<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with liberalism</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/liberalism</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'liberalism' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:01:31 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:01:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>A New Thaw for Russia?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81164/A%2DNew%2DThaw%2Dfor%2DRussia</link>
		<description> The global financial crisis has &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7952549.stm&quot;&gt;severely&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.rian.ru/russia/20090421/121223432.html&quot;&gt;affected&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2009/BUSINESS/03/02/russia.economy/index.html#cnnSTCText&quot;&gt;the Russian economy&lt;/a&gt;. The unstable situation in the country has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4882bf6e-ff78-11dd-b3f8-000077b07658,dwp_uuid=9170c6b8-7fde-11dd-8eeb-000077b07658.html&quot;&gt;contributed &lt;/a&gt;to a&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/03/putin-medvedev-kremlin&quot;&gt; growing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1886300,00.html&quot;&gt;rift &lt;/a&gt;between Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and President Dmitry Medvedev. As increasing numbers of Russians become disillusioned with Putin&apos;s promise of comfort and security in exchange for authoritarianism, Medvedev has &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.novayagazeta.ru/data/2009/039/00.html&quot;&gt;shown some willingness&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsweek.com/id/195077&quot;&gt;to take the country&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jamestown.org/single/?no_cache=1&amp;tx_ttnews[tt_news]=34880&amp;tx_ttnews[backPid]=7&amp;cHash=869d54a5a0&quot;&gt;in a more liberal direction&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dw-world.de%2Fdw%2Farticle%2F0%2C%2C4205624%2C00.html&amp;sl=ru&amp;tl=en&amp;history_state0=&quot;&gt;Some analysts&lt;/a&gt;, however, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/email/russias-new-perestroika&quot;&gt;remain unconvinced&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81164</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:01:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>liberalism</category>
		<category>medvedev</category>
		<category>putin</category>
		<category>russia</category>
		<dc:creator>nasreddin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Obama vs. Marx</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80221/Obama%2Dvs%2DMarx</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=e050da85-7d49-46da-80fc-d9168c0faec7"&gt;Despite The Republican Talking Points, There&apos;s A Difference Between Obama And Marx: One Of Them&apos;s Not A Socialist.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80221</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:12:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BarackObama</category>
		<category>BernieSanders</category>
		<category>DemocraticSocialist</category>
		<category>KarlMarx</category>
		<category>Liberalism</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>SocialDemocracy</category>
		<category>Socialism</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Wasting Away in Hooverville</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79826/Wasting%2DAway%2Din%2DHooverville</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tnr.com/booksarts/story.html?id=82c53220-7594-4ece-a136-a3b2f54243ec"&gt;Quit Lying About Roosevelt!&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Amity Shlaes, the GOP&apos;s Great Depression philosopher-queen, couldn&apos;t be more dangerously wrong.&quot; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79826</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:35:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmityShlaes</category>
		<category>Conservatism</category>
		<category>Economics</category>
		<category>FDR</category>
		<category>FranklinRoosevelt</category>
		<category>GreatDepression</category>
		<category>HerbertHoover</category>
		<category>History</category>
		<category>Keynesianism</category>
		<category>Liberalism</category>
		<category>Matrix</category>
		<category>NewDeal</category>
		<category>ParadoxOfThrift</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Post neoliberal or just pre liberal?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79199/Post%2Dneoliberal%2Dor%2Djust%2Dpre%2Dliberal</link>
		<description> &quot;The crisis is an opportunity to sweep away the rotten postwar settlement of British politics. Labour is moribund. But David Cameron has a chance to develop a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=10608&quot;&gt;red Tory&lt;/a&gt;&quot; communitarianism, socially conservative but sceptical of neoliberal economics&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/ourkingdom/2008/09/19/red-tory&quot;&gt;Philip Blond&lt;/a&gt; makes a compelling and long overdue critique of big government and big business in the sporadic tradition of British civic republicanism. His account of political failures and disappointments clearly has a popular resonance and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nextleft.org/2009/02/how-to-make-pale-pink-toryism-red.html&quot;&gt;continues to&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/09/madeleine-bunting-red-toryism&quot;&gt;pique&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/23/cameron-progressive-conservatism&quot;&gt;commentariat&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://thesocialbrain.wordpress.com/2009/02/13/red-toryism-and-new-communitarianism/&quot;&gt;interest&lt;/a&gt; since &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2008/12/David_Cameron_Making_progressive_conservatism_a_reality.aspx&quot;&gt;echoes from Cameron&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2009/01/23/will-the-red-tories-spill-blue-blood/&quot;&gt;launch&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.demos.co.uk/projects/progressiveconservatism/overview&quot;&gt;think tank Demos&lt;/a&gt;, last month. But &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=10622&quot;&gt;is his &quot;one nation&quot; social Catholicism a viable vehicle&lt;/a&gt; for collective identity and passionate