<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with media and newspapers</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/media+newspapers</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'media' and 'newspapers' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:21:06 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:21:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Black and White and Dead All Over</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81607/Black%2Dand%2DWhite%2Dand%2DDead%2DAll%2DOver</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://narcosphere.narconews.com/thefield/black-and-white-and-dead-all-over&quot;&gt;My, how the tables have turned&lt;/a&gt;: Many of the same daily newspaper correspondents that not too long ago turned up their noses at us online journalism pioneers, claiming we weren&apos;t &quot;real&quot; journalists, now fill my email box daily with their resumes, looking to me and others like me to provide them with work. ... Memo to my remaining daily print colleagues and their nostalgia club: Get over it and get over yourselves. It&#8217;s not that the Internet is Mr. Wonderful. Much of it mimics the same bad qualities that drove the public away from daily newspapers. You lost the public to us because - there&apos;s no nice or sugar-coated way to say it - you guys really suck at what you do. &lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;In your arrogance, you established calcified &#8220;rules&#8221; of &#8220;journalism&#8221; and false &#8220;objectivity&#8221; that neutered and spayed all of your reporters, domesticated so they would never again afflict the comfortable or comfort the afflicted. When you took the honest advocacy out of reporting you emptied it of all passion and reason to exist. It was a nice ride on your profit ledger sheet during the recent decades when you turned your rags into propaganda arms for the wealthy and powerful, but a funny thing happened on the way to the ATM machine: You lost the trust of your readers, half of whom have already given you the finger and pursued alternate routes to inform themselves of current events. And the rest are on the way through the same EXIT sign.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;strong&gt;[Caution: mean things are said about David Simon]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81607</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:21:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>algiordano</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>thefield</category>
		<dc:creator>Joe Beese</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A New Species in the News Ecosystem</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80437/A%2DNew%2DSpecies%2Din%2Dthe%2DNews%2DEcosystem</link>
		<description> The Huffington Post just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/29/huffington-post-launches-_0_n_180498.html&quot;&gt;announced &lt;/a&gt;that it is launching a new initiative to produce &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/30/business/media/30huff.html?_r=1&quot;&gt;a wide range&lt;/a&gt; of investigative journalism &#8212; &lt;a href=&quot;http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/03/30/huffpost_fnd.html&quot;&gt;The Huffington Post Investigative Fund.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/announcing-the-launch-of-_b_180543.html&quot;&gt;Arianna Huffington&lt;/a&gt; has &lt;a href=&quot;http://bigthink.com/ideas/1099&quot;&gt;various ideas&lt;/a&gt; about how to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-jarvis/huffpos-investigative-fun_b_180487.html&quot;&gt;fix the hole that failing newspapers leave behind&lt;/a&gt;, but this does have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.propublica.org/&quot;&gt;some precedent&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/76810/Sunday-Paper-Pledge-Drive&quot;&gt;.&lt;/a&gt; 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://industry.bnet.com/media/10001512/aps-loss-and-huffposts-gain/&quot;&gt;Some &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/30/AR2009033001853.html&quot;&gt;reactions&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/Americas/2009/March/Huffington-Post-Investigative-Fund-Aims-to-Save-Journalism-if-not-Newspapers.html&quot;&gt;so far.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80437</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:12:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>huffingtonpost</category>
		<category>huffpost</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<dc:creator>Potomac Avenue</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Printed Blog is exactly what it sounds like</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78514/The%2DPrinted%2DBlog%2Dis%2Dexactly%2Dwhat%2Dit%2Dsounds%2Dlike</link>
		<description> In yet another strange marriage of media new and old, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theprintedblog.com&quot;&gt;The Printed Blog&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/22/technology/start-ups/22blogpaper.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&quot;&gt;launches next week&lt;/a&gt;. The paper will be distributed in Chicago (home of the once-great, now-bankrupt &lt;a href=&quot;http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2008/dec/09/business/chi-081208tribune-bankruptcy&quot;&gt;Chigago Tribune&lt;/a&gt;) and San Francisco, and it&#8217;s free. &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/01/new-media-ventu.html#more&quot;&gt;&#8220;Why hasn&#8217;t anyone tried to take the best content and bring it offline,&#8221;&lt;/a&gt; asks founder &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/people/Joshua-Karp/533027148&quot;&gt;Josh Karp&lt;/a&gt;. What about people who don&#8217;t live in Chicago or SF? They can get the PDF &#8230; online.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78514</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:46:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<dc:creator>janet lynn</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>End Times?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78032/End%2DTimes</link>
