<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with macleans</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/macleans</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'macleans' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:52:29 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:52:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Hate Speech or Free Speech?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72439/Hate%2DSpeech%2Dor%2DFree%2DSpeech</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/12/us/12hate.html?hp=&amp;amp;pagewanted=all"&gt;Out of Step With Allies, U.S. Defends Freedom to Offend&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt; NYT article &lt;/small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_by_country&quot;&gt;Wikipedia &lt;/a&gt;describing different approaches to freedom of speech by country. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72439</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:52:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>1stamendment</category>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>firstamendment</category>
		<category>freespeech</category>
		<category>hatespeech</category>
		<category>humanrights</category>
		<category>humanrightstribunal</category>
		<category>macleans</category>
		<category>marksteyn</category>
		<dc:creator>lalochezia</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Internet Sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55860/The%2DInternet%2DSucks</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.macleans.ca/topstories/life/article.jsp?content=20061030_135406_135406"&gt;Teh Intarweb suXXors!&lt;/a&gt; Macleans, the venerable Canadian magazine of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/arts/media/macleans.html&quot;&gt;declining circulation&lt;/a&gt;, declares the Internet a failure. But they&apos;re not bitter.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55860</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:08:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>gambling</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>lies</category>
		<category>macleans</category>
		<category>Pornography</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>theft</category>
		<dc:creator>GuyZero</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Cancer be damned, kids wanna tan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42990/Cancer%2Dbe%2Ddamned%2Dkids%2Dwanna%2Dtan</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.macleans.ca/topstories/health/article.jsp?content=20050627_108020_108020"&gt;Cancer be damned, kids wanna tan&lt;/a&gt; &#8220;I know I might get cancer, but sometimes you want to look good no matter what. I&#8217;d rather look good that worry about what could happen to me&#8211;looks are more important to me sometimes than my health.&#8221; (Maclean&#8217;s Magazine)

Perhaps cancer is &#8216;natural selection&#8217; at work trying to weed out all of societies undesirables from the gene pool. I for one think we could do without people this stupid.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42990</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:31:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cancer</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>Macleans</category>
		<category>skin</category>
		<category>skincancer</category>
		<category>tan</category>
		<category>tanning</category>
		<category>vanity</category>
		<dc:creator>haasim</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19774/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.macleans.ca/xta-asp/storyview.asp?viewtype=browse&amp;amp;tpl=browse_frame&amp;amp;vpath=/2002/09/09/Attitudes/71489.shtml"&gt;Canada&apos;s long term viability in question amongst canadians&lt;/a&gt; &quot;only 30 per cent of Canadians are certain we will have an independent country 25 years from now&quot;. Sure it&apos;s a link about canada, but I&apos;m sure it has plenty of North American and Global relevance, doesn&apos;t it?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19774</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2002 09:33:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Canada</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>independence</category>
		<category>macleans</category>
		<category>opinion</category>
		<category>survey</category>
		<category>viability</category>
		<dc:creator>canucklehead</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


