<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with legalization and drugs</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/legalization+drugs</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'legalization' and 'drugs' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:37:45 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:37:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Who did and who didn&apos;t inhale?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82746/Who%2Ddid%2Dand%2Dwho%2Ddidnt%2Dinhale</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nicepeopletakedrugs.org/"&gt;Nice people take drugs&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82746</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:37:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>drug</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<category>Politicians</category>
		<dc:creator>PeterMcDermott</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Drug war</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81849/Drug%2Dwar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10080"&gt;The Portugal experiment.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;On July 1, 2001, a nationwide law in Portugal
took effect that decriminalized all drugs, including
cocaine and heroin. Under the new legal
framework, all drugs were &#8220;decriminalized,&#8221; not
&#8220;legalized.&#8221; Thus, drug possession for personal
use and drug usage itself are still legally prohibited,
but violations of those prohibitions are
deemed to be exclusively administrative violations
and are removed completely from the criminal
realm....  The data show that, judged by virtually every
metric, the Portuguese decriminalization framework
has been a resounding success. Within this
success lie self-evident lessons that should guide
drug policy debates around the world.&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato.org/pubs/wtpapers/greenwald_whitepaper.pdf&quot;&gt;pdf of complete paper&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/sites/web/opinion/11774507-47/story.csp&quot;&gt;Winds of change are blowing&lt;/a&gt; and a primary driver appears to be that very American value - money. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81849</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 06:35:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CATO</category>
		<category>Decriminalization</category>
		<category>Drug_War</category>
		<category>Drugs</category>
		<category>Legalization</category>
		<category>Policy</category>
		<dc:creator>caddis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Marijuana Goes Mainstream</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81020/Marijuana%2DGoes%2DMainstream</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;The New York Times&lt;/em&gt; discovers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/20/us/20marijuana.html&quot;&gt;the significance of today&apos;s date&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;Allen F. St. Pierre, the executive director of Norml, said he had cautioned supporters that any legal changes that might occur would probably be incremental. &#8220;The balancing act this year is trying to get our most active, most vocal supporters to be more realistic in their expectations in what the Obama administration is going to do,&#8221; Mr. St. Pierre said.&quot; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81020</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:57:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<dc:creator>Joe Beese</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dope wars for policy wonks</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67788/Dope%2Dwars%2Dfor%2Dpolicy%2Dwonks</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/History/drug_law_timeline.htm&quot;&gt;Historically&lt;/a&gt;, drug laws have been a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.druglibrary.org/special/goode/drugpanic.htm&quot;&gt;reactive response&lt;/a&gt; to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:JC_s-Qyf-BgJ:www.jphp.umb.edu/documents/203-106_health_24_3_buchanan.pdf+Drug+law+moral+panic&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=46&amp;gl=uk&quot;&gt;moral panic&lt;/a&gt;. Increasingly though, some governments are now seeking a more rational basis for drug policy. For the first time ever, all interested parties have been invited to get involved in the creation of the UK&apos;s next &lt;a href=&quot;http://drugs.homeoffice.gov.uk/drug-strategy/&quot;&gt;ten year drug strategy&lt;/a&gt; though many senior government advisors have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://drugs.homeoffice.gov.uk/publication-search/acmd/acmdconsultresponse.pdf?view=Binary&quot;&gt;openly critical&lt;/a&gt; of some of the premises. Ultimately, arguments about drug policy often boil down to arguments about personal values, and the extent to which &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bartleby.com/130/&quot;&gt;individual liberty trumps the collective good&lt;/a&gt;. For a long time though, we passed laws based on hypothetical future scenarios that may or may not have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulflynnmp.co.uk/tsar.htm&quot;&gt;sustainable by the data&lt;/a&gt;.

One tool for making rational decisions about drug policy is &lt;a href=&quot;http://cfpm.org/&quot;&gt;modelling&lt;/a&gt;. In the past, this tended to be limited to policy wonks working in &lt;a href=&quot;http://drugs.homeoffice.gov.uk/&quot;&gt;government&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/&quot;&gt;departments&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://healthpolicy.stanford.edu/research/policy_modeling_for_aids_and_drug_abuse/&quot;&gt;academia&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ukdpc.org.uk/index.shtml&quot;&gt;think tanks&lt;/a&gt;. However, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dpmp.unsw.edu.au/&quot;&gt;Drug Policy Modelling Programme&lt;/a&gt; at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unsw.edu.au/&quot;&gt;University of New South Wales&lt;/a&gt; have published their modelling &lt;a href=&quot;http://notes.med.unsw.edu.au/DPMPWeb.nsf/page/Tools%20and%20Methods&quot;&gt;tools and methods&lt;/a&gt; on their website.