		<description> Virtually all the predictions about the death of old media have assumed a comfortingly long time frame for the end of print&#8212;the moment when, amid a panoply of flashing lights, press conferences, and elegiac reminiscences, the newspaper presses stop rolling and news goes entirely digital. Most of these scenarios assume a gradual crossing-over, almost like the migration of dunes, as behaviors change, paradigms shift, and the digital future heaves fully into view. But what if the old media dies much more quickly? What if a hurricane comes along and obliterates the dunes entirely? Specifically, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200901/new-york-times&quot;&gt; what if &lt;i&gt;The New York Times&lt;/i&gt; goes out of business&lt;/a&gt;&#8212;like, this May? &lt;a href=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=NYT#symbol=NYT;range=5y&quot;&gt;New York Times stock performance over the past five years.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78032</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:11:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>debt</category>
		<category>digital</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>michaelhirschorn</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>print</category>
		<category>theatlantic</category>
		<dc:creator>netbros</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>FCC Moves to Change Ownership Rules Again</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65969/FCC%2DMoves%2Dto%2DChange%2DOwnership%2DRules%2DAgain</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003961397_media19.html&quot;&gt;The FCC, again, moves to loosen ownership rules for television and newspapers&lt;/a&gt;.  A similar proposal in 2003 drew huge public opposition.  This time, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6494220.html?industryid=47170&quot;&gt;there is a narrow window for public comment&lt;/a&gt;, ending in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/18/business/main3379863.shtml?source=RSSattr=Business_3379863&quot;&gt;mid-November&lt;/a&gt;.  You can contact the &lt;a href=&quot;http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/Upload/&quot;&gt;FCC&lt;/a&gt; or go to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commoncause.org/site/pp.asp?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&amp;b=192086&quot;&gt;Common Cause&lt;/a&gt; page. From Common Cause: &lt;em&gt;&quot;After the FCC&apos;s misguided 2003 vote, more than 3 million Americans voiced their concerns about media consolidation to the FCC and Congress.  In the Senate, a resolution rolling back the rules sponsored by Senator Trent Lott (R-MS) and Byron Dorgan (D-ND), passed overwhelming.  Media activists sued the FCC over the rules changes, and they were vindicated by a federal district court in Philadelphia.  In 2004, the court threw out the flawed rules, in part because the FCC had not considered public input in the rulemaking.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

As in 2003, lawmakers are threatening another &lt;a href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200710241514DOWJONESDJONLINE000945_FORTUNE5.htm&quot;&gt;non-binding &quot;veto.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  Wiki &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentration_of_media_ownership#United_States&quot;&gt;background&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65969</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:19:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fcc</category>
		<category>localism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>mediaconsolidation</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<dc:creator>McLir</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Journalism etiquette</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63186/Journalism%2Detiquette</link>
		<description> Since Rupes went to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s1916646.htm&quot;&gt;great lengths&lt;/a&gt; to protect Wendi, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jointhemediacircus.com/mediacircus/2007/07/deng-fever-and-.html&quot;&gt;see some other examples&lt;/a&gt; of newspaper self-censorship  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63186</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:25:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Deng</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>Murdoch</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<dc:creator>Geezum Crowe</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Unpopular premier slams popular press</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62007/Unpopular%2Dpremier%2Dslams%2Dpopular%2Dpress</link>
		<description> The UK media is like a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6744261.stm&quot;&gt;&quot;Feral Beast&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, and is undermining Britain, says Tony Blair. Simon Kelner, editor of The Independent, &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,,2101196,00.html&quot;&gt;responds&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/gallery/2007/jun/12/1?picture=330015020&quot;&gt;Some reasons why Blair might not be too keen on the press&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62007</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:19:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Blair</category>
		<category>Britain</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Feral</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Media</category>
		<category>Newspapers</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>press</category>
