<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with legalization and decriminalization</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/legalization+decriminalization</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'legalization' and 'decriminalization' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 06:35:21 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 06:35:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Drug war</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81849/Drug%2Dwar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10080"&gt;The Portugal experiment.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;On July 1, 2001, a nationwide law in Portugal
took effect that decriminalized all drugs, including
cocaine and heroin. Under the new legal
framework, all drugs were &#8220;decriminalized,&#8221; not
&#8220;legalized.&#8221; Thus, drug possession for personal
use and drug usage itself are still legally prohibited,
but violations of those prohibitions are
deemed to be exclusively administrative violations
and are removed completely from the criminal
realm....  The data show that, judged by virtually every
metric, the Portuguese decriminalization framework
has been a resounding success. Within this
success lie self-evident lessons that should guide
drug policy debates around the world.&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato.org/pubs/wtpapers/greenwald_whitepaper.pdf&quot;&gt;pdf of complete paper&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/sites/web/opinion/11774507-47/story.csp&quot;&gt;Winds of change are blowing&lt;/a&gt; and a primary driver appears to be that very American value - money. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81849</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 06:35:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CATO</category>
		<category>Decriminalization</category>
		<category>Drug_War</category>
		<category>Drugs</category>
		<category>Legalization</category>
		<category>Policy</category>
		<dc:creator>caddis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bad medicine</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73942/Bad%2Dmedicine</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-pot6-2008aug06,0,516054.story"&gt;The owner of a California medical marijuana dispensary has been found guilty of violating federal drug laws. [LA Times]&lt;/a&gt; FTA: &lt;em&gt;...jurors had a clear sense that Lynch was not an ordinary street-corner drug dealer, but the fact that he was dispensing medical marijuana didn&apos;t matter under federal law&lt;/em&gt;.  [...] &quot;&lt;em&gt;It was a tough decision for all of us because the state law and the federal law are at odds&lt;/em&gt;.&quot;  

&lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.tv/roughcut/show/503.html&quot;&gt;Detailed coverage&lt;/a&gt; of the trial by Reason TV.  Federal raids on California&apos;s medical dispensaries were recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/63256/We-know-whats-best-for-you&quot;&gt;featured on MeFi&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73942</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:46:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>decriminalization</category>
		<category>gonzalesvraich</category>
		<category>interstatecommerce</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<dc:creator>kid ichorous</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dope wars for policy wonks</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67788/Dope%2Dwars%2Dfor%2Dpolicy%2Dwonks</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/History/drug_law_timeline.htm&quot;&gt;Historically&lt;/a&gt;, drug laws have been a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.druglibrary.org/special/goode/drugpanic.htm&quot;&gt;reactive response&lt;/a&gt; to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:JC_s-Qyf-BgJ:www.jphp.umb.edu/documents/203-106_health_24_3_buchanan.pdf+Drug+law+moral+panic&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=46&amp;gl=uk&quot;&gt;moral panic&lt;/a&gt;. Increasingly though, some governments are now seeking a more rational basis for drug policy. For the first time ever, all interested parties have been invited to get involved in the creation of the UK&apos;s next &lt;a href=&quot;http://drugs.homeoffice.gov.uk/drug-strategy/&quot;&gt;ten year drug strategy&lt;/a&gt; though many senior government advisors have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://drugs.homeoffice.gov.uk/publication-search/acmd/acmdconsultresponse.pdf?view=Binary&quot;&gt;openly critical&lt;/a&gt; of some of the premises. Ultimately, arguments about drug policy often boil down to arguments about personal values, and the extent to which &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bartleby.com/130/&quot;&gt;individual liberty trumps the collective good&lt;/a&gt;. For a long time though, we passed laws based on hypothetical future scenarios that may or may not have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulflynnmp.co.uk/tsar.htm&quot;&gt;sustainable by the data&lt;/a&gt;.

One tool for making rational decisions about drug policy is &lt;a href=&quot;http://cfpm.org/&quot;&gt;modelling&lt;/a&gt;. In the past, this tended to be limited to policy wonks working in &lt;a href=&quot;http://drugs.homeoffice.gov.uk/&quot;&gt;government&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/&quot;&gt;departments&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://healthpolicy.stanford.edu/research/policy_modeling_for_aids_and_drug_abuse/&quot;&gt;academia&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ukdpc.org.uk/index.shtml&quot;&gt;think tanks&lt;/a&gt;. However, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dpmp.unsw.edu.au/&quot;&gt;Drug Policy Modelling Programme&lt;/a&gt; at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unsw.edu.au/&quot;&gt;University of New South Wales&lt;/a&gt; have published their modelling &lt;a href=&quot;http://notes.med.unsw.edu.au/DPMPWeb.nsf/page/Tools%20and%20Methods&quot;&gt;tools and methods&lt;/a&gt; on their website.

Now you too can download &lt;a href=&quot;http://cormas.cirad.fr/en/applica/simDrug.htm&quot;&gt;SimDrug&lt;/a&gt; and test your own assumptions about what would happen with illicit drug markets if &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;YOU&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; were drug czar. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67788</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:58:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>decriminalisation</category>
		<category>decriminalization</category>
		<category>drugpolicy</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>legalisation</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>modelling</category>
		<category>models</category>
		<category>policywonk</category>
		<dc:creator>PeterMcDermott</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Economists on drugs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32165/Economists%2Don%2Ddrugs</link>
		<description> A slim majority of sampled economists favor drug decriminalization, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf/Thornton%20Do%20Economists%20April%202004.pdf&quot;&gt;this .pdf article&lt;/a&gt; in the newly-launched &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.econjournalwatch.org/main/about_us.php&quot;&gt;Econ Journal Watch&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marginalrevolution.com/&quot;&gt;Marginal Revolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32165</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:00:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>decriminalization</category>
		<category>drugwar</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>warondrugs</category>
		<dc:creator>trharlan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15769/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thisislondon.com/dynamic/news/story.html?in_review_id=522065&amp;amp;in_review_text_id=486907"&gt;Cannabis&lt;/a&gt;  is given health all clear in UK  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15769</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2002 19:09:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cannabis</category>
		<category>decriminalization</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>pot</category>
		<dc:creator>semmi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9418/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-sager080101.shtml"&gt;Canada strongly considering decriminalizing or legalizing marijuana&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9418</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2001 11:13:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>decriminalization</category>
		<category>decriminalize</category>
		<category>laws</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>legalize</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>pot</category>
		<dc:creator>4midori</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