Now you too can download &lt;a href=&quot;http://cormas.cirad.fr/en/applica/simDrug.htm&quot;&gt;SimDrug&lt;/a&gt; and test your own assumptions about what would happen with illicit drug markets if &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;YOU&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; were drug czar. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67788</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:58:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>decriminalisation</category>
		<category>decriminalization</category>
		<category>drugpolicy</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>legalisation</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>modelling</category>
		<category>models</category>
		<category>policywonk</category>
		<dc:creator>PeterMcDermott</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Mexico set to legalize personal amounts of pot, cocaine, heroin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51270/Mexico%2Dset%2Dto%2Dlegalize%2Dpersonal%2Damounts%2Dof%2Dpot%2Dcocaine%2Dheroin</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/americas/04/28/mexico.drugs.ap/"&gt;Mexico Poised to Allow Drugs for Personal Use&lt;/a&gt; -- Mexico&#8217;s Congress has approved a bill decriminalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana, ecstasy, cocaine and heroin for personal use. President Vicente Fox is expected to sign the bill.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51270</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:54:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>mexico</category>
		<category>war_on_drugs</category>
		<dc:creator>ericb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I can stop if I want to!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33487/I%2Dcan%2Dstop%2Dif%2DI%2Dwant%2Dto</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.mcwilliams.com/books/aint/303b.htm"&gt;National Review, Pro-Drug?&lt;/a&gt; I was searching for information of drug use in Vietnam and during wars in general, when I found this gem. Scroll halfway down to a very interesting pro-drug discussion between the editor-in-chief of the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience and Mr. William Buckley. A little dated (1990), but I never thought I&apos;d come out of an article thinking to myself, &quot;Maybe all drugs should be legal.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33487</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 18:14:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>nationalreview</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>vietnam</category>
		<category>willbuckley</category>
		<dc:creator>geoff.</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Drugs are bad, mmmkay?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30989/Drugs%2Dare%2Dbad%2Dmmmkay</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://washingtontimes.com/national/20040121-101225-6688r.htm"&gt;Rep. Kirk (R), states, that Washington now must fuse counterterrorism and counternarcotics into an inseparable mission.&lt;/a&gt; It seemed almost inevitable, but could this indicate use of broad (possibly unconstitutional) anti-terrorism legislation for prosecuting drug users? With &lt;a _top href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/london/insideldn/politics/politics_110104.shtml&quot;&gt; Britain downgrading marijuana&lt;/a&gt;, and much of the Western world softening on drug use, it seems that the United States won&apos;t give up. In fact, they even have &lt;a _top href=&quot;http://www.unknownnews.net/040126waronthinking.html&quot;&gt;Wal-Mart in on the action&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30989</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 19:24:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>counternarcotics</category>
		<category>counteterroism</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>walmart</category>
		<dc:creator>geoff.</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18846/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nandotimes.com/politics/story/476812p-3810072c.html"&gt;Nevada may be the first state to decriminalize marijuana.&lt;/a&gt; In the meantime Drug Czar John Walters believes that if drugs were decriminalized &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=5362&quot;&gt;users shouldn&apos;t have the rights everyone  else has.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18846</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 20:58:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>nevada</category>
		<category>pot</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15769/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thisislondon.com/dynamic/news/story.html?in_review_id=522065&amp;amp;in_review_text_id=486907"&gt;Cannabis&lt;/a&gt;  is given health all clear in UK  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15769</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2002 19:09:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cannabis</category>
		<category>decriminalization</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>pot</category>
		<dc:creator>semmi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9341/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=709603"&gt;The Economist&lt;/a&gt; calls for the legalization of drugs in this editorial.  Plus these &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?Story_id=706591&quot;&gt;articles&lt;/a&gt; [per A&amp;LD].  We are always led to believe that only fringe (read criminal and self-interested) elements favor this course...does anyone know any other &quot;mainstream&quot; groups/people with the nerve to publicly state their support?  Or better yet, an online list of same.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9341</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2001 11:39:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>economist</category>
		<category>editorial</category>
		<category>laws</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8829/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/RTGAMArticleHTMLTemplate/C/20010706/wmarji?tf=RT/fullstory.html&amp;amp;cf=RT/config-neutral&amp;amp;vg=BigAdVariableGenerator&amp;amp;slug=wmarji&amp;amp;date=20010706&amp;amp;archive=RTGAM&amp;amp;site=Front&amp;amp;ad"&gt;Medical marijuana&lt;/a&gt; not as effective as previously thought. Should this study affect the legalization talks?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8829</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2001 05:38:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<dc:creator>bytecode</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