		<category>TonyBlair</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Craigslist dooms Bay Area print media</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47277/Craigslist%2Ddooms%2DBay%2DArea%2Dprint%2Dmedia</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfweekly.com/Issues/2005-11-30/news/feature_print.html"&gt;Interesting (if biased) article&lt;/a&gt; on the downside of Craigslist&apos;s populist appeal in the form of it&apos;s contribution to the imminent death of the print newsmedia, especially in the SF Bay Area.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47277</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:51:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>craigslist</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newmedia</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>print</category>
		<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The End of News?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46663/The%2DEnd%2Dof%2DNews</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/18516"&gt;The End of News?&lt;/a&gt; From the New York Review of Books. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nybooks.com/authors/71&quot;&gt;Michael Massing&lt;/a&gt;, a contributing editor of the Columbia Journalism Review, discusses the decline of the mainstream media and the ideal of objectivity: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aim.org/&quot;&gt;Accuracy in Media&lt;/a&gt; (1969), the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmpa.com/&quot;&gt;Center for Media and Public Affairs&lt;/a&gt; (1985), the abolition of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/F/htmlF/fairnessdoct/fairnessdoct.htm&quot;&gt;Fairness Doctrine&lt;/a&gt; (1987), &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh&quot;&gt;Rush Limbaugh&lt;/a&gt; (1988), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/&quot;&gt;Fox News&lt;/a&gt; (1996), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html&quot;&gt;weblogs&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001221102&quot;&gt;cost-cutting at newspapers&lt;/a&gt;. Of course, the newspaper business has always been a difficult one, as Walter Lippmann noted in his book &lt;a href=&quot;http://xroads.virginia.edu/~Hyper2/CDFinal/Lippman/contents.html&quot;&gt;Public Opinion&lt;/a&gt; (1921): [more inside]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46663</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:27:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>MichaelMassing</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>objectivity</category>
		<category>partisanship</category>
		<category>WalterLippmann</category>
		<dc:creator>russilwvong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Most-read newspapers in the world</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42708/Mostread%2Dnewspapers%2Din%2Dthe%2Dworld</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newspaperindex.com/blog/2005/06/03/100-largest-newspaper-by-circulation"&gt;The world&apos;s 100 largest newspapers by circulation&lt;/a&gt; Japan and China take 9 of the top 10 spots; Greece enters at #17, the United States at #19. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newspaperindex.com/blog/&quot;&gt;Newspaperindex&lt;/a&gt; now also has the list broken down &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newspaperindex.com/blog/2005/06/07/100-largest-newspapers-now-by-continent/&quot;&gt;by continent&lt;/a&gt;. [An updated top 100 list has been posted &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wan-press.org/article2825.html?var_recherche=100+largest&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;] &lt;small&gt;[via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cynical-c.com/&quot;&gt;Cynical-C&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42708</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2005 09:16:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<dc:creator>mediareport</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Berliner</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40657/Berliner</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000847073"&gt;Berliner?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/a&gt; Or broadsheet. Or tab? Your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsdesigner.com/archives/000482.php&quot;&gt;newspaper may be changing&lt;/a&gt;, its looks, its &lt;a href=http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/&quot; &quot;&gt;
ownership&lt;/a&gt; and how it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketwatch.com/news/yhoo/story.asp?source=blq/yhoo&amp;siteid=yhoo&amp;dist=yhoo&amp;guid=%7BB829EF99%2D2C05%2D4334%2D85F9%2D4F1BAA05A1EA%7D&quot;&gt;markets itself&lt;/a&gt;. Do you &lt;a href=&quot;http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/&quot;&gt;value&lt;/a&gt; or even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opensourcejournalism.org/blog/&quot;&gt;
need your local paper&lt;/a&gt;? Or can &lt;a href=&quot;http://editorsink.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;
you and your neighbors&lt;/a&gt; do it yourself? (Scroll down to &quot;backfence&quot; link.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40657</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:33:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>berliner</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<dc:creator>etaoin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>US Army Used Reporters for Own Ends in Iraq War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28150/US%2DArmy%2DUsed%2DReporters%2Dfor%2DOwn%2DEnds%2Din%2DIraq%2DWar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=industryNews&amp;amp;storyID=3396575"&gt;U.S. Army Used Media Cover in Iraq for Own Ends&lt;/a&gt; which sounds like a big old bowl of yellow journalism but isn&apos;t really, at least I don&apos;t think so. It was more to refute the Iraqi Minister of Lies talking about the whooping the Iraqi war machine was delivering to the coalition forces.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The main issue that the reporters had was that they were only getting the one side of the story and not the Iraqi perspective. 
