<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with legal and brokenlink</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/legal+brokenlink</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'legal' and 'brokenlink' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:18:16 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:18:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>malvo case ehxibits</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30194/malvo%2Dcase%2Dehxibits</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/courts/cases/jpg/120303df65_056.jpg&quot;&gt;Scribbling&lt;/a&gt; for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/courts/cases/jpg/120303df65_006.jpg&quot;&gt;jihad&lt;/a&gt;. Malvo case: defendant&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/courts/cases/malvo_defendant_exhibits.htm&quot;&gt;trial exhibits&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30194</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:18:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>jihad</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>snipers</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>trial</category>
		<dc:creator>hama7</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Job 9:12</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30187/Job%2D912</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.jurisint.org/pub/06/en/doc/30.htm"&gt;World Trade Organisation&apos;s Agreement on Government Procurement.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;International law? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/business/newswire/2003/12/11/rtr1177848.html&quot;&gt;I better call my lawyer.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/iraq/la-fg-contracts12dec12,1,2868937.story?coll=la-home-headlines&quot;&gt;I don&apos;t know what you&apos;re talking about&lt;/a&gt;, about international law,&quot; the president said.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30187</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:38:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>laws</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>wto</category>
		<dc:creator>the fire you left me</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>attorney general of NY investigates Verisign</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25585/attorney%2Dgeneral%2Dof%2DNY%2Dinvestigates%2DVerisign</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://wasyliklaw.com/verisign/"&gt;This short bit of info from the lawyers who apparently are going to be investigating verisign&lt;/a&gt; for the New York Attorney General. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/searched.mefi?option=2&amp;search=verisign&amp;date=4&quot;&gt;many&lt;/a&gt; a person seems to have had &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/searched.mefi?option=2&amp;search=verisign&amp;date=4&quot;&gt;issues&lt;/a&gt; with verisign. those in NY who have had problems with are encouraged to speak up.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25585</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 16:46:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>ny</category>
		<category>verisign</category>
		<dc:creator>sixtwenty3dc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Lynne Cheney parody draws White House ire</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24093/Lynne%2DCheney%2Dparody%2Ddraws%2DWhite%2DHouse%2Dire</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tribnet.com/24hour/entertainment/story/794376p-5674411c.html"&gt;Lynne Cheney parody draws White House ire&lt;/a&gt; An Internet lampoon of Vice President Dick Cheney&apos;s wife is no laughing matter at the White House, which has asked a satirist to remove pictures of her - complete with red clown noses - from his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.org/administration/lynne.asp&quot;&gt;Web site&lt;/a&gt;.

But the New York Civil Liberties Union struck back Wednesday on behalf of John A. Wooden, 31, threatening a lawsuit to protect his First Amendment rights to parody the White House and Bush officials on his site, whitehouse.org.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24093</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 07:13:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cheney</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>lynnecheney</category>
		<category>whitehouse.org</category>
		<dc:creator>turbanhead</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Journalist Bill Wyman threatened with legal action for having same name as Rolling Stones member</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21688/Journalist%2DBill%2DWyman%2Dthreatened%2Dwith%2Dlegal%2Daction%2Dfor%2Dhaving%2Dsame%2Dname%2Das%2DRolling%2DStones%2Dmember</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.austin360.com/aas/life/ap/ap_story.html/Entertainment/AP.V4871.AP-People-Wyman.html"&gt;Journalist Bill Wyman threatened with legal action for having same name as Rolling Stones member.&lt;/a&gt; Via Google News.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21688</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2002 13:08:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>billwyman</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>rollingstones</category>
		<category>wyman</category>
		<dc:creator>stevenf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17266/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;cid=583&amp;amp;ncid=583&amp;amp;e=1&amp;amp;u=/nm/20020520/od_nm/balls_dc_3"&gt;Good news!&lt;/a&gt; It&apos;s ok to &quot;steal&quot; golf balls again.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17266</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2002 01:30:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>golf</category>
		<category>golfballs</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<dc:creator>kingmissile</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16974/</link>
		<description> In a major policy reversal, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.findlaw.com/ap_stories/a/w/1154/5-7-2002/200205071020812413_32-34.html&quot;&gt;the Justice Department has officially endorsed an individual right to bear arms&lt;/a&gt;.  In doing so, the Justice Department has abandoned its long-held position that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://lcweb2.loc.gov/const/bor.html&quot;&gt;second amendment &lt;/a&gt;is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/issuebriefs/second.asp&quot;&gt;limited in scope to protecting militia activities&lt;/a&gt;.  Does this mean the Justice Department will stop enforcing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nraila.org/media/misc/FederalFirearms.htm&quot;&gt;federal laws&lt;/a&gt; that it sees as violating the 2nd amendemnt?  Should it?  If there is a individual right to bear arms, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nraila.org/FactSheets.asp?FormMode=Detail&amp;ID=25&quot;&gt;how &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shadeslanding.com/firearms/snyder.aw.ban.html&quot;&gt;far &lt;/a&gt;should it extend?   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16974</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2002 00:29:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2ndAmendment</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>firearms</category>