engagement? </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79199</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:31:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>communitarianism</category>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>liberalism</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>tory</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>doobiedoo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Torture is a blunt instrument</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69235/Torture%2Dis%2Da%2Dblunt%2Dinstrument</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/13/AR2007121301303.html"&gt;Five myths about torture&lt;/a&gt; In a Washington Post column, &lt;a href=&quot;http://academic.reed.edu/poli_sci/faculty/rejali/rejali/current.html&quot;&gt;Darius Rejali&lt;/a&gt;, author of Torture and Democracy, explains why five beliefs about torture are wrong. In &lt;a href=&quot;http://harpers.org/archive/2008/02/hbc-90002387&quot;&gt;a Harper&apos;s interview&lt;/a&gt;, he answers six questions. &quot;Yes, torture does migrate, and there are some good examples of it both in American and French history. The basic idea here is that soldiers who get ahead torturing come back and take jobs as policemen, and private security, and they get ahead doing the same things they did in the army. And so torture comes home. Everyone knows waterboarding, but no one remembers that it was American soldiers coming back from the Philippines that introduced it to police in the early twentieth century.&quot; &quot;The historical record is clear. Waterboarding is torture, and yes focusing on just waterboarding is a distraction. Waterboarding is serious, but only the tip of the iceberg. There have only been three documented cases of waterboarding, but the CIA has subjected at least 30 others to &#8220;enhanced interrogation&#8221; as Director Hayden says, so there are other kinds of techniques as well. And there are unaccounted prisoners last seen in US custody as well as secret prisons out there where these things continue to happen.&quot; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69235</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:37:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Confession</category>
		<category>Democracy</category>
		<category>Interrogation</category>
		<category>Liberalism</category>
		<category>Torture</category>
		<category>Waterboarding</category>
		<dc:creator>Kirth Gerson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Despotism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50130/Despotism</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.archive.org/details/Despotis1946"&gt;Despotism.&lt;/a&gt; In 1946, &lt;em&gt;Encyclopedia Britannica&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Lasswell&quot;&gt;Harold Lasswell&lt;/a&gt; produced an educational film about the nature of Despotism.   Calls to mind contemporary examples of despotism, and (in view of Lasswell&apos;s own views on the subject) raises some interesting questions about the uses and misuses of persuasion and propaganda. 

Film link via the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archive.org/details/prelinger&quot;&gt;Prelinger Archive&lt;/a&gt;, previously discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/44834&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50130</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:40:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>despotism</category>
		<category>fascism</category>
		<category>hitler</category>
		<category>lasswell</category>
		<category>liberalism</category>
		<category>nazism</category>
		<category>prelinger</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>tolerance</category>
		<dc:creator>washburn</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>internet as hyper-liberalism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48179/internet%2Das%2Dhyperliberalism</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://web.inter.nl.net/users/Paul.Treanor/net.hyperliberal.html"&gt;INTERNET AS HYPER-LIBERALISM:&lt;/a&gt; By the limitations of common sense and consensus. Sometime wacky ideas can help us look at things much clearer than a technical manual description of them by rational and well argued people. Paul Treanor is a one-of-a-kind writer. don&apos;t try to argue with him about being wrong. he does not believe in communication and therefore there is no CONTACT link anywhere on his site. He writes and lives in Amsterdam, Holland.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48179</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:50:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>empire</category>
		<category>freemarket</category>
		<category>hyperliberalism</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>liberalism</category>
		<category>nationalism</category>
		<category>paultreanor</category>
		<dc:creator>sundaymag</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Preserving Anti-conservatism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34996/Preserving%2DAnticonservatism</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre/conservatism.html"&gt;What Is Conservatism and What Is Wrong with It?&lt;/a&gt; According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre/index.html&quot;&gt;Philip E. Agre&lt;/a&gt;, previously discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/12083&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and the guy behind the &lt;a href=&quot;http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre/rre.html&quot;&gt;Red Rock Eater News Service&lt;/a&gt;, the answers to these questions are simple (if 13k+ words = simple).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34996</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2004 19:34:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conservatism</category>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>liberalism</category>
		<category>opinion</category>
		<category>PhilipEAgre</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RedRockEaterNewsService</category>
