<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with meritocracy</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/meritocracy</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'meritocracy' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:20:56 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:20:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>class is in</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82332/class%2Dis%2Din</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/10/business/economy/10reed.html?partner=rss&amp;amp;emc=rss&amp;amp;pagewanted=all"&gt;Reed has cast aside its hopes of soon accepting students based purely on merit, without regard to wealth.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Money was the problem. Too many of the students needed financial aid, and the school did not have enough. So the director of financial aid gave the team another task: drop more than 100 needy students before sending out acceptances, and substitute those who could pay full freight.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82332</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:20:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>meritocracy</category>
		<category>paytoplay</category>
		<dc:creator>plexi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>No Right Turn</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58645/No%2DRight%2DTurn</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nascar.com/2006/news/headlines/cup/01/12/car_of_tomorrow_test/index.html"&gt;NASCAR as an example of a meritocracy with equal opportunity for all.&lt;/a&gt; While frequently maligned for it&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://auto.howstuffworks.com/nascar.htm&quot; title=&quot;relatively primitive technology&quot;&gt;relatively primitive technology&lt;/a&gt; (excluding &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.howstuffworks.com/nascar-safety.htm&quot; title=&quot;safety&quot;&gt;safety&lt;/a&gt; ), the total lack of mechanical resemblance (other than appearance) of the &quot;stock&quot; cars to the brand they represent, soap-opera-slash-professional wrestling story lines, and being ripe political target for both &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/18/weekinreview/18macg.html?ex=1389762000&amp;en=9d4bca1f724a54f3&amp;ei=5007&amp;partner=USERLAND&quot; title=&quot;the right&quot;&gt;the right&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blpic-moran.htm&quot; title=&quot;the left&quot;&gt;the left&lt;/a&gt; as well as &lt;a href=&quot;http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=476206&quot; title=&quot;marketers&quot;&gt;marketers&lt;/a&gt;, it is a strong cultural force. The entrance of Toyota (&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6202545.stm&quot; title=&quot;likely to surpass GM as #2 US automaker&quot;&gt;likely to surpass GM as #2 US automaker&lt;/a&gt; in the near-future) into &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nascar.com/&quot; title=&quot;NASCAR&quot;&gt;NASCAR&lt;/a&gt; (with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/business/16704395.htm&quot; title=&quot;hopes&quot;&gt;hopes&lt;/a&gt; of &quot;winning on Sunday and &lt;a href=&quot;http://marketplace.publicradio.org/shows/2007/02/15/AM200702152.html&quot; title=&quot;selling&quot;&gt;selling&lt;/a&gt; on Monday&quot; in the heartland) and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/racing/02/14/waltrip.ap/?cnn=yes&quot; title=&quot;cheating scandal&quot;&gt;cheating scandal&lt;/a&gt; currently unravelling highlight an important concept woven into NASCAR&apos;s culture.   [more]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58645</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:51:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>analogy</category>
		<category>competition</category>
		<category>frameshop</category>
		<category>framing</category>
		<category>meritocracy</category>
		<category>metaphor</category>
		<dc:creator>rzklkng</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What do you mean I can&apos;t pay my rent with this?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55333/What%2Ddo%2Dyou%2Dmean%2DI%2Dcant%2Dpay%2Dmy%2Drent%2Dwith%2Dthis</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://bitchun.org/about.htm"&gt;The Bitchun Society&lt;/a&gt; is now open for all of your &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whuffie&quot;&gt;Whuffie&lt;/a&gt;-market needs. &lt;small&gt;Or cynical mocking, take your pick. &lt;/small&gt; Via &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;(of course)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://boingboing.net/&quot;&gt;BoingBoing&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;Can a brother get a ping?&lt;small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://craphound.com/down/download.php&quot;&gt;Confused?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55333</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 20:18:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Alternative</category>
		<category>Barter</category>
		<category>CoryDoctorow</category>
		<category>Currency</category>
		<category>DownAndOutInTheMagicKingdom</category>
		<category>Economics</category>
		<category>Economy</category>
		<category>Meritocracy</category>
		<category>Reputation</category>
		<category>ReputationCapital</category>
		<category>Technocracy</category>
		<category>TheBitchunSociety</category>
		<category>Whuffie</category>
		<category>World2.0</category>
		<dc:creator>loquacious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>10-15% of Metafilter users are so-called &quot;legacy children&quot; all fathered by quonsar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38312/1015%2Dof%2DMetafilter%2Dusers%2Dare%2Dsocalled%2Dlegacy%2Dchildren%2Dall%2Dfathered%2Dby%2Dquonsar</link>
		<description> &quot;A growing body of evidence suggests that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://economist.com/world/na/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3518560&quot;&gt;meritocratic ideal is in trouble&lt;/a&gt; in America. Income inequality is growing to levels not seen since the Gilded Age, around the 1880s. But social mobility is not increasing at anything like the same pace: would-be Horatio Algers are finding it no easier to climb from rags to riches, while the children of the privileged have a greater chance of staying at the top of the social heap. The United States risks calcifying into a European-style class-based society.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38312</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:23:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>meritocracy</category>
		<dc:creator>Krrrlson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8703/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,514207,00.html"&gt;Michael Young&apos;s critique of the meritocracy&lt;/a&gt;  is brilliant, subversive and quite possibly based on faulty assumptions.  &quot;It is good sense to appoint individual people to jobs on their merit. It is the opposite when those who are judged to have merit of a particular kind harden into a new social class without room in it for others.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8703</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:03:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>britain</category>
		<category>class</category>
		<category>meritocracy</category>
		<category>society</category>
		<dc:creator>lbergstr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8452/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vny.com/cf/News/upidetail.cfm?QID=195760"&gt;Racial discrimination at ford?&lt;/a&gt; White male managers accuse the Ford Motor Co. of reverse discrimination, claiming they are victims of racial, age and gender bias. 

After reading this article, I&apos;m really at a loss as to where the racism is. They are reviewing all management and ditching those in the worst 5%... 
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&quot;... older white managers who received &quot;Cs&quot; after long highly productive careers say they feel they are victims of discrimination.&quot; &lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Golly Pal. You know, the past counts for something but you have to keep producing or you&apos;re gonna get canned. What&apos;s the problem here? This isn&apos;t racism, it&apos;s meritocracy and I&apos;m all for it. If they were giving bonuses to the evaluations based on ethnic background or sex then I could see the gripe. But the article doesn&apos;t say they are so what exactly is wrong with cutting the fat? 
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8452</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:18:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>caucasians</category>
		<category>deadlinks</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>ethnicity</category>
		<category>Ford</category>
		<category>FordMotors</category>
		<category>jobplace</category>
		<category>meritocracy</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>racialdiscrimination</category>
		<category>racism</category>
		<category>reversediscrimination</category>
		<category>whites</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<dc:creator>revbrian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


