<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with mathematics and philosophy</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/mathematics+philosophy</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'mathematics' and 'philosophy' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:30:17 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:30:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>He laughed like an irresponsible foetus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82283/He%2Dlaughed%2Dlike%2Dan%2Dirresponsible%2Dfoetus</link>
		<description> &lt;b&gt;Parts &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OziPcicgmbw&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TedtMmUq8ig&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7I9pgqiLo0&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt; of a 1959 interview&lt;/b&gt; with &lt;a href=&quot;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/russell/&quot;&gt;philosopher&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://fair-use.org/bertrand-russell/the-principles-of-mathematics/&quot;&gt;mathematician&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.russfound.org&quot;&gt;peace campaigner&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Russell&quot;&gt;Bertrand&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/513124/Bertrand-Russell&quot;&gt;Russell&lt;/a&gt; (1872-1970). &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.users.drew.edu/~jlenz/brtexts.html&quot;&gt;Works&lt;/a&gt; and  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.humanities.mcmaster.ca/~bertrand/&quot;&gt;pictures&lt;/a&gt; online include &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.users.drew.edu/~jlenz/br-suffrage.html&quot;&gt;Anti-suffragist Anxieties&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://users.drew.edu/~jlenz/whynot.html&quot;&gt;Why I am not a Christian&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pugwash.org/about/manifesto.htm&quot;&gt;Russell-Einstein Manifesto&lt;/a&gt; against nuclear weapons and the book &lt;a href=&quot;http://russell.cool.ne.jp/beginner/COH-TEXT.HTM&quot;&gt;The Conquest of Happiness&lt;/a&gt;. Russell is also known for his pithy &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Bertrand_Russell&quot;&gt;quotes&lt;/a&gt;, his &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell&apos;s_teapot&quot;&gt;teapot&lt;/a&gt; and was the subject of poem &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bartleby.com/198/9.html&quot;&gt;Mr Apollinax&lt;/a&gt; by T.S. Eliot.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82283</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:30:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BertrandRussell</category>
		<category>interview</category>
		<category>mathematics</category>
		<category>peace</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>polymath</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>youtube</category>
		<dc:creator>TheophileEscargot</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Spherical Wave Structure of Matter in Space</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78755/The%2DSpherical%2DWave%2DStructure%2Dof%2DMatter%2Din%2DSpace</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.spaceandmotion.com/"&gt;On Truth and Reality.&lt;/a&gt; Despite several thousand years of failure to correctly understand physical reality (hence the current &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Philosophy-Postmodernism.htm&quot;&gt;postmodern view that this is impossible&lt;/a&gt;) it is actually very simple to work out how matter exists and moves about in Space. The rules of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Ockhams-Razor.htm&quot;&gt;Science (Occam&apos;s Razor / Simplicity)&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/metaphysics.htm&quot;&gt;Metaphysics (Dynamic Unity of Reality)&lt;/a&gt; require that reality be described from only one single source existing, as Leibniz wrote: &lt;em&gt;&quot;because of the interconnection of all things with one another.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;The Four Main Purposes of this Website&lt;/strong&gt;

1. To help people understand truth and reality
2. To realize that we are structures of the universe
3. To solve the central problems of knowledge
4. To share this knowledge with others

Deduce the most &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Most-Simple-Scientific-Theory-Reality.htm&quot;&gt;simple science theory of reality&lt;/a&gt;, the wave structure of matter in Space, then deduce from this to show that it works. There is no opinion involved - it shows that science does work - we just needed the correct (most simple) foundations.

Given the Wave Structure of Matter in Space it is now possible to explain what mathematics is, how it can exist in the universe, and thus why it is so well suited for describing physical quantities (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/mathematical-physics/logic-truth-reality.htm&quot;&gt;mathematical physics&lt;/a&gt;).

We can simplify Einstein&apos;s foundations of representing matter as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Physics-Albert-Einstein-Theory-Relativity.htm&quot;&gt;continuous fields in space-time, to waves in continuous space&lt;/a&gt;. It does lead to a very simple, sensible foundation for understanding physical reality, and thus how you exist in the universe.

This article basically explains the main subjects of quantum theory from a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Physics-Quantum-Theory-Mechanics.htm&quot;&gt;Wave Structure of Matter foundation&lt;/a&gt; (wave mechanics). If you prefer shorter summaries just browse the quantum physics links on either side of the page.

The purpose of the Cosmology page is to simply explain the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Cosmology.htm&quot;&gt;two cosmology theories that are consistent with current observations&lt;/a&gt;. You will need a basic understanding of the Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) before you read it. This WSM cosmology is actually describing what you really are, how you exist in this space of the universe and interact with everything around you.

There is a revolution coming in the foundations of our knowledge because we have solved the central problem of metaphysics, of what exists (space) that causes and connects the many things we experience (waves in space that form matter, the discrete and separate particle an illusion of our limited senses). Matter is large, a structure of space, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Philosophy.htm&quot;&gt;this truth about reality will change humanity&lt;/a&gt;.