		<category>gun</category>
		<category>GunControl</category>
		<category>guns</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>RightToBearArms</category>
		<category>SecondAmendment</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>boltman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10465/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2812834,00.html?chkpt=zdnn_nbs_hl"&gt;Is the GPL a binding legal contract?&lt;/a&gt; If so, who would be able to (and could afford to) bring necessary legal action against groups who choose to ignore the terms?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10465</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:11:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>contract</category>
		<category>gpl</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<dc:creator>milnak</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8792/</link>
		<description> Can your own private written journal be considered obscene? &lt;a href=http://www.dispatch.com/news/news01/july01/755632.html&gt;A guy in Ohio is given 10 years in prison&lt;/a&gt; for writing fictitious tales in a 14-page journal.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8792</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2001 10:30:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>fiction</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>obscene</category>
		<category>obscenity</category>
		<category>ohio</category>
		<category>trial</category>
		<dc:creator>gluechunk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8572/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/et?ac=005312373762734&amp;amp;rtmo=axa8xXHL&amp;amp;atmo=rrrrrrrq&amp;amp;pg=/et/01/6/21/nspec21.html"&gt;Tony Blair wants to nix Double Jeopardy protection.&lt;/a&gt; A right that has been considered vital since the days of the Magna Carta is under threat from Labour.  Blair wants to make it possible that &quot;&lt;i&gt;someone acquitted of a killing can be put on trial again if new evidence emerges&lt;/i&gt;&quot;.  Why not just be sure of the case in the first place?  This would only cause a rush to trial by unprepared prosecutors.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8572</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:47:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blair</category>
		<category>britain</category>
		<category>britishlaw</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>doublejeopardy</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>tonyblair</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>dwivian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6626/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.we-deliver.tv/"&gt;Can you buy pot online legally?&lt;/a&gt; That is the claim of this company.  According to their site, it&apos;s against US law for customs to open any box marked as being human remains.  They say they&apos;ll ship doobage from the Netherlands with a prominent &quot;euthanized human remains&quot; sticker on it and deliver the goods to your door.  Also, if you sign up by April 20, they&apos;ll toss in a free joint.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6626</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:10:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>netherlands</category>
		<dc:creator>norm</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6097/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,2-91954,00.html"&gt;Lawyers fail to fulfill social duties&lt;/a&gt; Thank the good lord we do not have a similar problem in the United States!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6097</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:20:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>greatbritain</category>
		<category>jackstraw</category>
		<category>lawyers</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2976/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/wire/2000/08/23/rape_case/index.html"&gt;Woman charged with statutory rape&lt;/a&gt; When laws collide.  They were married too late  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2976</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:54:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>justice</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>rape</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>statutory</category>
		<category>statutoryrape</category>
		<dc:creator>Outlawyr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2819/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/apf/000811/disney_law.html"&gt;Disney found guilty of theft?&lt;/a&gt; The house that Walt built loses in court to a complaint that they stole an idea. Here&apos;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000810/en/industry-disneylawsuit_2.html&quot;&gt;backstory&lt;/a&gt; to the $1.5 billion dollar lawsuit.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2819</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:09:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lawsuits</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>waltdisney</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2704/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cbc.ca/cgi-bin/templates/view.cgi?/news/2000/08/01/marijuana000801"&gt;Man, I love Ontario.&lt;/a&gt; Monday afternoon, an amazingly significant court trial ruled that possession of marijuana being criminal is unconstitutional, and that new laws need to be written.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2704</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2000 13:18:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Canada</category>
		<category>decriminalization</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>Ontario</category>
		<category>pot</category>
		<dc:creator>cCranium</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2330/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20000630/ts/clinton_e_signatures.html"&gt;Well, it&apos;s about time&lt;/a&gt;  that we got around to this. Imagine the freedom we have now. Also imagine the possibilities for abuse. Could a jpeg be legally binding now? We still have a long way to go, but it&apos;s a good first step...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2330</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:33:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>jpg</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>signatures</category>
		<dc:creator>dgallo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/747/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawnewsnetwork.com/stories/A15989-2000Feb11.html&quot;&gt;Yahoo! is being sued&lt;/a&gt;. The plaintiffs claim that Yahoo!&apos;s use of cookies violates Texas anti-stalking laws.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.747</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2000 12:07:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cookies</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>tdecius</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