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
But it raises some questions about the supposed objectivity of the media. Is this a proper use of them? To help achieve military goals? Or to try to avoid more unnecessary deaths?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28150</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 13:51:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>reporters</category>
		<category>USArmy</category>
		<category>USMilitary</category>
		<dc:creator>fenriq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Searching for Valerie Plame</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27242/Searching%2Dfor%2DValerie%2DPlame</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?srcht=s&amp;amp;srchst=&amp;amp;vendor=&amp;amp;query=%22valerie+plame%22&amp;amp;date_select=site1week&amp;amp;submit.x=81&amp;amp;submit.y=17"&gt;Search the New York Times website for any occurrence of the words &quot;Valerie Plame&quot; during the last week&lt;/a&gt; ...and you&apos;ll find nada, zilch, zip.  The so-called &quot;paper of record&quot; has remained totally mum on what may be one of the biggest scandals of the Bush administration yet.  You can read about it at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-uscia223383072jul22,0,1332639.story?coll=ny-nationalnews-print&quot;&gt;Newsday&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/24/opinion/meyer/main564891.shtml&quot;&gt;CBS&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,465137,00.html&quot;&gt;Time&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/capitalgames/index.mhtml?bid=3&amp;pid=823&quot;&gt;The Nation&lt;/a&gt;, and it&apos;s been mentioned on NBC... but not a word from the New York Times (save for a reference to it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/22/opinion/22KRUG.html?hp&quot;&gt;last week&lt;/a&gt; by syndicated columnist Paul Krugman, and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/auth/login?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Schumer-Agent.html&quot;&gt;wire service story&lt;/a&gt; today; neither of those pieces mentions Plame by name).  The Times&apos; news and editorial divisions are asleep at the switch on this story.  Maybe the Jayson Blair scandal was a distraction from the deeper problem: a paper that is so concerned with being balanced and respectable, it refuses to cover any politically controversial stories.  You can e-mail &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:letters@nytimes.com&quot;&gt;letters@nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt; to ask why the Valerie Plame news blackout.  Or just &lt;a href=&quot;http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?srcht=s&amp;srchst=&amp;vendor=&amp;query=%22valerie+plame%22&amp;date_select=site1week&amp;submit.x=81&amp;submit.y=17&quot;&gt;click this link&lt;/a&gt; a few dozen times to send &apos;em a message.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27242</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:49:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>journalists</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>Plame</category>
		<category>Plamegate</category>
		<category>reporting</category>
		<category>ValeriePlame</category>
		<category>WMDs</category>
		<dc:creator>Artifice_Eternity</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>So the FCC might let me be...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25777/So%2Dthe%2DFCC%2Dmight%2Dlet%2Dme%2Dbe</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.indystar.com/print/articles/7/042567-1217-031.html"&gt;So the FCC &lt;em&gt;might&lt;/em&gt; let me be...&lt;/a&gt; On June 2, FCC commissioners will vote on proposed changes to U.S. media ownership rules.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naa.org/utilartpage.cfm?TID=NR&amp;AID=4996&quot;&gt;Proponents&lt;/a&gt; of eliminating a ban on &quot;cross ownership&quot; argue that mergers between local newspapers and radio and TV stations in large and medium-sized markets will boost the quality and quantity of local news reportage. The nonprofit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consumersunion.org/index.htm&quot;&gt;Consumers Union &lt;/a&gt;calls the ban &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consumersunion.org/telecom/media-letters.htm&quot;&gt;&quot;critical to the independence and diversity of our nation&apos;s media&quot;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/ecfs/Upload/&quot;&gt;Let the FCC know where you stand&lt;/a&gt; (third item on list).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25777</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2003 17:40:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conglomerates</category>
		<category>corporations</category>
		<category>FCC</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>monopoly</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>ownership</category>
		<category>radio</category>
		<category>TV</category>
		<dc:creator>Bixby23</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Grey Lady Falters</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25689/The%2DGrey%2DLady%2DFalters</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/national/11PAPE.html"&gt;Times Reporter Who Resigned Leaves Long Trail of Deception&lt;/a&gt; The New York Times runs a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/national/11PAPE.html&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;long article detailing its preliminary findings in the matter of Jayson Blair, The Times&apos; young staff reporter who made up sources, facts, and anecdotes in potentially hundreds of stories.  Does this investigation help the Times avoid permanent disgrace? Or does this just confirm what you&apos;ve always &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smartertimes.com/archive_index.html&quot;&gt;thought about the Times?&lt;/a&gt; Slate magazine is attributing part of the problem to &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/id/2082661/&quot;&gt;affirmative action&lt;/a&gt; (Blair is black). Is AA &lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.observer.com/observer/pages/offtherec.asp&quot;&gt;relevant here?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25689</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2003 10:14:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>affirmativeaction</category>