If we are to discuss &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/theology-morality-god-world-religions.htm&quot;&gt;God and Religion&lt;/a&gt;, it is obvious that we must clearly define the meaning of these words (as all words are human constructions). In Philosophy God is generally referred to as the One thing that exists, infinite and eternal, that causes and connects the many things. Likewise, Religion, from Latin &apos;religare&apos; meaning &apos;to bind&apos;, describes our connection to God as the One thing which exists. From this foundation we then see the clear connection between the sciences of philosophy, physics, metaphysics, and theology, as they are all founded on this Reality of One thing existing.

As humans have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/evolution-ecology-nature-culture-society.htm&quot;&gt;evolved from Nature&lt;/a&gt; they ultimately depend upon Nature for their survival. Until we understand what we are as humans (what matter is) and how we are connected to the universe (reality), it is impossible for humanity to be wise, and to be able to evolve cultural knowledge that enables us to live in harmony with Nature.

It is well known that our senses are deceptive, that when we see things as being separate and discrete bodies this is an illusion. Using science terminology then all we are really talking about is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/health/index.htm&quot;&gt;evolution and ecology&lt;/a&gt;. That all things in the universe (including life on earth) are interconnected and changing (the dynamic unity of reality).

Teaching people how to think correctly and to use language carefully (to work out the truth for themselves) is a pretty &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Philosophy-Education.htm&quot;&gt;good start for education&lt;/a&gt; (i.e. by teaching philosophy to students from a young age).

