i&gt;extreme right-wing Republican (some say even a John Bircher)&lt;/i&gt;? &lt;small&gt;(brought to you from way way back in 1996, as a result of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/36392&quot;&gt;this thread)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36400</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:00:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cartoons</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>icons</category>
		<category>left</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>right</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Is The BBC The United Nations Of Broadcasting?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30744/Is%2DThe%2DBBC%2DThe%2DUnited%2DNations%2DOf%2DBroadcasting</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=3503"&gt;Trusting The Redcoats:&lt;/a&gt; How many independent-minded Americans actually rely on the BBC (specially the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/index.shtml&quot;&gt;World Service&lt;/a&gt;) for accurate coverage of American politics?  Not to mention &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Guardian&lt;/a&gt;.  Is it a strictly an elitist, liberal/left-wing phenomenon?  What does it mean? What does it say about better-informed liberal newspapers and media of the U.S.?  If so, why aren&apos;t like-minded Europeans just as cosmopolitan and, say, pay the same attention to news sources like The New York Times, NPR and others, rather than stolidly sticking to their own national staples?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30744</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:52:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>europe</category>
		<category>guardian</category>
		<category>impartiality</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>left</category>
		<category>npr</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>right</category>
		<category>trust</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16781/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.canada.com/national/features/mandate/story.html?id={5F5BDF34-59FF-4F8E-9BA4-72C0F483324A}"&gt;Canadians fuzzy on concept of left and right.&lt;/a&gt; A new poll suggests that three quarters of Canadians have trouble telling political left from right. Sort of makes me wonder why voter turnout is higher in Canada than the U.S.. Canadians are also hard to pin down politically, as polls suggests they generally want less taxes &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; more government spending.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16781</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2002 21:07:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>canadians</category>
		<category>left</category>
		<category>politically</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>right</category>
		<dc:creator>bobo123</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11329/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thestranger.com/current/feature2.html"&gt;With friends like these...&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The Left in 2001 needs a media upgrade in the worst way. It needs to figure out a way to communicate its message that doesn&apos;t cause a vast majority of Americans to roll their eyes. Change in this country comes about through numbers, and continually alienating the bulk of the nation with old, tired tactics isn&apos;t going to change anything. &quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11329</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:56:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2001</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>left</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>theMargin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