		<category>blair</category>
		<category>fabrications</category>
		<category>fraud</category>
		<category>jaysonblair</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>journalists</category>
		<category>kaus</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>mickeykaus</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>nyt</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>plagiarism</category>
		<category>plagiarists</category>
		<category>press</category>
		<category>reporters</category>
		<category>reporting</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<dc:creator>hhc5</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Are newspapers becoming opinionpapers?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21637/Are%2Dnewspapers%2Dbecoming%2Dopinionpapers</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thismagazine.ca/current_issue/f_3.html"&gt;Are newspapers becoming opinionpapers?&lt;/a&gt; Interesting article on the current preponderance of op-ed materials in newspapers.  The papers are cutting back on news, especially international news, in favour of news lite or opinion columns. Or what&apos;s styled as opinion but is really pieces by &quot;columnists&quot; who are totally &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationalpost.com/search/site/story.asp?id=E8156A87-6447-4F14-8DBA-0BC1EA3BA48B&quot;&gt;self-referential &lt;/a&gt;and whose idea of research is interviewing their own friends.

The article is very Can-Con (high Canadian content) but it&apos;ll be interesting if Me-Fiers from other countries weigh in with data/observations about their own media. Canadian media doesn&apos;t probably doesn&apos;t stand alone in this trend.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21637</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:31:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>columnists</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newscoverage</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<dc:creator>orange swan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20652/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/columnists/ny-libish062954062oct06,0,5639592.story?coll=ny%2Dnews%2Dcolumnists"&gt;Jimmy Brelsin has been taking stabs at Catholic Church&lt;/a&gt; over the last two days (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsday.com/news/columnists/ny-bres1008,0,3460740.column?coll=ny%2Dnews%2Dcolumnists&quot;&gt;the bishops are abusing money &lt;i&gt;this&lt;/i&gt; time&lt;/a&gt;).  As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0212/robbins.php&quot;&gt;one of the last true beat reporters &lt;/a&gt;in NYC, if not the nation, he&apos;s been writing for underdogs for over 40 years.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cunyba.cuny.edu/news/bacctrack/sp00/commencement_99.html&quot;&gt;Fairly well too&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20652</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 18:41:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bishops</category>
		<category>breslin</category>
		<category>catholicchurch</category>
		<category>catholics</category>
		<category>JimmyBreslin</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>reporting</category>
		<dc:creator>SimStupid</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17895/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.observer.co.uk/magazine/story/0,11913,738196,00.html"&gt;British papers&lt;/a&gt; seem to be the only place we can find out what goes on in the US these days.  Probably has to do with the liberal media, wouldn&apos;t you say?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17895</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2002 08:44:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>britain</category>
		<category>british</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17879/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/06/17/mills_fired020617"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Ottawa Citizen&lt;/i&gt; publisher fired for criticizing Chr&#xe9;tien.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;CanWest Global keeps it real for the little guy once again by continuing to silence dissident voices. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canada.com/ottawa/ottawacitizen/story.asp?id={5D8C5EE3-EA64-4D8C-B0E0-16832FE55441}&quot;&gt;The &lt;i&gt;Citizen&lt;/i&gt;&apos;s own coverage of the sacking&lt;/a&gt; is, unsurprisingly, scant on details.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17879</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2002 14:11:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>chretien</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>ottawa</category>
		<dc:creator>poorhaus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17605/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61414-2002Jun5.html"&gt;Notice something missing from today&apos;s Washington Post?&lt;/a&gt; In a creative protest of management&apos;s latest contract offer, Post union members withhold bylines from news stories and columns in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/fpImages/fp_front.jpg&quot;&gt;June 5 edition.&lt;/a&gt; Most articles are written &quot;By A Washington Post Staff Writer&quot; and pictures are taken &quot;By A Washington Post Staff Photographer.&quot; What other unique forms of labor protest have you seen where the union gets its point across without striking or compromising the quality of the product?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17605</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2002 06:54:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bylines</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>laborprotest</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>protest</category>