If we are to improve human societies (which has become an urgent problem) we must consider the forces that determine their evolution. And four of the most significant factors are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/society/politics-economics-truth-utopia.htm&quot;&gt;market economics, politics&lt;/a&gt;, education (the knowledge foundations of the people) and Nature. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78755</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:05:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>cosmology</category>
		<category>ecology</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>learning</category>
		<category>mathematics</category>
		<category>matter</category>
		<category>metaphysics</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>physics</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>quantumtheory</category>
		<category>relativity</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<category>theology</category>
		<category>wisdom</category>
		<dc:creator>netbros</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Reality</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72280/Reality</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2008/06/the_reality_tests_1.php"&gt;The Reality Tests.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quantum.at/&quot;&gt;team of physicists&lt;/a&gt; in Vienna has devised experiments that may answer one of the enduring riddles of science: Do we create the world just by looking at it?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72280</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:40:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Mathematics</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Physics</category>
		<category>QuantumMechanics</category>
		<category>QuantumOptics</category>
		<category>Realism</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<category>Solipsism</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>art with a lot of concept</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64328/art%2Dwith%2Da%2Dlot%2Dof%2Dconcept</link>
		<description> Fate, Absolute Life and Death, the Aleph, the Zeitgeist, the sinking of the Atlantis, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kentgallery.com/lafbio.htm&quot;&gt;World Trade Center&lt;/a&gt;, the formation of the universe...what more could you want from art?  There&apos;s probably already been a been a post on this guy, Paul Laffoley, but I should hope more people could get a glance at some of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.laffoley.com/&quot;&gt;this man&apos;s work&lt;/a&gt;.  Crazy or brilliant, you make your decision.  A &lt;a href=&quot;http://laffoley.com/sample/index.html&quot;&gt;video &lt;/a&gt;from his website.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64328</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:57:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>astrology</category>
		<category>mathematics</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>moonbizcut</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Nullity and Perspex Machines</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56810/Nullity%2Dand%2DPerspex%2DMachines</link>
		<description> Dr James Anderson, from the University of Reading&apos;s computer science department, claims to have defined what it means to divide by zero.  It&apos;s so simple, he claims, that he&apos;s even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/content/articles/2006/12/06/divide_zero_feature.shtml&quot;&gt;taught it to high school students&lt;/a&gt; [via Digg].   You just have to work with a new number he calls &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/features/divide_zero_sum.ram&quot;&gt;Nullity&lt;/a&gt; (RealPlayer video).   According to Anderson&apos;s site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bookofparagon.com/ &quot;&gt;The Book of Paragon&lt;/a&gt;, the creation, innovation, or discovery of nullity is a step toward describing a &quot;perspective simplex, or  perspex [ . . . ]  a simple physical thing that is both a mind and a body.&quot;  Anderson claims that Nullity permits the definition of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bookofparagon.com/Mathematics/PerspexMachineVIII.pdf&quot;&gt;transreal arithmetic&lt;/a&gt; (pdf), a &quot;total arithmetic . . . with no arithmetical exceptions,&quot; thus removing what the fictional dialogue &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bookofparagon.com/News/News_00002.htm&quot;&gt;No Zombies, Only Feelies?&lt;/a&gt; identifies as the &quot;homunculus problem&quot; in mathematics: the need for human intervention to sort out &quot;corner cases&quot; which are not defined.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56810</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 12:07:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>artificialintelligence</category>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>divisionbyzero</category>
		<category>jamesanderson</category>
		<category>math</category>
		<category>mathematics</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>nullity</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>philosophyofmind</category>
		<category>zero</category>
		<dc:creator>treepour</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Negative knowledge (or more precisely negative information)</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/44136/Negative%2Dknowledge%2Dor%2Dmore%2Dprecisely%2Dnegative%2Dinformation</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/jono/negative-information.html"&gt;Know less than nothing!?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;What could negative knowledge possibly mean? In short, after I tell you negative information, you will know less...&lt;/i&gt; &lt;small&gt;&quot;In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/vaop/nprelaunch/full/nphys104.html&quot;&gt;this week&apos;s issue of Nature&lt;/a&gt;, however, Michal Horodecki and colleagues present &lt;a href=&quot;http://physics.bu.edu/~youssef/quantum/quantum_refs.html&quot;&gt;a fresh approach&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0209082&quot;&gt;understanding quantum phenomena&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/wonews/jul03/lhand.html&quot; title=&quot;nothing at all&quot;&gt;cannot&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=47902254&quot; title=&quot;to do with negative quantum information&quot;&gt;be&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/5/3&quot; title=&quot;i don&apos;t think&quot;&gt;grasped&lt;/a&gt; simply by &lt;a href=&quot;http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/15/10/7&quot;&gt;considering their classical counterparts&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://science.slashdot.org/science/05/08/08/222245.shtml&quot;&gt;via slashdot&lt;/a&gt; :]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.44136</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 22:40:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>mathematics</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>physics</category>
		<category>probability</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>weird</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Nature of Mathematical Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43828/Nature%2Dof%2DMathematical%2DTruth</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/vhd05/vhd05_index.html"&gt;G&amp;#0246;del and the Nature of Mathematical Truth&lt;/a&gt; : A Talk with Verena Huber-Dyson  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43828</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:24:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>godel</category>
		<category>logic</category>
		<category>math</category>
		<category>mathematics</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>truth</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>You can&apos;t prove this title wasn&apos;t an attempt to illustrate Godel</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43130/You%2Dcant%2Dprove%2Dthis%2Dtitle%2Dwasnt%2Dan%2Dattempt%2Dto%2Dillustrate%2DGodel</link>
		<description> Godel&apos;s theorems have been used to extrapolate a great &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sm.luth.se/~torkel/eget/godel.html&quot;&gt;many&lt;/a&gt; &quot;truths&quot; about the world. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sm.luth.se/%7Etorkel/&quot;&gt;Torkel Franzen&lt;/a&gt; sets the record &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ucalgary.ca/~rzach/logblog/2005/06/franzn-on-use-and-abuse-of-gdels.html&quot;&gt;straight&lt;/a&gt; in his new book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1568812388/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Godel&apos;s Theorem: An Incomplete Guide to Its Use and Abuse&lt;/a&gt;.  Read the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sm.luth.se/~torkel/eget/tic.html&quot;&gt;introduction&lt;/a&gt; (PDF). If you want, check out his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sm.luth.se/~torkel/eget/godel/theorems.html&quot;&gt;explanation&lt;/a&gt; of the theorems.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43130</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 02:59:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>godel</category>
		<category>logic</category>
		<category>math</category>
		<category>mathematics</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>truth</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Meaning of Life</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35981/Meaning%2Dof%2DLife</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.meaningoflife.tv/"&gt;The Meaning of Life&lt;/a&gt; according to various rather famous people (Dennett, Fukuyama, etc).  I&apos;m watching the Dennett video at the moment and it starts rather weakly, but, by midway through, is rolling along nicely.  With topics like &quot;being good without god&quot; and &quot;the anthropic principle&quot; it struck me as relevant to a couple of recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/10596&quot;&gt;askmefi&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/8295&quot;&gt;threads&lt;/a&gt;.  
&lt;small&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Dennett: [pause] i guess i&apos;ll say it again, more slowly...&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(oh, and the player interface is rather delicate - give it time to load and click play a few times...)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35981</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 17:29:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>death</category>
		<category>enlightenment</category>
		<category>evil</category>
		<category>faith</category>
		<category>god</category>
		<category>life</category>
		<category>mathematics</category>
		<category>meaning</category>
		<category>meaningoflife</category>
		<category>mysticism</category>
		<category>mythology</category>
		<category>philosophers</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>theology</category>
		<category>thought</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<dc:creator>andrew cooke</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12260/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.rgshoup.com/lof/lof.html"&gt;Laws of Form&lt;/a&gt;  In 1969, George Spencer-Brown published a mathematical book called &lt;i&gt;Laws of Form&lt;/i&gt;, which has inspired explorations in philosophy, cybernetics, art, spirituality, and computation. The work is powerful and has established a passionate following as well as harsh critics. This web site explores these people, their ideas and history, and provides references for further exploration.     I read this then, didn&apos;t understand much of the math due to my innumeracy, but was struck by a passage in passing...           I especially am curious to see what the numerate in MetaFilter have to say.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12260</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2001 13:50:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>GeorgeSpencerBrown</category>
		<category>LawsOfForm</category>
		<category>math</category>
		<category>mathematics</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


