<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with macca</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/macca/rss</link>
	<description>tag posts with macca</description>
		  <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 05:55:52 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 05:55:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>She loves me yeah, yeah, er, no!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69988/She-loves-me-yeah-yeah-er-no</link>
		<description>
		Sooooo... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulmccartney.com/&quot;&gt;Macca&lt;/a&gt; finds himself &amp;#0163;24m ($50m) worse off &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/mills-wins-pound24m-in-mccartney-divorce-deal-796989.html?CMP=KNC-google_news&amp;HBX_OU=50&amp;HBX_PK=paul%20mccartney&quot;&gt;after his acrimonious divorce&lt;/a&gt; from strong woman / mentalist* &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heathermills.org/index.php&quot;&gt;Heather Mills&lt;/a&gt;. Mills also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/mar/18/law.divorce1&quot;&gt;loses her appeal&lt;/a&gt; against keeping the text of the ruling private (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/docs/judgments_guidance/judgment_180308.pdf&quot;&gt;read it here - PDF&lt;/a&gt;), maybe because of her &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Amb6bm8fj9g&quot;&gt;10 minute diatribe &lt;/a&gt;on the steps of the court yesterday, or because of her &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGXQB3o_gnc&quot;&gt;numerous TV appearances&lt;/a&gt;, but probably not because she &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2008/03/18/1205602341821.html&quot;&gt;threw a glass of water&lt;/a&gt; over Macca&apos;s lawyer, er, alledgedly. But the main point, of course (and thank you Dallas), was - &lt;a href=&quot;http://shoppingblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/03/heather-mills-divorce-settleme.html&quot;&gt;what the heck was she wearing?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;(*delete as approporiate depending upon your POV)&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69988</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 05:55:52 -0800</pubDate>

<category>macca</category>

<category>beatles</category>

<category>heatherMills</category>

<category>paulmccartney</category>

<category>strongwoman</category>

<category>nutter</category>

<dc:creator>the_very_hungry_caterpillar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