		<category>wapo</category>
		<category>washingtonpost</category>
		<dc:creator>PrinceValium</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15488/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspublishing/story/0,7495,666749,00.html"&gt;The editor-at-large of &lt;i&gt;The Spectator&lt;/i&gt; has resigned in protest at the publication of an anti-American article.&lt;/a&gt; There has already been some discussion of this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/15431&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; but the British press seems to be tearing itself apart about how much to support the War on Terror, and what viewpoints it&apos;s acceptable to express. The offending article will presumably appear &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spectator.co.uk/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; sometime in the next few days, though its content is somewhat predictable given &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0%2C1300%2C552101%2C00.html&quot;&gt;the views of the author&lt;/a&gt;. Funny quote: &quot;I want to be in the magazine more often than I seem to be&quot;. Maybe the price of freedom is eternal whingeing.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15488</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:53:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antiamericanism</category>
		<category>BruceAnderson</category>
		<category>editors</category>
		<category>Galloway</category>
		<category>georgeGalloway</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>journalists</category>
		<category>magazines</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>Spectator</category>
		<category>TheSpectator</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>Gaz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15197/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfbg.com/36/22/x_techsploitation.html"&gt;A print journalist admits her fear of blogs&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;What the blog threatens to do is dislodge the traditional news media&apos;s corner on the &quot;scoop&quot; market. With their unorthodox reporting strategies and lightning-fast publishing schedules, blogs are making it clear that you don&apos;t need to have some big, fancy newspaper job to break stories. In fact, you don&apos;t even need to write stories; you can just throw a couple of sentences up on your site with some telling links. And you can quote that naked boy in your bed who knows how to hack protocols. Whatever.&quot;


&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15197</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2002 14:07:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anxiety</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>scoops</category>
		<dc:creator>ezfowler</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13637/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/comment/0,5859,2837114,00.html?chkpt=zdnn_mh_comm"&gt;An analysis of some of the web&apos;s limitations&lt;/a&gt; as a medium for publishing newspapers&apos; content. It focuses on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsstand.com/&quot;&gt;NewsStand&lt;/a&gt;, the service offering the &lt;a href=&quot;http://nytimes.com/&quot;&gt;NYTimes&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/frontpage.html&quot;&gt;International Herald Tribune&lt;/a&gt; and others in PDF format, and says some interesting things about the respective formats&apos; ease of use and ability to guide readers to what they&apos;re looking for. (It has me thinking, is HTML/CSS just too limited to do certain things well?)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13637</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2002 16:52:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>onlinemedia</category>
		<category>onlinenewspapers</category>
		<category>PDF</category>
		<category>worldwideweb</category>
		<category>www</category>
		<dc:creator>mattpfeff</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12864/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nyobserver.com/pages/offtherec.asp"&gt;Here Comes the Sun&lt;/a&gt; Beware NY Times. Watch your flanks NY liberal establishment. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politicallinks.co.uk/politics/biog/ld_biogs/2542.stm&quot;&gt;Lord &lt;/a&gt;Conrad Black to back &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smartertimes.com/&quot;&gt;Smarter Times&lt;/a&gt; Ira Stoll and co in new conservative daily paper. Will they make it? (PS.  Apparently are looking for editorial staff  &quot;willing to work long hours in an entrepreneurial, start-up environment&quot;) Start spreadin&apos; the news, these little town blues are melting away, it&apos;s up to you, New York, New York...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12864</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2001 07:46:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ConradBlack</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>NewYorkSun</category>
		<category>NYSun</category>
		<dc:creator>Voyageman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10169/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.examiner.com/achangedamerica/"&gt;The Examiner spells it out.&lt;/a&gt; As a newspaper page designer (for a much smaller, tamer paper), I wonder what you all think of the San Francisco Examiner&apos;s semi-profane but heartfelt front-page headline. On one hand, it&apos;s editorializing, but on the other, it expresses what an awful lot of people are thinking. I think I like it, but I also know it&apos;d never get printed in a lot of papers, including my own.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10169</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2001 01:05:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Examiner</category>
		<category>frontpages</category>
		<category>headline</category>
		<category>headlines</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>SanFrancisco</category>
		<dc:creator>diddlegnome</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


