<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with lists and brokenlink</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/lists+brokenlink</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'lists' and 'brokenlink' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 08:52:40 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 08:52:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Paul Krugman: The best places to get sick</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41285/Paul%2DKrugman%2DThe%2Dbest%2Dplaces%2Dto%2Dget%2Dsick</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2005/04/15/opinion/edkrug.html"&gt;Paul Krugman: The best places to get sick&lt;/a&gt; A dozen years ago, everyone was talking about an American health care crisis. But then the issue faded from view: A few years of good data led many people to conclude that HMOs and other innovations had ended the historic trend of rising medical costs.

But the pause in the growth of health care costs in the 1990s proved temporary. Medical costs are once again rising rapidly and the U.S. health care system is once again in crisis. So now is a good time to ask why other advanced countries manage to spend so much less than we Americans do, while getting better results.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41285</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 08:52:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bestlist</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>costs</category>
		<category>healthcare</category>
		<category>hmo</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>medical</category>
		<category>paulkrugman</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The 100 greatest British albums</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33828/The%2D100%2Dgreatest%2DBritish%2Dalbums</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://observer.guardian.co.uk/omm"&gt;The 100 greatest British albums&lt;/a&gt; ... and look what came &lt;a href=&quot;http://observer.guardian.co.uk/omm/story/0,13887,1240034,00.html&quot;&gt;first&lt;/a&gt;.  Why?  I personally don&apos;t believe the justification given.  And surely the word Rock is missing from the title of the poll because I don&apos;t see many other genres mentioned.  To be honest, &lt;a href=&quot;http://observer.guardian.co.uk/omm/story/0,13887,1240294,00.html&quot;&gt;I&apos;m with Miranda Sawyer on this one &lt;/a&gt;-- why aren&apos;t more girls aloud?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33828</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:22:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>100greatestbritishalbums</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>genres</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>rankings</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20312/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.americanheritage.com/AMHER/2002/05/over-under.shtml"&gt;Riding The Reputation Seesaw:&lt;/a&gt; I&apos;m a sucker for underrated/overrated lists anyway, but this series of short articles from underrated &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanheritage.com&quot;&gt;American Heritage&lt;/a&gt; magazine is one of the best I&apos;ve ever read.  I specially liked the haphazard criteria for selecting the categories, leaving out some of the most obvious.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20312</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:30:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanHeritage</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>overrated</category>
		<category>underrated</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14587/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thestinkers.com/100stinkers.html"&gt;Worse movies of the 20th century?&lt;/a&gt; I think not.  There&apos;s lots of stinkers here, but including Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me and ignoring such dreck as The Omega Man certainly has to be illegal somewhere. Let the &quot;I thought this underrated movie was actually good&quot; confessions commence.  [via the null device]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14587</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 00:48:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>20thcentury</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>worse</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7166/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4173226,00.html"&gt;This is a list of a 101 things we don&apos;t miss in the UK.&lt;/a&gt;   Actually, it&apos;s mostly 70% right.  Any suggestions for what&apos;s missing?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7166</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2001 05:59:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/898/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.listquest.com/lq/search.cgi?ln=web405&amp;amp;mid=&amp;amp;sp=&amp;amp;q=RMail@accountpros.com&amp;amp;b=1&amp;amp;s=1&amp;amp;a=1&amp;amp;o=0&amp;amp;x=25&amp;amp;y=7"&gt;Nannybots and mailing lists don&apos;t mix&lt;/a&gt; - especially nannybots that have gone &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;insane&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.898</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2000 11:01:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>filters</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>mailing</category>
		<category>MailingLists</category>
		<category>obscenity</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<dc:creator>CrazyUncleJoe</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/369/</link>
		<description> The &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.dismal.com/top25/introduction.asp&apos;&gt;Top Economic Events of the Twentieth Century&lt;/a&gt; is an interesting list. It&apos;s good to know that people truly realize the economic importance of things like the Apple II and the Web browser.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.369</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 1999 17:11:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>20thcentury</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<dc:creator>tdecius</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