		<dc:creator>boost ventilator</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Philosophy of Food</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25867/The%2DPhilosophy%2Dof%2DFood</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/"&gt;Open Democracy: Anticapitalists Of The World, Left And Right, Unite?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Open Democracy&lt;/strong&gt; is a very interesting project which proposes to discuss - and open to discussion - the great issues of our day. While mostly socialist and liberal - with some new anarchism intelligently thrown in - it refreshingly makes space for conservative philosopher and polemicist &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rogerscruton.com/&quot;&gt;Roger Scruton&apos;s &lt;/a&gt;reflections on the political and social consequences of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/debates/article-4-64-1224.jsp&quot;&gt;how we eat&lt;/a&gt;.  Despite a vaguely anticapitalist bias, so far as I can see, &lt;strong&gt;Open Democracy&lt;/strong&gt; seems to be intellectually &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/about/index.jsp&quot;&gt;wide open&lt;/a&gt;.  I&apos;ve been a subscriber for a while now (it&apos;s free, btw) and it&apos;s that old-fashioned thing: &lt;em&gt;it makes you think&lt;/em&gt;. Do consider adding it to your usual peregrinations.  [&lt;small&gt;&lt;em&gt;I&apos;ll resist the temptation of pointing to favourite essays and debates - it really is worth exploring one one&apos;s own. &lt;strong&gt;Jacknose&lt;/strong&gt; was the first to refer to &lt;strong&gt;Open Democracy&lt;/strong&gt; on MeFi, back in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/13018&quot;&gt;December 2001&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25867</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2003 14:20:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anarchism</category>
		<category>anticapitalism</category>
		<category>conservatism</category>
		<category>liberalism</category>
		<category>opendemocracy</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>rogerscruton</category>
		<category>socialism</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20377/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/LiberalFAQ.htm"&gt;Liberalism FAQ&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=http://www.counterrevolution.net/consfaq.html&gt;Conservativism FAQ&lt;/a&gt; describe the differences (and similarities) between the two oft-discussed by seldom understood political mindsets.  Both FAQs are detailed, concise, enjoyable, and not annoyingly biased.  Read with caution: Knowing your enemies sometimes makes it less fun to bash on them.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20377</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:21:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conservatism</category>
		<category>faqs</category>
		<category>liberalism</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>oissubke</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12580/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/db/articles.asp?ID=17431"&gt;&quot;Universities have a serious problem.&lt;/a&gt; The type of liberalism so heavily favored by the intellectual elite has crossed the line. Professors throughout the educational world are supporting murderers and terrorists; they are justifying despicable actions because of the political philosophies of the actors. Murder, slaughter, and terrorism are OK, they say, as long as they are directed at law-enforcement officials or civilian Westerners. It&apos;s fine as long as the murderer is anti-capitalist, anti-establishment or anti-conservative.&quot; -- Written by a UCLA student  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12580</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2001 16:26:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conservatism</category>
		<category>culturalrelativism</category>
		<category>elitism</category>
		<category>liberalism</category>
		<category>ucla</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11326/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,566638,00.html"&gt;Limp Liberals - Aintchasickovem?&lt;/a&gt; A really fine left liberal answer to Berkely and all the faint hearts. And it fits right in with my own thinking. It&apos;s time we stood up and got counted for human rights against any &quot;culture&quot; or &quot;religion&quot; that denies them. Polly Tonybee writes an excellent and timely piece. Liberals too, should not &quot;go wobbly&quot; out of a plain cowardly &quot;respect&quot; for reactionary strains of Islam, Christianity or Judaism. What do you think?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11326</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:51:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>guardian</category>
		<category>international</category>
		<category>liberalism</category>
		<category>liberals</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>toynbee</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>terrymiles</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11153/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.prospect.org/print/V12/18/berman-p.html"&gt;Terror and Liberalism&lt;/a&gt; I have found this piece in The American Prospect to be one of the most balenced pieces I have yet come across.  It considers all aspects of the terrorist groups--Israel, American policy, poverty, Iraq, fundamentalisim, history of the area, westernization, etc and finds the rights and wrongs in each, offering finally a way to cope with things in the future while at the same time dealing with present needs.
  In other words, it avoids the overly simplistic formulas offered by so many stalwarts of the far Right or far Left.
    </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11153</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2001 15:00:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fundamentalism</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>israel</category>
		<category>liberalism</category>
		<category>poverty</category>
		<category>theamericanprospect</category>
		<category>theleft</category>
		<category>theright</category>
		<category>usforeignpolicy</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2197/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/06/19/waco/index.html"&gt;Why does the left ignore Waco?&lt;/a&gt; I remember watching Waco burn on tv and being totally radicalized by it. Believing I was experiencing holy truth, I was of course shocked to find alot of people thought they had it coming. This link proposes things I had not considered.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2197</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2000 10:56:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ATF</category>
		<category>BranchDavidians</category>
		<category>DavidKoresh</category>
		<category>liberalism</category>
		<category>Salon</category>
		<category>Texas</category>
		<category>tragedy</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>Waco</category>
		<dc:creator>thirteen</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


